http://utc.yacoin.club/index.php?page=gettingstarted*.conf file could be problem too. Rename it from you miners location. *.oldconf Solo or pool mining? What gpu's you are using? Valpe Some one help me  . I have tried CGminer and CCminer . Nothing works. What are the steps to start mine ? i have modified Bat file in sgminer and double clicked . nothing works.
|
|
|
|
I tried one gt710. Getting about 1kh/s and taking power 24w. You can get 1.08 kh/s if overclock it. Valpe Thanks!  Hi Are these hash rates from pool end or from miner? Thanks! I made one rig with one gpu  (two years break). Waiting more information (GT710) and then I am going to buy more gpu's. Pool is working and no problems at all. Seems that low end cards are mining quite good. Scrypt-jane algorithm is really undervalued. Valpe Thanks for the info. Most of these things I already knew, I've been mining (heavily) for past 5 years.
Could you post some reference hashrate values for cards you own? Scrypt Jane algorithm is far away from the spotlight. With Claymore miner for newer algorithms you can't influence hashrate with some settings as it was the case with older algorithms. And without some reference values it's hard to say if everything is working as expected.
Edit: room for tweaking is very limited. I get around 550 H/s with -I 8 and 1.05 KH/s with -I 9. Still, with -I 9 some of the cards occassionaly give HW.
Rig with 6 x 270 draws around 330W from the wall, much less than 580W while mining Zcash.
This seems to be very strange algorithm. Type of card somehow doesn't affect hashrate. My 280X and 270 cards give same hashrate with same intensity settings. That explains why that tiny GT720 with -I 9 also gives 1.1 KHs.
UTC hash rates for hardware in my rigs (@ Nf = 14) R9 270X 4GB: 2.23 Kh/s x3 ( -I 9 cgminer-3.7.3-kalroth-sj0.03) HD 7950 3GB: 1.15 Kh/s x2 (-I 8 cgminer-3.7.3-kalroth-sj0.03) R7 240 4GB: 0.837 Kh/s x6 (-I 9 cgminer-3.7.3-kalroth-sj0.03) GTX 750 Ti 2GB: 2.20 Kh/s x1 ( t64x1 cudaminer-2014-02-28) GT 740 1GB: 1.30 Kh/s x1 (k4x25 cudaminer-2014-02-28) GT 720 1GB: 1.13 Kh/s x4 (t17x3 -or- t26x2 cudaminer-2014-02-28) Also investigating viability of the GT710, as it reportedly hashes 50% better than the GT720 @ the same ~19W TDP. The card is laughable for games/graphics performance, but has potential for UTC @ Nf=14. If my test GT710 holds up, I will be creating some super-cheap 5x rigs. These values are direct, per card, from the miners. Pool rates tend to vary, but average about the same. Will update when I get a GT710. This may not be for awhile, though. If someone else gets one (they are everywhere, and are not especially expensive), use the Cudaminer version referenced above. For first run, let it autotune before setting permanent config, then experiment from there. Post your bat info (minus acct. info). |
|
|
|
Thanks! Hi Are these hash rates from pool end or from miner? Thanks! I made one rig with one gpu (two years break). Waiting more information (GT710) and then I am going to buy more gpu's. Pool is working and no problems at all. Seems that low end cards are mining quite good. Scrypt-jane algorithm is really undervalued. Valpe Thanks for the info. Most of these things I already knew, I've been mining (heavily) for past 5 years.
Could you post some reference hashrate values for cards you own? Scrypt Jane algorithm is far away from the spotlight. With Claymore miner for newer algorithms you can't influence hashrate with some settings as it was the case with older algorithms. And without some reference values it's hard to say if everything is working as expected.
Edit: room for tweaking is very limited. I get around 550 H/s with -I 8 and 1.05 KH/s with -I 9. Still, with -I 9 some of the cards occassionaly give HW.
Rig with 6 x 270 draws around 330W from the wall, much less than 580W while mining Zcash.
This seems to be very strange algorithm. Type of card somehow doesn't affect hashrate. My 280X and 270 cards give same hashrate with same intensity settings. That explains why that tiny GT720 with -I 9 also gives 1.1 KHs.
