No gains with p0 state on 960, 970 and 980. Only ETH gains some % with memory oc. Anyway I managed to put all the cards to p0 state also in windows. It is the same "trick" as in linux using nvidia-smi tool. I'm not responsible if You kill Your GPU. The risk is Yours.The procedure is: 1) open cmd.exe with the admin privileges 2) cd C:\Program Files\NVIDIA Corporation\NVSMI 3) nvidia-smi -q -d SUPPORTED_CLOCKS -i 0 4) nvidia-smi -ac 3505,1455 -i 0 -i 0 means display adapter 0. -i 4 would mean display adapter 4. Step 3 is used to show the possible clock settings combination for each power state. The numbers will change if You overclock Your gpu before running step 3. The result after typing step 3 would be looking like that: C:\Windows\system32>cd C:\Program Files\NVIDIA Corporation\NVSMI
C:\Program Files\NVIDIA Corporation\NVSMI>nvidia-smi -q -d SUPPORTED_CLOCKS -i 0
==============NVSMI LOG==============
Timestamp : Sat Jan 02 19:09:48 2016
Driver Version : 359.06
Attached GPUs : 5
GPU 0000:01:00.0
Supported Clocks
Memory : 3505 MHz
Graphics : 1635 MHz
Graphics : 1623 MHz
Graphics : 1610 MHz
Graphics : 1598 MHz
Graphics : 1585 MHz
Graphics : 1572 MHz
Graphics : 1560 MHz
Graphics : 1547 MHz
Graphics : 1534 MHz
Graphics : 1522 MHz
Graphics : 1509 MHz
Graphics : 1496 MHz
Graphics : 1484 MHz
Graphics : 1471 MHz
Graphics : 1458 MHz
Graphics : 1446 MHz
Graphics : 1433 MHz
Graphics : 1420 MHz
Graphics : 1408 MHz
Graphics : 1395 MHz It always starts with the clocks of the p0 state. In my example it shows memory 3505 after that You can find listed all the possible graphics settings. You must chose one and type it exactly the same number in the step 4. Example: nvidia-smi -ac 3505,1446 -i 0 The nvidia inspector shows Your card in p0 and You can overclock also the memory with msi afterburner or any other oc tool. If You type nvidia-smi -ac 3505,1440 -i 0 it won't be accepted because 1440 is not in a list of matching Mhz for memory clock 3505. I'm not responsible if You kill Your GPU. The risk is Yours. |
|
|
|
lol please tell me you donated cause he has not even given you his newest version.... lemme guess he asked for another donation?
LOL I have donated because I have made some BTC in an unexpected P&D... Nobody asked me about anything I just felt it that way. I have this version since 2. july 2015 and I have made enought to donate. 0.1 BTC was around 25$ at that time and my gain was like adding an 750ti which was priced around 120EUR. I really don't care about the text in the miner. Anyway I will not partecipate in Your dev wars. And btw check the definition of donation. My BTC and my decision. Simple as that. |
|
|
|
The private spreadcoinminer is around 15-25% faster than the opensource. Compute 5.2 Cards get the most increase in the hashrate.
Everybody who donate more than 0.1 BTC will get it.
Using %20 more power..............bringing us back to a %5 increase........ My rig uses 3% more power and hashes 15% faster with optimized miner. Those are my numbers with public miner, wattmeter showing ~850W at the wall: *** Spreadminer 0.1 - a SpreadX11 miner for nVidia GPUs ***
based on ccminer 1.2 Copyright 2014 Christian Buchner, Christian H.
based on pooler-cpuminer 2.3.2 (c) 2010 Jeff Garzik, 2012 pooler
SpreadX11 additions by tsiv
[2015-12-26 16:31:33] 5 miner threads started, using 'spreadx11' algorithm.
