https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/science-sushi/evolution-watching-speciation-occur-observations/

"From the description, one would think that this was a very convincing example of macroevolution in action. Obviously, there must have been quite a number of massive mutations to produce an entirely new species that could not interbreed with the original. Right? Actually, every statement above is absolutely true. However, some of the important details have been intentionally left out, in order to make this example sound much better than it really is. Here is what actually happened.

The example above is not macroevolution, but is simply due to a single genetic event known as polyploidy. The original goatsbeards from Europe were standard diploid (two copies of each chromosome) plants. However, plants often do not undergo complete monoploidy during meiosis (during the formation of the sex cells, or gametes). This means that the gametes may remain diploid. When diploid gametes fuse, a new polyploid "species" is formed. No new information is created (Do you have twice as much information if you copy one book to produce an identical copy? No!), but the chromosomes are duplicated. The new "species" cannot produce viable offspring with the original species simply because of the difference in number of chromosomes.  With goatsbeards, the process has happened more than once. Of course, the two "new" species have the same number of chromosomes and can produce viable offspring, since they are virtually identical.

If you look at the speciation events that are listed as evidence of evolution, most of them will fall into the polyploidy plant category. Evolutionists often "forget" to tell the reader that the new "species" are unable to produce viable offspring with the parental species simply because of a chromosomal duplication event. A casual oversight on the part of the writers? I think not! How much new information added to the new species? None!!! Were you deceived into thinking that the example given above was a dramatic example of evolution in action? Be wary of evolutionists bearing examples of "speciation.""


You conveniently leave out the parts of the movie I had gave you. And now you play ignorant that you do not know what I am talking about. How convenient. Just like your "evolutionists" masters of omision.


Nervous?

Now I know why it is called a theory - by ommision the unconvenient truth by a half truths. That is trully wicked way of tricking the science community. And to think all of that effort just to discredit the Holy Word.


That does not meet the criterium of a definition of a new specie. Sorry to say that. It is just "so called" hybrydisation which means a breeding within the same specie, but for a convenience sake, and sake of their taxonomy called a different specie.

How come - when it came to the polyploid plants so called "evilutionists" knows exactly what is the definition of the specie, and when it come to the other species - they forget that? Im talking about this part:



Classic definition.............. There is no other. At least there shouldn't be a switchy switchy with the definitions for convenience sake. That just proves we live in a totally wicked world if something like that happens.

Stop and think for a second. Doesn't that bother you? Are you so hopelessly tuned on to evolution that you are not even slightly critical, that something fishy is going on?

In one article they say that it is normal for hybridisation to have fertile offspring, on the other they say that hybrids are infertile. That should make your red light off - they are messing with your head by contradictory informations ok? They are preying on your ignorance.

If I will call myself a Cyborg and everybody would agree would that make me one? According to some self proclaimed scientist yeah.

Yeah I know you will say that my sources are not credible because they have God in the name of the page. You guys are predictible. You do not want to double check if that is true, you will just assume they are wrong because you are so SCIENCE POWER RANGERS... Sigh..... ehhhhh

"See, how hard was it to read the first few comments or to actually understand that the first premise of the video is just wrong?"

Ok. You win by a word game. That was all that the modern science begun. "Scientists" were discussing words. Francis Bacon generally have said - words are not important. What is important is the reality. That is how science developed. Sadly now science look exactly the same way as in the times of F. Bacon.

It DOES NOT MATTER how you will call it a theory/diaper/superman/batman if it violates known laws it cannot exist or the laws it violates can not exist.

It cannot be called anything scientific at all as the premise had not even been tested and/or no new specie have been found because that is the hypothesis of evolution. I have no idea why it is called a theory honestly. IT SHOULD NOT. No new specie have been found on the experiment.


 It is a mind boggling what happened to the scientific method if people are not mad at this obvious fraud.

According to this diagram of scientific method it should still be called a hypothesis.



