Not many people are selling zrc now. I can see only big buy orders at all exchanges.
other alts is going down, zrc is stable.
This is a good signal. I think when production and buyback would start ZRC can be a much better instrument to hedge risks instad of USDT.
Maybe many investors forgot their tokens or some people accumulated at low prices. I do not think that investors have forgotten about this project, probably just like me, waiting for the project to be completed and will work, that is, the project can be fairly evaluated, then when it will make a profit. So we are waiting for a successful start of production, I hope this will be this year. Hope it will happen and if somebody forgot already, price appreciation will be nice surprise. |
|
|
|
"Think about the long-awaited Tokenomics of how the MTNT utility token will bring value to the token holders, together with lots of more functions that we have not mentioned yet." Sounds good but I think more active community is needed. And from that update can be get idea that you're in touch with some big funds? |
|
|
|
|
Keeping them for a long term, in the mean time I'm doing some adjustments in my portfolio.
|
|
|
|
|
It can affect but markets continue listing new coins, they didn't stop listing. If so the race of getting listed is getting harder but still there winners.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't trust them, am just using them for tracking ICOs sometimes. We can't know their motivations for providing service.
|
|
|
|
Does anyone know why investment is closed on both properties? is it because they were looking for a number of investor only or what?
It means required REAL was raised for both properties, better wait for the future ones. |
|
|
|
Any reason why price is going up there is any good news or it is exit pump. I browsed the social media channels but there is silence it seems this bull trap and big whales are off loading their bags.
I didn't hear much, after the latest update. With this liquidity it can be hard to load off heavy bags. |
|
|
|
To be honest I also didn't get this part "What's the difference between accepting 1 ERC20 token or 10 ERC20 tokens?"
By definition, ERC20 tokens have standardized smart contracts on the Etherium chain, meaning that once you do the behind-the-scenes programming to support 1 ERC20 token, there is minimal work on implementing support for all others. Like Waves tokens, a single Etherium wallet can hold many ERC20 tokens. It's not like their other payment gateways like Bitcoin, Zcash, DASH, Monero, etc which all have their own blockchain that you have to work with. Thanks but I meant I also didn't get why they are not adding bunch of ERC20 tokens at the same time. But obviously they have different plans and things can change after atomic swap. |
|
|
|
Dether’s official launch date is set for Wednesday, June 20. Earn money selling ETH for fiat in over 130 countries. Don’t forget to sign-up for early access, and be one of the first to register your point of sale before anyone else: https://app.dether.io Get ready for Detherization! I understand that the mainnet was not started, what are the reasons for the transfer of the launch? And what new launch date can you say? "We realize that we were much closer to getting the exchange feature in place than we originally thought. Even more than that, we want to have the biggest impact in the crypto space by launching a feature so crucial to Dether’s mission from Day 1. For this reason, we’ve decided to postpone our original launch date of June 20, and release the app as soon as the exchange feature is completed." And they didn't set any date for the launch, there is just an image that it is close  |
|
|
|
Now what happened suddenly so many people start crying this is scam project even few days ago it was looking promising. As I think this is happening because of slow progress and listing on exchange is also going on very slow but they are trying to raise awareness and in future they will find nice way.
Investors just want to see things are on the track. And I always said for this project, the value will come with partnerships. Without attracting content any development will bring success. |
|
|
|
You hav e to inform us at least if the soft cap has reached
a lot members of the forum have promoted this project for a long time, they have to know something
From July 17th in Telegram: Mihai Ivascu:admin Guys we have attracted institutional contributors in the private sale and allocated to them the full amount. That was our strategy in order to protect the project and the real contributors from a pump and dump strategy that destroys so many coins afterwards. This is why i have said that from the beginning, we are not a project that will deliver just some ‘hype’ and deliver some fast returns as we are not an investment vehicle. We are a tech project, funded by private investors in the holding company, that launched an ICO with the scope of distributing the access tokens for the platform and to fuel up the growth and user adoption. I agree that probably we should have build more ‘hype’ in an ICO style way but we are preparing some of those reviews and articles for the following weeks, but the focus was really on building the tech platform, as we are in the position to deliver 90% of the full ecosystem next month, one year and a half before scheduled We are posting tech and biz dev updates on our Medium Blog and will do a better job communicating with you over here or by mail, we’re available full time I support that vision and actually that is the true vision we need but also I prefer more transparency for who is following this project. |
|
|
|
Not many people are selling zrc now. I can see only big buy orders at all exchanges.
other alts is going down, zrc is stable.
