|
I hate fasis And then I hope fasis goes to hell
|
|
|
|
|
These all need to be aware, do not do this is the illusion of a person, but what if the people affected by this fraud
|
|
|
|
|
Do not use the laptop for mining that will make you a bad hard drive, we suggest you buy a vga or ASIC miner, it is more advantageous :-)
|
|
|
|
|
only the foolish man admitted that he had tried to commit suicide, and the method emperism will explain everything, the prophet Mohammed in the teachings of Islam to travel to heaven and hell called in Islam traveling israj Miraj, the Prophet Mohammed with the empirical method explained everything, so also with Gautama Buddha he did emperisme method for communicating the level to 7 in reincarnation, while the method of emperism you simply absurd to think
|
|
|
|
an atheist who claims he would be foolish for atheists, because atheists believe that theis is a liar, the circumstances of this theis is a belief about the absolute spirit, while atheists believe that the absolute spirit was not there, but how do atheists talk about ideas? atheistic idea is also an absolute spirit she did not appear to be material but he think? then atheists believe that theis is a liar? try to look in the mirror for the atheists how that idea in your head with a spirit of absolute spirit
How do atheists talk about that idea? Simple, have you seen/heard or had any contact or evidence of that spirit or anything divine for that matter? Why not? Because a religion and it's teachings, no matter how big, are all an illusion. It's pretty simple when you think about it, just science wasn't that developed hundreds of years ago so people quite easily adopted religion as it had answers to the unexplainable. Give me any question you have and I can give you a logical answer on why is it wrong. you know Descartes ? he talk " cogito Ergu sum or I think ,therefore I am" . then how does an atheist say that god does not exist? and the spirit of the absolute spirit was an illusion? whereas when we think the spirit of the absolute spirit was playing naughty in the brain?, when atheists think like this then he has the answers that the neurons of the brain are working? But how can that be? Do you memperintahkan brain neurons work? it therefore "I said that the idea is the absolute spirit." have regarding the absolute spirit of God and theis, while atheists are also included in theis because they are not robots or computers, theis also have an idea There is no such thing as spirits or souls. I am an animal, just like you. We got here because of billions of years of evolution. Unknowns are just that: unknowns. Religious people equate unknowns with 'God' and stop investigating/thinking. For us unknowns, are things to be discovered and understood. That is the difference between us. then you know that it also theis atheist? If not then I would laugh out loud, I did not say that theis not always about religion? theis is a trust? If atheists do not believe in anything? then the atheist is an alien? , about evolution, and you say that man is an animal? how can you say that man is an animal? , Which category man is an animal is a foolish mistake to think, what difference does an atheist who does not believe in God but believe in evolution, and the human is an animal category terraced the Buddhist and Hindu religious teachings And then I very very like if atheis talk " God is death, And left his body ." , and I hope no one is proud to be an atheist but does not have a stake in science I don't even know where to start. First of all, try reading a biology book, or you've failed that class? Second, atheism isn't based on any religious teachings, duh, it's based on science and research... Human is an animal just as any other animal you see, but rather us having tail and claws and fur all over our bodies, we've adapted to the different surroundings and we've evolved intelligent, unlike most of other animals. no atheist would ever say that. where did u even get that from? But believing in something a sand human wrote a couple thousands of years ago is to be proud of? If atheism is not a religion, why read a biology book? The info in the biology book is part of the atheism dogma. The idea that a human is just a different kind of animal is another dogma of atheism. Atheism is simply a religion wherein its believers use their religious dogma to attempt to prove that atheism isn't a religion.  Because a biology book contains the basic of animal evolution through time? I can't tell you to read a book for electro-engineering... What's wrong with you? ya like egg or chicken question first? I will answer the chicken because there is no( egg chicken )in question. if the atheist is not dogma, if the atheist is not about religion, why do atheists always spread his teachings? When karl marx said "religion is the opium." He possessed a strong reason to make argumemt it, he explained that people who are being oppressed in ninabobokan by religion, he is destined poor because the test of gods, but not in such a way, he's poor and oppressed because there is a large sucking. Atheists, too, the atheists speak as much as possible, and make a lot of people are frustrated, and most people are atheists only talk about no god, without understanding the importance of science and stomach because hungry |
|
|
|
Who create God? Why there is always a confusion, misunderstanding and debates on the topic of God? Why do people want God? Isn't we are the one to make everything possible? We don't have to give our faith and hope to God. Isn't it ? Why God exists in all people mind?  " cogito Ergo sum " ( I think, therefore I am) - Descartes . if you dnot think a bout God , you dnot know god If you do not think about the people in India, you do not know the people in India. Doesn't mean they don't exist. esensi frist of eksistensi |