[2015-12-26 16:31:34] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 778.99 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:31:34] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 730.37 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:31:34] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 737.35 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:31:34] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 747.34 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:31:35] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 684.86 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:31:35] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 5197 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:31:35] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 4218 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:31:35] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 4068 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:31:35] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 4104 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:31:36] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 2712 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:31:40] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 5212 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:31:40] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 4292 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:31:40] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 4079 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:31:41] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 4116 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:31:41] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 2695 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:31:45] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 5246 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:31:45] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 4309 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:31:45] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 4102 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:31:46] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 4144 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:31:46] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 2711 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:31:50] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 5228 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:31:50] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 4293 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:31:51] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 4089 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:31:51] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 4130 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:31:51] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 2700 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:31:55] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 5232 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:31:55] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 4298 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:31:56] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 4097 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:31:56] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 4131 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:31:56] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 2707 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:00] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 5240 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:00] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 4307 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:01] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 4101 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:01] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 4136 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:01] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 2707 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:05] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 5243 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:06] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 4303 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:06] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 4091 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:06] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 4135 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:06] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 2706 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:10] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 5239 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:11] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 4308 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:11] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 4107 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:11] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 4144 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:11] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 2706 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:15] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 5255 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:16] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 4312 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:16] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 4104 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:16] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 4156 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:16] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 2706 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:21] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 5221 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:21] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 4289 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:21] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 4126 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:21] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 4087 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:21] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 2702 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:26] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 5237 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:26] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 4308 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:26] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 4114 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:26] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 4148 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:26] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 2710 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:31] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 5255 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:31] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 4315 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:31] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 4120 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:31] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 4146 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:32] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 2709 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:36] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 5237 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:36] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 4297 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:36] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 4130 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:37] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 4092 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:37] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 2702 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:41] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 5228 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:41] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 4279 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:42] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 4138 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:42] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 2696 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:42] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 4083 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:46] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 5234 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:46] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 4289 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:47] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 4128 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:47] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 4083 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:47] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 2695 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:51] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 5220 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:51] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 4292 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:52] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 4094 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:52] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 4139 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:52] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 2693 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:56] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 5234 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:56] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 4299 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:57] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 4126 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:57] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 4084 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:32:57] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 2693 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:33:01] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 5224 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:33:01] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 4287 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:33:02] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 4097 khash/s Same hardware with sp's spreadminer shows ~885W at the wall and hashing: *** Spreadminer 8 - a SpreadX11 miner for nVidia GPUs ***
based on ccminer 1.2 Copyright 2014 Christian Buchner, Christian H.
based on pooler-cpuminer 2.3.2 (c) 2010 Jeff Garzik, 2012 pooler
SpreadX11 additions by tsiv
Optimized by SP
[2015-12-26 16:27:14] 5 miner threads started, using 'spreadx11' algorithm.
[2015-12-26 16:27:14] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 1292 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:15] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 1696 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:15] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 1104 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:15] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 1718 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:15] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 1737 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:16] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 5834 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:16] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 5044 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:17] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 4858 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:17] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 4821 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:17] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 2941 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:21] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 5852 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:21] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 5056 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:22] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 4831 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:22] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 4825 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:22] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 2943 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:26] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 5845 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:26] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 5056 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:27] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 4829 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:27] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 4819 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:27] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 2940 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:31] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 5847 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:31] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 5058 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:32] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 4831 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:32] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 4822 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:33] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 2926 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:36] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 5848 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:37] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 5060 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:37] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 4822 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:37] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 4821 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:38] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 2913 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:41] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 5849 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:42] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 5061 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:42] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 4824 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:42] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 4817 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:43] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 2918 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:46] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 5852 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:47] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 5059 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:47] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 4836 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:47] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 4824 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:48] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 2911 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:51] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 5849 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:52] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 5011 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:52] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 4778 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:53] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 4728 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:53] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 2915 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:56] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 5842 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:57] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 5060 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:58] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 4823 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:58] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 4823 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:27:58] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 2912 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:01] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 5849 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:02] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 5065 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:03] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 4826 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:03] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 4822 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:03] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 2908 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:06] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 5841 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:07] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 5058 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:08] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 4824 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:08] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 4824 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:08] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 2913 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:11] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 5847 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:12] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 5060 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:13] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 4835 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:13] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 4828 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:13] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 2912 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:16] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 5849 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:17] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 5063 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:18] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 4818 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:18] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 4822 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:18] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 2907 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:21] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 5848 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:22] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 5060 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:23] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 4821 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:23] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 4825 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:23] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 2909 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:26] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 5844 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:27] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 5061 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:28] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 4817 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:28] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 4821 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:28] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 2909 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:31] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 5847 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:32] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 5059 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:34] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 2906 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:34] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 4816 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:34] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 4824 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:36] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 5848 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:37] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 5054 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:39] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 2910 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:39] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 4819 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:39] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 4819 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:41] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 5849 khash/s
[2015-12-26 16:28:42] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 5064 khash/s So You can do Your own calculations... |
|
|
|
Spreadcoin is up 125% today. My donation spreadminer is very profitable.
