Bitcoin Forum
June 22, 2024, 05:03:06 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 »
121  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: BitCrack - A tool for brute-forcing private keys on: June 05, 2021, 04:40:27 PM
@elvis

maybe try this?

https://github.com/Uzlopak/BitCrackOpenCL/releases/tag/v0.4.2
122  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: BitCrack - A tool for brute-forcing private keys on: June 05, 2021, 04:10:02 PM
Please a little more specific?

What errors do you get?
123  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: BitCrack - A tool for brute-forcing private keys on: June 04, 2021, 11:17:02 PM
Released v0.4.1

https://github.com/Uzlopak/BitCrackOpenCL/releases/tag/v0.4.1
124  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: BitCrack - A tool for brute-forcing private keys on: June 03, 2021, 02:38:15 PM
Does somebody has an idea why there is an keyFinderKernelWithDouble additionally to keyFinderKernel. What is the point of this additional function?
125  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: BitCrack - A tool for brute-forcing private keys on: June 02, 2021, 07:24:47 PM
I refactored more. Still trying to determine your Issue. Locally it works with my P620 Quadro and my Radeon Vega56. I use now Radeon Developer Tools and there I get some similar errors. So i will try to fix those issues and hoping solving the issues you mentioned.

I am now at about 95 MKeys/s. So I improved the performance about 30 Mkeys so about 45 % faster than standard OpenCL Bitcrack

When doing clBitCrack.exe -i addresses.txt --keyspace 1:fffffffffff -b 512 -t 256 -p 256 I get now about 360 MKeys/s

EDIT:

After reading again your remark:
Actually this should be solved now. But the remarks in Radeon Developer Tools make me think. So I will fix them also. Then the tool should be a piece of cake. Wink.


Also forgot to mention:
Now you get a System Beep when you find a key.
126  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: cpuBitCrack on: May 30, 2021, 03:04:19 PM
Hahaha

https://github.com/albertobsd/keyhunt/issues/75

Quote
Is it possible to add the tool I wrote with Python to Keyhunt? I think it will be more advantageous compared to faster and sequential search.

The balls to suggest that to a serious repo/developer  Grin Grin Grin Grin
127  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: cpuBitCrack on: May 30, 2021, 11:24:33 AM
What is unfounded??? Please stop ignoring the critique:

The code is concatting a string and exec(using) it.

This is garbage.
128  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: cpuBitCrack on: May 30, 2021, 10:52:58 AM
According to human rights a critique does not need to be nice. Even harsh words are acceptable.

I guess you are such a person that thinks that everything what he does has to be commented nicely and if not, it is personally insulting and then you conclude that the critique is void.

On the contrary... Where would we be when harsh critique would be void? I mean Bitcoin is a huge fuck you to the Fiat and banking system.

So to be honest, your program is indeed garbage. Take the critique like a man and use it as a chance to personally grow and motivation to learn programming. But don't whine when your garbage is classified as the garbage it is... We see here professional coding which is a magnitude of a million better than your "code".
129  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: cpuBitCrack on: May 30, 2021, 12:47:43 AM
It is using https://pypi.org/project/bit/ as library, which does all the calculations. But yeah, I guess that OP does not even know python enough to be called a coder. I mean... he basically concatenates a program which then is called by exec.  Grin Grin Grin
130  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: I've implemented a high performance bitcoin address finder on: May 29, 2021, 04:03:19 PM
Is it possible to provide in the OpenCL a private key like a int 32 array and get the private keys?

Do you have a codesnippet for this?
131  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: cpuBitCrack on: May 29, 2021, 02:07:40 PM
This is somehow a step backwards...


I mean, even forking from Brainflayer would have been OK, I guess...
132  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: I've implemented a high performance bitcoin address finder on: May 29, 2021, 01:36:56 PM
Hi

I saw your questions in hashcat repo and on stackoverflow. Does your code also searches for uncompressed addresses?
133  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: BitCrack - A tool for brute-forcing private keys on: May 28, 2021, 09:00:26 PM
Hmm yeah I am on it. What gpu are you using?
134  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: BitCrack - A tool for brute-forcing private keys on: May 28, 2021, 03:09:53 PM
I am looking for c code snippet, which covers the whole privatekey to pubkey compressed and uncompressed in a simple manner or a code snippet utilizing such a c-library?