Maybe they say that partially the theory of evolution works because there exist a natural selection or something like that. Or another type of word games like:

The test should prove to produce new species/ and or speciments should produce urine. Ok there was no new specie but a speciment urinated. Is that how this fraud got the status of theory? Or what other fraud was there?

I guess it was stated that although no new specie have been observed the natural selection occurs. So that should be the theory of natural selection that is 100% accurate. Yes natural selection happens within the limits of genepool of a specie. But that is not what it's all about.

Ok the guy in the video took hypothesis for a theory. I knew you would be nitpicky on that. For the sake of argument - pretend he had ment a hypothesis and not a theory, and watch the rest ok?

We must know what are we talking about. You say that I don't know. But do you know? What is the theory evolution in your understanding of it? Maybe we are talking about two different things.

As I understand it. It is a theory that states what Darwin stated. "On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life".

If that is the case - IT IS WRONG. No new specie originated by that means. But yes natural selection occurs and is 100% verifiable.

Why do you think I know nothing of evolution? I know more than you. I know there is no empirical evidence for it. Just a possibilities and assumptions. Those in my humble opinion should not be the basis to create your life ideology around. Just that.

I am not smarter than anyone. I admire someone spending so much energy and devotion to defend such a ridiculous idea to make it more believable. So I not only think Im not smarter than those people I am a lot less devoted than them.

Oh I do not even need to write anything on the subject of evolution. There are a lot of materials on the internet that absolutely demolish evolution. For example:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=38VngsfvMOs&index=6&list=PLvi3DA39DmAFRwMmadh6Nrkf8ognXmgnB

I would add that the unused organs dissapear - called Atrophy, that would prove evolution wrong as well, as the evolution claims that proves are within the remains of now unused organs. That is simply impossible because it violates the law of Atrophy of unused organs.

So the only one claim that is shouted everywhere, about supposedly unusuful part of the body, that was used by the specie that was evolved from is just impossible to happen as it violates scientific law.

That one is enough to prove that "evolutionists" are not credible, to say the least to be called a knowledgable and critically thinking people.

Yeah. True. Religious people lie. Bible don't as far as I am aware.


Well... No. Actually the staging of the crime scene is a very weak empirical evidence, but evidence none the less if it is enacted with the logical framework of other clues. Noone had staged the evolution. Find another similiarities.


No. Not most of them. You lie. The data shows something close to 50% depending on religion. I have nothing to do with them. Why do you compare me with them? That is not an argument.

I have told you. There are a lot of atheist that deny evolution. And I was one of them.

You make yet another logical fallacy - now using the error of equivocation.


Good that you have pointed that out - in my real life I have not seen evolution, nor anyone for that matter. So yeah.... who is detached from reality here?


Like what evidence? I have just told you noone had ever made a new specie, and by specie I mean the new speciment that cannot interbreed with any other speciments of the same specie, but can interbreed with the similiar speciments.

AND THAT IS THE EVOLUTION.

Nope. Noone had ever seen even in the thousands of years the appearance of any new specie anywhere on earth. What we could see is the natural selection. Yes that exist. One specie can die, and the other can adapt but still is a specie of that kind - it can breed with the the same speciments. It all comes to a taxonomy. Nowadays "evolutionists" call subspecies a new specie. There is no reason to have a subspecie taxonomy if a two speciments of subspecie can interbreed - it is still a specie. Lion is still a cat, tiger is still a cat and cat is still a cat, they all can interbreed. There is an urban legend that those species are infertile, it was proven to be false.

There are some rare instances of partial infertility proven scientificly within the so called ring species. But it is nowhere near to prove that a cat is not cat anymore for example.

Noone has ever seen evolution in action, only so called adaption and natural selection. Noone. So logical conclusion must be that it must take more than thounsands of years - millions.

That is not science. Sorry. You just can not assume something has happened because it is possible. Someone will say - hey the God theory is not a science as well. I agree. Both are not science. Period. However one or another would try, it is imposible to say you have seen something when you have not. Period.

