Bitcoin Forum
May 30, 2024, 06:54:53 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 »
121  Other / Meta / Re: The strict policy in Bitcointalk. on: September 27, 2020, 04:00:15 PM
I've heard this before:

Or forget about merit and focus on trading to earn money.

It looks like some people absolutely feel like posting the same advice every month:

Quote from: Laudanum
Go forth now and fill ya boots.

Or just learn to trade and earn 100x more in under 6 months.


You have issue with people posting sensible advice?
What refutation do you have?

Or just eating a bit more ass and demonstrating my last point for me?


Of course you're doing your best with method one eating ass for merits and spamming shitty gambling sigs
Learning to trade is the best chance of not having to exist on dust and smell of ass.

The important part of my preceding post was that the OP has it the wrong way around.
There is no enforced rules, nor criteria or guides or any kind of definable stipulations to regulate giving merit to others.
Therein is the problem.

Now read and stay on topic salad tosser.

Anyone with a gambling sig can generally be viewed as dirt.
122  Other / Meta / Re: The strict policy in Bitcointalk. on: September 27, 2020, 03:28:36 PM
The OP is the reverse of the reality here.

It is because there is absolutely no way to to ensure merit is awarded to truly valuable posts only that the merit system is broken and dangerous.

I would read and understand this thread

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5088852.0

Now you have been identified for merit starvation, I would just burn that account and start a new one. Get back to meta and learn to eat ass like those noob accounts that have done the same thing here before and have lots of earned merit. Poker-player is having a good go with that method. Copy it.

Or forget about merit and focus on trading to earn money. It's much easier.

For those on chipmixer telling you you're obviously only posting here to make money, you may certainly call them hypocrites. ( but not on your new account, on that one make sure never to be tempted to tell the truth.
. )

You have it all wrong. Completely wrong.
That link will set you straight. Study and learn.
123  Economy / Reputation / Re: News about suchmoon. (Not moderated) on: September 27, 2020, 01:14:30 PM
It's very simple, Provide some solid proof that suchmoon is connected to betmoose so that people will take your accusation seriously. You are accusing a reputable person here without a proof that's why most of the post above is just a troll just like your thread which is full of threat about your alleged doxxing to suchmoon.

Just provide an info how you come up to the conclusion that suchmoon is an alts of betmoose then you might find support here with your claim. If you are just posting this thread to make revenge to suchmoon then you will be forever be ignore here in the forum.

This is a 2 way street.

If you must produce proof that is independently verifiable that stands up to scrutiny to make an accusation?

Then suchmoon must do the same.

Suchmoon makes accusations and refuses to provide any independently verifiable evidence that stands up to scrutiny aka proof either.

This must be a universal rule for all members.

You can not have double standards here or 2 sets of different rules.

Without independently verifiable evidence or proof to examine, you are just speculating or making a best guess.

There is some circumstances that would suggest this could be true. Suchmoon is quite possibly an alt of lauda. Lauda was given special treatment by FJ. Why? Some say lauda was involved with running that gambling site.

That is speculative but not as easy to disprove as suchmoons allegations against others.

If you claim making accusations without " proof" are trolling I could support that if it were universally enforced here but DT1 will reject that.




124  Economy / Reputation / Re: List of things Vod has done wrong. (Non-modded / Non-affiliated thread) on: September 27, 2020, 09:24:51 AM
Vod has done things wrong. The most serious of which is facilitating and protecting scammers. When you oppose a flag based upon indisputable evidence of scamming you are the lowest of the low.

Not agreeing with your opinion is lower than embezzling 25 million dollars?   Your bias is clear.

I made a thread where you can post the accusation along with the proof and it won't be deleted or get lost in other nonsense posts.  Smiley



No. There is a clear definition of scamming.  Lying or deliberately deceiving for financial gain.

So when someone deliberately lies and deceives for financial gain they are scammers.

You dare not attempt to present a counter argument because there is no other explanation.

You can't say that this is a matter of opinion. The evidence is irrefutable.

You are found to be opposing legitmate scam warnings to protect your scammer friends.

2 of your pals are undeniably guilty of this and yet you still protect and defend them.
You are a scammer protector.

The quote were referenced where you said you dare not tag or exclude lauda because they may ruin your account.
That is a cowardly and pathetic excuse and demonstrates you are not fit for DT1

Also you did 100% dox the forum treasurer I know it and you know it
Deleting it from your thread because you say there is a lack of evidence is just attempting to hide the truth.