That's why You more than deserve another donation from me: TxId: a47d16401ea9d7e8b89c79a58f8a94a18cff6398a40f0d7c21153dae0f599f68 Merry Xmas  |
|
|
|
New Spreadcoin Block ExplorerI'm pleased to announce that spreadx.eu is now live. I'll be adding network statistics and service node status checking in due course. Many thanks to Chaositec for doing the grown up bits! I have a small observation about the new block explorer(which is great). It shows the UTC/GMT time and not the local time. Maybe it is supposed to be like that but personally I prefer it showing my local time like cryptoid explorer does. Keep up with the good work guys |
|
|
|
|
I have finally received my BTC back so they are not stolen anymore.
Sorry for bothering You guys in this thread.
|
|
|
|
What happened with your withdrawal? Why was it rejected, have you received any reason for this? I wanted to exchange some BTC to PM USD. I have followed all the steps and the indications. It was written max amount possible in BTC matching exactly the sum I have sent. They have received my sum(quickly as it should be) and the status changed to not enough funds.My next step was contacting the support and they said I'll have to wait. I didn't want to wait and we agreed for the refund. They changed the status to rejected at that point. I have received a mail saying: You were refunded. -- 11th decemberI have sent 2 more mails saying I was still not refunded. The last mail from coinomat was: Hello!
Please, sorry for delay.
It's connected with some technical problems, which will be solved during the day. ---13th december. I didn't send them another mail since today and still waiting the response. I have accused them in this thread and on official FB page for now. I will stop doing it if they give me back my BTC or PM USD as I wanted till the beginning. That's it.  |
|
|
|
|
BTW I would prefer by far having back my BTC than posting all around.
I have also posted on FB coinomat page with my real account so I'm serious.
|
|
|
|
|
Please avoid coinomat service. They have stolen my 0.29768214 BTC from 2015-12-09 20:26:35.
|
|
|
|
Before that crash happens, sucking all out of it. 83MH@600W.
Yes, pretty good to mine right now. Just remember to mine directly to the autochance btc exchangeadresses. It's enought just to avoid cryptsy... I have over 0,5BTC pending withdrawals  |
|
|
|
Contemplating selling my (9) 750ti's, (3) 970's, and (1) 960 because I can't find anything worth mining anymore. Is there some hidden gem I don't know about?
Only ETH in linux. Just tested my rig with my old usb linux installation and it seems OK. Also the 750ti should be somewhere where it was. Getting 110MH with 980 +3x970 +960 +750ti. Power at the wall shows exactly 900W. In windows I got 96MH without 750ti. But there is also a memory OC of all the cards 750ti=6300Mhz, 960=7500Mhz, others to 7700Mhz. I somehow succedeed to put the cards into the higher power state and OC also the memory. I couldn't find a way in windows for that. Hi dominuspro I think you are wrong about 750Ti. I also tested this card a week ago, and can prove that TLB is definitely an issue. Yep, in benchmark mode i got 18 mh\s from 2 750Ti cards. but during benchmark DAG file is aroung 1G only, but if you will try real mining it will be more that 1G, as a result i got only 5mh\s from 2 cards on real pool. But 980/970/960 still can mine well. If you want to recheck my test - just remove all your hi-end cards and leave 750 Ti only in your rig for test. P.S. let me know if you will have different result. P.S.S that's on linux of course. You are right. I cannot enable only 750ti with cuda-devices param, but I can disable the 750ti and I loose 7MH. So 750ti is hashing around 7MH. On the same clocks(1426/6300) it used to be over 11MH some months ago. 960 with 2GB is not loosing that much. It is still around 11MH. The 980+3x970 combo increased hashrate with mem oc from 86MH(Windows) to 92MH(Linux). The power limit is still on the factory settings on all gpus. A screenshot if someone finds it somehow usefull:  |
|
|
|
Contemplating selling my (9) 750ti's, (3) 970's, and (1) 960 because I can't find anything worth mining anymore. Is there some hidden gem I don't know about?