I have not claimed I saw God either. I am only convinced based on how everything is constructed, how life works, and how everything interact with eachother. It is a waaaaaay smarter guess than the evolution if you find out the evolutionists lie and cheat.

Where are those "ape-like" ancestors? None were found. Why do people say that they saw things that they did not? It is called a patological lies, and definatly not a science.

By the way. Evolutionists love the argument that if you do not believe in evolution you must think that God had made it. No way......... There are a lot of people that say the evolution is a lie, and they are 100% atheists. I was one of such a guy. It is just easier to believe in God if you do not believe your fellow human liars, thats all. They throw a stumbling block on you.

Those kind of proponents of evolution think that when they promote their point of view they are opposed by the God. NO! They are opposed by the truth. And it so happens to be that the God is on the truth side 100% times. Coincidence?

It just proves the words of the Jesus - Know the truth and truth will set you free. What truth? That we are an apes? To the contrary - that we are not. We are a children of God.

There are a lot of people that are just afraid of freedom. They like their little confinement. Ok. Let them be. I do not mind their choices. Just do not claim your lack of perspective is the whole picture.

The history proves you and your meme is just wrong. Puritans like I. Newton (modern physics) and F. Bacon (modern scientific theory) were absolutely convinced that God had did it all and yet they still wanted to know how he made it.

So if you believe in God, it does not imply that you are not curious - how he made it all.

On the other hand, if you are not curious how evolution works (like most of the people), but you are convinced it is true becuase someone had said so - you are beyond help.


It is easy. The date of fossils are dated based on the geological layer dating. It is one assumption based on another assumptions. Why noone would double check those assumptions? Because one is from the biology departament, and the other is geological. One and the other believes the other is right because they have to believe it because most biologist have no clue about geology and most geologist have no clue about biology. Those biologists who know geology will not get the review because there are not enough specialists to review them.

Even if some people have doubts, they are not the ones that teach the students on the universities, because most of the time it is the dumbest people. that can't find another job teaches on the universities, and dumb people are not thinking much. They believe they are very smart and privileged to teach.

You might say - it's impossible... Nah. Sadly it is possible. It is even more so. It is a reality.

The topic is hilarious. Do you believe that a pennies on the return on the mining equipment investment will make North Korea build nuclear weapon? Actually it is better to (even if it is a government) invest in a long term investement rather than a short term weaponry? Does it?

Or maybe an OP thinks that North Korea can not invest into anything and they have to be super poor in order for them to not have additional nuclear weapon.

Most of the North Korea weaponry is either a soviet junk, or it is proven to be the western weaponry. Stop selling or giving them weapons if you are worried about them.

I propose some features to improve the game.

1. Warp time feature that allows to spend satoshis to decrease the cooldown. It could allow people to skill faster and it could allow some additional usage of satoshis. Warp time should be balanced to not be able to use during wars. For example if one has a criminal status he cannot warp time.

2. Allow to borrow some money from the bank for the new players. Make it reputation based. The more GPD reputation you have the more you can borrow. Those satoshis could not be withdrawn from the game. You can hint new players as well to improve your credit rating make new missions for GPD.

3. Make some minigames like gambling or ingame faucet that people can do while they wait for the cooldown. The more faucet the better. Call them like additional jobs to clean up the mess in galactic beurocracy, that was caused by the war with AI or so. You can call them something funny like - captcha office or so lol.

4. Make an auction for a unique expensive items for rich players to auction for. Make it mysterious with some awesome names.

5. Do not allow to invest if you wish, but the premium account should be bought with the invested sathosis. And promote the premium account more that way or so.

6. New unique items does not have to be inventive. Just make energy beam mk 4 or 5 shields mk 2 or 3. And so on and so forth.

I have the same problem. I hope it will be fixed soon.

The best lesson I have learner is that if something totally bad will happen, and you think you would not, you feel like anything can happen and it will be fine.

Homosexuality is in opinion an error in human sexuality.

