i have an old scotcoin wallet, and i was wondering how i move the coins to the counterparty wallet.
You said it has a wallet, i doubt an XCP asset has a wallet so i dont think you can move it. didnt they all have a wallet at some time? how do you get coins from their old wallet into a counterparty wallet, is what i am asking? You import the private key. Shown here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/jtd7xwoy91lurqo/Screenshot%202016-05-20%2011.38.53.png?dl=0so is that the web based electrum wallet, or is there a qt/core binary as well?
|
|
|
i have an old scotcoin wallet, and i was wondering how i move the coins to the counterparty wallet.
You said it has a wallet, i doubt an XCP asset has a wallet so i dont think you can move it. didnt they all have a wallet at some time? how do you get coins from their old wallet into a counterparty wallet, is what i am asking?
|
|
|
i have an old scotcoin wallet, and i was wondering how i move the coins to the counterparty wallet.
|
|
|
hey dev, i still have globalboost coins before it was globalboost-y. how do i convert them? just copy my wallet.dat over to this one?
|
|
|
its nice accumulating so cheap ;]
|
|
|
So I've been somewhat absent here for the past week or two. Busy busy... anyway, what actually happened here? Anyone with a summary let me know. I'm not trying to scroll through all the pages right now. From what I can tell:
1) Someone with a shit ton of hash power jumped on at a diff adjustment (rented most likely) 2) People are now angry because the distribution was skewed and someone dumped the coin to the floor
Am I missing anything here? Only thing that could have prevented one guy with a few BTC to rent power with from doing this would have been to have a steady load of high hash power mining the entire time. Obviously that did not happen and when the adjustment came it got bad.
yeah, small/new chains always face this problem, but for now, its cheaply acquired c-bits! ill probably post some c-bit tor nodes monday or tuesday
|
|
|
I would not call this news, it is the opinion of one man who offers no alternative or solution. Good or bad publicity is still publicity and his statement will only draw more interest to C-Bit. mtnminer i saw this article like a week or two ago, same site http://bitcoinist.net/c-bit-core-clone-block-size/im guessing that newer article is an editorial to say the least.. lol anywho, im gonna coordinate with the devs n see where they are with bitpay, if they need help or not.. ive forked bitpay before.. if theyre all set on it, ill work on a few other things.. pretty sure ill have no problem making anything work with c-bit.
|
|
|
as soon as im finished with what im working on now, i will contribute to c-bit development.. i just need about a week or so. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) ps: thanks for whoever dumped, i had a buy order in at a ridiculously low price, and didnt think id get so many for so cheap lol
|
|
|
Where are you mining, because my reward has evaporated too and my settings have not changed the whole time other than the pool I am mining. mtnminer Why do i feel like this "OFFICIAL BS CBIT POOL" is just taking our hash and minng BTC or wtv I mined for 2 days at 8th/s and got 12coin .... SOOO Who ever is mining this coin is wasting their time and money.
You're doing something wrong then. I'm only throwing in about 500 GH and I get around 800 every 2-4 hours. maybe you guys just have really low hash and arent finding blocks? every time i mined i got paid out properly.
|
|
|
april special:
3btc android wallets! 1btc web wallets, hosted for a year!
|
|
|
im not, but i enjoy wrecking trolls. anyone that knows me on here knows that about me ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) although, i did contact the devs about helping with some stuff. ive worked on bitpays insight before so hopefully i can lend a hand.
|
|
|
can we all just relax and get back on track? OSMIUM, thanks for all the nice graphics. send me a direct message and i will send you a few xct.
bitpay is being worked on, we'll let everyone know when it's ready. bitpay provides a block explorer, wallet, and merchant services all in one, and will be a great tool for the c-bit community.
