For arsenal to win Premier league Two things will happen which they will continue to remain consistent in their games and if Manchester City lose their games, this is the only way arsenal can end up with winning the premier league. Manchester City have a better chance of winning Premier league than arsenal, as for the Champions league it is not very sure if Manchester City will win over real madrid, because the game is not going the way expected to be. Real Madrid is a tough team that Manchester City can defeat just like that.
City isn't even ready to lose a single match in favor of arsenal. They would spread out and play with every strategy they've got to be able to win the remaining matches... Go take a close look at a table, you'll realize arsenal still got a big problem with the goal difference... It's clear that the lapses can't be covered in just 2 matches straight,...one of Which they might even lose in the process... lol😆 .. now arsenal have got to face Brighton next... That's total brutality though, we all hope they survive them. Sandra 🧑🦰 |
|
|
|
|
I didn't even notice it early enough since I'm not down on gambling my funds.., but I noticed that when I ran a txn on my campaign earnings and I was charged so high that I thought I had altered something on my TW address or so... After some proper scrunity, I discovered that the dollar value had risen high too, which is prolly the reasons for the incessant increments.
I would say ...alot are still coping even with the fees; mostly the ones that had 'em funds HODLed in there already. Does this really mean casinos won't be having alot of turn-ups like ever before? Cus helllllll...!! Everyone is damn affected with this.
Sandra 🧑🦰
|
|
|
|
Tbh I can't really tell if the slot I'm playing is original or not but most of the slots I play on my favorite casino are coming from 3rd party providers. I think I like it when it comes from 3rd parties as long as I am playing it on the trusted casinos, it doesn't matter if it isn't original, what's important is I can play with ease.
Hahahaha.... I love the fact that you don't really care.., but I was thinking; what if the authenticity of slots are based on who it comes from? ....and also it Nearest winning possibility?? Lmao.. you sounded like you don't really give a fvck if it cuts or not. I mean, it's actually fine to be having slot games from 3rd party providers anyways... All a good gambler wants is having his favorites almost everytime he playes....I don't play slots either but I do know that the have huge, based dependency on lucks almost everytime. Sandra 🧑🦰 |
|
|
|
|
I won't believe we've got a decentralized casino yet; except there's a way to bypass and manipulate, then I can believe that( but I can't even term that as being decentralized) .... Cus you think 'em gamblers aren't observing the highlights everytime they wager? They might actually get used to it as they play-on and that will actually be massive loss to the casino...''Centralization" is the word it'll infer at the end... that's if you can see it that way
Personally, I believe gambling isn't majorly about how much you know how to combine them odds; it's more about how lucky anyone would be at the time they play.
Sandra 🧑🦰
|
|
|
|
|
Are u literally asking if you can make a 100 bucks monthly on gambling?
Yes you can,...but I'm afraid you'll need a gun and a map to Thier head-house...lmao 🤣
This would actually mean buying 'em over-written odds from smaller league teams and staking heavy on them.... Does it go well that way? IDK either. If you're only having your analysis done based on the head-to-head and maybe, how you see the capacity of the team, then you can't have them swirling to your favor everyday.... It'll only remain a matter of chance.
Sandra 🧑🦰
|
|
|
|
Quite disgraceful how Chelsea has been this season, changing managers everyday and yet we still can't win games comfortably. The win against Bournemouth was just we been lucky as Bournemouth had their chances to equalize and probably win the game but couldn't take them. Frank Lampard has turned the club to a laughing meme. Imagine we celebrating a win against Bournemouth and now mathematically we won't be relegated.
Sometimes, I feel things aren't going too well in the club, Honestly... Cus how could they have lost serially to every team and would only manage to bargain a win in some rough cases (the likes of the time before they won against Bournemouth)? What's really happening?? Honestly, I feel they administrations don't even know what the Heck! Cus if they knew, how could they have signed 3 coaches serially, just to realize the coaches aren't even the problem?... They've really been undecided on the 11th position and will face the relegation zone if their performances keeps on point. Sandra 🧑🦰 |
|
|
|
I agree, such people should look for professional help or get support by close circle. I don't blame reckless people who leave gambling addicts to their own fate since it was their own fault losing life savings on casino. Some gamblers don't take it seriously and keep depositing because they don't have close friends who can warn about possible results addiction can lead, unfortunately.
I don't even think gambling addicts usually conceive a second-thought about the whole proceed,...cus if they did, there'll always be some major interceptions. Sometimes, maybe they feel it ain't even hurting them anyways and whatever goes as Thier loss isn't much....so all they'll be left with is doing the same thing over and over again untill it becomes VERY impossible to desist from it. Any addict should kill the ability of fancying every opportunity to wager and making self-thoughts of encouragement over a win on it. Sandra 🧑🦰 |
|
|
|
Manchester United lose the game to West ham, this can make them lose the top four for the season Liverpool are close to Manchester United in points and Liverpool are trying all their best to get to the top four position to participate in Champions league. Liverpool will try there best to climb to top 4 best.
