Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 02:31:28 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 [65] 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 »
1281  Economy / Speculation / Re: The only reason Bitcoin is more valuable then other altcoins on: August 13, 2014, 12:55:29 AM
Liquidity.  Bitcoin has the most liquidity of any cryptocurrency by 1 -2 orders of magnitude.  That is because it was the first technology to address the problem of decentralized trust.

It will be very hard, if not impossible, for any new coin to surpass bitcoin in terms of liquidity.

The other thing to consider is that bitcoin was allowed to incubate in relative obscurity for the first couple of years, well before 0.1% of humanity had ever heard of such a concept.  Any new coins will have to attain their liquidity in a very different environment.

So yes, it is the most valuable because it was first.  But do not underestimate the importance of being first.
1282  Bitcoin / Press / Re: [2014-08-12] U.S. watchdog calls bitcoin 'Wild West' of finance on: August 12, 2014, 06:58:23 PM
Nice detailed analysis, Cubic Earth. Lot of work!

I am uncomfortable with the "cool" assessment on the final point. I speculate that this portal will be abused for control purposes.

"Troubles with Crypto? Snitch to Big Brother, who will make all your troubles go away." I prefer caveat emptor, and taking responsibility for my own actions - I was an early BFL customer/victim, and I'll whine about it, but not to Big Brother - my error, my problem, none of BB's business.  Wink


If you encounter a problem with virtual currency or a virtual currency company, let us know. Submit a complaint online at (government link). Submitting a complaint takes only a few minutes.

Cool!


Thanks.  I don't disagree with you that they might abuse consumer complaints to further some agenda of their own, but they also haven't done so yet.  So I will remain "skeptically optimistic". Also, since vigilante justice and private police forces aren't currently allowed in the U.S., I am receptive to the idea that the government can play a positive role in resolving disputes.  Long term, I look forward private systems replacing whatever it is that this agency hopes to accomplish.  When I said "Cool!" to myself, it was with a tinge of sarcasm.  I probably should have wrote "Okay.", which I would I have

Also, I wrote the following email the CFPB this morning:
Quote
Hi,

I read though your entire report on virtual currencies.  Based on the report, it seems like you have good intentions, to educate consumers about some of the risks.  But there were a few glaring inaccuracies.  Some were factual errors, while others seemed designed to mislead.  All of the mistakes erred on the side of “scaring people” away from virtual currencies.  I’ll give you credit, perhaps 80% of the info was good advice, but why the mistakes?  For an agency that is supposed to help consumers, engaging in the very kind of deceptive tactics and mis-reporting that you watch for is just embarrassing.

A separate question: Why not also publish a report letting people know the benefits of these systems?  They have much to offer.  Banks and credit card companies are not angels.

I would be happy to discuss what the mistakes and errors were, and help to correct the document so the public can have good information.

- My Name
- My Phone Number
1283  Bitcoin / Press / Re: [2014-08-12] U.S. watchdog calls bitcoin 'Wild West' of finance on: August 12, 2014, 06:41:43 AM
Flowing is my reformatting of the brochure-like PDF that was published by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.  Also, the parts outside of the quote boxes are my comments.  I could have re-written almost the entire thing, but on parts where I felt they were close, or on the right track, I just wrote "agreed", or "true". A few parts were blatantly wrong, or worse, outright deceptive.  That is all the worse from an agency that is supposed to "protect consumers" form those very same deceptive practices.  Have they no shame?

******************************************************************************

+++The following parts formatted like this, in between pluses,
were set aside, in little green boxes in the original text+++

******************************************************************************

Quote
CONSUMER ADVISORY | AUGUST 2014 - Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

Risks to consumers posed by virtual currencies

How about risks and benefits?  At least they acknowledge they are being one-sided.

Quote
What are virtual currencies? And, as a consumer, what risks should you be aware of?

You may have heard about virtual currencies like Bitcoin, XRP, and Dogecoin. You may have heard you can buy them online. In some circumstances, you can send them to other people or use them to pay for goods and services. You may also have heard that some people buy them as speculative investments or that you can “mine” them with your computer. But what are virtual currencies? And, as a consumer, what risks should you be aware of? In a nutshell, while virtual currencies offer the potential for innovation, a lot of big issues have yet to be resolved – some of which are critical. If you are interested in using or buying virtual currencies, you should be aware of the associated risks:

The above is fair and accurate.

