It's not the best video demonstration and a bit hard to follow what he is doing. But the end result is that he retrieved the private key somehow by manipulating the command prompt window. Btw, is that QR code on the right one of the Electrum wallet's private keys or what is it?

I Bitcoin-only i Univerzalni model podržavaju isti firmware. Firmware ti određuje šta će od kriptovaluta uređaj podržavati. Ako instaliraš Bitcoin-only frmware, onda možeš samo Bitcoin čuvati. Ako instaliraš multi-coin firmware, možeš raditi sa svim coinima i tokenima koje Trezor i Trezor Suite podržavaju. Razlika između ta dva modela u izgledu je u poleđini. Bitcoin-only model ima žuti/narandžasti poklopac a kod univerzalnog možeš birati između četiri druge boje. 

Since OP is satisfied with the outcome, I can't support the flag anymore and will therefore delete my support for it. The negative feedback for the casino will remain until the backlog of unresolved accusations has been resolved.

It's a matter of their goodwill to do that. They are certainly not required to give back the money you gambled away. I would say you were lucky to get something back that you originally didn't have. No idea what caused the delay with withdrawals in the first place, though.

Placing bets on any market that is open and available is allowed regardless of what the bookies try to tell you. If you don't want bets to be placed on a selection, close the market and don't open it again. If you don't want a player to play on your webste, limit him or ban him after paying out the money they are owed. 

And if that limit happened before, it would be ok. But since both the casino and betting provider accepted the bet, it should be honored. You did the right thing in the end.

There are billions of people on earth and only less than 21 million bitcoin will ever be mined. There is no way that everyone can get at least 10 coins. There is no way they can get 1 coin each. I can continue decreasing the number but I think you got the point.

Some did lose their passwords to centralized services where passwords were required, but the bigger concern is the loss of private keys and seed phrases (once they were introduced). That's what losses your spending ability.

@OP
If you are a good friend, you'll tell him not to make stupid decisions like selling your home for an investment in bitcoin or anything else. If he doesn't have money to invest, then he shouldn't invest. You don't take an asset as valuable as your house in a gamble to get more in the future. In reality, most people have something. Tell him to start with a smaller investment. He probably owns something he doesn't use any more. If he has a car, he can sell that and buy a cheaper one. Perhaps he has a bike, a computer, a PlayStation, some jewelry, etc. that isn't essential to his life. All those things are better to sell if you aren't using them and badly want some money to throw around. 

Careful. Some people may read this as financial advice and not understand that it's sarcasm.

What about AgoraDesk? It supports Monero but I am not sure of it's decentralized nature. They have an arbitration feature but I don't know much about it. LocalMonero is basically the same thing with a different name. 
Isn't UnstoppableSwap a decentralized solution for Monero?
Also, Robosats supports Monero. I think it's still centralized, but there was a proposal to make it decentralized. No idea how far they have come with that. If I remember correctly, there was talk about the decentralized solution becoming custodial during trades, so that's not optimal.

I don't disagree, however, the parties that brought them down (a bit) didn't do it because of the goodness of their hearts. Their intentions aren't a more fair crypto economy with less manipulation. Their goal is to make themselves more important and have greater affect on prices and public opinion. It's just shifting the ability to influence or manipulate the market to a better-suited party. 

If we were to compare satoshi and Bitcoin to Litecoin and Ethereum and their founders Buterin and Charlie Lee, we would see a difference. Satoshi's addresses hold millions (if not billions) in value when converted to USD. On the other hand, Lee and Buterin sold their holdings back in 2018 during the bull run. I think Charlie Lee even officially stepped away from the project. That shows you that the Bitcoin spinoffs were quick money grabs meant to enrichen the creators and those close to them.   

You can't rule anything out with this guy as a president, but I don't see him making bitcoin legal tender. More precisely, if he goes down that road, I don't see him making bitcoin the only legal tender. Argentina will probably use one of the world's reserve currencies for the time being and perhaps bitcoin will become a secondary asset adopted alongside. I have never been of the opinion that you should force people to use BTC. Making it the only legal tender does exactly that. It forces you to use it. It should be an option you switch to if you want and if you see value in it. That's the natural way to foster adoption.

If the thread you created has posts from other users, then you can't delete that thread. Only the moderators can. If you had that privilege, it would basically mean that you are deleting other user's posts together with yours. But if no one else posted in your thread (only you did), you can delete it. I don't know if this isn't possible in certain boards like Services.

