Bitcoin Forum
May 27, 2024, 04:26:32 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 »
121  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: up to 800GH/s on: March 15, 2014, 11:22:53 PM
If BTC went to a million, your assumptions would lead to the absurd conclusion that HashFast owes gmaxwell $98,000,000.
Only the self-interested intentional delusions of the greedy, windfall-seeking plaintiffs would make such a ridiculous case.

Good thing HF held on to gmaxwell's BTC payment then (as should be expected considering the ToS/order confirmation). Talking about windfalls...

The specific coins I paid you ended up at https://blockchain.info/address/1KFrqkEGy6Yq7X4SYCbYoj8HEwfbWVUDJ9 which is not under Bitpay's control.
122  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: up to 800GH/s on: March 15, 2014, 11:04:20 PM
That's a textbook case of buyer's scammers remorse.  I know how it feels bro.  

If HashFast had enough resources to build your machine without your money, we would have simply kept the machines for ourselves and not taken the unnecessary (and risky) step of involving customers investors.

FTFY
123  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: March 15, 2014, 07:10:52 PM
HashFast's behavior has been completely unacceptable by any measure. The fact that they seem to be getting away with it irks me to no end.

The bottom line is that money is power.
A pre-order is you giving that power to a counterparty based on trust, promises and a sales contract.
The counterparty can decide to default on their contract/promises and proceed to use that power against you.
HF has been doing exactly that by hiring Strategic Counsel Corp. and Zuber Lawler & Del Duca.

124  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: up to 800GH/s [Non Self Moderated] on: March 14, 2014, 07:27:44 AM
Quote
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

Quote
Quote
Quote from: HashFast_CL on Today at 01:41:44 PM
Sorry to all those feverently wishing for Santa HashFast to bring them a pony named Windfall.   Cry


You really are a piece of work.

* If HF would have delivered on time the machines would have produced roughly the amount of bitcoins they were sold for in the first place. This is why you have batch 1 customers.

* To guard against delays and difficulty rises there was the MPP. However HF has not delivered on this promise. Even if they do at some point in the future it is now a case of too little to late.

* As a last resort there was the promise to refund the original payment. Made here on the forum, in support emails, in person and in the ToS+order confirmation. HF has defaulted on all their earlier promises and shifted the risks and losses to their customers.

To even suggest that customers asking for a refund of the original payment in BTC are opportunists looking for a windfall is an insult.
125  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: up to 800GH/s on: March 14, 2014, 12:59:23 AM
To even suggest that customers asking for a refund of the original payment in BTC are opportunists looking for a windfall is an insult.

Are you going to reply to that consumer compilant?
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #HmO9DQ79J9kvCP5q

No I won't because it won't go anywhere. The complaint triggered a letter to HF to see if the complaint could be resolved between the company (HF) and consumer (me). Because HF went the legal route that option is now off the table. The Department of Justice in the State of California is prohibited by law from representing individual citizen's legal interests in civil matters.

They will retain my customer complaint and the response on behalf of HF by Zuber Lawler & Del Duca in case legal action is taken against HF by their office in the future. In that case the complaint can be used as evidentiary material and provide vital documentation for use on behalf of California consumer's interests. (at least according to the cover letter)
126  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Ixcoin TODO on: March 11, 2014, 06:47:53 AM
Both http://www.ixcoin.co/ and http://www.ixcoin.eu/ look pretty good.

Seems you guys invested a lot of time in rebranding (logo, site) and rebasing (0.8.6.0). Who knows.. maybe IXC will still go places? I'm cautiously optimistic.

I bought a couple of K just in case. Only thing I'm worried about is having all IXC in circulation before fees are ready to take over. If merge mining by the Bitcoin miners stops, IXC hashrate (and network security) will crash. Are there any safeguards in place to prevent this from happening?

Also the fact that most of the monetary base is brought into circulation in just a few years while it has not been widely adopted will cause an huge imbalance in ownership, which can not be healthy for the IXC ecosystem.

127  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: up to 800GH/s on: March 11, 2014, 01:35:43 AM
HashFast's new world record holding 750+ GH/s ASIC.

This isn't the ASIC Olympics.
128  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: up to 800GH/s on: March 10, 2014, 11:04:12 PM
As of right now, all the Cointerra has done is make 1.3TH/s boxes into 1.6TH/s boxes with new firmware

Yes, it is unbelievable that HashFast beat Cointerra to demonstrating a 2TH/s miner, especially since Cointerra advertised "500GH/s" chips and was supposedly the ASIC Dream Team.