UTC hash rates for hardware in my rigs (@ Nf = 14) R9 270X 4GB: 2.23 Kh/s x3 ( -I 9 cgminer-3.7.3-kalroth-sj0.03) HD 7950 3GB: 1.15 Kh/s x2 (-I 8 cgminer-3.7.3-kalroth-sj0.03) R7 240 4GB: 0.837 Kh/s x6 (-I 9 cgminer-3.7.3-kalroth-sj0.03) GTX 750 Ti 2GB: 2.20 Kh/s x1 ( t64x1 cudaminer-2014-02-28) GT 740 1GB: 1.30 Kh/s x1 (k4x25 cudaminer-2014-02-28) GT 720 1GB: 1.13 Kh/s x4 (t17x3 -or- t26x2 cudaminer-2014-02-28) Also investigating viability of the GT710, as it reportedly hashes 50% better than the GT720 @ the same ~19W TDP. The card is laughable for games/graphics performance, but has potential for UTC @ Nf=14. If my test GT710 holds up, I will be creating some super-cheap 5x rigs. These values are direct, per card, from the miners. Pool rates tend to vary, but average about the same. Will update when I get a GT710. This may not be for awhile, though. If someone else gets one (they are everywhere, and are not especially expensive), use the Cudaminer version referenced above. For first run, let it autotune before setting permanent config, then experiment from there. Post your bat info (minus acct. info). |
|
|
|
Hi Are these hash rates from pool end or from miner? Thanks! I made one rig with one gpu (two years break). Waiting more information (GT710) and then I am going to buy more gpu's. Pool is working and no problems at all. Seems that low end cards are mining quite good. Scrypt-jane algorithm is really undervalued. Valpe Thanks for the info. Most of these things I already knew, I've been mining (heavily) for past 5 years.
Could you post some reference hashrate values for cards you own? Scrypt Jane algorithm is far away from the spotlight. With Claymore miner for newer algorithms you can't influence hashrate with some settings as it was the case with older algorithms. And without some reference values it's hard to say if everything is working as expected.
Edit: room for tweaking is very limited. I get around 550 H/s with -I 8 and 1.05 KH/s with -I 9. Still, with -I 9 some of the cards occassionaly give HW.
Rig with 6 x 270 draws around 330W from the wall, much less than 580W while mining Zcash.
This seems to be very strange algorithm. Type of card somehow doesn't affect hashrate. My 280X and 270 cards give same hashrate with same intensity settings. That explains why that tiny GT720 with -I 9 also gives 1.1 KHs.
UTC hash rates for hardware in my rigs (@ Nf = 14) R9 270X 4GB: 2.23 Kh/s x3 ( -I 9 cgminer-3.7.3-kalroth-sj0.03) HD 7950 3GB: 1.15 Kh/s x2 (-I 8 cgminer-3.7.3-kalroth-sj0.03) R7 240 4GB: 0.837 Kh/s x6 (-I 9 cgminer-3.7.3-kalroth-sj0.03) GTX 750 Ti 2GB: 2.20 Kh/s x1 ( t64x1 cudaminer-2014-02-28) GT 740 1GB: 1.30 Kh/s x1 (k4x25 cudaminer-2014-02-28) GT 720 1GB: 1.13 Kh/s x4 (t17x3 -or- t26x2 cudaminer-2014-02-28) Also investigating viability of the GT710, as it reportedly hashes 50% better than the GT720 @ the same ~19W TDP. The card is laughable for games/graphics performance, but has potential for UTC @ Nf=14. If my test GT710 holds up, I will be creating some super-cheap 5x rigs. |
|
|
|
I will send about 50 € , as soon as btc wallet is ready. Valpe Alenevva is back I am pleased to report that Alenevaa is back - the pool has been serviced and pool payments sent out. Thanks Alenevaa. It seems that Alenevaa was indeed travelling. Had his computer and photographic gear stolen early into the trip - hence no contact for a while. Most importantly he is alive and well and enriched from his travels.  I'm intending to send Alenevaa a gift (0.3 BTC - roughly the cost of his annual server fees for the UltraCoin pool - Euro 480). He obviously has not been working for a while and with the loss of his gear he will have a lot of expenses to catch up on now hes back. This is the least I can do for him after his tireless efforts testing the new wallet, setting up the test pool and debugging the new wallet versions and operating the only UTC pool at his own expense. If anyone wants to contribute towards this 0.3 BTC gift of appreciation - send your BTC to this address. It will help me a lot as I hate spending my BTC at present. Any contributions gratefully received to the UltraCoin Dev Fund BTC address: 1LpFmfieMBH63ivFA1Us5ju1jnH9CSccKZ WELCOME BACK ALENEVAA Thanks usukan
|
|
|
|
Good to know Usukan. You have my full support. Valpe  |
|
|
|