I can't even say man United was meant to play the premiership this season cus Thier performances doesn't say so in anyway. I had watched through the first half of the game and with that, I presumed already that they was never gonna be a win for them.... This was against Brighton... I'll comfortable call this a loosing spree for them since they still had to lose today against Westhampton. Man U has lost the whole preference with Which a winning team should have and I think it's gonna take some time to build that back. I mean, the team's overall GD is 8? How poor could Thier performances become in Thier next game? Sandra 🧑🦰 |
|
|
|
|
Casinos might be facing a challenge of being manipulated, but sportsbetting could be worst... Cus when you see the likes of smaller clubs in Thier local leagues playing with every fixed prediction, it'll only tell anyone that games could be rigged on all cost, be it casino or sports.
I'm not gonna say that it's actually happening in major leagues yunno... When it comes to that, it's strictly based on a great uncertainty; previewing a head-to-head could also put you on a great advantage too.
Sandra 🧑🦰
|
|
|
|
|
Why did you decide to wait that long on an account??.... for over four years??.., when the only option you've got left with is creating a new one?
I understand why some peeps feel too weary on creating a new account (especially those that existed before the inception of the merit system); Truth be told, most of 'em old OPs don't even have what it takes to build an account, NO!.... They were massively mobilized under the liverage, during the introduction of the merit system. C'monnnn,I'm not putting it on everyone, but alot haven't been able to have 50 merits as the Least for themselves aside the airdropped merits. Peeps like this be begging for years to get access through an old account again....
Edit: This is actually one of the reasons I don't joke with core legends like Dmr, LFC, Jay, fillipone, oeleo, Malek etc.... It ain't fuckin' easy to keep a standard for years without wavering..
Sandra 🧑🦰
|
|
|
|
|
There's no restrictions on the quantity of coins anyone should HODL.
If you're able to afford 50 BTcs.comfortably , good for you.... I cannot tell why some peeps be having a big doubt on BITCOIN's process but will still prefer to stake up some shitty coins that stands to get devalued over time.
Investing little on the other hand would also mean you haven't got much to do so... Don't let it get to the point where your cash Capital turns out the source of your survival -- cus that's exactly where peeps be saying that Bitcoin isn't profitable....it only means you'll be forced to sell during the buying sessions< and yunno what that means right?
Sandra 🧑🦰
|
|
|
|
May sound silly but has anyone tried meriting themselves on a discussion they start. I noticed that the option to merit a post is still available on a post we make, I wanted to try it out, but I do not want to default, so I decided to come ask first.
Is it possible to merit yourself?
Yeah....lmao It actually sounds really silly you know what I'm saying? Are you just getting too used to the system already? Or rather too tired to rock-on that you're tryna think of ways to cut corners?? 😹jokes anyways..It's not possible to merit your own self from the same account... You could merit yourself assuming you've got two accounts running, BUT THAT'S NOT ALLOWED AND YOU COULD POSSIBLY LOSE THE TWO ACCOUNTS IN A ROW... It's actually funny cus I thought of even more silly things than that.....and it didn't work Sandra 🧑🦰 |
|
|
|
|
My heart skipped when I saw the title ... I actually thought another exchange went down.
Storing an asset in a centralized exchange is simply compatible to doing same on a casino site or app. The domains could get scrambled at any time and everything will be gone. I dunno why alot of peeps still make the same mistakes everyday and will end up saying it happened so they'll learn from it .... losing your funds unnecessarily, for the fact that it wasn't properly stored could affect you health-wise,.... remember, depression is real. A non-custodial wallet is best for storing 'em coins - only you'll need be careful lest you misplace 'em phrase too..
Sandra 🧑🦰
|
|
|
|
Given by your rank. I think you should be aware on this kind of scheme on crypto. Not only AI technology but anything that become trending has a lot of shit project for the sole purpose of scamming people. Elon, Memecoin, DeFi, NFT gaming, metaverse and so on has a lot of shit project designed to scam investors that willing to risk on this project for a high risk high reward opportunity.
The right language is - peeps will always take advantage of anything that's new and authentic, in a bid to get some few bucks or so for misleading other people the wrong way, leaving a negative sensation on the project, all to the inventor's expense... What baffles me the most Is why investors decide to take those huge risk for any project at all... they're only giving them net-gurus an impression and a chance that anything could penetrate and make them pay for something that's fake. Sandra 🧑🦰 |
|
|
|
KYC achieves two things only - mass surveillance, data harvesting, and control on behalf of your government and a variety of three letter agencies, and innocent people having their identities stolen.
