My parents and and the parents of my wife has about 4-5 years which buy tickets about a national bingo. No one time have won. And if someday will win the amount which can win I don't know if it will cover the money spent during these years. Where are the money of living here?

It is the biggest lottery here were I live. Maybe in USA when can be won million of dollars it is possible this, maybe even in some other country. But in most of the countries the amounts that can be won are few.

But even if accepted that the amount is everywhere big as in USA. How many people can have this luck. Maybe 10-20-30 in a year. Can be such amount of people enough to name this kind of game tool which is able to assure the live of the people. To be an example to follow? People are millions of persons. Are 30 or even 50 of those able to represent all the people of one country. Telling that it is possible to live with lottery? I think no.

That's was the form which has my answer given at July 17. It is not that I "predicted" your above post?     Below the repetition of my answer given to your previous and actual questions:

"Definitely I would take both. It is normal to diversify the investments. Both of them are potential investments. So I would prefer to believe equally in both of them. Half of my money that are designated to invest will go in bitcoin and half of them in gold. Maybe 60-70% in bitcoin because of hope I have that bitcoin will go high in years."

July 17, 2015, 12:27:17 PM

It is changed only the word "diversify" because in the original post was wrong (diversificate)

I've right if evaluate myself with 5 stars?    

I see to many fear and alarmism only by one article. I can imagine what will happen if it will be two or three article which will give THE SAME news. But I can't imagine if it will be a bunch of articles about to many events which EXPLAIN the situation but will be given as catastrophic by the journalists.

There must occur to many things in order to be a crisis like that of 2008. There are not something more terrible than the panic from an (even it is not normal or usual) financial event make from the Federal Reserve.

I'm doing tens of posts like yours but yet I see that are hundred who believe in the things written to my previous posts quoted by you. I see even strategies about the secure wins in gambling. So i must find different ways to show at the gamblers that their hope is an simple but pure and risky desire or addiction and not something else.

What is the difference between the casino gambling and sport betting? Are not both connected with luck? Or with need to earn more? This last make possible (or inevitable) the loss?

In the sport betting you can make an "easy" bet when it will be a match between a big team against a weak team. You have big probabilities to win. But never you can be sure. But lets suppose that you will win. If you win the amount will be very few if you bet few money. So to earn more with this kind of matches you need to bet big amounts. And again the amount earned will not enough to live with it. Even you will do to many of this bets yet the amounts earned can't be enough to live. To not suppose here that even can lose. One time of this kind of loss will cost you a lot of money. Because such must be the amounts of money used in such kind of bets. So one match wrong and you can leave all the earnings of the month. How can be possible to live in this way?

To live with betting in sport mean play big amounts and win big amounts. I explain above that the amounts with which you bet must be bigger, more easiest is the possibility to win. Because if you bet a little amount will earn very few; not enough to live with those.

What is the point. You will try to win with your money using bets with big amounts of money but in risky matches when the amount which can be earned is big. So you will risk. You will bet in difficult matches. If you do this you will lose all your money. Because even if you will win one day, you will lose tomorrow or another; can't win always. Or you will want to earn more and will bet all the earnings. One day will lose all. Is the same like in casino games.

To live with gambling it is impossible. Even if you have big amounts in disposition with which you can do various bets.

No problem and no need for sorry. You tried to communicate and help me. This must be appreciated. And I appreciate it. 

There are someone which can explain me with simple but in full words what does it mean to have talent in dice; or in roulette; or in slot machine?

Then, after doing that, can explain in the same way and for the same gamble games above what does it mean to have skills in those?

Thanks.

Why must to do this? Why I must do such kind of job? You are the interested person who want to know those; you find the way to have those.

In my post I tell that I don't care from anything I do in internet. I can tell again this. But I must tell that when I wrote that sentence I had not in mind my emails or other personal stuffs. I meant navigating in internet. Following the way and the normal meaning of the expression used by OP to formulate its question - NSA monitor the bitcoin-related sited. Not the emails or other personal stuffs of the people, not even the people but the activity in the bitcoin-related sites. That it is simple navigation. Then if they find suspicious activity in such monitoring this is another thing. Bitcoin is used mostly in the dark web and I have not visited never this kind of sites. If they are able to find criminals monitoring this kind of bitcoin-related sites I can't do nothing else than congratulating with them.

But to tell the truth even if NSA will learn about my personal things or will read all my emails and learn some other personal things yet I don't care about this. It is another thing if my emails will be read by anyone (as it was understood my post by above poster). This is undesirable and in this point of view my above expression need correction.

If we go again to NSA, I don't think that NSA have the patience and, above all, the time to read all the emails of all the people which are not suspected. And I know that I am not suspected. Have made nothing in my life that can make me suspected person.

As I told above I have nothing to hide to NSA and they, (if want) can read every my email. I can give myself my password to them. Even I know that they read only the suspicious emails taken from key words or phrases. I am sure to not have such. If I have, no problem that NSA read even those. Will read more about me and my correspondence but I have not problem that that kind of people learn more about my "secret" life. My life is healthy and clean in everything. They will not find anything with interests about their job and will not made public those. So no one other will know something.

