I only quoting "Leetcoiner" statement with one word, that is no FUD!
And that's exactly, what I have already wrote about - creating posts just to increase your forum rank. In addition to that your quoting fud & threats (leetcoiner post), which will not be tolerated here.@Strugg please delete every rubish posts of this fudders. I want to have clear topic with no idiot stories.
Yes, moderation might seem to be something negative for some people, but unfortunately there is no other way on bitcointalk. When you see 2 accounts posting in your thread the same day the same thing it's probably an attempt to fud & manipulate other people. And it's very likely that it's the same person behind these 2 accounts. We will not tolerate such attacks in our thread. Regards
~ Strugg
|
|
|
@lasvegas83
FUD & threats or posting just to increase your forum rank will not be tolerated, especially from people who has never been interested in Navajo Coin and/or comes from other coins threads (like Cloak in your case). Regards
~ Strugg
|
|
|
@leetcoiner Please dump on 300 satoshi.
From the theoretical point of view, as a demonstration of force, it would be much simpler transfer all 3+ M of NAV to another of its addresses, and then provide the TXID, without dumps on the market, and so no one loses or gains 1 single Nav. Exactly my thoughts. Proof or quit your "I'm so powerful" BS. Cheers
~ Strugg
|
|
|
@leetcoiner
If You really think that someone with millions of NAV is "waiting to dump" then... think again Instead of trying to fud, You might want to take a look at our roadmap for summer 2015, where we have already presented our incoming projects. Regards
~ Strugg
|
|
|
Am i the only one thats feeling a little betrayed by hashforce101 ?
all this blabla all the time and now Poof hes gone and he "made it to the moon".
So all those positive supportive posts where only so he could unload the Nav he bought around 200-300 sat and now hes done and gone ?
If there is another way of looking at this someone please enlighten me.
Well, he had ample opportunity to unload earlier at 3000+ but he didn't. And I know it sounds like a cliche but with the roadmap out slating things to be released within the next two months, its hard to imagine price not returning there once things start rolling. If he sold now, he probably needed the money. I don't know how much he sold, what does 6Gs mean? But he must have bought a lot, so either he dumped it and the price held, which is good or he kept most of it, which means he is still around, just not doing the daily cheerleading. Can't blame him really. The whole crypto business can be frustrating at times. Its good to keep up with the news but some of us spend way more time than we should. There was 13btc buy support at 1990-2000 sats on trex yesterday(about $3500 cad) include other exchanges And there probably was around $6000 cad, so basically he dumped into buy support effectively holding the price from any upward movement, holding it below the 2000 sat mark. WELL DONE ..... This big buy order didn't get filled - it was cancelled. If someone would sell that much into it then You could see it in market history / volume. Cheers
~ Strugg
|
|
|
My compliments to this Navajo Team. Great work like always. I do not understand all those investors that invest in Sh*tcoins like all the "tron" coins. They all get burned at one time. Invest in REAL DEVs like VanillaCoin, NavajoCoin, Ripple etc. All the best and the price is way too low for all those great features of NavajoCoin. Nice infomercials/videos about Navajocoin: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lwvyvCy_XTQhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1cnIEy3sWMPlease watch in 720p. Sorry but this 2 Videos are soooo bad...thats not professional! My 10 year old son can make this video with movie maker! They're fan-made and not official ones. Still it's great to see people supporting NAV and making something on their own! Like You can see in the roadmap we will create new & official one. Cheers!
~ Strugg
|
|
|
Well, I think that the hard work always deserves an answer and thanks.