This is a good signal. I think when production and buyback would start ZRC can be a much better instrument to hedge risks instad of USDT.
Maybe many investors forgot their tokens or some people accumulated at low prices. |
|
|
|
750 million dollars it is huge total capitalization and I think they OmiseGo not able to increase price anymore. Sure OmiseGo will grow with the whole crypto market but not vs BTC.
$750 million huge. But realistic valuation should come after the release, when people are able to stake their tokens. Then we can see different price in terms of both USD and BTC. |
|
|
|
|
#JOIN Signature Campaign
Bitcointalk username: lofegs
Forum rank: Hero Member
Posts count: 1853
ETH address: 0x0F4BCe027077Bad777f6CD2cFfe4BB62Ac268f7B
|
|
|
|
That's a pretty big endorsement, good to see that they are paying attention to the right projects. That really is. And possible Gemini listing is quite big thing too with their reputation on the whole industry. |
|
|
|
Don't get me wrong, I love Waves and now hold alot because it's a steal at this price. But I'm just saying what others are thinking, and no answers are forthcoming... I believe my posts are thoughtful and intelligent, and I genuinely hope that Waves can clean up its act. Hello. There will be a payment gateway for ERC20 tokens as a temporary decision before atomic swaps. Obviously there are difficulties with implementing a new payment gateway because Waves Platform has only the following gateways: Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, Zcach, Bitcoin Cash, Dash and Monero. That's why it's not very easy to add all Ethereum-based tokens via payment gateways.
I'll have to disagree with you there. What's the difference between accepting 1 ERC20 token or 10 ERC20 tokens? When the work is done for 1, 99% of the work is done for all. That's the whole point of ERC20 tokens. Speaking about voting, it's impossible to be included in the list of voters without taking part in voting because anyone can check the list of wallets there. There's no point in this.
You missed the whole point of my post. It's that the voting is centralized and not on the blockchain. Waves can make up votes if it wants, and have them appear on that list, to force whatever token they want to win. Hence, no point in that vote. To have a proper vote, it needs to be on the blockchain. Eg, send any minimal amount of Waves to a certain address that corresponds to your vote. That's how I've seen other votes be done in the past. Other projects using Waves tokens are looking at how Waves itself does things, and this is not the correct way to hold a vote at all. More clarifications concerning your questions about ERC20 voting will be announced in our social media such as Twitter: https://twitter.com/wavesplatform and Telegram news and announcements channel: https://t.me/wavesnewsin the near future. Kindly rely on your patience and understanding. But I mean, what's the point for the whole platform to be engaded in falsification of the voting results if someone can discover his wallet in this list? This is an unjustifiable risk for the whole project. Kind regards, Waves Community Manager To be honest I also didn't get this part "What's the difference between accepting 1 ERC20 token or 10 ERC20 tokens?" And who will be the gateway provider? Coinomat? The last thing, voting will end around at the end of the month. So smart contract should be on the mainnet. Wouldn't atomic swap more logical? |
|
|
|
Can I ask when the developers intend to make payments for the bounty of social networks?
I remember that this procedure lasts for a very long time and I can not understand what's the matter
Sale was delayed until Sept 15. Distribution is after that sale. Is there any private investor already? Or blockchain invstment funds? There was a public presale and a private presale already. Can you share the results of those fund raisings? |
|
|
|
Can I ask when the developers intend to make payments for the bounty of social networks?
I remember that this procedure lasts for a very long time and I can not understand what's the matter
Sale was delayed until Sept 15. Distribution is after that sale. Is there any private investor already? Or blockchain invstment funds? |
|
|
|
|
Iw ould love to see some partnerships with other blockchain real estate projects. Maybe things can be easier together.
|
|
|
|
Just like the team said ZrCoin project is 80% complete. Small delays are due primarily to the fact that we had to make amendments to the project with regard to increase in production line output, difficulties with construction companies and the specifics of the region where we are building the plant. So with these, future of Zrcoin is bright for token holders and investors.
Those difficulties were already known, at least should've been. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