P.S. I haven't see you links because to tell the truth I don't care about the work of NSA.

The price of gold is decreased at least the last 4 years and half. Investing in gold is not more like it was time ago. It is better save the money in a bank then in gold.

A commercial bank never will have its coin. The study and the (possibly) application of blockchain by every of those which will want to make this will serve to them to reduce their costs. Nothing else. It is not possible that every bank create its own coin. The world of currencies will go in anarchy and it will a big mess. First because they must agree with every other bank to accept their coin. Then to use it. The other banks will want to do the same things. Even if this it would possible what is the reason and the meaning of all this?

Blockchain is one product of peer to peer technology. This technology is called disruptive even because decrease significantly the costs where it is applied. Bitcoin is one of its materialized applications but its possibilities are for way much more. It is the materialization of peer to peer on blockchain the reason of its study and the possibility of application of its technology to the banks which attract the lasts to be interested on it and not the production of another coin. Where can be applied then? Only those can know this but for sure in their transactions yes. Because with this application, at least, it will be the decrease of the costs of those.

It is the loss of the money in the favor of the owner of the business which organize the betting (whatever kind of business it will be; online or offline).

Good, good. I like your post.  This is the true. Your's true written in your post. . Don't exist the joke in gambling even if you play between friends or spend even one cent. I correct my post telling that is wrong don't call my games and bets gamble and I am lucky that I have stooped gambling in the right time without having create addiction from it.

May the people like you be more and more here in this forum and make posts like yours. It will be a big pleasure for me to read and comment about those. 

I haven't read any other thing more strange than this. Connections between things away one from another, fatalism at its highest level, imagination and reality mixed together, shortcut reasonings about big things who need maybe books to be explained, uniqueness of ways when there are to many others that can be verified (even with more probability), calculations and results which need the computers of NASA to be made and books with numerous data to enter on those....

Maybe I see blue today....

True. I invested time and bitcoins in Latium. The developers give it free when you create an account and then for every referral you found. Thinking that was a coin with perspective invested a little less than one bitcoin in buying other coins in one exchange. The price goes down every day and I lost almost 0.5 bitcoin with my investment. Thanks God haven't invested more. Now Latium has put a bunch of words on its site where write that it will be e new open in the future and that they has finished the first part of their projects (who knew this before). Until the devs spent the money earned. Then it will be again the same story with new users which will believe to their words.

Thank you for your explanations but it was not this the reason and the meaning of my sentence or all my post. I know very well what is a casino and know even more about it. My posts wanted to tell that I never have gamble seriously in my life. Showed my "gamble" experience to tell you that my "gambling" was a joke and not a true gamble. So someone (me in this case) can't stop something that has never began. As it was mentioned in your previous post and which I have highlighted with bold.  

I never can believe that someone may live with gambling. I want to not tell more because it is in vain. Who want to believe in this kind of dreams make with open eyes believe on those whatever word can be write. Who think and learn, understand that this things are only urban legends. I want to tell only that gamble make the people to wast money not only for the owners of gamble game/site/casinos but even to be recovered from the addiction from those.

Same to me. Even I have a happy marriage. So it is not true.   But I laugh with all my hart with the above post.

You are wondering with open eyes. You see to many movies and those convince you about math strategies in winning in dice or in various other gambling games. There are no any possibility to create strategies or super strategies in dice game. There are no genius which can calculate something. There is not nothing that can be calculate or command the dice. Even if you will have the Deep Blue you will be subject only of the luck. The luck is chaos. The luck is anarchy. The luck is a total of unknown things and impossibility to know even only one of those. There's no order on it. There are not any possibility to calculate or predict it. There can be chances which fit it with your deisres but this is not calculation or prediction. It is only LUCK.

WAKE UP.

I haven't seen never a casino within in my life. My first "gamble" was when I was young and was in betting for football matches. It was a game between friends within a class. The amount played (converted in us dollar) was about 4-5 us dollar for every week. The maximum of money that can be won was 40-50 us dollar in a week (depended from the number of friends entered that week). This experience lasted about one year. Then after about 15 years happen the second experience: playing poker for about 1 year (normally the Saturday evening for 3-4 hours with my three friends - but even other days when everyone of us was free). The overall amounts of money played (circulated during all the seance) in our game was (by all our four) never more 200 us dollar (so 50 for everyone). Then after this year never played any kind of game with money. If this can be called "gamble" yes I was a "gambler". But even my results from these experiences were positive (I was in profit) I am against the gambling. Even the money played were money which goes from one friend to another; so remained between us which were friends.

Gambling is a gangrene.

Are very rare the people which gamble and don't be addicted from this kind of disease. All the kind of gambles (including those mentioned by you in the above posts). Important in this story is the time. If you will continue to gamble for a long time you for sure will be addicted by that. Even from the most "innocent" of those (like the lottery, sport betting or worst, the poker). It is not the edge who is dangerous in itself (even this is the bigger and the most known danger) but the use of money to win. Using for fun in the long time become desire to win. The desire to win need always more money to use. If you arrive in this point have no importance what you gamble. Whatever it will be the gamble (even the above mentioned by you), you will use and you will need always for more and more money. You are addicted already if you arrive in this point.