|
Montreal Canadiens 4 @ 3 Minnesota Wild
|
|
|
|
|
Cleveland Cavaliers 114 @ 102 Utah Jazz
|
|
|
|
apart from trolls/fud etc.. does that mean you are not working on it anymore? or are there still plans for the future?
I don't know what you mean apart from the trolls/fud. They killed any momentum this project ever had last year, and there is no recovering from that. Anyone who is pretending to be concerned about this project "now" is pretty condescending to me as far as I'm concerned. I am very much done with this project, because of the toxic culture that was dominating crypto last year. Anything associated with that year is tarnished because of them, and is unrecoverable. This is a result of people taking the word of trolls as gospel. I have no interest in basically volunteering "my" time for ungrateful and hateful people. There is nothing but vitriol here, and part of the reason we tried to move away from here in the first place. We had a forum that no one contacted us on or used. Now people are saying they "believe in the project"...? Yeah...No... As well, the way people feel entitled to talk down to "me" or any of us for that matter...No...not happening...I won't take part in that... Chris |
|
|
|
|
You all killed this project.
You are not "shareholders", and to act like you are is either disingenuous or displays an extreme lack of understanding.
After all this time, only two people have ever contacted our team beyond this thread. None of you ever wanted this project to succeed, so stop pretending.
You don't talk to grown men like this, and expect a positive response right?
As far as I'm concerned, anyone still posting in this thread is just doing it out of pure malice.
Chris
|
|
|
|
|
We are working on a rebrand to get things moving. Bitcointalk forum will not be a central hub.
Chris
|
|
|
|
time to trade some or be delisted at cex  is there any requirement for the volume of transactions to avoid de-listing? or PROZ just needs to have any trade within the next week? We just talked to C-Cex and explained the current project we are working on, and they took us off the de-listing. We are hard at work, and will hopefully be making some formal announcements soon. Chris |
|
|
|
Working on a partnership to potentially add 20,000 users to our platform. If anyone wants to contact me about the project, Chrisbates01@gmail.com. Or you could potentially try and use our website. That might help the community out. Chris |
|
|
|
|
We are still working on restructuring and trying to figure out how to properly approach the market. Very much still working.
It is looking as if getting a more focused information distribution forum whether it be through a website hub, or a podcast network concerning all things blockchain related as far as what the market is responding to. Complexity of technology is not the most important thing for us to focus on to help digital currency and blockchain tech cross the mass adoption threshold.
In addition, hosting a "forum" will be part of it, but not the main focus, as it is clear from this thread the market has no interest in going to coinproz.com for a crypto forum. Instead of trying to force it, we will instead focus on what has been working.
Chris
|
|
|
|
|
Tim Frost is quickly becoming one of the leading marketing gurus and crowdfunding strategists in Crypto. His profile within the crypto community is gaining more and more respect with every project that looks to him for help. The Providence Project is quickly gaining momentum with media coverage, and looks to potentially rival Ethereum concerning scale.
Chris
|
|
|
|
[...]
The MAIN MISSION of this project was to accelerate mass adoption of crypto currency, and that is EXACTLY what we are doing, and doing a damn good job of it.
Chris
Let me disagree on that. I believe, and that is what I wrote in my mail to you, that PROZ project is actually failing in two aspects, what multiple questions in this thread prove to some extent, namely: - simplicity - referring to both general and more detailed level: starting with the project structure and other co-related projects that may affect PROZ, but for now it was completely unclear in what way and why PROZ should benefit from them, and then through all the steps finishing at the very bottom of the structure with: (a) wallet concept, why not having a dedicated qt wallet, and how to use the other wallets instead, and what are the security risks (please check this BTT topic how much of these questions were popping up since the project start), (b) blockchain explorer, and how to perform transaction checks. - understanding of the project goals - I bet that having more simple and transparent project structure will bring more understanding to your actions across the board and will help to fight with FUDers and lack of interest we have in last two months. as for the communication channels, I think that having IRC or Slack channel would be of great benefit, too. As far as I see it, most of the users here may prefer this form of communication. Our approach was that a "desktop QT" while accepted by first adopters of bitcoin is clearly not a solution conducive to mass adoption. A desktop QT is available, however the compiling takes ten minutes, and this was not acceptable by many. Unfortunately, you are dealing with people with real lives, and while it would be great to get them to work further on projects, they need funding. It is not fair to them to ask them to do something for free when that was not what they had set out to do. We built a forum, and the issue is that while many people have their habits, it is not going to build traffic through our site if we continually drive our traffic elsewhere. Our site has been down because it is being rebuilt, as clearly the community has not responded well to it. Let me disagree on that. I believe, and that is what I wrote in my mail to you, that PROZ project is actually failing in two aspects It has been openly addressed that the community has not been following the Proz team whatsoever beyond this thread. Chris |
|
|
|
do you have any plans to provide revenue for people who invested? it seems like you are doing a lot, but how can it translate to something positive for the holders of your coin?