Only ETH in linux. Just tested my rig with my old usb linux installation and it seems OK. Also the 750ti should be somewhere where it was. Getting 110MH with 980 +3x970 +960 +750ti. Power at the wall shows exactly 900W. In windows I got 96MH without 750ti. But there is also a memory OC of all the cards 750ti=6300Mhz, 960=7500Mhz, others to 7700Mhz. I somehow succedeed to put the cards into the higher power state and OC also the memory. I couldn't find a way in windows for that. |
|
|
|
BTW what should be the --diff for FTC solo mining? Default settings in r.74 gets accepted 4/10 blocks.
Depends on the pool. If there are rejects (low diff shares) then decrease the diff multiplier below 1.0 and if a pool shows low hashrates without rejects then increasing -f is a good place to start. Asking about solo mining... diff 2 seems even worst: [2015-12-10 22:40:47] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 676
[2015-12-10 22:40:47] accepted: 0/3 (0.00%), 2496 kH/s nooooo
[2015-12-10 22:41:11] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 606
[2015-12-10 22:41:12] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 606
[2015-12-10 22:41:12] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 636
[2015-12-10 22:41:16] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 686
[2015-12-10 22:41:17] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 605
[2015-12-10 22:41:17] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 633
[2015-12-10 22:41:17] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 604
[2015-12-10 22:41:47] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 604
[2015-12-10 22:41:47] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 633
[2015-12-10 22:41:47] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 604
[2015-12-10 22:42:05] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 684
[2015-12-10 22:42:16] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 605
[2015-12-10 22:42:17] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 633
[2015-12-10 22:42:17] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 604
[2015-12-10 22:42:17] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 684
[2015-12-10 22:42:46] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 634
[2015-12-10 22:42:47] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 604
[2015-12-10 22:42:47] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 684
[2015-12-10 22:43:08] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 603
[2015-12-10 22:43:08] accepted: 0/4 (0.00%), 2508 kH/s nooooo Now trying diff 0.5 And runing ccminer.exe -a neoscrypt -o IP:port -u x -p y --broken-neo-wallet -d 0,2,3,4 --diff 0.5The diff parameter doesn't matter for solomining at all (sorry, missed that you said solo). Using wallet 0.8.7.1 I have no issues solomining (found a block while writing this). Also, you shouldn't be able to find shares (reject or not) anywhere near that frequently with that hashrate. In fact, a 5 card 970 rig (ignoring the 980 for simplicity) have an average block finding frequency of 36 minutes with the current difficulty. It's like you're mining to another wallet that's not FTC. Or your wallet have sync issues. Are You using release 74? I'm using the same wallet but I get more non accepted shares then good ones. Overnight I got accepted 4/27. Not sure about the diff. It looks worst if I use it with factors 0.5 and 2. I'll do another, longer run without it... |
|
|
|
BTW what should be the --diff for FTC solo mining? Default settings in r.74 gets accepted 4/10 blocks.