Even more unvelievable is that HashFast's Sierra EVO only uses 3 chips to get 2TH/s, while Cointerra's uses 4 and only gets ~1.6 (if you're lucky).

What a treat to unveil our 2TH/s beast in Austin, right in Cointerra's back yard!   Cool

OTOH, Cointerra's chip is still being misrepresented as "500GH/s" when it actually only gets about 400GH/s.  Even after a two month delay, they couldn't get their machines to run at the promised 2TH/s. The only company in the world selling mining equipment that really hashes at 2TH/s is HashFast (hence our name).

True or False: CoinTerra's first ASIC's Hash-Rate is greater than 500 GH/s?

This is the Custom Hardware subforum.  We are supposed to discuss things like

-HashFast ASIC specs (original 400GH/s goal met, now up to 800GH/s)
-Cointerra ASIC specs (much less than original 500GH/s target)

In other news, Cointerra *did not* demonstrate a working 2.1TH/s miner in Austin at last week's Bitcoin Conference, or anywhere else.  Ever.  

I'm confused. Is this the Cointerra thread? Why does HF_CL keep talking about Cointerra, Cointerra, Cointerra?

I bought a HF product. Please ship it.
129  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast BabyJet users thread on: March 08, 2014, 08:45:17 PM
Any status on MPP that are now over a month late?

Quote
However, as some customers were starting to try to point out, this wasn't going to be the case; every evidence (or lack thereof) was pointing towards the worst: the first miners would have been shipped just before the end of December contractual deadline, and the MPP was a bad marketing joke, given the lack of a shipping timeframe.

http://hashfast.org/

Nice job on the wiki cedivad!

And yes, I think the plan for MPP is to wait until the new EVO PCB is done. If they can sell and market it as 800 GH/s they will only have to ship 2 boards instead of 4 based on the older PCB which will be a lot cheaper for HF. Of course it means more delays. And since there is no deadline they are likely to prioritize all existing and new orders over MPP.
130  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: up to 800GH/s on: March 08, 2014, 07:12:49 AM
Care to explain the Customer Liasion part of your name HashFast_CL?

Customer: People who buy your products (e.g. us)

Liasion: Liaison means communication between two or more groups, or co-operation or working together.

But by all means carry on.
131  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast BabyJet users thread on: March 08, 2014, 07:03:38 AM
New version of cgminer - 4.1.0 - with dramatic stability and performance improvements for these devices, along with new features. This version will work with all older firmwares as well:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=28402.msg5581480#msg5581480

The cause of the regression in performance was found and this should outperform any previous cgminer releases.

Thank you!
132  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: March 08, 2014, 06:59:41 AM
Update: My post just got deleted by HF on the other thread so reposting here.

I’d like to address some of that statements HF made in the response to my customer complaint @ http://hashfast.org/HashFast_consumer_complaint_response.pdf



Code:
Complainant pre-ordered his Baby Jet unit in order to secure his status as a “Batch 1” customer, 
meaning he would receive a unit from HashFast’s first batch of production.
All HashFast Batch 1 customers were offered a final shipment deadline of December 31, 2013.

I did pre-order a Batch 1 BJ stated as ‘in-stock’ and ‘Shipping Oct 20-30’ on the HashFast order site. The December 31st deadline was not part of the Terms of Sale I agreed to at the time of the sale. Nor did it appear on my BitPay and HashFast order receipts. The final shipment deadline was added after the fact. It was added to the 'order confirmation' that I receive a week after I completed the transaction.

Aug 9 ToS:
http://pastebin.com/EfS9vmRf

References:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=299193.msg3209063#msg3209063
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=270384.msg2949502#msg2949502
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=262052.msg3405970#msg3405970



Code:
Complainant alleges that the only option HashFast gave it’s customers to pay for its products was in Bitcoin. 
In reality, besides Bitcoin, HashFast accepted (and still accepts) most traditional methods of payment such as checks and wire-transfers,
and Complainant was free to pay for his equipment by these means if he so chose.
It was not until online purchasers made it all the way to the “checkout” page that they were
offered the additional option of paying in Bitcoin, in addition to payment in USD.
HashFast accepted payment in Bitcoin as a convenience to its customers.

At the time of my order (Aug 9), payment in Bitcoin via BitPay was the only payment option available to me on the website. It was only after the widget broke that HashFast accepted alternative methods of payment.

- Shipments begin: October 20th-30th, in order of purchase
 - Payments to be made in BTC with the help of BitPay

Orders are taken in BTC, in the unlikely event we get to refunds they will be given in BTC.