Quote
•Hackers. Virtual currencies are targets for highly sophisticated hackers, who have been able to breach advanced security systems.

This is true.  They can’t breech cold storage however.  Please educate yourself.

Quote
•Fewer protections. If you trust someone else to hold your virtual currencies and something goes wrong, that company may not offer you the kind of help you expect from a bank or debit or credit card provider.

Absolutely true.  Hold your private keys yourself!  Don’t trust large sums of money with third parties.  However, let us not forget that banks don’t always provided the level of help that we would hope for either.

Quote
•Cost. Virtual currencies can cost consumers much more to use than credit cards or even regular cash.

Yes, so be careful, pay attention to fees, exchange rates, etc.  But vice versa is true as well.  A balanced report would point out that credit cards and cash can be more expensive than bitcoin in many situations as well.

Quote
• Scams. Fraudsters are taking advantage of the hype surrounding virtual currencies to cheat people with fake opportunities. So before you get involved, it’s important to know what can go wrong.

No argument here.


Quote
What are virtual currencies?
Virtual currencies are a kind of electronic money. That means when you buy a virtual currency you don’t get an actual coin or bill that you can hold in your hands. Instead, you receive electronic units that many people may agree to accept and treat like dollars, euros, or other forms of money. But virtual currencies aren’t regular money. To begin with, virtual currencies are not issued or backed by the United States or any other government or central bank. No one is required to accept them as payment or to exchange them for traditional currencies. To work, they depend on the processing power of vast networks of unidentified, private computers around the world, which maintain and update a public ledger called the “blockchain.” (Think of it as a public spreadsheet.)

Fair enough.  They intentionally mislead the reader, however, by suggesting virtual currencies are somehow different from government issued currency in the fact that they are not “backed by the United States or any other government or central bank.”  U.S. dollars have not been backed by anything since 1971 when President Nixon unilaterally revoked a dollar’s convertibility to gold.  To reiterate, neither dollars nor bitcoin are ‘backed’ by anything except the trust of their users.

Quote
Further, virtual currencies are not kept in banks or credit unions. In order to use virtual currencies, you need to store them in a "digital wallet," which are identified by your "public keys." To access the virtual currency in your digital wallet, you use "private keys." (Your private keys are random sequences of 64 letters and numbers that should be kept secret; your public keys are corresponding letter/number sequences that everyone can see on the blockchain.) If you want to send someone your virtual currency, for example as payment, you use the private keys to unlock your digital wallet. In many ways, your private keys are your virtual currency so keeping your private keys secret is critical to owning and using virtual currency. You can store and protect your private keys yourself or entrust them to a company called a wallet provider to protect them for you.

Right on!  It’s almost like they are beginning to understand how it works!  It would be a major positive for everyone if the government provided quality education materials.

Quote
You can learn more about how virtual currencies work at http://www.fatf-gafi.org/topics/ methodsandtrends/documents/virtual-currencydefinitions-aml-cft-risk.html.  And before you decide to use virtual currencies, here are some of the things you should consider:
Quote
+++According to online accounts, after learning about a Bitcoin exchange from an internet search, Nicole* transferred cash to a bank account designated by the exchange’s representative, Jackson, who she had e-mailed with and even spoken to on the phone. Nicole never received her Bitcoins, however. When Nicole tried to call Jackson again, the line was disconnected.    +++                     *All names have been changed.

Yep. This happens.  It can even happen with dollars too, believe it or not.

Quote
+++Virtual currency exchanges, including those using kiosks, are required to register with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network— which is part of the U.S. Treasury Department—as money services businesses.
Before you do business with an exchange, you can verify that it has registered by checking www.fincen.gov/financial_institutions/msb/ msbstateselector.html.
(Note, though, that though it is illegal for a virtual currency exchange to operate without registering with FinCEN, the registration does not, on its own, mean that an exchange is trustworthy.)
Exchanges may also need to be licensed with your State as money transmitters or currency exchanges. You can check with your State’s financial regulators to make sure that an exchange is licensed.+++
Yep.

Quote
If you are buying virtual currencies :
Know who you’re dealing with if you decide to buy.

