Bitcoin Forum
June 29, 2024, 04:06:45 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 [63] 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 ... 299 »
1241  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: What is your biggest concern with Bitcoin right now? on: January 02, 2016, 07:21:16 PM
long term there a thread of quantum computers in my opinion.
Do you seriously worry about this?  I worry about this just about as much as I worry about being struck by lightning - twice in the same day.

Quantum computers do not exist.
Quantum computers with enough power to actually do something interesting will not exist for a long time.
Even if they existed, with enough power, Bitcoin is basically immune to quantum computers.
Even if they existed, with enough power, and new algorithms were designed to make them a threat:  all users could simply stop reusing addresses making it impossible for anyone with a quantum computer to make a profit from the blockchain.

Even after all that the Bitcoin protocol could be changed as needed to avert any possible quantum computer attack.
1242  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it on: January 02, 2016, 07:11:19 PM
We should form a cooperative and search the private key...
Most dump idea ever. Grin
You made my day.
You obviously do not know me very well.

This idea is not even a mole on the ass of a gnat on the ass of the dumpest idea I have ever had.

Thinking about is a bit further the cooperative method of finding the next prize can be simplified to just giving the entire prize, all 0.051 x $433.42 = $22.10 to whoever is lucky enough to be assigned the lucky section of private keys by the server.

That way we would not have to figure out which charity, or how to prove work, etc.

It would just be a lottery with a $22.10 prize for using up an immense amount of electricity.
1243  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: What is your biggest concern with Bitcoin right now? on: January 02, 2016, 04:07:07 PM
Centralization
Address reuse, white/black lists, fungibility
Block size issues
Legal issues











Way down here:  price
1244  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it on: January 02, 2016, 03:31:57 PM
We should form a cooperative and search the private key space for the next correct value in much the same way GIMPS (http://www.mersenne.org/) searches for prime numbers.

Everyone that wants to participate would run a client in the background on their computer.

There would be a central server which would dole out search spaces of one billion or trillion consecutive private keys (whatever makes sense as a chunk size) to the connected clients and the clients would grind through their assigned search spaces using my suggested (increment by G) algorithm.

When a client was done with its assignment it would request another chunk of private key space from the server.

If a client did find the correct private key then the winner would keep the 0.051 BTC.

we could do something with the BTC, suggestions are:

split it among all clients proportional to work done [but method to prove work would need to be figured out]
donate it to charity
open to other suggestions
1245  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it on: January 02, 2016, 03:20:12 PM
Here are all keys from #1 to #40:
Very nicely done.  I especially like the graphical binary form and the log2 is also informative.

Thanks for this.

Are you currently trying to discover the values above 40?
1246  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: How many people buy or sell Bitcoin locally on: January 02, 2016, 02:52:18 PM
I never had any problems or issues buying or selling Bitcoins for cash in face to face transactions at a public coffee shop unless they were undercover cooperating witnesses, confidential informants or agents for homeland "security".

As long as you make sure you are not dealing with LE or people under the thumb of LE you will be OK.
1247  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it on: January 02, 2016, 02:08:33 PM
It seems to me that you guys should not be using the ECC scalar multiplication function at all, just a very fast, totally optimized "increment by G" function:

Code:
Initialization:

Set BitcoinAddresses[256] = the list of bitcoin addresses from the transaction, binary form without the checksum
Set BitcoinAddressIndex = 0;
Set PrivateKey = 1;
Set PublicKey = G;

Loop Until BitcoinAddressIndex == 256: // == "forever"

Call Convert PublicKey to BitcoinAddress [but just to the binary form, do not encode or calculate the checksum]

If BitcoinAddress == BitcoinAddresses[BitcoinAddressIndex] Then

    Log BitcoinAddressIndex, PrivateKey, PublicKey, BitcoinAddress

    Create transaction and claim Bitcoins if any available at BitcoinAddress

Endif

++PrivateKey;

Call Increment PublicKey by G // Highly optimized, very specialized function to just compute PublicKey = PublicKey + G

EndLoop

This algorithm, when optimized, and split up so that many loops could be done in parallel, is as fast as it can be done.

Note on the PublicKey to BitcoinAddress conversion function:

You only need to do the first 3 of the 9 steps in this process.

1 - Take the PublicKey and format it properly (add the 1 byte of 0x04, change to compressed form if needed)
2 - Perform SHA-256 hashing on the result
3 - Perform RIPEMD-160 hashing on the result of SHA-256

This result can be compared directly to the BitcoinAddresses[] array assuming you have stored the 256 Bitcoin addresses in the proper binary form.

Not sure a miner would help as it only does one of the steps in the PublicKey to BitcoinAddress conversion.

Of course an FPGA could be programmed to do this.  And, of course, if you had the resources an ASIC could be made to do this.