Hi Sigma2543, Do you have mature coins for staking? My wallet is working well. Valpe Can't get wallet to work. It's synced but not staking and I clicked enabled staking. Also, devs need to go on and ask Cryptopia for a better rating. Spread the word.  |
|
|
|
Working very good! and UTC is fast. Valpe |
|
|
|
Vote for a good parthership. Valpe Community AnnouncementIf you want to support Cryptopia - a splendid idea might be to adopt their signature here on BitCoinTalk Cryptopia Signatures: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1669443.msg17112474#msg17112474On BitCoinTalk - Just go to: Profile>Forum Profile Information - and copy/paste the signature corresponding to your BCT membership level into the "Signature" field. SAVE - thats all. They might even "pay" you for this in the future............. I did it - easy as Support Cryptopia please - we can build a good partnership here with them. Thanks - usukan |
|
|
|
Very good job Usukan! We should speed up website project. Now we need act fast and not only to say that something is going to happen. Rapture333? We need to take this opportunity, we cannot lose this. Valpe Well Cryptopia are very efficient ! They got back within 30 mins? Yes we can list UltraCoin there (subject to review etc of code). Just need to fill this in Exchange Combo Listing
Name
Ticker
Algorithm Network Type
Currency Website
Source Code link
Block Explorer Link
Launch Forum Thread
Extra Information (optional)
Price: 595000.00000000 DOT Available: 0.00000000 DOT Pay the money and we get the process in motion (about 0.15 BTC max) Currency Website - This still needs updating by Steven - but we can try listing with Website TBA. So we can pay 500k DOT for straight listing - or 595k for the Combo deal https://www.cryptopia.co.nz/PaytopiaI would go for the combo deal. Community please check out and advise your preference - and support. Thanks - usukan |
|
|
|
I removed all from Bittrex. Idont wanna support they any more. Usukan could you tell us how we can help UTC? Valpe Hi bathrobehero
Yeah sucks for sure - but a chance forced on us for a new start.
Cheers - usukan
I have 1.000.000 UTC and off 0.000000000000000000000000000 YES Hi for everet - make sure you withdraw any UTC you might have On Bittrex asap (and anything else) You are not the only one here to be screwed up by Bittrex here. Its not really the time for whinging - its time to do something. Step up if you want to help get UTC listed somewhere else. Interesting - Bittrex seems to be in trouble really - they are losing market share fast. https://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/volume/24-hour/ - currently #26 which is pretty abysmal really. Note the coins churning their top vols - not very inspiring. Only 2-3 coins which are legit. 26. Bittrex # Currency Pair Volume (24h) Price Volume (%) 1 Jumbucks JBS/BTC $76,823 $0.339672 10.02% 2 ClubCoin CLUB/BTC $46,684 $0.323225 6.09% 3 Decred DCR/BTC $40,910 $2.59 5.34% 4 Dash DASH/BTC $31,685 $15.99 4.13% 5 Stratis STRAT/BTC $28,321 $0.096456 3.69% 6 Gulden NLG/BTC $27,731 $0.027456 3.62% 7 ZCoin XZC/BTC $25,545 $1.74 3.33% 8 Ethereum ETH/BTC $24,750 $10.69 3.23% 9 GameCredits GAME/BTC $22,735 $0.248844 2.97% 10 Safe Exchange Coin SEC/BTC $20,995 $0.000396 2.74% View More Total $766,696 Bittrex is dying I'm afraid - little wonder they are delisting so many coins - Be warned. Cheers - usukan |
|
|
|
|
Seems like Bittrex is delisting UTC.
UTC market is offline.
Valpe
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Usukan!
Another exchange will be handy. When you see light out of tunnel Bittrex will flush UTC back.. .
OpenLedger might be good place for UTC.
Opportunities what WAVES tokens might bring to UTC are interesting indeed.
Valpe
|
|
|
|
Congratulations to the UTC team! UTC looks very promising now. Valpe |
|
|
|
|
Thanks UTC team,
This is why I love UTC. UTC is rising.
UTC is really cheap now, good opportunity.. .
Valpe
|
|
|
|
|
Bittrex: UTC wallet is under maintenance
|
|
|
|
Contest: December 12, 12:00 UTC |
|
|
|
There must be something wrong at the moment.. loading very slow. Could someone check it? Valpe Volume is more than 4.2 btc, so UTC should stay. Valpe Can you confirm UTC will not be delisted from bittrex?
I gave up on http://utc14.yacoin.club/ pool...it would take me 2 more hours to set workers. The ping time must be 600,000ms  |
|
|
|
Volume is more than 4.2 btc, so UTC should stay. Valpe Can you confirm UTC will not be delisted from bittrex?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