 If something goes wrong with your purchase of virtual currencies, do you know how to contact the seller? Some virtual currency exchanges do not identify their owners, their phone numbers and addresses, or even the countries where they are located. Ask yourself: In any other business transaction, would you trust these people with your money? Do you know what your contractual rights would be (or how you would enforce them) if the seller doesn’t deliver what you purchased?

Sound advice.

Quote
Understand what the actual costs will be.
For example, do you know what the relevant exchange rate will be and how it was determined? Are there any mark-ups to the exchange rate or other fees? How long will the transaction take to complete? Do you know what will happen if rates change before the exchange is made?
Good point.

Quote
Bitcoin “ATMs” are not ATMs at all.
Bitcoin kiosks are machines, connected to the Internet, that allow you to insert cash in exchange for Bitcoins (which they can give you as a slip of paper or by moving money to your public key on the blockchain). They may look like traditional ATMs, but unlike ATMs that you may associate with your checking and savings accounts, Bitcoin kiosks do not connect to your bank and may lack many of the safeguards you would expect. They may also
charge high transaction fees – media reports describe transaction fees as high as 7% and exchange rates $50 over rates you could get elsewhere.

And some dispense cash when you supply the machine with Bitcoins.  The Government is correct that the fees can be a little on the high side.  But “exchange rates $50 over rates you could get elsewhere”, that works out to a 9% fee at $600 per coin.  Saying 9% would be more informative, but perhaps “$50” sounded scarier?  It is also pretty darn sloppy to reference unnamed “media reports”.  Get out there and do some research on your own if you actually want to help people, CFPB.

Quote
Be prepared to weather very large price fluctuations.
In 2013, Bitcoin’s price fell as much as 61% in a single day. In 2014, the one-day price drop has been as big as 80%.

Yes, be prepared to weather large price fluctuations. Don’t invest more than you can afford to lose.  That is true.  The 80% price drop the government quoted for 2014 is absolutely bogus and misleading and calls into question the government’s credibility, competence, or both.  I’m guessing they were referring to the BTCe flash crash.  Ask yourself this question:  If a car dealer announced they were selling all the cars on the lot within the next 5 minutes in an auction with no minimum bid, the cars would sell for way, way under value.  Would it be accurate or helpful to tell someone that the price of “cars” had carshed?   One exchange absolutely does not set the market price for bitcoins anymore than one supermarket sets defines the price of a gallon of milk.

Quote
Virtual currencies are still experimental.
Virtual currencies, like Bitcoin, are still in active development. There are big issues that have yet to be resolved. In particular, the critical component
of the entire system—the public ledger known as the blockchain—is maintained by vast unidentified private computer networks spread all over the world. It is possible that elements of these networks could abuse the power that comes with maintaining the ledger, for example by undoing transactions that you thought were finalized.

Bitcoin is still an experiment.  As for reversibility, the probability that a transaction could be reversed is a function of time, with the likelihood of a reversal becoming infinitely small as time goes one.  See https://bitcoil.co.il/Doublespend.pdf for more information.  Banks, credit cards, PayPal, etc. undo transactions all the time.  A bounced check or a counterfeit bill are two paper examples of ‘reversibility’.  Nothing is perfect, but bitcoin transactions have thus far been orders of magnitude more reliable than our contemporary alternatives.   That is part of why bitcoin was created.

Quote
If it seems too good to be true, it may be.

Many criminals have seized upon the press and enthusiasm relating to virtual currency to create new versions of old scams. In early 2014, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission sued the organizer of an alleged Ponzi scheme in Texas
that purportedly advertised an “investment opportunity” that promised up to 7% interest per week. Instead, invested Bitcoins were allegedly used to pay existing investors and the organizer’s personal expenses. Like any other investment, do your due diligence before giving someone money.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has issued important warnings about virtual currency investment scams, which you can read at www. sec.gov/investor/alerts/ia_virtualcurrencies.pdf and www.sec.gov/oiea/investor-alerts-bulletins/ investoralertsia_bitcoin.html.

Good advice.

Quote
Bitcoin transactions may not be entirely anonymous.
Information about each and every Bitcoin transaction is publicly shared and stored forever. Persistent, motivated people will likely be able to link your transactions to, among other things, your other transactions and public keys, as well as to your computer’s IP address. So it is possible that others will be able to estimate both how much Bitcoin you own and where you are.