Depends on the pool. If there are rejects (low diff shares) then decrease the diff multiplier below 1.0 and if a pool shows low hashrates without rejects then increasing -f is a good place to start. Asking about solo mining... diff 2 seems even worst: [2015-12-10 22:40:47] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 676
[2015-12-10 22:40:47] accepted: 0/3 (0.00%), 2496 kH/s nooooo
[2015-12-10 22:41:11] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 606
[2015-12-10 22:41:12] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 606
[2015-12-10 22:41:12] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 636
[2015-12-10 22:41:16] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 686
[2015-12-10 22:41:17] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 605
[2015-12-10 22:41:17] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 633
[2015-12-10 22:41:17] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 604
[2015-12-10 22:41:47] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 604
[2015-12-10 22:41:47] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 633
[2015-12-10 22:41:47] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 604
[2015-12-10 22:42:05] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 684
[2015-12-10 22:42:16] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 605
[2015-12-10 22:42:17] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 633
[2015-12-10 22:42:17] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 604
[2015-12-10 22:42:17] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 684
[2015-12-10 22:42:46] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 634
[2015-12-10 22:42:47] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 604
[2015-12-10 22:42:47] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 684
[2015-12-10 22:43:08] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 603
[2015-12-10 22:43:08] accepted: 0/4 (0.00%), 2508 kH/s nooooo Now trying diff 0.5 And runing ccminer.exe -a neoscrypt -o IP:port -u x -p y --broken-neo-wallet -d 0,2,3,4 --diff 0.5 |
|
|
|
I was mining ETH earlier with 750Ti:s on linux and the cards hashed at around 7-8Mhs back then.
Maybe You forgot to OC  Memory should be overclocked too for ETH(especially 750ti). I was hashing at 21+MH with 2x750ti. I should do some tests again... Never tried other maxwells in linux. Maybe I'll find some time around wednesday... BTW what should be the --diff for FTC solo mining? Default settings in r.74 gets accepted 4/10 blocks. |
|
|
|
Seems some more Hashes for each gpu. But non profitable nowadays  Seems like Etherum is the only profitable algo at the moment on the NVIDIA unreleased gpu's I'm not sure about that. Anybody know how much a 750 Ti is expected to earn a day (before electricity)? The 750ti is not good in mining etherum. You need a compute 5.2 or bether. Period ETH USD Minute 0.000342 $0.00 Hour 0.020540 $0.02 Day 0.492959 $0.39 Week 3.450715 $2.73 Month 14.788778 $11.71 Notes Thanks. How about 970s? Check by yourself I allways got a correct calculation. 750ti was doing 8-11MH some time ago in linux. Don't know if it degraded allready... 970 should be around 20MH. |
|
|
|
like i was mentioning many times earlier - cuda 7.5 was working and compiling fine on my fedora 22 x64 systems ... and were on par - if not better ( by a little bit ) than cuda 6.5 ... now that you are tuning the kernels to this compile - this should be a nice update in hashrate - though the rates that a lot of people are getting here are in no way related to what im getting on stock clocks ... ill test today if there is any chance to ... tanx for new update sp ... #crysx I have just tuned a few kernals in quark and x11 (qubit). Lyra2v2, neoscrypt, x13,x14,x15,x17 etc. will be done later. Optimizing for compute 5.0 is hurting 5.2 performance. I should split the kernals and make seperate versions. New compiler alot of work.. Please donate some beers  Just sent 0.05061365 BTC so keep up with the good work |
|
|
|
Release 75:
My gigabyte windforce G1 factory overclocked does 17.9MHASH in the quark algo on standard clocks.