You are simply lying and trying to hide your past and present wrongs here

You look even more shady deleting these things from your thread.

125  Other / Meta / Re: Troll role? on: September 27, 2020, 12:17:41 AM
Number of trolls is growing every day
Not really.  I think we're dealing with one or two trolls tops, and they're just making a lot of noise.  Pretty sure most of the more vocal trolls as of late are alt accounts of cryptohunter and his confederates.  Bitcoin SV I'm not so sure about.

You have to be a seriously disruptive troll in order to get banned, because Theymos values freedom of speech--even if trolling is against the rules.  In my time on the forum I've only seen a handful of members get banned for trolling, and if I recall correctly they weren't even attacking other members like CH has been doing.  I've reported quite a few posts as trolling, but I don't think anything came of my reports.

So all in all, it's just something we've all got to put up with unless Theymos changes his stance on the enforcement of that rule.  Things were so nice and quiet for months, and now the shit is starting to get stirred again.  To me, it's almost as if things are getting back to normal in a weird way.  And if a particular member is pissing you off, just put them on ignore.

Lol at suchmoon

Attacking other members = presenting unpopular but on topic irrefutable truths they want to remain hidden.

Imagine how all the other scammers should complain. These horrible scam hunters attacking us. Lol


But wait suchmoon is reporting all of these trolling posts but can not provide even 1 example here that demonstrates that they are trolling.

The conclusion one has to draw = suchmoon is trolling.

Post the examples suchmoon.

Meanwhile suchmoon goes to their threads where legitimate discussions are taking place and demands the discussions stop? That's okay though.

Hmmm seems like suchmoon just doesn't like being revealed as a moron who gets destroyed when trying to fight against people presenting the truth. Then when their specious arguments and excuses are crushed they start crying troll and being a baby about it all

You must learn to accept your betters suchmoon. I mean you simply don't learn. You will never successfully debunk my points because they are the irrefutable truth.

Now last chance : bring your examples of trolling you are reporting and we can examine them together. If they are found to be conclusively debunked lies being presented as truths then fair enough.

Watch no examples will be presented because they do not exist.

I mean I won't even ask for the conclusive proof they are CH alts because suchmoon knows that is impossible.
That is irrelevant anyway.

Examples of conclusively debunked information being presented as true or you're a liar.

Let's see.

The reader is likely very confused: all of these highly trusted DT1 are screaming troll but then can not provide any examples .
That is weird? I mean if someone is a hyper troll there must be lots of examples of clear trolling right?

These hyper trolls must be filling this forum with conclusively debunked crap that they are claiming is true.
Show us suchmoon where is it all? Just one example ?

Attacking these poor innocent members accusing them of conclusively debunked nonsense ? Where is it? Just one example. ?

I will investigate it with you here and now.
126  Economy / Reputation / Re: News about suchmoon. (Not moderated) on: September 26, 2020, 02:33:35 PM
Moose is a little bit of a give away. I like her style. She loves risky shit.

To defend suchmoon a bit although she's a caustic bitch and untrustworthy  . I would say she is way hotter that MM.
Her face is not too bad and those juggs are massive. I would be all over it actually but then I'm into gangster badass chunky bitches.
She kinda makes me horny when she starts getting thrashed in debate and goes all wild.
But now she's ignoring me again since I destroyed all of her silly arguments in public I will have to reinvent myself to gain her attention.

Do you have any bikini shots or thong images of her? Don't post PM me. I have the castle pic of " her"  but I would like a few more.

I am 100% not messing about. She is quite delicious if you like chunky girls.  The fact she's also apparently practically a gangster makes her irresistible. Imagine that all oiled up rolling around on you in the garden. Yum.

I mean I just PB at the gym 180kg for 6 reps on the bench so I wouldn't suggest everyone engage in the fantasies I have about suchmoonnfor real. Also don't tell me about it or my jealousy will know no boundaries.

I can't accept your description of her physicality but the rest I would be open to believe.

I think you will need some solid evidence to convince me,  but even irrefutable proof probably won't convince suchmoon or her DT1 pals.
127  Economy / Reputation / Re: [Achivement] Finally I reached the Legendary rank! on: September 26, 2020, 01:39:00 PM
Congratulations another member achieved the legendary rank. I see your post and other records it's really deserve to be a legendary member. I hope one day will reach up the rank like that. I hope you contiously supporting other member too.