Very true.  That is why mixers or tumblers are important for everyone to use.

Quote
If you store virtual currencies by yourself
You can be hacked.
If you use virtual currency, the data on your computer or phone can be an attractive target to hackers. If someone gets access to your computer (for example, using a “Trojan Horse” virus or other malware), they can get your private keys and, thereby, steal your virtual currency.

True.  Learn about cold storage, offline-wallets, and paper wallets.

Quote
You are on your own.
With a traditional bank account or payment card,
if someone breaches your account, your bank or payment card company will help you recover some or all of your funds. If you’re storing your virtual currencies on your own computer, you’re basically on your own if your virtual currency is stolen. There is no other party to help you.

Correct.  Personal accountability is not for everyone.

Quote
If you lose your private keys, you’ve lost your funds forever.
If you store your virtual currency yourself, you
can lose your funds without being hacked. If you lose your private keys, you have lost all access to your funds. No one can help you with password reminders and no one will refund your loss. Some people store their private keys offline on a USB
key, external hard drive, or even paper. But if they haven’t made a backup copy and they lose that USB key, hard drive, or piece of paper (or spill a glass of water on it), they lose those funds forever.

True. Backup. Backup. Backup.  You can backup your bitcoin! But can you back-up a $100 bill?  Not legally at least.  Read up on multisignature wallets, or  “multi-sig”, for how it can help you to stay safe and secure.

Quote
+++ According to news reports, James
mistakenly discarded a computer hard drive containing his private keys for 7,500 Bitcoin in 2013. As of July 2014, that amount of Bitcoin was valued at nearly $5 million. James didn’t back up the drive and has not been able to locate the drive at the city dump. Consequently, he has lost all his funds.+++

Yep.  Take care of your assets.

Quote
If you trust someone else to store your virtual currencies
Quote
+++ According to media accounts, Kat had
Bitcoin valued at nearly $10,000 stolen from an account she maintained with a major Bitcoin company. When it happened the first time, they refunded her money. When it happened again a month later, they told her that she didn’t qualify for a refund.
The same media accounts note that when Larry had $5,000 worth of Bitcoin stolen, his hosted wallet company would not help him with a refund because Larry hadn’t set up their strongest security settings.
+++

Quote
The government does not insure virtual currency accounts (or “wallets”).
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or
the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund typically protects your funds if a bank or credit union fails. But this doesn’t apply to virtual currency accounts. So, if an exchange or wallet company fails—and many have failed—the government won’t cover your losses.

True.  Hold the coins yourself to avoid this risk, or go with private insurance.

Quote
You still have to be prepared to protect yourself from hackers.
Are you using your wallet provider’s recommended practices on securing your login and password? Are you careful to avoid sharing your access credentials, inadvertently or otherwise? Watch out for fake websites or e-mails that may try to trick you into turning over your login and password, by mimicking your wallet’s website (sometimes referred to as "phishing" or "smishing"). The Federal Trade Commission offers useful additional information about phishing scams at www.consumer.ftc.gov/ media/game-0011-phishing-scams.

Yes.

Quote
Even if you use best practices, anything that connects to the Internet—even big companies—can be hacked.
Do you know how your wallet company stores its customers’ virtual currencies or if their security systems have been audited? There have already been numerous reports of hackers successfully getting access to peoples’ phones and computers, allowing them to bypass systems that require both forms of identity authentication.

Cold storage. Paper wallets.  Multi-sig.  Don’t keep lots of fund in a “hot-wallet”, that is one which is connected to the Internet.

Quote
If you have linked your bank account or payment card to your digital wallet, they may also be at risk.
Hackers that compromise your digital wallet account may not just empty it of your virtual currency – they may also pull funds (like U.S. dollars) from your traditional bank account if you have linked it to your digital wallet.
Possibly.  Earlier in this same publication, the government seemed to suggest that banks would protect us.  I guess maybe not.  Seems like consumers could be on the hook for unauthorized drafts on their banks accounts after all.
Read your agreement with your wallet provider carefully.
With a traditional bank account or payment card, the bank or payment card company will generally return your funds or reverse your charges if someone makes an unauthorized transfer from your account. In contrast, virtual currency wallet companies may disclaim responsibility for replacing your virtual currency if it is stolen on their watch.