The goal is having every detailed information about everyone in stock. You see, even if I'll say they don't have full control over crypto - apart from some minor restrictions - you would wanna agree right?? But don't you think that as long as HODLERS are made to pay a certain percentage Which is invariably proportional to Thier staked coins, the governs still got our stock on Thier finger tips?? Cus from calculating the net expenditures/ profit annually, on due percentage stat, they could value your asset and decide to take actions from there... I meannn, these are all tools to enhance Thier policies... Meanwhile in crypto, pseudonymity rules over the system. Bitcoin has turned out the largest digital exchange and I bet they'll keep trying effortlessly to break the silence. Edit: whatever trick that's composed behind the reasons for KYCs isn't even about them... Orwell's 84 tells us all. Sandra 🧑🦰 I always wondered: why do you always add those emojis at the end of your posts and also your name? Everybody can see the post is made by "Sandra_hakeem"  Uhmm, you don't like it?  well, It's actually my preferred Monica; especially when it seemed we haven't got much successful women in here ... Nobody cares about the gender anyways, but does that change the fact that I'm a cat?? Rhetorical...  |
|
|
|
All this KYC nonsense is based on the idea of the Four Horsemen of Infocalypse. Which are money launderers, drug lords, terrorists and pedophiles. The idea is greatly debated by Julian Assange in his book Cypherpunks: Freedom and the Future of the Internet. Other great minds are also part of the book, such as Jacob Appelbaum (TOR developer), Andy Müller (a hacker which is a member of Chaos Computer Club (CCC)) and Jérémie Zimmermann (co-founder of La Quadrature du Net). Governs are emphasizing that all these decisions are based on combating these four horsemen, but it's a lie. The problems determined by the horsemen of infocalypse can be mitigated with other ways, not with KYC. Besides, make sure to read also 1miau's topic Why KYC is extremely dangerous – and useless which is complementary to OP. I sometimes see no true reason for the invention of KYCs other than enhancing the - monitoring and control policy. I believe it somehow has something in affiliation with the control and influx of cash in the economy; where an individual isn't expected to own much more liquid assets than the governs.... The simple prove-course for my objection is the act - when a certain billionaire's possession was siezed by his local bank,.. even though it was released, they gave restrictions on the terminals of where, how and what those funds were utilized for. It's one of the insane reasons that brought about the idea of cryptography; since no one is ever able to control decentralization, they're simply placing sanctions and the whole move is made political. I haven't seen much improvement on money laundering cases since the inception of KYCs ... They only keep recording cases but the point is, IT HASN'T STOPPED. Sandra 🧑🦰 |
|
|
|
|
Hehe .... It's appalling to have HODLERS panic too much about the certainty of Bitcoin and how durable it could be...
It aches to my marrow when I'm being asked some questions like that; I don't like convincing those naive set of people to the truth.... sometimes, coupled with that fact, this questions paves a pathway in me -- haven't they been well tutored on Bitcoin already before they invested?? If no, what was the motivation then? Cus nobody would sink in money in something he/she isn't sure about.... To avoid unnecessary questions when the price tends to swirl, then we must be well taught.
Sandra 🧑🦰
|
|
|
|
Hello everyone I'm new here.
Please what are the fastest ways to learn about bitcoin? and how can a software development student meaningfully contribute to the forum?
Software development?? That's great to hear if it was about you - cus it sounded like you Aksed on behalf of someone else. I mean, you've got a greater advantage as a software developer; if you're doing it multipurposely, then I suppose you've got so many useful ideas that peeps in here would appreciate. First of all, you've got to follow the rules in here ... ofcourse you should know that every coordinated site like this would likely have 'em rules....they aren't some kinda hard ones either, but the penalty for flaunting them could result to a perma- ban. The Grand rule is "avoiding plagiarism" or copy pasting .... You could prolly rock on to the technical board and share you ideas as well. Sandra 🧑🦰 |
|
|
|
|
I'll support the motion... Since they aren't gonna be given a consideration on any loan request (except they've got a good collateral to offer), YEAH?that's just unnecessary when they're found creating multiple threads in there - most times, they have an idea who's qualified for any loan, but they just feel if they could throw shits at the wall, maybe it'll stick.
Other times, it's difficult to know how effective the lending board is, since you'll only find some comparable nuisance in a cordon. How about if they're true newbies that are willing to be honest and follow the rules in there? With 'em ascertained collaterals too?? Isn't that gonna look like lending in here is limited and controlled by the forum which, I'm sure, that ain't supposed to be so??
Edit: what's this raucous of Loyce not being a staff and so on?
Sandra 🧑🦰
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