Having a 1.5k merit is a large number.

No congratulations from me shit bird.

You're a scammer supporter and trust abuser. Possibly the alt of a proven scammer.
You've achieved nothing of note nor ever posted anything original that was thought provoking that made any lasting difference here.


We does not entertain this kind of toxic behavior, and getting bitter.

The undeniable truth is a bitter pill for some to swallow.
Of course should you be able to prove I am not speaking the truth, that would be different.

It is my opinion that anyone with provable scamming or that is frequently protecting and defending proven scammers should be denied legendary rank.

If you feel the truth is toxic. Then I feel you should be watched closely.
If you don't entertain the truth I don't care. The reader deserves to have access to the truth if they choose to entertain it ...that's up to them.

As the highest rank legendary should be permitted to only honest and high achieving members.

Hence why I will never celebrate this turd as legendary.

Got it now? Good.
128  Other / Meta / Re: Troll role? on: September 26, 2020, 01:24:39 PM
temporary shadow banning might be an easy solution.

Yes jetcash that will work very well.

But first we need to locate some trolling to present as examples here so we know how these trolls attempt to pass off provably false and conclusively debunked information as true.

Why are we all talking about dealing with all this trolling we can't even locate and present here as examples??

Maybe it doesn't exist? When you go to copy it here you realize what you thought was trolling was just the truth?

The challenge to any member here crying about trolling is just to present an example ??

Why can not one member present all of this provably false information that these trolls are frequently and relentlessly claiming is correct and true?

This is very strange ?

Is every one else here a liar or a troll? Maybe you guys are trolling me? There is no trolling by this " hyper troll " that you claim exists?
129  Other / Meta / Re: Troll role? on: September 26, 2020, 01:10:38 PM
Troll is like as trust, the forum does not moderate it as I know. game-protect is a good troll example. He troll over years and he did it from personal to company targets.

He get temp ban 2 or 3 times and the last time, he tried to attack theymos. That attack attempt caused his permanent ban.

Look at him to know if he did not attack theymos seriously, he would have not been banned permanently soon like that. If troll is seriously moderated, many trollers would have been banned.

Community can help with "don't feed the troll".

Sure but why can't we have a 'special' stinky role for them in their profiles for everyone to see, and maybe even some badge?

If people can be banned for plagiarism, then they can be banned for repeated trolling and spamming the forum, or charge them evil fee if they want to write.

Present  a specific example of the trolling to which you claim is taking place.

Are you sure its trolling and not just a truth you find inconvenient?

Post an example ffs. What are you afraid of? You're not telling lies are you?

If the forum puts in the rules that trolling is telling the truth then you could be on to something here.
130  Other / Meta / Re: Troll role? on: September 26, 2020, 12:38:00 PM
You achieve literally nothing by responding to cryptohunter trolls. He has been bleating the same nonsense for over 2 years. Nothing you say will change his mind. All you are doing is wasting your time and making the forum less usable and less readable for everyone else.

Just click "ignore".
Exactly, it is just waste of time.
I don't understand what forum rule NO TROLLING means when no actions are taken against trolls?
Rules don't apply for trolls?


I agree why are those promugating provably false information as true not banned? Like oieeioe or suchmoon or any other DT1 troll who insist on promugating false information as true??

Especially those that accuse members or trolling when that accusation is provably false. ?

Most of DT1 are deliberately and wilfully accusing anyone that presents inconvenient truths about them of being trolls?
Why is that permitted? They want the forum to become an echo chamber? Ashamed of there past histories here?

I say ban people instantly who accuse people of trolling when that accusation is provably false.

Start with suchmoon and ioeioe or whatever that fools name is.

These people are attempting to silence the truths others present and have even started stalking their threads demanding the debates and discussions taking place end.

The problem is people can not debunk or refute the truth so they attempt to label it trolling.

What this for example.

Can you provide some examples of cryptohunter or the alts you speculate are his TROLLING. You know where you have conclusively debunked his points or the evidence he presents and yet he continues to present them as truths?

Where is the incorrect information he is promugating as true.

I challenge any member to bring it here now. Let's wait and see.

I say no examples will be presented because they do not exist.