Agreed.  Read all fine print carefully.

Quote
Really, read your agreement with your wallet provider carefully.
If your wallet company does promise to reimburse you for unauthorized transactions, will they make the refund in virtual currency or U.S. dollars? What happens if there’s been a big exchange rate increase or decrease in the interim – who gets the benefit of the difference in exchange rates, you
or your wallet provider? If your wallet provider offers insurance, what exactly does the insurance cover and what does it provide when the coverage applies?

Agreed.  Read all fine print carefully.
Quote
+++In February 2014, Japanese Bitcoin exchange Mt. Gox froze customers’ Bitcoin accounts and the Mt. Gox website disappeared, as was widely reported in the news. Shortly thereafter, Mt. Gox announced that it had lost almost $400 million of customer funds, which was nearly 6% of all Bitcoin then in circulation. Customers’ only recourse was to file claims in Mt. Gox’s later bankruptcy proceeding. To date, customers have not recovered any of the missing funds.+++

Painfully true.

Quote
If you use virtual currencies to pay for things or send funds to other people
Mistakes can be extremely costly.
When using virtual currencies to pay for goods
or services, if you don’t enter the recipient’s 64-character public key perfectly, you will send
the funds to the wrong person. If you’re not using
a hosted wallet provider (a service that helps manage your private keys), there’s no mechanism for stopping the payment or getting the money back. And if you do use a hosted wallet provider, the provider may disclaim responsibility for helping you get your funds back.

This is not true at all : “if you don’t enter the recipient’s 64-character public key perfectly, you will send
the funds to the wrong person”.  By design of the bitcoin protocol, there is only a one-in-four-billon chance an incorrectly entered bitcoin address will be valid.  So no, the money would not go someone else.  It would stay in its original location unless you were both careless and extremely unlucky.

Quote
Virtual currencies don’t have status as legal tender in any jurisdiction.
No party is required by law to accept payment in virtual currencies. While the number of stores and online retailers that accept virtual currencies as payment is increasing, the current universe is still very limited.
Also, the tax treatment can be complicated. If you spend (or sell) your virtual currency, you have to keep track of your taxable gains (and possibly your losses) so you can report them on your tax filings.
The Internal Revenue Service has issued important guidance relating to virtual currencies, which you can access at www.irs.gov/uac/Newsroom/IRS- Virtual-Currency-Guidance.

Agreed.

Quote
If you pay for things with virtual currencies, know how the merchant does business.
If you buy something with virtual currency you may be paying more than you would pay if you paid in dollars. Know how the merchant sets its exchange rate and look for mark-ups or other fees. Further, not all merchants that accept virtual currency have policies outlining guarantees for consumers when purchases go wrong. If you request a refund, are they going to reimburse you in virtual currency or U.S. dollars? Again, who gets the benefit of a large exchange rate spike or drop in the interim – you or the merchant?

Agreed.  This is a new industry.  Norms and conventions are still being developed.  Read and understand terms carefully, especially for larger transactions.

Quote
If you encounter a problem with virtual currency or a virtual currency company, let us know. Submit a complaint online at www.consumerfinance.gov/complaint. Submitting a complaint takes only a few minutes.

Cool!

*Edited to improve formatting*
1284  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Down to Earth explanation of SHA256? on: August 09, 2014, 05:21:35 PM
SHA256 = A deterministic food processor
1285  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Which Bitcoin logo do you prefer? [I want your input for a study] on: August 04, 2014, 08:52:16 AM

Actually, I am in favor of a very radical change, which'd be the redefinition of a bitcoin, which I'd suggest should be one hundred satoshis. This gets around the issue of everyone talking "bitcoins" when they're dealing with maybe .003BTC for small transactions. From all the many discussions on this, the biggest take-away I get is that people are going to be talking in bitcoins no matter what, so there needs to be a very strong, unified push for "bitcoin" as being something orders of magnitude smaller for all these definition schemes to work -- we can't just make up definitions for "sub-bitcoins," I think - but need to completely redefine what a bitcoin is.