Quote
Quote
Please add CC payments
no, they want only those committed to leaving their BTC with HashFast until the end of the year.  if they fail to deliver, they have said they will give full refunds in BTC.

Reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=270363.msg2894478#msg2894478



Code:
HashFast never made any promises to Complainant that the Bitcoin he used to purchase equipment would be refunded 1:1, 
nor do the ToS state that a 1:1 Bitcoin refund would be given. In fact, the absence of any such promise is not coincidental
as the price of Bitcoin has been volatile since its creation in 2009, subject to sharp appreciations and precipitous depreciations in value.
As such, Bitcoin is a fluctuating virtual currency. It is not a standardized unit of value.

Apart from the promises made as such by Simon Barber, Cypherdoc (paid sponsor and member of the board) and Cara?

Quote
if you buy Baby Jet for 51 BitCoins today and it does not ship, you will be refunded the 51 BitCoins you paid.
-Cara

In fact, John Skrodenis from HashFast did make that promise to me in person during my visit to the HF office in SF on October 30.

Quote
Another topic was the possibility of refunds and John was pretty specific that if refunds do happen they will be full refunds in the currency the order was paid in (BTC in BTC, USD in USD). Please note that I have not requested a refund and have no plans to do so at this point.

Note that I sent notification of my post to HashFast by email directly asking for corrections if I made any mistakes or misinterpreted anything. HF responded that it looked fine over email and also quoted the post on this forum.

Reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=262052.msg3452898#msg3452898



Code:
Complainant suggests that HashFast said it would offer him a full 1:1 refund in Bitcoin. 
In reality, HashFast’s order confirmations state that “If Buyer ordered one or more Baby Jet units,
and HashFast does not deliver such units by that date, then Buyer may at his or her discretion,
cancel the undelivered portion and HashFast will issue a full refund the payment for the units that Buyer purchased but did not receive and cancelled.”
Nowhere in the order confirmation, or the applicible ToS, does HashFast offer a 1:1 Bitcoin refund,
Rather, HashFast offered a full refund of “the payment for the units.”

The ToS/order confirmation states:

Quote
HashFast will issue a full refund the payment for the units that Buyer purchased but did not receive and cancelled.

But it also states (at least in my order confirmation):

Quote
HashFast Technologies has received your order and payment in BTC for 1 Baby Jets, shipping via Next Day Air Saver (UPS). Total BTC 59.7987

So the payment is clearly BTC based. Unless otherwise specified a full refund should mean a 1:1 return of the original payment.



Code:
Complainant lodged the instant complaint when the value of Bitcoin grew 800% above what he originally paid. 
The price of Bitcoin now trades at over 500% of what it did when Complainant placed his order.
No doubt, Complainant would eagerly have accepted a USD refund and cried foul to a refund in Bitcoin if the price
of Bitcoin has dropped to 20% from the date of his purchase.

This is an unwarranted and untrue accusation of my character. In fact I have always been clear from the start that I expected refunds to be made in BTC and well before the value started to appreciate. For example on Aug 09 I wrote the following:

Quote
The Oct-Dec timeframe is when these miners will earn back the vast majority of the investment cost. If anything the Oct 20-30 shipping date is what justifies the high cost of this unit. Take that away and you might end up with an expensive heating element. I don't like it either but that is the reality of an exponentially increasing difficulty. One day it is pure gold, the next a lump of coal. When it comes to refunds - I expect those to be done in BTC not USD. You take orders in BTC, you refund orders in BTC.

And on Aug 11:
For every day HashFast misses their target shipping date, a partial automatic refund should be made based on what a 400 GH/s unit would have mined at the difficulty at that date.This would continue until either the refund is complete or the unit is delivered.

And on Aug 17:
Quote
I expect refunds to made in accordance to the Bitpay receipt of payment.

References:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=270363.msg2901489#msg2901489
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=270384.msg2907958#msg2907958
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=270384.msg2949898#msg2949898

In addition, I filed a refund request within 10 days after HF defaulting on their advertised shipment date of October 30.
My refund request was ignored by HF and closed without response (see: https://i.imgur.com/qPrxhmE.png).
To say I was motivated by the USD value at the time of the complaint is baseless. If any party was motivated by the USD value it was HF as is apparent from their actions that are contrary to their earlier statements and terms.