|
|
|
Who create God? Why there is always a confusion, misunderstanding and debates on the topic of God? Why do people want God? Isn't we are the one to make everything possible? We don't have to give our faith and hope to God. Isn't it ? Why God exists in all people mind? " cogito Ergo sum " ( I think, therefore I am) - Descartes . if you dnot think a bout God , you dnot know god |
|
|
|
an atheist who claims he would be foolish for atheists, because atheists believe that theis is a liar, the circumstances of this theis is a belief about the absolute spirit, while atheists believe that the absolute spirit was not there, but how do atheists talk about ideas? atheistic idea is also an absolute spirit she did not appear to be material but he think? then atheists believe that theis is a liar? try to look in the mirror for the atheists how that idea in your head with a spirit of absolute spirit
How do atheists talk about that idea? Simple, have you seen/heard or had any contact or evidence of that spirit or anything divine for that matter? Why not? Because a religion and it's teachings, no matter how big, are all an illusion. It's pretty simple when you think about it, just science wasn't that developed hundreds of years ago so people quite easily adopted religion as it had answers to the unexplainable. Give me any question you have and I can give you a logical answer on why is it wrong. you know Descartes ? he talk " cogito Ergu sum or I think ,therefore I am" . then how does an atheist say that god does not exist? and the spirit of the absolute spirit was an illusion? whereas when we think the spirit of the absolute spirit was playing naughty in the brain?, when atheists think like this then he has the answers that the neurons of the brain are working? But how can that be? Do you memperintahkan brain neurons work? it therefore "I said that the idea is the absolute spirit." have regarding the absolute spirit of God and theis, while atheists are also included in theis because they are not robots or computers, theis also have an idea There is no such thing as spirits or souls. I am an animal, just like you. We got here because of billions of years of evolution. Unknowns are just that: unknowns. Religious people equate unknowns with 'God' and stop investigating/thinking. For us unknowns, are things to be discovered and understood. That is the difference between us. then you know that it also theis atheist? If not then I would laugh out loud, I did not say that theis not always about religion? theis is a trust? If atheists do not believe in anything? then the atheist is an alien? , about evolution, and you say that man is an animal? how can you say that man is an animal? , Which category man is an animal is a foolish mistake to think, what difference does an atheist who does not believe in God but believe in evolution, and the human is an animal category terraced the Buddhist and Hindu religious teachings And then I very very like if atheis talk " God is death, And left his body ." , and I hope no one is proud to be an atheist but does not have a stake in science |
|
|
|
an atheist who claims he would be foolish for atheists, because atheists believe that theis is a liar, the circumstances of this theis is a belief about the absolute spirit, while atheists believe that the absolute spirit was not there, but how do atheists talk about ideas? atheistic idea is also an absolute spirit she did not appear to be material but he think? then atheists believe that theis is a liar? try to look in the mirror for the atheists how that idea in your head with a spirit of absolute spirit
How do atheists talk about that idea? Simple, have you seen/heard or had any contact or evidence of that spirit or anything divine for that matter? Why not? Because a religion and it's teachings, no matter how big, are all an illusion. It's pretty simple when you think about it, just science wasn't that developed hundreds of years ago so people quite easily adopted religion as it had answers to the unexplainable. Give me any question you have and I can give you a logical answer on why is it wrong. you know Descartes ? he talk " cogito Ergu sum or I think ,therefore I am" . then how does an atheist say that god does not exist? and the spirit of the absolute spirit was an illusion? whereas when we think the spirit of the absolute spirit was playing naughty in the brain?, when atheists think like this then he has the answers that the neurons of the brain are working? But how can that be? Do you memperintahkan brain neurons work? it therefore "I said that the idea is the absolute spirit." have regarding the absolute spirit of God and theis, while atheists are also included in theis because they are not robots or computers, theis also have an idea |
|
|
|
|
HT: Tottenham 1 - 1 Chelsea
FT: Tottenham 2-3 Chelsea
|
|
|
|
|
an atheist who claims he would be foolish for atheists, because atheists believe that theis is a liar, the circumstances of this theis is a belief about the absolute spirit, while atheists believe that the absolute spirit was not there, but how do atheists talk about ideas? atheistic idea is also an absolute spirit she did not appear to be material but he think? then atheists believe that theis is a liar? try to look in the mirror for the atheists how that idea in your head with a spirit of absolute spirit
|
|
|
|
maybe they think that others nigeria very stupid, it's not good food I thought, how can a billionaire in the wring while they can buy someone's life or pay people to do criminal acts |
|
|
|
Mr. President Rodrigo Duterte does he really do his job to stop drugs within 3 to 6 months?.What do you think?