Assuming that, we can use a completely different symbol for "change" (I'm thinking like US/CAN dollar systems here, where we generally pay, say, $1.24 or $1095.95), and we'd literally just call it "bitcents." This way, we really only need two currency definitions, similar to many currencies, where it's the equivalent of dollars and cents -- very manageable. -But we can really use any symbol for the cents... we don't want it to look like the bitcoin symbol... If we go with satoshis as the "change," we can use a modified "s," and still following the dollar-type schemes, it'd just be an "s" with a diagonal or straight vertical through-strike (ideally, not in a way which makes it look like an "8," heh). There's an issue with the radix point, here, though, and that's really an even bigger problem, beyond Bitcoin, we're seeing with economic globalization and which exists on this forum, where "$1,950" is "$1.95" to someone else.


In reality, I don't think any proposal will be pushed with enough unity and force to work, and we'll end up with a very fractured set of words and icons used, where we talk bitcoins and then ("thousands-place type")satoshis, so like kilosatoshis and the like. Frankly, I don't think we can all come around to adopt something new and beneficial -- it'll probably just be something confusing we'll have to live with until we die, and it'll just be more and more difficult to change as more people start using it.

I totally agree with this thinking.  I think we should redefine a single bitcoin as 100,000 Satoshis.  That would put its current value at around $0.60 cents.  If and when 100,000 Satoshis become worth $10 or $100, a bitcoin could again be redefined as 1,000 Satoshis.  This community would only have to make that difficult change once.  By the time we are 1-2 orders of magnitude more valuable, we will have governments and professional marketing firms helping to decide what nomenclature to use so as to not disrupt the economy.

The concept of a Bitcoin has tremendous brand awareness and reputation behind it.  By having that 'unit' be so valuable as it is now ($600), it becomes basically unusable.  And we scare people off when they think it is too 'expensive'.  If we redefined what a bitcoin was, it would make education that much easier.
1286  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Situations where static addresses are appropriate on: July 31, 2014, 06:34:43 PM
Using a fresh address for each donation I believe is the right thing to do.

Static addresses on things like forum posts are fine, but when you can provide a fresh address it avoids issues where third parties analyze donation rates and sizes.

But for charity donations, wouldn't transparency be a good thing?  When bitcoin becomes widely used and understood, organizations will have to weigh the pros and cons of a transparent financial structure vs a private one, or what combination to employ.  I was hoping people would use the case of Wikipedia as an example.  Should they offer a static address, and what would be the pros and cons?
1287  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Situations where static addresses are appropriate on: July 31, 2014, 09:30:00 AM
No ones going to type out the btc address from a printed advertisement

You are correct.  That is why we have QR codes.
1288  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Situations where static addresses are appropriate on: July 31, 2014, 05:42:49 AM
Wikipedia just announced the are accepting bitcoin.  They are using Coinbase, and as a result their receiving address is different for each donation.  Using a fresh address for each transaction enhances privacy, but it also makes it a little harder to verify that you are sending funds to the correct party.  If the address is static, it can be printed in magazines and newspapers or displayed on a charity's main website without too much dynamic code.

Are there reasons why a charity wouldn't want to have a publicly know, static donation address?  Maybe they should at least provide a fresh, private address if requested, but it seems like the sender should be protecting their own privacy if they care.
1289  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Wikimedia Foundation is now accepting Bitcoin donations on: July 30, 2014, 05:25:25 PM
Here is the generic follow-up email:
Quote
Dear Wikipedia Supporter,

Recently, many donors have been in touch to say they were interested in supporting us with donations of Bitcoin. We are happy to announce that as of today, the Wikimedia Foundation will be accepting Bitcoin donations. You can read our announcement here:

https://blog.wikimedia.org/2014/07/29/wikimedia-foundation-now-accepts-bitcoin/

We strive to provide flexible e-payment options for our donors around the globe, and we’re happy to add this new way to give today. If you choose to give, your donation will support the technology, people, and projects working to provide the sum all of human knowledge to everyone, for free.

Please click here to donate Bitcoin.

We have no plans to accept other forms of cryptocurrency in the near future, but we will continue to monitor them with interest. For a full list of other donation options, please visit:

http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Ways_to_Give/en

Thanks again for taking the time to email us,
The Wikimedia Foundation Fundraising Team

They are using Coinbase.  There is a little form you have to fill out, with email, name, address, etc, but there is no verification.  That is fine if you want to get a tax write-off or something, but I hate to see them pass up the simple beauty of just posting a static donation address and QR code.