I want to generate privatekeys and put them directly into secp256k1 to get the both pubkeys, but it seems, that the one I find are all optimized for point addition.

Any suggestions?
135  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Iran bans Bitcoin too on: May 27, 2021, 10:47:07 PM
There are currently 14 big bitcoin mining "factories" in Iran, managed by Chinese. They consume together 450 MW.

https://www.computerbase.de/2021-02/bitcoin-ethereum-china-miner-iran/

At the beginning of the year, the idiots from the energy ministry of Iran even called it "BitCorn".

With the Corona Virus lockdown, currently the streetlights are also off in the night-time. It is simply dangerous to walk nights.

Currently every day Tehran has about 3 h blackout. The economical issues are bigger than any mining profit.

Imagine how many simple people get fucked by this, as their refridgerated food gets destroyed. In a country, where you have a minimum income of 3 Mio. Toman per month, while even the iranian parliament estimates that the poverty-line is about 10 Mio. Toman per month.

Also... in few weeks are presidential elections. So people have to be appeased... Thats perhaps why the ban is also limited till 22nd september...
136  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: BitCrack - A tool for brute-forcing private keys on: May 27, 2021, 05:29:30 AM
With the pool/program, you can't fake a range searched.

Well... I could do the same by just forking the client or sniffing the network commucation and sending garbage to the server... There is shares you can create like in pooled mining.
137  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: BitCrack - A tool for brute-forcing private keys on: May 26, 2021, 04:09:34 PM
I fixed that bug and program finds all keys in the range.
138  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: BitCrack - A tool for brute-forcing private keys on: May 26, 2021, 02:15:07 PM
When you have time could you compile an .exe release please? Would like to test it vs. the original. Thanks.

Done:
https://github.com/Uzlopak/BitCrackOpenCL/releases/tag/v.0.4.0

I also tested the performance:
On my System with a Vega56 I had at the beginning with the old clBitCrack about 58 MKeys/s. Now I get about 83 MKeys/s. Keep in mind: This is just without any specified -b -t -p parameters, which will increase the throughput significally. with -p 5000. I get about 215 MKeys/s. With the old clBitCrack I get with -b 5000 about 190 MKeys/s. If I change only -b to 512 I get about 130 MKeys/s

So the 30 % Improvement are significantly when having low pressure on the GPU. On big load I get "just" 12 % improvement.

I read you can get the bytecode of the on-the-fly compiled openCL part.I will probably implement a solution to store the compiled openCL bytecode in the same folder and load if you run again clBitCrack. Thus should speed up the starting speed... Testing the best parameters should be then not taking always 20 seconds, because OpenCL is building.....

EDIT:
I get with clBitCrack.exe -i addresses.txt --keyspace 1:fffffffffff -b 512 -t 256 -p 256 about 268 MKeys/s

With the old clBitCrack I get in the same case about 210 MKeys/s

So the performance gain is definetely there Wink
139  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: BitCrack - A tool for brute-forcing private keys on: May 26, 2021, 01:01:27 PM

Professor Lubin noted this here:
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3697090/endomorphism-rings-of-elliptic-curves-over-finite-fields

Perhaps this will be of some help to understand more about endomorphism, rings and EC. His example uses a diff formula than what's used by secp256k1 but for me it was helpful.


Maybe it is something you can easily digest. But for me this just raises questions.

Do we have some codesnippet which we can copy and put into our codebase?
140  Economy / Economics / Re: How to protect from inflation? on: May 26, 2021, 11:53:34 AM
Inflation is per se not a bad thing. If you live in a country with 1-2 % inflation, then it is used to "force" people to invest reasonably. It is actually motivating the economy to invest.

If you live in a country were the inflation is negative, like Japan, it means that the people are holding their savings, in the hope that it will get more value over the time. Thus killing the economy, as the private sector is the actual engine of the economy.

If you live in a country were the inflation is very high, like 40%, it means that the people have to earn more and more money to buy less and less stuff. Thus killing the economy by having no way for companies to save money for bigger investments, demotivating the banks in giving credits with reasonable interest. Thus making the owners of gold and land etc.. de facto richer and richer.

And to be honest... if you think a little bit out of the box, then paying Gas money on Eth or the fee on bitcoin transaction or simply the constant unlimited mining like AltCoins of Doge to be the equivalent of inflation, as it is constantly devalueing the currency you have.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!