Final note on the BitcoinAddresses[] array values:

To get the proper values for this array simply undo the last 6 steps of the PublicKey to BitcoinAddress function for each of the 256 Bitcoin addresses in the transaction:

1 - Decode the base58 string to a binary byte array
2 - Strip off the 4 checksum bytes from the tail
3 - Strip off the version byte (0x00) from the front
4 - Store the result in the array
1248  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: How many people buy or sell Bitcoin locally on: January 01, 2016, 10:35:59 PM
Buying and selling on localbitcoins.com is a great option as long as you are responding to an ad that someone else placed (you are the "customer").

If you place an ad that is a whole other ball game.  If you live in the US they can charge you with "operating a business without a licence".

See my story (search BurtW here on the forums or click on the links in my signature).  Placing an ad on localbitcoins.com cost me almost $300,000 in legal fees and federal forfeiture, 1 night in Denver county jail and 3 days and 2 nights in solitary confinement in a Federal facility.

The Federal jail had much better food than the County jail.
1249  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it on: December 31, 2015, 09:48:07 PM
According to this, that address belongs to Luke Jr.: https://github.com/bitcoinjs/bip21/blob/master/test/fixtures.json
The Bitcoin address 1BgGZ9tcN4rm9KBzDn7KprQz87SZ26SAMH "belongs" to whoever knows the private key.

The private key is 1

So everyone that knows that the private key is 1, including you, now "owns" that address.

BTW the Bitcoin address 1EHNa6Q4Jz2uvNExL497mE43ikXhwF6kZm also has a private key equal to 1 so now, since you know the private key, you also "own" that address.
1250  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Protect yourself against Civil Asset Forfeiture on: December 31, 2015, 05:10:11 AM
I did not realize you were working on a plan to be identified as the only victim in this case, and the doctrine of victim compensation being employed to regain some portion of your assets.
Just another of our many longer term ideas.  I really want to confront the Sheriff at some point.  I would like to ask him exactly how much the Boulder County Sheriff's department spent supporting the many undercover Bitcoin buy/sell operations in the Homeland Security "operation Avalanche" against Bitcoin traders.

And then follow up with how much he got, or hoped to get, and now since equitable sharing has been suspended he will no longer get back from the Feds for the hundreds of wasted man-hours supporting their failed operation.

Was it worth it Mr. Pelle?

I bet he will think more than twice before supporting any future Homeland Security wild goose chases - especially since he now knows there is no chance of getting any funds from any federal asset forfeitures from any such operations.
1251  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it on: December 31, 2015, 04:53:23 AM
Why the fuck am I now downloading http://www.sagemath.org/ ?
That is why everyone calls you Gleb "Gullible" Gamow Wink
1252  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it on: December 30, 2015, 06:07:59 PM
Sounds like overfitting to me. Its easy to find a function with x+1 terms to match x points exactly. 2 points define a line (a*x1+b*x0), 3 points define a function of leading coefficient x2, etc.

The only thing that makes me think there might be something to this is the "burst" of claims after a long delay.  This indicates that the person was able to claim #47 - #50 in short order, possibly by finding a polynomial fit.

The interesting thing is that addresses #1 - #46 were cleaned out in January 2015. Then nothing for many months. Then on Sep 1 2015 #47, #48, #49 and #50 were almost simultaneously cleaned out.
1253  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: brute force on Bitcoin Addresses - Video of the action on: December 30, 2015, 05:29:03 PM
Lets start by what we know:

The BTC values of the outputs (0.001 through 0.256) are obviously the sequence numbers and the private keys are the sequence values.

How many of the sequence values do we already know (have been found by brute force)?  

Is the list in this thread the entire list of known values from the sequence?

You dont seem to be a very honest person. Brute forcing and stealing is a crime.
It is a mathematical puzzle with a BTC reward.  So, it is not stealing.  See the other thread.
1254  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it on: December 30, 2015, 04:20:24 PM
What do you mean? The explanation of my finding or something else here on the thread?

Good luck with this, cause i havn't got a baldy what the heck yous are talking about.    Huh
He is just bumping his post count for his paid signature.  He did not read a single posting in the thread. Ignore him.
1255  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it on: December 30, 2015, 04:17:40 PM
So there is hope of finding a mathematical solution!  Great find.

Adjust parameters until you match the first 50 claimed private keys then start adjusting parameters until you start finding more keys.

I wish I had time to do this.

Maybe when I finish paying off all my legal fees and retire Smiley
1256  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Protect yourself against Civil Asset Forfeiture on: December 30, 2015, 04:07:37 PM
so they have the 186btc seized... and ontop of that, are they wanting $40k cash and approx 93btc as a bribe as a separate payment??..

or are they classing that 186btc as the $40k $40k(btc) bribe?

time i double check my coins are stored in a location not linked to my name so no search warrant can compromise them..

and just leave 3btc to my name.. Cheesy


The 186 BTC sitting here:

https://blockchain.info/address/1Eu38i1DkRAPAJhSqbseVroJDpMRfJbAx3

were worth about $40,000 at the time they kept them (about $220 per BTC at that time).  In addition to keeping this 186 BTC they also kept $40,000 USD that they had seized.  They returned everything else: all my personal computers, my wife's computers, all my corporate computers, all the memory cards they took from our cameras, the cell phone they seized, all the corporate financial paperwork and receipts, etc. and dropped all criminal charges against me and all civil cases against all the seized property.