I think they should also have a separate donation address where they pledge to keep the donations in Bitcoin and spend them as bitcoins.  I'll write back to them with the suggestions.
1290  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Wikimedia Foundation is now accepting Bitcoin donations on: July 30, 2014, 04:52:17 PM
Did you tell Rassah at Bitcoin100 so they can get a donation?

Not yet.  I don't see any news stories or other posts on this yet... did I break the news? Smiley
1291  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Wikimedia Foundation is now accepting Bitcoin donations on: July 30, 2014, 04:42:15 PM
I woke up and saw this email in my inbox:

Hi John Doe

Thanks for your email.  I wanted you to be among the first to know that as of this morning, the Wikimedia Foundation is accepting Bitcoin donations!

Later today, you'll receive a generic email from the Foundation with the news, but I'm hoping that my note reaches you first.  If your offer is still good, we're definitely interested, and we would be very grateful for your generosity and your patience! 

You can donate here: https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Ways_to_Give/en#bitcoin.

Best,
Caitlin

Caitlin Virtue
Director of Development
Wikimedia Foundation
1292  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: NYDFS form for submitting comments on bitlicense on: July 29, 2014, 10:38:32 PM
I just hope that people actually post constructive comments and aren't just 'trolling' or harassing the people devising those regulations. Talking about a mature community and a currency that's evolved enough to enter Wall Street and the banking sector.
I would agree that this will be very important if any of the "anti regulation" comments are to be taken seriously. If they get a lot of comments like "horse shit" then they will think you are a 13 year old and will likely ignore you.

This is mostly not true.  Be civil, be somewhat informed, but a massive deluge of comments will let them know that we are watching, and that we care.  There are experts who are going to write very detailed, well thought out responses and proposals about what should be changed and why.  Lets back that up with thousands and thousands of : "I don't support the regulations as written, they are too onerous and overly broad".   The more of us who speak up, the better.  Don't be dissuaded from speaking up just because you don't have the time to read every letter of the proposed regs or because you don't feel like writing a five-page thesis in reply.

I expect the regulations to be heavily modified after this draft.  They got it wrong.  I will spend time to give a more targeted reply after they are revised.


Here is what I am writing:

"I find your proposed regulations for Virtual Currencies to be too onerous, with many of the definitions overly broad.  As written the regulations will stifle innovation.  Only the largest, most established players will be able to afford to comply with the new rules.  Please don't drive innovation out of New York or out of the United States."
1293  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Random generation for Bitcoin on: July 10, 2014, 06:52:24 AM
Probably not.  Remember the nonce range is only 2^32.   A 1 GH/s chip will complete that in a matter of seconds.   A 10 GH/s chip in a matter of milliseconds.   If you have multiple chips they all are starting at a nonce of zero they are just working on different work.  In hindsight it would have been better if Satoshi had made the nonce range larger (at least 64 bit) but that is water under the bridge.   I did point out a way that the blockheader could be changed to support this.  It would require a hard fork but it could be done in a manner which is compatible with existing hardware.

I see what you saying, that having a larger nonce space would make mining more efficient.  But since mining is proof of work, I don't see how making it more efficient for everyone would change anything at all.  In fact, if searching the SHA-256 space was too efficient, we would have to switch the proof of work to something harder.  It's highly doubtful we would ever face such a problem, but my point is proof of work need not be made easier.
1294  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: A bitcoin client with no PRNG. Possible? on: July 09, 2014, 09:17:59 PM
I like the idea of taking a random photo (with a camera that has no internet capabilities) and then downloading the photo to an offline computer and taking a SHA256 of the photo file.

Easy to do - and hard to screw up IMO (you could attach a simple web cam to the offline computer to make this even easier).


Of course that should work just fine, but I don't think there is really a good way to audit it.  You have have to trust the camera.

That's the beauty of the card method, or dice, or something physical.  You personally can control the influences on the physical item, and keep a record of the state.  Then you can verify using different hardware and software setups that the resultant public keys and hashes come out the same.  With the camera method, you have to trust the manufacturer of the camera to not backdoor the chips.

And on the card method, perhaps just adding a second deck would increase the bitspace enough so even really terrible shuffling bias would still yield computationally secure results.