he was very cool to me, as if he is a villain who hates drugs, but when the president of the Philippines suppress the use and drug dealers, the mainstream also use |
|
|
|
|
untuk prospek kedepannya gmn ya ? apa mungkin akan menggantikan dogecoin ?
|
|
|
|
Hello, After successfully predicting BTC moves in 2016 here on the forum, I have a new set of 2017 predictions that I'm using to trade the current move. 1. Rise to $1,200-$1,300 (Current move) 2. Correction to $800-$900 level and range trading for a while 3. Rise to $1,500 4. Correction to $900-$1,000 and range trading for a while 5. Continued rise to $2,000 by end of year tldr; BTC will double this year after making a couple of moves up and down. are you serious about this? If this really happens what will happen next? crisis will be money? or will be deflation and inflation in countries that use bitcoin |
|
|
|
|
I hope so, if the price of bitcoin remained stable and did not have climbing high or sharp decline, hence the popularity of bitcoin will get better, we should use bitcoin for every transaction we do not use 3rd parties, therefore anounymous of eyes this money is to be and maintain popularitasanya
|
|
|
|
it is the story of a bitcoin, it is not easy to convince people that bitcoin is not a ponzi, but we can not say 100 ℅ that bitcoin net of sekema Ponzi, Ponzi many who use bitcoin, but bitcoin is not a ponzi
An article in the financial times thinks the bitcoin is a ponzi. they have not entered the world of bitcoin and cryptoccurency, and politics in investing is still owned by the ruler of that crazy for power and money, therefore they herded publik opinion that bitcoin ponzi, but try to think back into yourself why you are using bitcoin? whether because anounymous or for investing? if the answer to that question you invest, deathh essence of bitcoin |
|
|
|
As Bitcoin mining is partially controlled by Chinese miners, I have a feeling that sometime in the near future, Bitcoin can become centralized if no solution against this is proposed. If BTC could manage to bring a solution towards mining centralization by preventing mining pools with the most hashrate to effectively gain control of the network, then it would aim to become more decentralized over the years. As mining difficulty increases and new ASIC hardware gets developed, it would make it less possible for any average user to mine Bitcoin, thus making it more centralized each day. Nevertheless, I would like to know your opinion about this, as if BTC becomes centralized, it might cause it to decrease in value, and most of all, violate the principles that it was created for.  I strongly agree with you, if the ownership and mining bitcoin be centered not be denied and can not be blamed for the occurrence of monopolistic pricing and ownerships bitcoin |
|
|
|
Is it correct if more people start to use Bitcoin than they will use less fiat currency than demand of fiat currency will reduce and at the same time Bitcoin value will be growing?
"Fiat money is currency that a government has declared to be legal tender, but it is not backed by a physical commodity. The value of fiat money is derived from the relationship between supply and demand rather than the value of the material that the money is made of" -- Investopedia So basically fiat value is based on supply and demand and same thing for bitcoin as well , the higher demand it is , the better. I doubt we will see changes in fiat just because of bitcoin demand only though , at least not in the next few years. Thank you for the information, this adds to my deeper insight, if government join hands in bitcoin what will happen? whether the transaction should anounymous disappearance? , What will happen in the deep web? then it is gone essence of bitcoin and cool relief from having bitcoin |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