They even returned my copy of the United States Constitution that they had seized and placed into evidence!
1257  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Police Civil Asset Forfeitures Exceed All Burglaries in 2014 on: December 30, 2015, 01:52:09 PM
Some good news on this front:

Quote
The Department of Justice announced this week that it’s suspending a controversial program that allows local police departments to keep a large portion of assets seized from citizens under federal law and funnel it into their own coffers.
 
The “equitable-sharing” program gives police the option of prosecuting asset forfeiture cases under federal instead of state law. Federal forfeiture policies are more permissive than many state policies, allowing police to keep up to 80 percent of assets they seize – even if the people they took from are never charged with a crime.

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/justice-department-ends-key-civil-forfeiture-program

http://www.redstate.com/2015/12/27/civil-asset-forfeiture-congress/

http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2015/12/28/1464215/-In-big-news-Very-significant-part-of-the-civil-forfeiture-program-is-shutting-down?detail=email
1258  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Protect yourself against Civil Asset Forfeiture on: December 30, 2015, 01:43:25 PM
glad im not in america. 80%!! damn that is just thieving.. no wonder police love doing road checks and random stops..

did you get ALL your funds back, or just 20% and have you learned to not have private keys in places a search warrant can get access to..

EG not in plaintext format on paper. but using another form of storage involving your brain.. thus you can use your right to silence to not tell them how to decode the ciphered paper wallet
All criminal charges against me and all the civil cases against all the property they seized were dropped in exchange for a "donation" of $40,000 cash and $40,000 in Bitcoins to the Federal civil asset forfeiture slush fund.

The Bitcoins taken from me by Homeland Security (plus some dust given to Homeland Security by the Bitcoin community) are still just sitting here:

https://blockchain.info/address/1Eu38i1DkRAPAJhSqbseVroJDpMRfJbAx3

The ending of equitable sharing is great news for the country in general and a step in the right direction but bad for me personally.

Under the nefarious equitable sharing program my local Sheriff's department was slated to receive up to 80% of the funds taken from me once my Bitcoins were auctioned off.

I had hoped to argue that since my family was the only victim in the case the local sheriff should return to me his share of the take in the theft of my property as victim compensation.  That might have lead to the return of up to 80% of the funds taken from me.  However, now that the equitable sharing program has been terminated I would have to argue the victim angle directly with Homeland Security and the Federal Justice Department.

More expensive and much less likely to work.

Yes, this is just a step in the right direction but it is a very big step.

It will not end the practice of civil asset forfeiture but it will stop local and state law enforcement from helping the feds steal in those states (like Colorado where I live) where civil asset forfeiture is not legal by state law.
1259  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: BurtW arrested (update: charges dropped!) on: December 30, 2015, 01:34:41 PM
The Bitcoins taken from me by Homeland Security (plus some dust given to Homeland Security by the Bitcoin community) are still just sitting here:

https://blockchain.info/address/1Eu38i1DkRAPAJhSqbseVroJDpMRfJbAx3

The ending of equitable sharing is great news for the country in general and a step in the right direction but bad for me personally.

Under the nefarious equitable sharing program my local Sheriff's department was slated to receive up to 80% of the funds taken from me once my Bitcoins were auctioned off.

I had hoped to argue that since my family was the only victim in the case the local sheriff should return to me his share of the take in the theft of my property as victim compensation.  That might have lead to the return of up to 80% of the funds taken from me.  However, now that the equitable sharing program has been terminated I would have to argue the victim angle directly with Homeland Security and the Federal Justice Department.

More expensive and much less likely to work.

Yes, this is just a step in the right direction but it is a very big step.

It will not end the practice of civil asset forfeiture but it will stop local and state law enforcement from helping the feds steal in those states (like Colorado where I live) where civil asset forfeiture is not legal by state law.
1260  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Follow the Bitcoins taken from me by Homeland Security on: December 30, 2015, 01:32:45 PM
The Bitcoins taken from me by Homeland Security (plus some dust given to Homeland Security by the Bitcoin community) are still just sitting here:

https://blockchain.info/address/1Eu38i1DkRAPAJhSqbseVroJDpMRfJbAx3

But there was some really good news today.  The justice department ended the practice of "equitable sharing"

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1004863.msg13399046#msg13399046

This is great news for the country in general but bad for me personally.

Under the nefarious equitable sharing program my local Sheriff's department was slated to receive up to 80% of the funds taken from me once my Bitcoins were auctioned off.

I had hoped to argue that since my family was the only victim in the case the local sheriff should return to me his share of the take in the theft of my property as victim compensation.  That might have lead to the return of up to 80% of the funds taken from me.  However now that the equitable sharing program has been terminated I would have to argue the victim angle directly with Homeland Security and the Federal Justice Department.  More expensive and unlikely to work.
Pages: « 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 [63] 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 ... 299 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!