Yes, but we also have to always consider this demand, because a supply and demand will always exist in the market in every condition, so don't immediately believe in the promise of large income if we are not ready for market conditions.

What you have done is a very extraordinary thing, because the profit is very clear, but whether BTC will continue to grow in the next 5 years, everyone will certainly find it very difficult to find out, but if we look at history the development of BTC, then the opportunities and potentials of course still exist for the next 5 years.

Yes, and the average person here also thinks almost the same as you, because providing original data such as KYC to the project team, which in fact we don't know at all, will obviously be very risky if they use the data we provide for things not true.

If the question about the warning from the exchange doesn't exist, then you can also submit it again at the exchange support section, and wait for their answer and also ask about a valid wallet for OMG, because this has already happened.

Yes, and if necessary, you should often ask people who already have more experience in certain matters to help our learning too, because then it will help us better understand the sciences we have learned.

This means that this could be the work of their own party who carried out the hack so that it could shock the crypto universe, indeed it looks strange when they do not anticipate sending it to another wallet before the hacker sells the token.

Yes, everyone obviously has to use their heads to think, because without careful thinking someone will obviously not get anything, meaning that everyone must consider the promises of the project team in their various offers, because they are also humans who can break those promises.

Yes, it all depends on the project, but we also have to see the amount of allocation given by the project to the bounty program, if the allocation is small and the project is good, then automatically the participants will get a little profit, because a good project will always be enlivened by participants bounty.

Yes, everyone has very mature thoughts in terms of choosing projects and investing, maybe for those who dare to take risks on a scam project is just because they want to get rich quickly through the benefits offered by the project, but for people who are always looking for it, of course this is the case. like this they will not, exactly as you say it.

Yes, everyone obviously does work according to their respective abilities and expertise, but to be able to get more benefits we also have to make improvements in science, because without knowledge everyone will get lost.

If greed can make us do stupid things, then from now on get rid of that greed, because obviously that trait is not good for anyone, and those who put thousands of dollars in smart contracts will definitely have some judgment before they do.

I don't think there is an Exchange that can make transactions without gas fees, how can an Exchange only serve transactions while they don't get anything from that service, doesn't an Exchange also want to grow and want to gain profits through the transaction fees they have set ? try to think more logically bro.

Yes, you really have to make a review of the new project before posting, but it is also difficult to know at first, so many also qualify to be posted, because the scam or not a project is sometimes discovered after the project is almost finished, not when the new project starts.

There is no need to spend more dollars on transaction gas costs because transaction gas costs also often fluctuate every day, so for those who like to hunt for tokens from Airdrop, they can also use the time to monitor transaction gas costs on the official website.

The difference is that the TRC-20 wallet address comes from the TRON platform, while the ERC-20 wallet address is from the Ethereum platform, so they are clearly not wrong because the project team built their token through the TRON platform, so they asked for the TRC-20 wallet address so they can send you tokens when distribution begins.

If you have the capital to invest and like investing in DeFi tokens, then choose DeFi tokens that already have trading volume on the market, don't choose DeFi tokens that don't have a market yet because that will be very risky for you, even though DeFi tokens already have trading volume is also risky, but the risk can still be minimized by trading rather than choosing one that has no volume at all.

This means that you are not lucky in using it, because the reward is never told when it will be given so that many people are disappointed when suddenly the UNI reward is given to users who first used Uniswap in terms of trade.

This is a good strategy from the exchange and I also hope that in April next year, the Nominex exchange can be even better through some developments that are being made by the team at this time.

In a way, this is the case, but everyone must also be observant in seeing and taking advantage of opportunities at all times, because conditions that we do not want can happen at times we don't expect and can even be the opposite of what you say.

And the coins that you bought in 2016 are still valuable and valuable in the market, because tokens such as neo, nxt, xrp, mco are tokens that already have a lot of interest and large volumes in the market, so you will not be harmed by continue to hold the tokens forever.