Notblox1 can you present the examples of what you are whimpering about?

Yes or no?

If you constantly accuse someone of trolling here but can not provide an example of the incorrect information they are presenting as true then you are the troll. Sorry that's a difficult concept for you guys to grasp.

If you want to change the definition of troll to : person who presents inconvenient truths to the reader that is unpopular with the others posting on that thread, then appeal for a change of definition.

Reveal too many inconvenient truths you are awarded the prestigious title of " hyper troll" lol
131  Economy / Reputation / Re: 🏆 Crypto Community Awards - Discussion on: September 26, 2020, 11:14:12 AM
Bitcointalks inexorable journey to mimic the central banking system blasting ahead at full steam here.

Only those that print the merits and give them to each other and a few pals can vote for each other to receive the rewards we give each other.

Lol at you dumb smucks hahaha

How about you post up the member and allow public analysis of their ACTUAL achievements.
After the debate is exhausted the most compelling and robust review of them left standing will be compared to that of others up for review. Then if ANYONE regardless of their scammy merit score can nominate another member for that award that can provide a far more compelling and robust case for winning then they will receive the reward.

No no no you all scream? How will we be sure to give our awards to each other and our pals ?
Because we have no real achievements here and there will be a very compelling and robust case to demonstrate we are net negative scammers and scammer supporters and protectors that all just want to collude to take all of the finite rev from bitcointalk.

Lol let the self appointed self nominated and self awarded clown awards begin. I can't wait to give my public and entirely robust analysis of the winners. Bring it on but just speed it up. I mean obviously the winners will be either

Lauda, tman, vod, suchmoom, moronbozo, ioeieoe, Hugeblackwoman, foxy, jollygood, owl, robovac, or simply one of the other human centipede shit cyclers.

Just match the awards to the names and let's get going haha.

Just forget the super convincing nomination and algo. Reminds me of Bpip that vod made when you ranked it by most popular or most mega member....well....who would have guessed it... vod became number 1 lol

132  Economy / Reputation / Re: List of things Vod has done wrong. (Non-modded / Non-affiliated thread) on: September 26, 2020, 09:25:45 AM
Another Vod Vs. OG thread just what the forum needs, more drama... Not self modded too!

Let's fuel it then.

 I'd love to understand why or how someone could dislike OGNasty... Nasty has been a standup person for years.

Do you consider OGNasty's "business" a ponzi, or not?

Because ponzi promoters ans ponzi sellers are always hated here. (maybe there are some exceptions, is there?)




This thread is to list the things vod has done wrong. Not an OG vs vod thread.

Besides many would consider bitcoin a ponzi.

Vod has done things wrong. The most serious of which is facilitating and protecting scammers. When you oppose a flag based upon indisputable evidence of scamming you are the lowest of the low.

Especially when he has previously admitted he was too scared to tag the same scammer before because he thought they would tag his account as retaliation.

This is exactly why the trust system is dangerous

133  Economy / Reputation / Re: JollyGood: I just made Legendary rank ! on: September 26, 2020, 09:15:53 AM
Sorry I missed this JollyGood, you’re one of my favourite people on the forum. It’s a well deserved achievement, you’re a great poster & an even better person. I class you as a friend, well done, you deserve it.

One proven liar and back stabber of friends on the orders of a proven scammer.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5136759.40

Congratulating another scam facilitator and double standards scum bag.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5229023.0

Legendary rank is polluted daily with non achieving scammers and shady scumbags.

Self congratulatory nauseating piece of dirt.

Only current and wanna be DT human centipede segments sharting out congratulations.

Move the thread to rep or better the trash.  Has no place on meta.
134  Other / Meta / Re: Reduced forum activity on: September 26, 2020, 09:01:58 AM
Well "Very Well Endowed" seems to have killed this thread. Smiley

I don;t know why people stay and continue to post if they think the forum is so bad. If a forum starts to have no value for me, then I just move on.  Bitcoin Talk seems to be changing, but it still has some great members contributing, and I am pleased to have access to their knowledge and opinions. The world of crypto is changing and expanding quite rapidly at the moment. If you aren't taking advantage of it, then you are missing out on a life changing opportunity. Discussion in this forum will help all of us establish ourselves in the new world that is emerging.