That does sound great! Can the C-bit team provide any sneakpeaks/images or more detailed progress reports to the community? Would be a nice change of topic in the thread our github repo can always be browsed to see what we are working on https://github.com/c-bit/you have done nothing in 9 days~ who are you joking? * https://github.com/c-bit/===> Last contributed 9 days ago ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) https://github.com/c-bit?tab=repositoriesi see 4 days ago, then again i understand how to use github. relax craig elliot anderson. do the safety dance. also why'd you delete your reddit account after you realized i had your info? and msypace profile pic? doesnt matter, still saved an archive of your facebook. keep it up and im gonna start posting more information about you, like your ip, pictures, and phone number. gembitz/anderson705 https://www.facebook.com/craig.e.anderson/ip=173.51.173.53 Country Code=US, State/Province=CA, Latitude=34.1454, Longitute=-117.8514, Metro Code=803, Area Code= 626 ISP: Verizon Fios
|
|
|
btw, anderson705 and gembitz are the same person. just an fyi everyone. edit: unless they just live in the same house in southern california ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
look noob ===vvv all the 1.O diff blocks go to the attacker ! ~ pfft you guys need another hint? ![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif) 54983 2016-03-22 23:48:57 3 1885.83161148 1.0 27492000 68.8401 30.0157% 54982 2016-03-22 23:28:46 2 15500.0100089 1.0 27491500 68.8261 30.041% 54981 2016-03-22 23:08:36 3 2479.20837787 1.0 27491000 68.8121 30.0321% they arent going to an "attacker" you baffoon lol they are going to the c-bit pool that has the most hashpower ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) edit: and they are 1 diff because they are 20 minutes apart and there needs to be 6 per hour haha what an idiot edit edit: they went to the "Foxtrot" pool http://foxtrot.btc-bit.com/statslmao you are acting like there is a conspiracy here and its hilarious. ok wiseguy show us wheres the outgoing transactions from this gimmick "pool" ===> http://cryptobe.com/address/1Qk3HDZgr9fh5NR6wasdX2FTexLKnzF2j ![Kiss](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/kiss.gif) are you blind? Transactions in: 9488 Received: 4649120.39247834 XCT Transactions out: 9448 Sent: 4629520.38077819 XCT learn how to read a blockchain, then come back.
|
|
|
look noob ===vvv all the 1.O diff blocks go to the attacker ! ~ pfft you guys need another hint? ![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif) 54983 2016-03-22 23:48:57 3 1885.83161148 1.0 27492000 68.8401 30.0157% 54982 2016-03-22 23:28:46 2 15500.0100089 1.0 27491500 68.8261 30.041% 54981 2016-03-22 23:08:36 3 2479.20837787 1.0 27491000 68.8121 30.0321% they arent going to an "attacker" you baffoon lol they are going to the c-bit pool that has the most hashpower ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) edit: and they are 1 diff because they are 20 minutes apart and there needs to be 6 per hour haha what an idiot edit edit: they went to the "Foxtrot" pool http://foxtrot.btc-bit.com/statslmao you are acting like there is a conspiracy here and its hilarious.
|
|
|
what are you guys trying to figure out? it's all pretty clear. there is no mystery here.
someone went on the network with a few ph/s (they've already admitted that here in the thread, also that is alot larger than a 51% attack, its more like a 500% attack)
luckily, they were noobs and mined on low difficulty ports on the c-bit official pools, and it crashed the unomp stratum due to being overwhelmed with shares.
this caused the difficulty to drop since there was alot less hashpower after.
there's about 40th/s on the network right now. the difficulty is climbing back up/adjusting, and its over 9 million. there are 6 blocks being made per hour. a block releases at a difficulty of 1 when it takes too long and gets close to being only 5 blocks in an hour. this is standard in both bitcoin and c-bit, as well as many other coins with a bitcoin codebase.
i don't know why anyone is confused about this.
if you increased the network hashrate by 500% on the bitcoin network, the same thing would happen, but instead of it costing a few thousand dollars, it would cost hundreds of millions. (estimated, i dont feel like doing the math)
the only solution to prevent this from happening again, would be to put more steady hashpower on the network, and/or change the retarget from 2016 blocks (2 weeks) like bitcoin, to something much lower, like a few hours.
as far as what you guys should do with the millions stuck in the pool, that is up to you. personally i would burn it, by sending it to an address that doesnt exist, like 1cbitBURN212h12kjl312jk3jk or something. i certainly wouldnt reward the idiot that did this. i'd assume it was malicious. i can dig up his info and post it here in the thread if thats what the community/devs want.
if anyone needs help, feel free to contact me.