my 2x 6pin EVGA 970 does 15,7MHASH
A quick quark test on my rig: [2015-12-09 19:45:30] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 17885
[2015-12-09 19:45:30] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 960, 10631
[2015-12-09 19:45:30] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 7121
[2015-12-09 19:45:32] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 7126
[2015-12-09 19:45:32] accepted: 19/19 (100.00%), 94889 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:45:33] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 22162
[2015-12-09 19:45:33] accepted: 20/20 (100.00%), 94893 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:45:35] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 7126
[2015-12-09 19:45:35] accepted: 21/21 (100.00%), 94914 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:45:37] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 22032
[2015-12-09 19:45:37] accepted: 22/22 (100.00%), 94909 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:45:39] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 19356
[2015-12-09 19:45:39] accepted: 23/23 (100.00%), 94913 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:45:40] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 7124
[2015-12-09 19:45:40] accepted: 24/24 (100.00%), 94931 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:45:45] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 17936
[2015-12-09 19:45:45] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 18124
[2015-12-09 19:45:45] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 960, 10627
[2015-12-09 19:45:46] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 22074
[2015-12-09 19:45:46] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 22279
[2015-12-09 19:45:48] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 19376
[2015-12-09 19:45:50] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 18093
[2015-12-09 19:45:50] quark.eu.nicehash.com:3345 quark block 2546773
[2015-12-09 19:45:50] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 22093
[2015-12-09 19:45:50] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 7130
[2015-12-09 19:45:50] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 19162
[2015-12-09 19:45:50] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 17930
[2015-12-09 19:45:50] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 18355
[2015-12-09 19:45:50] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 960, 10661
[2015-12-09 19:45:50] accepted: 25/25 (100.00%), 94977 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:45:51] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 960, 10564
[2015-12-09 19:45:51] accepted: 26/26 (100.00%), 94970 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:45:51] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 19239
[2015-12-09 19:45:51] accepted: 27/27 (100.00%), 94965 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:45:53] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 18355
[2015-12-09 19:45:53] accepted: 28/28 (100.00%), 94965 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:45:58] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 18051
[2015-12-09 19:45:58] accepted: 29/29 (100.00%), 94964 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:45:58] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 19239
[2015-12-09 19:45:58] accepted: 30/30 (100.00%), 94964 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:46:00] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 22093
[2015-12-09 19:46:00] accepted: 31/31 (100.00%), 94964 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:46:04] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 7130
[2015-12-09 19:46:05] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 17930
[2015-12-09 19:46:05] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 960, 10564
[2015-12-09 19:46:06] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 22041
[2015-12-09 19:46:06] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 21844
[2015-12-09 19:46:07] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 19370
[2015-12-09 19:46:07] accepted: 32/32 (100.00%), 94953 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:46:09] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 960, 10623
[2015-12-09 19:46:09] accepted: 33/33 (100.00%), 94951 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:46:10] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 18056
[2015-12-09 19:46:10] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 17828
[2015-12-09 19:46:10] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 17771
[2015-12-09 19:46:10] accepted: 34/34 (100.00%), 94936 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:46:13] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 18061
[2015-12-09 19:46:13] accepted: 35/35 (100.00%), 94936 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:46:13] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 19347
[2015-12-09 19:46:13] accepted: 36/36 (100.00%), 94938 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:46:13] accepted: 37/37 (100.00%), 94938 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:46:14] quark.eu.nicehash.com:3345 quark block 2546774
[2015-12-09 19:46:14] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 22143
[2015-12-09 19:46:14] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 7130
[2015-12-09 19:46:14] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 17911
[2015-12-09 19:46:15] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 960, 10649
[2015-12-09 19:46:15] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 18186
[2015-12-09 19:46:15] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 19250
[2015-12-09 19:46:15] accepted: 38/38 (100.00%), 94958 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:46:17] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 17834
[2015-12-09 19:46:17] accepted: 39/39 (100.00%), 94954 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:46:18] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 17962
[2015-12-09 19:46:18] accepted: 40/40 (100.00%), 94958 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:46:22] quark.eu.nicehash.com:3345 quark block 2546775
[2015-12-09 19:46:22] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 960, 10631
[2015-12-09 19:46:23] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 19303
[2015-12-09 19:46:23] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 18069
[2015-12-09 19:46:23] accepted: 41/41 (100.00%), 94957 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:46:23] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 22058
[2015-12-09 19:46:23] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 7127
[2015-12-09 19:46:23] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 17885
[2015-12-09 19:46:32] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 7132 Seems some more Hashes for each gpu. But non profitable nowadays |
|
|
|
300 SPR for the person that guesses when Georgem goes Legendary (nearest will do).
My bet is on 2. 2. 2016 |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
