|
There are not many coins based on games. This seems good and will be watching this.
|
|
|
|
|
Wow! A thread started in 2013 and still active though not many posts.
|
|
|
|
|
First the title and then the OP looks interesting. Didn't go through the entire thread yet. Will see how things move here.
|
|
|
|
|
Gambling can get you into trouble. Altcoin trading is a good opportunity. Investing in btc based revenue sharing program is also a good option provided you get in early. New cycler programs are also coming up which accepts btc.
|
|
|
|
but if any cloud mining cheat theirs investors will crime branch or police take action on this.
i don't think so that police or any authority gonna do this.so i think here making money is too easy.open an investment site just collect 5-20btc and run away.
wow this is really good idea and no one gonna doing anything.
what's your idea?
If they have a registered office in India, legal action can be taken against them if not nothing can be done. |
|
|
|
...
It wasn't exactly at a discount, just someone in the same city and a nearby place to me. But I have turned him down and have told him to use localbitcoins or go with giving cash first since I have decent trust.
In your case, would an escrow have helped? On the other hand, getting cash for 5 BTC shouts black money. Where you able to find if he did trade elsewhere? |
|
|
|
|
Like the majority in this thread have said, signature campaign is the best for weekly earning. For this you don't have to put in any money. One thing to be noted here is you can participate in only a single campaign at a time and you will have to post quality posts. If you can put in funds, try altcoin trading. But before trading, follow the forums very closely for making the right decisions or you will get burnt.
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin has a long way to go in India. The general idea is that Bitcoin is illegal in India. I once asked a bank manager of a nationalized bank and his response was it is a crime to use bitcoin since it is against the law. Such type of fear is placed in most places. This misconception needs to go for bitcoin to become a major success in India.
|
|
|
|
...
My trust ratings are, ultimately, of no importance, as the market will decide who will stand at the end. It is my hope and striving that LEOcoin and the LEOcoin owners have no need to be ashamed.
The persons giving negative ratings do neither know me, nor do they understand my intentions, which renders them utterly unqualified for their judgment. I am fairly positive that the sole intention of these ratings was not to give a balanced or warranted judgement, but to spread their own negativism. They are free to do so, but I sincerely hope that the majority of the readers will see that LEOcoin Foundation is simply striving for a good development of LEOcoin.
This said, we are not perfect, but I think that as long as we are honestly trying, we are justified in ignoring the usual trolls.
I like your positive attitude and appreciate the last sentence. This post made me look at your thread once again and I'm liking what I'm seeing. |
|
|
|
|
People are trying out creative ways to bring a coin down. In this case, caught red handed. If the proof wasn't posted, at least I would have believed it to be real as some admins do request for such speculations and promotions.
|
|
|
|
Is there a way to see why a user is given negative trust? I see the OP with a negative trust.
A user, after losing a discussion, felt the need to give a negative judgement as form of cheap revenge. As LEOcoin Foundation is not trading any coins at all, the warning is stupid on itself. Instead of going against it, I have opted to wait for other users to give a positive signal of trust to get it balanced out. I hope that, when LEOcoin will continue to rise, this will occur rather sooner as later. Just my opinion. The time I posted my previous comment was my first time in your thread. For a person seeing the thread for the first time, 2 members with the LEOcoin handle with negative trust sends a negative message and could end up ignoring the coin completely. Its not easy getting a positive trust here. Good luck on getting your trust back. |
|
|
|
...
I hope it would be credited.. and if its possible I suggest that there should be a spreadsheet update to help the campaigners specially we as newbies so that we will know if we have reached the requirements or not yet..
The number of posts you post are already visible, then why would you need to see it in a spreadsheet. You don't have to limit to 36 posts each week. You can post any number but you will get paid only if you have at least 36 quality posts. |
|
|
|
|
Too bad the contest has ended, but still I would like to share my ideas and would like to see them implemented in the future.
1. A crowdfunding platform where projects are paid with EMC
2. BTC / LTC / other altcoins price ticker in wallet interface
3. An arcade gaming site which hosts gaming tournaments. Entry fee and prizes in EMC. I had tried this for a different altcoin long time ago, but the payment was manual which was one of the reason it didn't attract many.
|
|
|
|
|
I remember folding long time ago before I quit. I think its time for me to start again.
|
|
|
|
|
Is there a way to see why a user is given negative trust? I see the OP with a negative trust.
|
|
|
|
Now that the wallet is back up at Yobit, have the people received their CMT sent during wallet maintenance?
the wallet still showing that it is still in maintenance on my end mate, have you tried to check it? I'm also waiting for the wallet to be updated so i can try to move my cmt. I don't have an account in Yobit yet. I'll have to test the waters soon. |
|
|
|
|
Just curious. If the price is coming down by 50% how would you take it to 1000%?
|
|
|
|
|
What is the cut off time for the signature campaign? I don't see it in the OP. I just see payment will be made at 23.59 UTC Friday. It would be better if cut off time is also mentioned in the OP.
|
|
|
|
|
Now that the wallet is back up at Yobit, have the people received their CMT sent during wallet maintenance?
|
|
|
|
Correct me if I'm wrong. I understand it as 36 posts per week. When the week is over, the counter resets to 0 and will have to post another 36 posts for the next week. In any case 36 posts is a bit too much for quality posts.
36 post a week is too much?? No it's almost only 5 quality post a day it's not hard to post that 5 post aday even you post good quality why you say it too much ? See other campaign give 75 Maxx post a week with a good post quality. This is my first experience with a signature campaign. To me 36 posts per week seemed on the higher side since I do not post much and absolutely dislike posting just for the sake of posting. I didn't even log into BTCtalk for almost a year since I get the information without logging in and I didn't find myself with the knowledge to post here in the forum. When the subject knowledge is average, contributing to the forum gets tougher. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