I congratulate really, in the new roadmap there is really great stuff Thank You! The connections between the various activities are an embellishment graphic or denote a dependency between tasks / curator ? I would say both. It's division into 3 main groups of tasks: "useful tools (mobile&web wallet, multipool), PR/Marketing focused projects (press releases, promo video & dedicated forum) and main projects (Decentralization, Cooperation System, Masternodes, Redesign).The forum will be a brand new one, or it is a revision of *alk.org, which so far it has been very under used? We are planning to create a brand new one.Regarding masternode I not know well the concept so I might talk nonsense, so please be patient, but from what I think to understand the DevTeam manages currently at least 4, and is in constant search for funds to cover their costs and keep them active. A private how could get gain from the management of a masternode? Regarding masternodes system we will explain this idea further once it's development is in more advanced stage Launch a multiPool for mining in the hottest period of summer (hemisphere borealis), you don't think it is a bit risky? Well, we do not force anyone to use it I don't see a point in waiting with setting it up any longer, miners can always wait and use it later, if they're afraid to do so during summer. The cooperative system, for as stated, is not likely to become a oligarchic system? (but perhaps of this, we can talk about it in due time) I don't think so. And even if someone would see it that way - altcoins need it. Rewarding people for investing in Your coin is very healthy and promising strategy.The re-design of the coin regard just the aesthetic side, or also some inside technical parameter ?
Currently it's planned to be focused on aesthetic side. But if Community suggests something more in this matter we're opened for discussion I hope my answers satisfied you! Best Regards
~ Strugg
|
|
|
Thanks for reminding Remy! OP updated as well as projects section on the website. Cheers!
~ Strugg
|
|
|
Nice roadmap.
Any chance of cooperating with other teams like Blocknet where Ethereum is going to be Blocknet enabled. If we can share their knowledge or marketing power, would that be beneficial?
Thanks! It's a matter worth discussing, but in my personal opinion the idea of Blocknet / Supernet is much more beneficial to these teams, than the coins, which are part of that.
Cheers ~ Strugg
|
|
|
New roadmap looks great!
Thank You As u can see it didnt have the impact on the price, so ppl doesnt trust dev teams right now. Web wallet should be finished on April, and we dont have it yet. Im not telling that u will not realize promises, but please show us that u can finish lots of thing in this frame time to restore our faith. Then coin will be push forward
Sorry, but You must be new here. We have been delivering all our promises for over a year now, so please don't say that we have to "restore your faith". We have never announced that Web Wallet will be done on April, we have clearly stated that we are working on it during that month. Like we have been saying many times: Web Wallet delay wasn't our fault - the team (Altcoinguys) hired to do this had delays, so there was nothing we can do. Also we never have said that it will be done for x day for sure, we have been always saying that it should be, simply becouse we haven't been preparing it directly.As u can see it didnt have the impact on the price, so ppl doesnt trust dev teams right now.
Sorry, but I fully disagree. Bitcoin & altcoin markets in general are having a hard time now, so it's not just NAV.
More support, less accusations please. Cheers
~ Strugg
|
|
|
So, according to this roadmap, within 6 weeks all these projects will be accomplished? That's at least 2-3 projects per dev if the team is 4 people. Even the most insanely optimistic person should have doubts about this. Hell, a single one of those updates has had a few weeks delay already. I would expect all those things to be accomplished by the end of the year, not the middle of summer, and even so, it still sounds like tons of work. Please revise the roadmap to a more realistic time plan or we will simply have more rounds of disappointment. Or just prove me wrong. I'd love to be wrong given the circumstances Yes, all these projects should be accomplished within ~6 weeks.
Web & Mobile wallet are being prepared by hired team - Altcoinguys. They had delays, that's why it took more time than we thought it will.
jsmit332 will take care about new design, but we have already worked with him and he has been finishing his work very quickly.
All other projects presented in the roadmap will be done by Development Team and Foundation members. Also not all of these projects requires a huge amount of work. The most difficult tasks are Decentralization of NAV Anonymous Technology, NAV Cooperation System, NAV Masternodes System and Official Forum. That's why they're planned for late June or early July We didn't set exact dates to have more time and flexibility.
Of course if there would be some problems we will revise the roadmap, but we are pretty sure we will finish everything on time.
Cheers
~ Strugg
|
|
|
Where is update? We decided to test 2.0.9 version a bit more and add some extra fixes. Roadmap will be released today! Cheers
~ Strugg
|
|
|
New Update Ready 2.0.9!
Warm Regards, ~SoopY~
Cool! Link? Where? We're making some final testing yet! Stay tuned ~ Strugg
|
|
|
Remember about a new roadmap coming this weekend. You will know what more we have planned for NAV then! Stay Tuned & ignore the fud! Cheers
~ Strugg
|
|
|
Hello Everyone!