I have already given up and accepted my losses. I'm making this post simply to set the record straight. I wish those that are taking legal action against HF all the best.
133  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: March 08, 2014, 12:40:44 AM
Welcome to the club raskul! Smiley

In other news - I just received a response from HF after filing a consumer complaint with the State of California Department of Justice a couple of months ago:

Quote
"This letter is to inform you that the Attorney General's Office has received a reply from the company you contacted us about which indicates that there is a difference of opinion on the issue you raised in your complaint."

https://www.dropbox.com/s/h7abwnv4og1xn3e/HF_consumer_complaint_response.pdf

Basically HashFast's response is that I am the bad guy.
...

Thank you for linking the material. Not surprisingly HashFast is playing the bitcoin volatility card. Every informed miner knows that this is a strawman as bitcoin price is irrelevant (under current conditions) to bitcoin mining. If you plan further action, you need to expose that strawman in writing.

Thanks Jutarul,

Currently I'm not planning further action. However, I would like to assist those that do on this board.

I did write down some of my thoughts regarding HF response to the complaint here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=493435.msg5577876#msg5577876
134  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: March 07, 2014, 07:57:41 AM
Welcome to the club raskul! Smiley

In other news - I just received a response from HF after filing a consumer complaint with the State of California Department of Justice a couple of months ago:

Quote
"This letter is to inform you that the Attorney General's Office has received a reply from the company you contacted us about which indicates that there is a difference of opinion on the issue you raised in your complaint."

https://www.dropbox.com/s/h7abwnv4og1xn3e/HF_consumer_complaint_response.pdf

Basically HashFast's response is that I am the bad guy.

Quote
"Complainant lodged the instant complaint when the value of Bitcoin grew 800% above what he originally paid. The price of Bitcoin now trades at 500% of what it did when complainant placed his order. At the time of making his claims to you, such a maneuver would have provided Complainant with an approximate 800% windfall based on the price of Bitcoin when he made his purchase. No doubt, Complainant would eagerly have accepted a USD refund and cried foul to a refund in Bitcoin if the price of Bitcoin had dropped to 20% from the date of his purchase."

At this point I have already accepted my losses and accepted the BJ, so I am not going to fight it. That said I am very angry at the untrue statements HF is making in this letter as fact. I am too tired now, but hopefully tomorrow I'll find some time to go through the individual statements and refute them based information in the public record (earlier threads and saved documents).

Bitcoin is a wonderful thing. It is something we need to nurture, protect and grow together. It is bigger then just you and me. It is something we owe future generations. Let's not screw this up. Maybe I am an idealist, a dreamer or just a fool to be taken advantage of but it really pains me to see so many scammers and opportunists in this space.

This is why we can't have nice things.
135  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: March 07, 2014, 12:04:45 AM
FYI: Chris from HF responded to my support ticket from early Feb regarding MPP today:

Quote
In regards to MPP - other than knowing that for Batch 1 it will be the full 1.6TH, I am unable to release any more information of this for you. I do hope to get something out shortly as this is a very hot topic in the forums.

So.. 'shortly'

Not sure what that means, but probably 'soon-ish' Wink
136  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: up to 800GH/s on: March 06, 2014, 11:59:06 PM
HashFast won the race to be the first ASIC company to get 2TH out of a single 4U box! 
Another company promised "500GH/s" chips and "2TH/s" machines, but they were delivered 2 months late and 20% (400GH) under spec.  Of course it would be inaccurate and churlish to call them a scam for simply being late, but delivering under spec another matter.

*Ignores customers, continues pissing match with competitors*

137  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: up to 800GH/s on: March 06, 2014, 06:18:39 PM
What matters is shipping time, $ per GH/s and W per GH/w. In that order!

^ This. If you don't get this right, you don't have a business.

We are not here to talk. We are here to mine. The fact that I'm posting here means we have unfinished business.
138  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: March 06, 2014, 12:03:36 AM
And if they 100% refund you and nobody else, which is probably a move they might consider, what's happening, next?

That would provide an incentive for others to become core developers as well. Everybody wins Smiley
139  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: March 04, 2014, 11:23:09 PM
Apparently Gmaxwell is a bitcoin core programmer?

Hmm, now he can officially say that HashFast has screwed the heart and soul of Bitcoin. (as one of their customers!)

HashFast sent gmaxwell a refund check in early January; it was returned.

gmaxwell, if you want another refund check, please let me know.

How about you just send gmaxwell his original payment back (whatever currency it was in) and stop playing games.
140  Economy / Speculation / Re: Why is the price rising so fast today. on: March 03, 2014, 08:03:08 PM
Fortress
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!