Or we could all build dice-o-matics -->   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7n8LNxGbZbs
1295  Bitcoin / Press / Re: [2014-07-08] 5,000 Terminals Across Ukraine Now Offer Bitcoin for Cash on: July 08, 2014, 11:10:43 PM
Unbelievable how Bitcoin has evolved itself on other countries and here in Mexico seems to be barely prehistoric age  Cry

Well, do something about it!  Seriously - there is huge opportunity in the fact that Mexico is behind.  There are a few bitcoin companies in Mexico, and I am sure they need help.  Give them a call, and ask what you can do.  Or, if your feeling more entrepreneurial, start a company yourself.  You know the remittance potential....
1296  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I hooked up a servo motor to fly a bitcoin flag when a bitcoin payment is made. on: July 03, 2014, 01:17:47 AM
Makes me think of this story: Liquidising goldfish 'not a crime'  http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/3040891.stm

But what if you had to pay 0.01 BTC to push the button and the 'Artist' kept the money.  It seems like that would change the ethics at least a little.  Although the museum in this case probably charged for admission, but that is less direct.  Anyways, I'm not really going to let a captive rat starve to death.

Quote
An art display which invited the public to put live goldfish through a food blender did not constitute cruelty to animals, a Danish court has ruled.

The goldfish were placed on display swimming in the blenders, and visitors were told they could press the "on" button if they wanted.

At least one visitor did, killing two goldfish.

Peter Meyer, director of the Trapholt Art Museum in Kolding, 200 kilometres (125 miles) west of Copenhagen, was fined for cruelty to animals after complaints from campaign group Friends of Animals.

But a court in Denmark has now ruled that the fish were not treated cruelly, as they had not faced prolonged suffering.

The fish were killed "instantly" and "humanely", said Judge Preben Bagger.

The court had earlier heard an expert witness from the blenders' maker, Moulinex, that the fish had probably died within one second of the blender being switched on.

A vet also told the court that the fish would have died painlessly.

Mr Meyer will not now have to pay the fine of 2,000 kroner (269 euros) originally imposed by Danish police.

The case only went to court because he refused to pay the police fine. He told the court that artistic freedom was at stake.

"It's a question of principle. An artist has the right to create works which defy our concept of what is right and what is wrong," he told the court in Kolding.

The display featured a total of 10 blenders containing goldfish.

After the complaints, the blenders were unplugged and the exhibit continued without the possibility of killing the fish.

The exhibit was created by Chilean-born Danish artist Marco Evaristti, who was apparently trying to test visitors' sense of right and wrong.

Mr Evaristti said at the time he wanted to force people to "do battle with their conscience".

The idea, he said, was to "place people before a dilemma: to choose between life and death."

"It was a protest against what is going on in the world, against this cynicism, this brutality that impregnates the world in which we live," he said.

 
1297  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I hooked up a servo motor to fly a bitcoin flag when a bitcoin payment is made. on: July 03, 2014, 12:36:20 AM
Or, they could feed the rat. 
The worlds first experiment in decentralized rat care.
1298  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I hooked up a servo motor to fly a bitcoin flag when a bitcoin payment is made. on: July 03, 2014, 12:22:30 AM
I did!  Smiley



I'm gonna buy a rat.  
You can feed the rat for bitcoin.
He can only be fed once per hour.
If no one feeds him, he will die.
1299  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I hooked up a servo motor to fly a bitcoin flag when a bitcoin payment is made. on: July 03, 2014, 12:09:14 AM
Coiner1 -  You are a genius!

edit: Paid.  Really hoping it will fly on the unconfirmed transaction.
1300  Bitcoin / Press / Re: [2014-07-02] Video: Bitcoin quietly making a comeback? on: July 02, 2014, 10:28:32 AM
I enjoyed the clip.  The last, long cycle of media negativity towards bitcoin seems to finally be yielding to positive coverage.

LiteCoinGuy, I share your enthusiasm that bitcoin is an inclusive project, and it's good to see people from all walks of life are realizing its transformational potential.   I don't know about calling Charles Payne 'the next "black" matt miller' though.  I find that characterization a little bit distasteful.  But I'm happy to have racial diversity amongst the bitcoin faithful, and it sounds like you are too.  I think it's great he is on a different network.  I'm pretty sure FOX and Bloomberg have different demographics.
Pages: « 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 [65] 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!