Looks like forum is back up again! Stay Tuned for updates coming this week. If You would like to discuss anything - as always - please contact me via PM. Cheers & Stay Tuned!
~ Strugg I want to discuss here. Team said 2 weeks ago that we should be ready for an update in next week. Please check our recent updates on this:Hello guys,
I like to give you an update on the webwallet development. As you know we decided to hire the AltCoinGuys for this, cause they are very experienced and have already set up multiple webwallets for different coins.
They wrote me, they are having some problems with compatibility at the moment, which they need to solve right now. I will keep you all informed, as soon as I get new information! Stay tuned
thank you Shahim
Just a follow up: Yesterday I managed to help them with the integration, so the compatibility problem with the explorer api is solved. The AltCoinGuys started to move on with the webwallet immediately. I will keep you informed about the progress! regards Shahim
|
|
|
Top 25 largest balances:
0. 509773.27 [Premine tokens that will be permanently burned by Bittrex]
1. 109725.63 2. 100000 3. 100000 4. 99750 5. 76209.47 6. 69515.8 7. 62102.53 8. 59850.35 9. 53768.89 10. 52667.87 11. 52238.81 12. 50000 13. 46154.97 14. 43990 15. 41338.52 16. 35910 17. 35064.91 18. 31388.01 19. 31241.14 20. 29844.86 21. 27929.62 22. 27431.25 23. 25522.26 24. 21371.66 25. 20149.5
VS richlist: http://explorer.gambitcrypto.com/richlist1 1508848.45144854 60.35% 2 509773.26429452 20.39 BURNED TOKENS 3 83011.14800196 3.32 4 62122.62471755 2.48 5 59858.75197451 2.39 6 50002.91516385 2.00 7 38387.92526551 1.54 8 25006.56384620 1.00 9 20154.91912703 0.81 10 17470.42223050 0.70 11 16123.67797418 0.64 12 15916.32012325 0.64 13 14936.00000000 0.60 14 12586.72081788 0.50 15 11003.56319943 0.44 16 10003.23111130 0.40 17 8005.31589004 0.32 18 7999.98000000 0.32 19 6507.02344070 0.26 20 3691.24660255 0.15 21 3098.21935963 0.12 22 2508.23277599 0.10 23 1808.44148170 0.07 24 1679.03647575 0.07 25 1511.31552502 0.06 Care to elaborate about this? Top wallet is Bittrex, which includes all coins currently being on that exchange. Correct me if I'm wrong, but that's it as far as I know.
|
|
|
Hello Everyone!
Looks like forum is back up again! Stay Tuned for updates coming this week. If You would like to discuss anything - as always - please contact me via PM. Cheers & Stay Tuned!
~ Strugg
|
|
|
Dead..
|
|
|
Days ago there was a technical request about the POS, I did not understand if the request was sincere or just a provocation, but either way, since the Dev are busy with persistent connectivity problems of the servers, and so I guess they can not give them an answer to that request in the short term, I try to answer as a simple user. The request was for a chart showing the evolution of Pos Difficulty, in fact, recently this was not discussed a lot, but in the last period there has been some increase. The following chart is the trend of the POSDIF extracted from a block-chain starting from 2015-04-01 and aggregated at intervals of one hour. The red trace (left axis) is the average of the POS, the black line is a moving average of the POS with a window of 24 hours to soften fluctuations on a daily basis, and the blue trace (right axis) is the average number of seconds between the blocks. As you can see there emerges a cyclical swing in the POS, a stronger on the 24 hours, and one less noticeable over the week. These changes are better shown on these two other graphs, whose blockchain's data are aggregated into 15 minute intervals starting from 2015-01-05, and in turn aggregates again on hourly basis, wrapped over the 24 Hours, or wrapped over the entire week. Obviously the data are to be considered as preliminary and indicative only, I may have committed errors of form or method (although I do not think). This answer I do not think that fully meets the initial request, but I hope that satisfies this technical curiosity. Considering that a picture is worth a thousand words... this time I tried to be more concise. Bye Bye Thank You for Your analysis Remy!
@Community We are making good progress behind the scenes, please stay tuned for updates in the upcoming week! Cheers!
~ Strugg
|
|
|
wallet cannot sync Dev already explained the same issue to Roberto:
|
|
|
|