Very Well Endowed bestowed the only real life, light and value upon your groping in the dark thread.
You don't want to accept those ideas as valuable because of the origin.
Grow up at 84 years old and stop crying when people demonstrate your ideas are not especially useful and gift you some that may be.
Accept that at 84 if you've not made it then there is probably a good reason for that.

Now again, demonstrate why my suggestions are " killing your thread " and not actually providing much needed value.
That is a direct challenge. Of course you will run away from that.
If you were less hostile and not such a cry baby then I wouldn't need to be so critical.
135  Economy / Reputation / Re: List of things Vod has done wrong. (Non-modded / Non-affiliated thread) on: September 26, 2020, 08:44:36 AM
Vod, I think you shouldn't worry too much about people posting right/wrong criticism about you. Let people come at you with what they got, its not gonna hurt you or your actual reputation. So long as you be truthful to yourself, and stay on the right side, there is nothing to fear, right?

I also think, you and Og should talk it out like normal adult people, instead of calling each other liars or any other nicknames yall have given each other. If QS and lauda can solve matters between one another, I am sure you two can do the same as well. Its 2020 afterall.

Of course the things he's done wrong won't hurt his reputation here.
His reputation is already that of a doxer of the forum treasurer, trust abuser and scammer facilitator.
136  Economy / Reputation / Re: List of things Vod has done wrong. (Non-modded / Non-affiliated thread) on: September 25, 2020, 04:32:52 PM
without having their stuff deleted
Here's an overview of all (un)edited/deleted posts in that topic: https://loyce.club/archive/details/topic_5277553.html
Any time you post (or quote) this link, it gets updated.

Excellent.  As long as the data is there (and here) there is nothing wrong with my keeping that topic clean for things I have done wrong.

Hilariously vod deleted this post and changed his demand from things he has done wrong must no longer just be accompanied by evidence they must be accompanied by " concise " evidence.

I don't expect intelligent people to have to wade through pages of garbage, like the post I deleted of yours.  

"You also admitted", "You also deliberately protected" -- your opinions are not things I have done wrong.   If you want to complain how I posted information I gathered from the internet, do it with a link showing the evidence - even if you need to create a thread yourself to show it concisely.  I have no problem admitting exactly what I did, but don't muddy it with unfounded claims and your biased opinions.  Just the facts ma'am.

The pages of garbage with your own posts quoted as proof that fully corroborate the things you have undeniable done wrong ?


Which statements that I made about you do you wish to attempt to refute?
The links I provided detail specifically the points I made.

Pick one.

Are you claiming you didn't do these things ?
Bring me the specifics here. Which of the things I mentioned do you claim did not take place?

I will work through any of the these events with you step by step.

You are claiming they didnt happen? or just the evidence is not presented as you say it should be ?
You claim you deleted the post because people should not have to click a link?

I mean anyone can claim their actions are not deliberate but if at anytime you can remove or reverse those actions and you do not and you are unwilling to debate those actions then it seems very unlikely they are not deliberate. What excuse will you come up with next. I can't wait.

I would love to get into specifics with you but I know you will run away.

Prove me wrong. Don't run. Debate publically you actions.
Lets see.

Okay number 1

Did you dox the forum treasurer? Yes or no?
Was it wrong?

Just be honest.



137  Other / Meta / Re: Reduced forum activity on: September 25, 2020, 02:19:48 PM
I'm intelligent enough to realise that making a full quote immmediately after a post .would make me look stupid
I'm also intelligent enough to put you on ignore

Only in the diseased mind of an 84 year old sitting there with his happy meal to obtain some internet access.

Now be sensible

Tackle my points or accept these are the truths you seek.
If you can refute conclusively those points I will ask MD to lower the requirement from happy meal to small fries for your free wifi.

Ignore on meta aka I am scared of the truths you present that reveal my posts as downright silly.

Can you seriously find a fault with my suggestions.
Yes or no. If so present your case.

Are you interested in growing the activity of the forum or just want to play at making silly threads that will achieve nothing?

Some old dogs like to learn new tricks. Come on jetcash expand your horizons. Stick with me and you'll be dining on big macs and large fries even a choc shake now and then?

