Alright!
So what now,both of them are banned forever or the ban can be appealed?
And regarding this particular service,I have a future perspective of starting the same service,can I or that might result into a ban too?
Excuse me for bad grammar but English is not my first language.
They are permanently banned, correct. You can appeal the ban, but I don't recommend doing it soon. Additionally, you can provide the service as long as it has nothing illegal (e.g. hacked accounts). This forum does not enforce TOS, so we don't care whether it breaks it.
Update: Typo. |
|
|
|
0.01 BTC per minute and I do it
~240$ hourly wage? You can't be serious. |
|
|
|
Sorry for the late reply, hmm I thought it would be easy to solve, since I used to solve more difficult problems, but the fact that I didn't use matlab for almost a decade, I need to start from basics again, good luck finding someone to help, if I get some off time later I'll try again.
It is not a problem. I can only image just how different it must be for you. I've solved some of these (excluding the transformations), but I also have new tasks. I will update the thread later. |
|
|
|
Arent global moderators supposed to be moderating all the boards? I guess economics falls under the "all" category...
Yes, global moderators have the power to moderate every section. However, they might not be active at all times and reports from a particular section might be handled much later than others.
Update: Correct. You know what I meant, i.e. sometimes it will take reports longer to be processed. |
|
|
|
The concerned usernames are rslsrkr and Ubercode.Both of them have similar service rather same service.
It was the case that I've remembered. I can't tell you why rslsrkr was banned (I don't know), but I'm the one who nuked Ubercode due to ban evasion. If one is banned, they are only allowed to create a thread about their ban in Meta (from another account). Posting somewhere else results in a permanent ban. |
|
|
|
|
IIRC "your friend" might be the person that was banned and tried to sell the same uber stuff from a new account. There was one case that I remember. However, if you want an exact answer you would need to provide us with usernames.
|
|
|
|
Sure. You could also open a payment channel and fund it with just enough coin for 1 cup of coffee. It would be a stupid thing to do, you would loose money vs. transacting on the blockchain & bloat BTC blockchain in the process, but yeah, technically you could.
If BTC tx fees ever become substantial, setting up a payment channel for 10 cups of coffee would make that coffee prohibitively expensive. So 100 cups is a reasonable number, I'm good with it.
Doing so for 1 cup of coffee does not make sense indeed. LN is not efficient for such. However, you have no calculations to back up any exact numbers (e.g. at exactly what point is it inefficient/expensive). You're part of the 'complaining is better than contributing crowd'. The rest of your comments are simply "no ur rong," and, as such, deserve no response. Responding only because it pains me to see you reduce yourself to this, Lauda, sniping like a hurt little girl. Stop acting like a hurt little girl, Lauda, it's unbecoming.
Simiarily you think that "ur rite" without anything backing up your words. I've done nothing but reduce to your level. +1 for ad hominem attempt.
Update: Seems like I've wasted my time. Stop trolling. |
|
|
|
yes it is possible, but you have to be very stupid to let that happen, first of all, set as many passwords and other security a you can, don't share your codes to anyone because if you will, there might be a chance that somebody will try to get in your wallet, and if someone will then you will probably lose them
Your suggestion is not helpful. If one's desktop gets infected, no password in the world can help you. This is due to the fact that the 'evil' entity is able to install a keylogger and record your password(s). Users that use a desktop wallet need to educate themselves about general security and safe browsing habits. |
|
|
|
That is a bad metric for measuring the 'fullness' of the blocks. You're looking at transaction per block which tend to vary due to the average size of each transaction. As previously said, in order to argue whether blocks are indeed almost full you will have to define what real world transactions or what spam is and make an analysis based on that. Otherwise, one could easily manipulate you into thinking what one wants. Blocks 'full' --> Txs Fees high --> Mass Adoption down --> Discussion high --> BTC Market Price down --> .... ? (will lost users come back?)
