What a shit excuse. So, are you saying that you won't add an extra security measure that benefits your users because "you are not like the other mixers/you don't want to be like the other mixers"?

No one here is talking about Javascript. Everybody agrees that requiring Js is a bad thing. But what does this have to do with giving your users a proof that they used your mixer? What does this have to do with js functions and animated buttons?

Adding extra details also have nothing to do with js. You can't just print all the static information without any js.

I agree that his posting quality is bad. But why do you need a DT member?

theymos already stated that the DT members shouldn't be tagging users solely based on their post quality.

No. I don't think asking for your user's email is a good idea.

It should just show up in the mixing screen along with the details (address to send the coins, maximum and minimum, etc...)

I think they are supported anywhere.

Actually, (AFAIK) BTC.com (Bitmain) is based in China.

You are missing the point. It doesn't matter if Coins.ph is an exchange or a web wallet. What matters is that they are holding your coins, which means that if they get hacked/robbed/whatever, your coins are gone. Being associated with banks means shit when your coins are sitting in a third party wallet.

No.

Did you check "Always stay logged in" when logging in? You don't necessarily get disconnected when accessed from another computer, but when you didn't check that box, or when you log in from another computer and don't check it (in this case, you get disconnected from every computer - even from those which you initially checked the box).

Obviously. Just write them in one post. And if you have anything new to add, edit your last post.

The majority of what you post is redundant answers in SMT (Spam Mega Threads). You will never get any merit if you keep doing this instead of creating relevant content.

---

@kriptopsina: see what I did here? answering 2 users in 1 post.

That chat is full of people trying to shill/pump their coin. Please don't take any advice from them.

In a paper wallet. Just generate a private-key/wallet seed for every one of your coins and write/print them down.

Alternatively, you could use a hardware wallet. But the device could stop working, so having the backup seed would be the main priority (back again to the paper wallet).

Braydean #1125787


Copied from: https://bitcoinexchangeguide.com/cloudfish-ico-cfh-token/

Probably in the new forum software (if it ever gets released).

This has been suggested tons of times in the past and nothing has ever been done about it.

The point of having a Letter of Guarantee for every time someone uses your service is that you can guarantee the user that he has evidence of using your service. So, if you scam him, he can just post the Letter and prove that he really used your service and that he didn't receive any coins. That's why it's a good idea to put every detail in the Letter (deposit address, receiver address, amount, fees, delay set, etc...).

Here is a real example:

BitMixCoin exit scammed and stole at least 16 BTC from just one user. They claimed that it was a lie. But he had the Letter of Guarantee which proved he was saying the truth.
Thread: BITMIXCOIN.IO scam confirmed: 16+ Bitcoin stolen

Not true. This only happens when the user gets nuked (mainly when the user is a Newbie with a recently created account).

Yes. Nothing will change. The user won't be able to post or merit anyone, but the account will stay the same as before.

---

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4560722

My choices would be:

a. Trust
b. imToken

Both of them support ERC20 tokens, have a slick design and store your private keys locally.

What's the point of generating a safe and offline paper wallet if you are going to import it in Blockchain.info's web wallet? Wtf.

Please change your tutorial from "using Blockchain.info to sign a message" to "using Electrum to sign a message"; Or even better: "using Electrum offline cold-storage to sign a message".

There is nothing you can do unless mods start moderating and banning scammers.

A negative trust is probably all they will get.

1. Do you charge any fee for this?
2. Why is the minimum that high? (0.005BTC)
3. Why should we trust you with even 0.005BTC?

Is every BitcoinTalk.org link now whitelisted? Or only this specific post from satoshi?

Not possible in iOS (apps are sandboxed) and most likely not going to happen in Android if you are not rooted/doesn't give the app root permissions.

I can't see anything because the quality of the image from your link is shit. Here is the HQ version of that screenshot.