Which of my points were you intelligent enough to pretend to ignore?
138  Economy / Reputation / Re: 🏆 Crypto Community Awards - Discussion on: September 25, 2020, 01:53:16 PM
What about bitcointalk ladies hottest physique award? I have someone in mind.
Oh, so you haven't forgotten me, after all. Tongue

The tail swishing gif may have been on my mind from time to time.
However, unbelievably , I had another fuller figured beauty in mind for the top award. ( not a post OP vod either...although...)
139  Other / Meta / Re: Reduced forum activity on: September 25, 2020, 01:48:51 PM
I get so tired of all the crap about people only being here for the signature earnings. For me the social interaction, educational discussions and threads, and the possibility of making business contacts are more important. I'm a domainer, so I use my signature sometimes to help with some project of mine - hence the stuff about Rag St. It would be a loss to me if I could use my signature space for various things as the mood takes me, I don't care if some helpful member uses his sig to earn a bit as a result of making helpful posts, but I do find it annoying when somebody with a minimal command of English makes meaningless posts, in an attempt to gain rank. They then whinge about everybody having the right to ponce off the forum to earn a few pence.

Maybe signatures should be banned for all those below full member level. Smiley

I can't work out if you are stupid and well intentioned or a serious bad guy here.

As if most people here are not here to make money? Where do you get off with these stupid statements.
That is a given. Why are many of DT1 making sure they are on the highest paying sig campaign on the forum?

Not to mention everyone else except those already wealthy pushing to get every bit of rev they can via sigs, escrowing, lending at exorbitant rates, trading , scamming, account peddling.

Be sensible ffs.

The final suggestion would kill the forum of even more quickly.
I suggest you read my posts, understand them and learn something.

Even in a true meritocracy you dont want to cut off the energy of the incapable posters if you want to pump life and volume into the board. Spammers here must be controlled so they spam social media and  elsewhere and bring traffic and investment here.

These threads are a typical example of a circle of stupidity and stubbornness  avoiding answers or ideas they reject or ignore due to the the origin. That's just silly. Grow up. You're 84 right?  I can teach an old dog new tricks.
Be objective.
140  Other / Meta / Re: Reduced forum activity on: September 25, 2020, 01:36:47 PM
Something similar is happening right now, old members of this forum are worried because Bitcointalk is having less and less activity and they will not be able to earn money from their signatures, sooner or later this forum it will die if something doesn't change, so they post in this tread and they propose the most ideotic ideas to bring to life the forum like banning users from 3rd world countries, and then someone (me) tell you that the signatures and you (those with signatures) say no
 because this will affect you economically. You are killing the forum for your profit. But this is not a coin and nobody will fork it, there are already alternatives out there.

Your conclusions are ridiculous to say at least, because this thread was opened by a member who doesn’t even participate in a paid signature campaign. Unlike you and others like you who show up from time to time, some have been on this forum for years regardless of whether someone paid them for it or not. Instead of trying to constructively answer the questions I asked you in the previous post, you draw meaningless parallels between some coin forks and the fact that some members are afraid that they will lose something because the activity has decreased.

Being in a paid signature campaign has always been a privilege for those who have in any way proved valuable to the forum - so let me conclude that your concern for the future of the forum is not real, you are just envious that you are not in a position to get some BTC in the same way.


1. Provide conclusive proof jetcash does not have an alt that is on a highly paid sig? ( a petty point because it is irrelevant since most defending the sigs here and the route to the sigs is not just jetcash. )
2. You would be pushing to retain the status quo because you're a prime beneficiary of it ? Come on?
3. Lol at proved valuable to the forum? Many chipmixer and highly paid sig spammers on DT1 are proven scammers or scammer protectors. Also many have achieved nothing of note and can't even provide any examples of original thought provoking posts that had  any real lasting impact here.

You are just making a lot of bogus statements that will fall apart under scrutiny. There is no meritocracy here so stop pretending there is  

I see you didnt respond to my points I made above? Why? Because that leads to the truth.
Nobody here likes the truth when it threatens the status quo they control and benefit from immensely.

Keep it as it is and watch. You will never see and influx and energy of the last bull ever again. It will slowly just become DT1 there pals and some alt projects that have nowhere else to go.  Then when the sponsors dry up most of DT1 will be gone.

You've not been here very long yourself. Neither have a lot of DT1. Most are bootlicking noobs. Allowed into maintain the status quo they know they have to support to get some crumbs.

I'm not having a personal go at you since I dont know who you are. However you seem to either be very mislead or trying to mislead others. There is no meritocracy hear. The systems are broken. 
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!