How high do 'TX fees' have to be in order for 'mass adoption' to go down? Everyone keeps saying this, yet nobody gives exact numbers. Should we panic if the average fee is 15 cents?  |
|
|
|
This debate shouldn't exist at all, whatever happens even with the fork, bitcoin will still continue to exist without any problems, so no civil war in my opinion regarding bitcoins.
How can you claim that there is no "civil war" when there have been countless "discussions" that include various forms of hostility over the course of the last few months? Who cares about the block size issue!
Seems like a lot of people do? That has come and gone and now we have a plethora of browser still fighting for dominance. The same will happen with Bitcoin, because everyone wants to be on top and there are only place for one. ^smile^
So your solution to the 'debate' is to introduce additional crypto-currencies that will 'fight for dominance'? |
|
|
|
I haven't been her for 4 months, and now everyone is hero members.....
It takes much more time than 4 months to become a hero member. is there like a market for users??
Yes. how come everyone here is now an expert?
No. The rank has no relation to knowledge. It simply shows that you've been active for X amount of time. There are high ranked members that I would consider newbies. |
|
|
|
Well, there is Blitz for the speculation section. However, he doesn't seem as active anymore. I think theymos should assign someone to the board
I concur. It would not be bad if there was someone looking over that section. |
|
|
|
I'm telling you it's a fundamental flaw which you don't seem to find problematic.
I'm telling you that it isn't. Correct, though has little to do with what I said, that being "what amounts to buying gift cards."
It doesn't. Before you can buy your overpriced cup of coffee via Lightning, you have to lock away enough BTC for 100 cups, or Lightning is as pointless as buying yourself a "1 cup of coffee" gift card each time you buy a cup of coffee.
Which is pointless.
100 cups? See, you're being hyperbolic again. You can just as easily do it for 10. Though some might suggest you're not technically using BTC, either.
Whoever says that does not understand LN (albeit it is better than those that say that LN is an altcoin). Isn't segwit supposed to launch this month? Seems like a big move.
The code might get released this month. |
|
|
|
I tried to enter and delete it but i can't delete any post, there is no the "delete" icon, i think that's because of the ban.
You can't edit/remove your posts now, that is correct. Wait out your ban and make sure that you don't post outside this thread (from your account(s)). |
|
|
|
I thinking logically, most miners are located in China and they have cheapest electricity in the world we can use their mining price as referent price.
Yes, that is correct. The majority is concentrated in China, but can you really ignore the others? So we can tell they won't dump under that price, so price can only be higher.
You think that they have such a strong influence? What about 'whales' that might dump? Same story goes with bitcoin, small percentage of coins are on exchanges and they are in hands of whales - mostly.
That does make sense. Things seem to be a bit calm these days though. Speculators will drive the price up once we are closer to the halving.
You can't know that for sure. |
|
|
|
Where did I say I want to rush anything? I said it is too late now to "plan"
That's the impression that one gets after mentioning those 'two weeks'. If Core did have a plan in place for this situation, there would be no need to rush anything (segwit maybe, hf to classic maybe) and no need to worry about gridlock.
You can't really know if they have a plan or not, unless they explicitly state so. Fine, doesn't address my question.
The fees aren't really 'built up'. As you say, spam is hard to define.
Standard fee payers have never had much to fear from spam.
Real transactions are hard to define as well. I agree,
But as I said, "On Bitcoin's present trajectory blocks will be.."
My bad. Do you have evidence that supports this 'trajectory'? |
|
|
|
You don't find it somewhat problematic that a system billed as A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System can't handle the transaction volume generated by a small suburban shopping mall?
Finding something problematic and saying that it is a fundamental flaw is fundamentally different. You don't consider it a problem that "the next world currency" can't come up with a coherent scaling roadmap which doesn't involve third parties & what amounts to buying gift cards from people you plan to do business with (lightning network)?
The Lightning Network does not involve third parties nor buying any kind of gift cards. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