that is exactly my point. ICO was sold at 300 satoshi and users who bought it, myself included, are wondering whether at all we can get back somewhere close to that price, with the price currently not even sitting at 10% of the ICO price. Having good intentions and working hard is one thing, having bad information policy is the other. In the end of the day, thanks to these early investors who bought the ICO, the Dev team is able to realise their project at all, so in that sense these investors deserve a fair treat and prompt and exhaustive progress information (saying we are working hard is not sufficient). It shouldn't be a big deal to pop up in this thread, say once a week, and post some bullet points on the most recent developments, or am I asking too much? PS. there is a maintenance currently ongoing on C-Cex. Do we now more details about it, how long it will last, etc.? So, one of the big issues from the very beginning was that we wanted to create a buyback reserve so that people not invested in Prozcoin would not be able to short sell and drive down the price. There was outrage against this proposition from the beginning, and while I tried to argue from the beginning that a buyback reserve is necessary, it "seemed" at the time that the "community" was saying that was a bad idea, however in retrospect I hope people realize many that asserted a buyback reserve was a bad idea were also those FUDDING the thread. Meanwhile, we had released a planned schedule for development, which was exactly what the funds were used on. Shannon went above and beyond what was planned, to the point of working beyond budget to meet milestones. I established office hours, and gave out e-mail addresses so that we can be contacted at ANY time beyond "this thread". We established a website to host a forum about our progress, yet "investors" expect us to come here to report. That makes no sense. In fact, that means the "investors" are actively not supporting the project by not moving traffic about "Prozcoin" to the "CoinProz" site. do you have any plans to provide revenue for people who invested? it seems like you are doing a lot, but how can it translate to something positive for the holders of your coin?
First off, it is illegal to pay dividends on "tokens", and many coins that have done that are potentially in legal trouble. We have been working EXTREMELY hard to establish our team as a leader in the crypto-community, and beyond "this thread" it is working. If "the market" is not responding to our work, that is completely out of our control. As far as C-cex, it looks as if they are doing maintenance on Mastercoin, and it may take them a couple days to sync their blockchain. Ultimately, if we can start generating enough revenue, we will establish a buyback reserve. The MAIN MISSION of this project was to accelerate mass adoption of crypto currency, and that is EXACTLY what we are doing, and doing a damn good job of it. Chris |
|
|
|
|
It is unfortunate that many people have spent so much time trying to FUD instead of following up with us. We have been working with some extremely awesome projects that are removed from "coins", and there has been so much development in the scene that we have been helping with. We have been doing EXACTLY what we set out to do concerning advancing education of blockchain technology, and have had nothing but FUD accusations. As far as I'm concerned, there are many who people should be apologizing for slander. I apologize to people in the community who suffered because some immature trolls decided to try and lump us in with everyone else. In many ways, we are busier than ever.
Chris
|
|
|
|
They are working on a few POA campaigns. Spoke to them about it in the last day.
If you look back through the thread there is a Skype address. That is the best way to reach them.
But they seem are't on thread for few days. Yeah, we are completely accessible any time. My skype address is in the OP. We have been very busy working on various projects and campaigns. If ever trying to contact the developers, coming to this thread is not the most direct route given we have skype and e-mail contacts that go directly to us. Chris |
|
|
|
If this coin can't be listed on bittrex, there will be much FUD to the new coin created.
Prozcoin getting listed on Bittrex has absolutely nothing to do with Bitsies. Bitsies is a different team of people for which we are doing PR and running a campaign. Not only is that not cause for FUD, it is great news for the Coin Proz community that we are making progress and doing PR for blockchain technology related projects. Zennet Bitsies Gems All projects we are promoting currently. If you are not paying attention to anything but coin price, then you are missing about 99% of what is going on with our team. At some point, I remember when every coin needed to get on "Mintpal" or else the coin would get FUD. That did not turn out well for the coins that played into that. Chris |
|
|
|
Looks like a serious project. Best of luck!
The team is poised to make some great strides with integrating social media and blockchain technology. |
|
|
|
with current price below 20 satoshi a piece of PROZ, it may be too little to motivate people to do anything. That is why my previous statement that price of the coin should not be completely ignored by the Dev team. ps. Disclaimer: I did enter all your PoA campaigns. We are not ignoring the price of the coin. We are working on projects. Clearly there are people who are willing to sell their Prozcoin for cheap, so if you are trying to support the community, this represents an opportunity to pick up some cheap coins. Talking with a few different coins, and a few different online universities about doing campaigns for them. Stay tuned! Chris |
|
|
|
current Price per PROZ PROZ amount Price per PROZ 0.00000056 PROZ amount 101936.3687 btc 0.05708437 ^see is extra 0The idea is to give a discount for using Prozcoin. Chris |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