The book "so called evil" is about the animal impulsive drives. And every animal including human is hard wire sexually. If a male is fearful towards their mare he will not have a sexual drive towards her. And the female will not have a sexual drive toward male if she has the aggression impulse on him.

Ever wondered why gays are not looking like they would be fearless? Just because they fear women in their hearts and that is why they kill their sexual drive to them.

The same with women. Why most feminists are lesbians? Because they have the aggression toward males. They kill their sexual drive toward men.

We are animals and not only animals. The sexual drive need to manifest somehow so it manifest the other way than it should like in homosexuality if it cannot be normal animal proper phisiological reaction.

Noone will tell me it's normal behaviour. I tolerate that behaviour but those people need to seek help.

Society can perfectly live without money. It had lived without it in villages and tribes a sometimes hamlets.

Money is just unpersonalised form of a debt as one can figure out by reading the debt the first 5000 years by David Graeber. Debts can perfectly be a personalised in nature. Hey it is a lot better and less complicated to do so.

The way it is not like so because of a thievery, lack of trust etc. etc. It is not good within a time of scarcity, but its perfectly ok with the society of abudance.

If the working abroud would not be such a problem there would be no polish left in Poland where I live.

Yes it is a huge sacrifice and an unwritten cost of immigration. You sell psychological safety to a physical safety.

The problem and a paradox of a nowaday society is that, you have to have a lot of money first to make yourself sustainable and to not need it any more.

So we can conclude basing on that paradox that a lack of money is a form of bondage until you can buy yourself from bondage.

Islamists love other people so much that they have a special tax for them to bribe them not to kill them.

We in the west should apply the same law to them. For not to be hipocrite they should pay a special very high tax for us not to kill them.

It seems fair to me.

Ofcourse I am just kidding you. but..... it shows what religion of hipocrites they are. They are implying we as nonmuslims are obliged to be taxed by them under the treat of killing us.

The earth belong to noone, but the creator of it. If you have not made something it is not yours unless someone that had made it had sold it to you.

That logic applies to the atheists as well as a believers in the creator.

And it was like so until the laws of conquerers mainly the Saxon laws in england that invented the land ownership. There was no land ownership back then in the middle ages. There were people belonging to the protector by the law of the conqouror.

The Rome had the latifundia as well, but those were not the modern land ownership. It was more like a conquered right to have profits from the people of the land.

However you look at this land ownership was made because of wars. One group of people agreed not to kill another group of people if they agree that the piece of dirt they are standing on is theirs.

Just because someone can kill someone else does not mean that the piece of dirt is his.

It is sick however you look at it.

Bitcoin is taxable and is taxavoidable in the same time. As long as your have your bitcoins in the wallet, or if you pay with bitcoins you are safe from the taxes. As long as you pay out from the exchange and transfer it to the bank you could be fined for not paying your income tax that you have gained on speculating activities.

That is so in most countries at least. Btw... most income taxes are actually illegal in the international law. But that is the subject for whole another issue.

The problem with criminality is that the bigger fishes are remaining to be immune to any persecution from governments.

And those does not have to remain very anonymous. The problem for the country are the small criminals and those use the btc. So it is more like a fight with a small criminality and not big that uses bank anonimity like with panama scandal.

BItcoin loss is one of the reason why bitcoin is so high. The artificial scarcity is the result of the loss of a whole bunch of satoshis in the depth of the webspace.

If you think about it, such a behaviour is a little scavenge like. It is not much honorable behaviour. But a people including me see that it as ok as bitcoin is just a social experiment. So it is kind of interesting how everything is coming out in the bitcoin world.

The buisness idea that involved with bitcoin in my country is connected with:

Freelancers (awesome form of payment)
Services (it is less controlled fiscally so less problems with btc transactions)
Food services (especially with the ATM inside or near, or by paying pre-delivery)
Hotels (especially pre-paid)
Auctions online

I am not sure about the other types of buisness, but those are succesfully mixed with btc