|
I'm seeing the same errors as MobGod on qt and source.
Trying to compile on Ubuntu 12.10 64Bit..
|
|
|
|
Ok I hate to keep asking but I'm running the blockexplorer and a pool, so I need the source to compile Linux this is taking a long time where is the source........
Good morning. Sorry about that, was sick and forced to rest. Odd since not many people are on this place. Getting source out now and promise to get through all these messages. Thanks Kimoto - Hope you feel better soon! |
|
|
|
Cryptsy dead again as usual!!!
Still working fine for me...  |
|
|
|
and its down AGAIN
killing me, always at VITAL times
Working fine for me.. |
|
|
|
I assure you we are not trying to scam anyone! We did have some problems with blocks not paying out properly for about a 24-48 hour period. We have a custom catcher system in place that catches unpaid blocks and distributes them amongst miners. The way the catcher system works is every 5 minutes we scan through the last 400 blocks and see if any blocks were solved by the pool and if they were if they have already been paid out or not. If they were missed by mmCFE the catcher script looks at each users total shares submitted and then deducts the last total count we have recorded from the last run of the catcher script. The resulting shares for each user are then added up and the total unpaid block count for that run of the catcher script is divided between the outstanding shares. The problem that is becoming apparent with this system, is that if you mine for say 12 hours and the pool mmCFE misses paying out on some blocks then you stop mining the missing blocks are distributed amongst those who are still mining... When I built the catcher script it was designed to run once every 24 hours, however in an effort to speed up missed blocks a few days ago we moved it to run every 5 minutes. On average it works out well, but I admit it is far from perfect and I am in the process of re-designing the whole back end of mmCFE to avoid these problems altogether. If you mine on the pool it may take a while for the system to ramp up to your full share with pplns and missed blocks - after the first 24 hours you should see the coins per day estimates being reached. I have been mining on the pool for a few days to test out whats going on and my payout over the last 24 hours was estimated yesterday at about 350 MEC per day, on completion of the 24 hour period the daily estimate stood at 307 MEC / Day - At the end of the 24 hour period I had received 302 MEC. Yes, a little under 350 estimated the day before, but pretty damn close to the 300 as estimated today. Don't forget at difficulty goes up your estimates will go down. The payouts for the 24 hour period before that were not running smoothly and I apologise for that - missed shares were badly distributed, especially as mentioned above to miners who stopped mining on the pool  . At the end of the day it is still currently, for the most part of the day, the largest Megacoin pool and often has at least 50% of the network hashing power (only 33% currently - looks like a multipool is hitting Megacoin at the moment) - we have some pretty big miners there and of the ones I have heard from their payouts are, aside from the problems a couple of days ago, consistently on par with (or at worst slightly below) with what they should be getting and they have no problem with the pool. |
|
|
|
interesting... I think Diamond has the same code base as other PoW/PoS coins, such as galaxycoin, bottlecaps, bitgem. etc. All from PPCoin/Novacoin. But GLX, CAP, GTG have block explorers, why they work? maybe check with them?
There is a version of Abe that works with ppcoin based coins - its just that the version that works with non ppcoin coins will not work with ppcoin based coins at the same time without significantly changing the Abe code. So I cannot easily run for example megacoin and diamondcoin using the same Abe instance.. |
|
|
|
Yes I won't sell at this price  Do we have a block explorer? Not yet.. I may look into that, maybe some implementation of this: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/AbeI tried to add Diamondcoin to my current block chain explorer and am having some difficulties. It seems there are complications when trying to run ppcoin based coins and regular bitcoin based coins on the same block explorer: Opened /home/me/.Diamond/blk0001.dat
Exception at 72056513853653130
Failed to catch up {'blkfile_offset': 0, 'blkfile_number': 1, 'chain_id': Decimal('3'), 'loader': None, 'dirname': u'/home/me/.Diamond', 'id': 9L}
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "Abe/DataStore.py", line 2621, in catch_up
store.catch_up_dir(dircfg)
File "Abe/DataStore.py", line 2879, in catch_up_dir
store.import_blkdat(dircfg, ds, blkfile['name'])
File "Abe/DataStore.py", line 3006, in import_blkdat
b = store.parse_block(ds, chain_id, magic, length)
File "Abe/DataStore.py", line 3037, in parse_block
d['transactions'].append(deserialize.parse_Transaction(ds))
File "Abe/deserialize.py", line 86, in parse_Transaction
d['txIn'].append(parse_TxIn(vds))
File "Abe/deserialize.py", line 45, in parse_TxIn
d['sequence'] = vds.read_uint32()
File "Abe/BCDataStream.py", line 71, in read_uint32
def read_uint32 (self): return self._read_num('<I')
File "Abe/BCDataStream.py", line 110, in _read_num
(i,) = struct.unpack_from(format, self.input, self.read_cursor)
error: unpack_from requires a buffer of at least 4 bytes
The issue is discussed here: https://github.com/jtobey/bitcoin-abe/issues/4 |
|
|
|
Any updates coming Kimoto?
Yeah - Where is the source code for the latest client update? What are the other upcoming developments for the coin you mentioned in an earlier post? Kimoto did you get my PM regarding a Megacoin forum? |
|
|
|
Price is rising - Join the pool and get mining! Contact email address was down for a few days due to changing domain registrar - has now been changed. Delayed stats loading page issue has now been fixed. |
|
|
|
|
There are only 12,348 DMD in existence. It might be hard, if possible at all, to find someone with 2000 of them...
|
|
|
|
Megacoin now has a greater market cap. than Digitalcoin  11 Megacoin $ 204,739 $ 0.016 13,101,500 MEC +80.40 % 12 Digitalcoin $ 192,216 $ 0.036 5,362,243 DGC +0.79 % (from coinmarketcap.com) Actual values according to Cryptsy: Megacoin = 13101500 × 0.018 = $235827 Digitalcoin = 5362243 × 0.04 = $214489.72 Go Megacoin!!! |
|
|
|
I would think that 12 GH/s is not attack, but ... the fact that it was just reactivated on cryptsy + left only 11 hours to UNOCS :-) + currently difficulty dropped little bit (eg multipools switching)
Removed from Cryptsy again.. |
|
|
|
MΣC price is rocketing upwards. 0.00013000  Almost 0.00015  When will it hit 0.0002 ? |
|
|
|
Still down for me.. Working now. |
|
|
|
Still down for me.. |
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I am not worried.
Script kiddie DDOS just means the website is not reachable - I don't know why people automatically assume this means their coins are not safe..
|
|
|
|
NOTHING about crypto implies that it should 'keep being profitable'.
How so, who is going to mine if it is not profitable - ASIC or GPU alike? |
|
|
|
Cryptsy down yet again... Bugs and problems everywhere Bitjohn  Are the funds safe? You should really consider changing complete interface and engine, it doesnt work good like this. Too many coins, if exchange cant handle it, shut it down, fix it and reopen. It will be much better that way. Dont get me wrong I like Cryptsy, but problems are too often. For example Mcxnow did not have a single fail since it opened... I think that is a bit harsh.  |
|
|
|
|
Getting an error page trying to connect to Cryptsy..
Anyone else seeing this?
|
|
|
|
|
ASICs taking over Bitcoin might be a blessing for scrypt based coins.
When the masses decide it is finally uneconomical to mine bitcoin on GPUs there will be many miners looking for the next best thing -> altcoins. More hash on altcoins means more secure blockchains..
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