|
|
|
@gembitz So if the attack was a time stamp one and not 51% we can say that toronto held coins must be released because it was no attacker there. Another thing is,watching the block explorer we can say that the attack is not over yet as there are always 1diff blocks generated again and again and if it not will stop,diff will return to 1 one more time
the said [ 51% / timewarp ] is obvious ~ just look @ those 1.0 diff blocks ...stay tuned ![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif) actually that quote gembitz posted is from 2011 lmao the difficulty went down and then someone mined with a 1+ ph/s rig. there was no timewarp, just a 500% attack.. i looked at the source code, its identical to the newest bitcoin source code. what happened here could happen to bitcoin, if enough hashpower hit it. from what i read, farms do shut off before difficulty retarget and then turn back on when it switches if its lower. 1 difficulty blocks are to make sure that at least 6 blocks get released per hour. if there are only 5 and an hour approaches, a block with a difficulty of 1 is released. :yawn: fool look at these blocks (diff = 1.0 )===> 54950 2016-03-22 17:01:46 2 990 1.0 27475500 68.5573 30.4018% 54949 2016-03-22 16:41:34 2 990 1.0 27475000 68.5433 30.4289% 54948 2016-03-22 16:21:23 2 990.01024709 1.0 27474500 68.5293 30.4561% per : http://cryptobe.com/chain/CBit==================== what else do you call this?>>> could it be a classic timewarp type attack ...hmmm ? ![Kiss](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/kiss.gif) you must not have read what i typed/you quoted. the network makes 6 blocks per hour. if it has not done that, and it gets past ten minutes, it makes a block with a difficulty of 1. rofl, definitely not a time warp. see, after block 54948, 20 minutes had gone by, so it released a block with a difficulty of 1. then, at that block, another 20 minutes had gone by, so another block with a difficulty of 1 was released. this is to ensure that 6 blocks are released per hour. its standard per bitcoins 6 blocks per hour rule.
|
|
|
@gembitz So if the attack was a time stamp one and not 51% we can say that toronto held coins must be released because it was no attacker there. Another thing is,watching the block explorer we can say that the attack is not over yet as there are always 1diff blocks generated again and again and if it not will stop,diff will return to 1 one more time
the said [ 51% / timewarp ] is obvious ~ just look @ those 1.0 diff blocks ...stay tuned ![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif) actually that quote gembitz posted is from 2011 lmao the difficulty went down and then someone mined with a 1+ ph/s rig. there was no timewarp, just a 500% attack.. i looked at the source code, its identical to the newest bitcoin source code. what happened here could happen to bitcoin, if enough hashpower hit it. from what i read, farms do shut off before difficulty retarget and then turn back on when it switches if its lower. 1 difficulty blocks are to make sure that at least 6 blocks get released per hour. if there are only 5 and an hour approaches, a block with a difficulty of 1 is released. :yawn: If there is not enough power spread on pools,this could happen one more time? yes if someone wants to spend a couple thousand dollars, its possible. btw: c-bits blockchain looks fine now.
|
|
|
@gembitz So if the attack was a time stamp one and not 51% we can say that toronto held coins must be released because it was no attacker there. Another thing is,watching the block explorer we can say that the attack is not over yet as there are always 1diff blocks generated again and again and if it not will stop,diff will return to 1 one more time
the said [ 51% / timewarp ] is obvious ~ just look @ those 1.0 diff blocks ...stay tuned ![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif) actually that quote gembitz posted is from 2011 lmao the difficulty went down and then someone mined with a 1+ ph/s rig. there was no timewarp, just a 500% attack.. i looked at the source code, its identical to the newest bitcoin source code. what happened here could happen to bitcoin, if enough hashpower hit it. from what i read, farms do shut off before difficulty retarget and then turn back on when it switches if its lower. 1 difficulty blocks are to make sure that at least 6 blocks get released per hour. if there are only 5 and an hour approaches, a block with a difficulty of 1 is released. :yawn:
|
|
|
Option 1: Faucet... which will not attract to many people from outside of this current community. option 2: Use the 2 million to fund future projects/bounties... which will piss off some miners. option 3: Burn the fuckers. publicly burn all those coins... this option pleases my inner pyromaniac.
yes i agree. i think we should do a bit of all of those. put some in a faucet, put some in the public dev fund, burn some, and even send some to the two miners who did a 51% attack but apparently didnt realize it. Please kindly clarify how I could have done an attack with 250TH/S? i think they mean the guy who added 1+ ph/s
|
|
|
|