I forgot the name of the user, but it was a temporary ban, wasn't it? The user returned to the forum later after the ban but stopped posting altogether after a while. I remember the drama. He felt the thread should be where he posted it but the mod didn't agree and thought the content isn't fitting for that board. The topic was then edited a bit only to be moved back and forth again. He was warned not to do it, did it again, and got banned... 

I don't see anything wrong in what Lucius said. The donators do deserve thanks, but I wouldn't take the respect away, regardless of the value of the donated coins at the time. There are no problems with the rest of his post. Bitcoin was cheap at that time compared to today's standards. It was minable with A CPU and later with GPU. And finally, the mining reward was 50 BTC per block. I don't think anyone could anticipate that the price would explode and rise so drastically a decade ago.

And regarding the 'not mining yourself' part, he probably didn't know about BTC at the time, didn't care about it, or didn't think that an experimental digital coin could get so far. He wouldn't be the first to think that way. I laughed at the idea of accepting bitcoin the first time someone suggested it to me for some online work I completed. And that was a very long time ago. If I had, and I hodled those coins until they went up to tens of thousands of dollars, my biggest concern would be whether to take my lambo or helicopter.      

If it was a phishing link, malware, or something nasty, then I would be in favor of banning the person doing it. Other than that, I don't think the forum and its administration will (or should) take the route of censoring information they don't like. If someone wants to discuss how bad Bitcoin or a piece of software is, let them do it. Point out why they are wrong and what knowledge they are missing or ignore them for your own health.

We have that maniac (fxsurfer, antikvark, whatever the name is) who returns every couple of months and creates a few threads bashing bitcoin, everyone argues with him, and then he disappears, only to come back again some day.

It's probably this case from October that was recently bumped: harizen - ban appeal. But the OP of that thread seems to have given up and hasn't been online for months. He can't expect other forum members to fight his battles if he isn't here himself anymore.

I don't think the forum has an existential problem with account hacking and people left and right losing access to their accounts due to no mistakes of their own. If that was the case, we would see dozens of complaints weekly. We get a few complaints every now and then and it's unfortunate. Although we never understand what exactly happened, it's usually a mistake of the user. Some don't want to admit it, others don't know what they did wrong. But remember, prisons are full of people and they are all innocent if you ask them. I am not blaming anyone, just saying.

If a staff member locks your thread, you can't unlock it from your end. They have to be the ones to do it. If a mod moves your thread to another location, you can move it back or move it somewhere else entirely. But that's about it. If you feel that a thread should be locked, then you can report it and explain why you think that is. Point out what rules it breaks.

Btw, where is that link he posted to avoid detection? I don't see it in his thread. Did it get deleted?

It all depends on the subforum where the post was made. In some boards, you need to wait 24 hours before you can delete a post. So, you are right about that. But in others, you can immediately delete it after submission, and there is no need to wait.

This request isn't about OP losing access to their account and not having a way to log back in to use it. They wanted to have their posts and history cleared due to, what they believe, is sensitive content and information they posted about taxes.

Perhaps it's not as easy as you think. He did add some other code that PowerGlove created relatively quickly. This time, though, that's not the case. Perhaps the code fixes one issue, but creates three new problems in a live environment.

No, OP was never banned. The notification banner on his account says that it got locked for security reasons.

Of course, they will. No one is punishing the user. The flags and negative tags only serve as a warning to other members not to trust or use anything the account posts until it's back in its rightful hands.

Everything points to OP being hacked and someone else using his login credentials to post that malware-infected software. The question is, how?
There are over 1000 results on Ninjastic Space if you enter R*****X (I don't want to enter the name and give importance to it) with the same or similar ANN that was posted by harizen' account. Most of them date back to March 2023. 

Even if your account was deleted, users on Bitcointalk have post scrappers and everything you posted (just like anyone else) has been scrapped and there is a copy of it. Besides wiping everything you said from the forum, you would also have to ask the creators and owners of those scrappers to delete everything from their records. Glad you decided to stay.

Počeli su da šalju te narudžbe već. Ali sad će se opet odužiti zbog Black Friday/Cyber Monday ludila. Jesi li naručio Bitcoin-only ili onaj univerzalni model?

Ne vjerujem da je to razlog što Trezor Safe 3 nije na popustu. Novi je uređaj a mnogi su ga kupili po punoj cijeni. Tek sad šalju te narudžbe i ne bi bilo fer prema tim kupcima da u isto vrijeme ponude veliki popust za isti hardverski novčanik a kupci poput tebe još čekaju da dobiju ono što su davmo platili.