Haha, so its depend on Iasenko view bro, of course it will be different if someone try to renting their signature? not a campaign, they must have a quality posts than a merit.
he has the right to decide, we have the right to propose our opinion for him to choose, it doesn't matter if you speak your mind. Merit is a criterion to increase rankings, so for those who have reached the highest rank (more than 1000 merit), they will not bother too much in the earning merit, but they have acquired a large amount of merit, meaning their articles are of high quality. Therefore, @iasenko, I propose a new rule for legendary member, anyone at the legendary member needs to earn a minimum of 60 merits within 120 days or earn a total of 500 merits (Or other quantity more suitable). @bones261 is a prime example  |
|
|
|
Hello
I have been rejected last night in try to withdraw some funds
fatal error - withdrawal blocked
support and security teams do not respond
any help?
Well, it seems a problem started to happen, even though it was someone's alt, maybe. Quote here so we can pay attention to the way they solve this problem Ideally, they should solve this problem well, if not, it's a good way to identify them as unreliable, like 1xbet. |
|
|
|
Someone please tell me that it is not true  something like the global economic crisis, and bitcoin led the way down, then gold, crude oil, everything, ... where did the money flow go during this time  What the hell is going on Corona is not the reason, certainly, it is just an excuse Bitcoin can't even survive this storm, what the hell do we trust it in the future Now it's like a piece of shit, damn Bitcoin  |
|
|
|
Sorry if I bother you, but I have a few questions. If you want to buy Bitcoin legally , why don't you use Coinbase to do that In addition, there are a few other places to buy Bitcoin legally like Coinbase, which will be cheaper if you buy it via escrow or lawyer. I would also like to know what form of payment you would make in this case LOL bitcoin in the legalization
Edit: Damned Today was a bad day for me I don't understand why I misunderstood his title, sorry because my content is wrong  |
|
|
|
@Chuckbuck
no. this is not an old image. this screenshot has been made few minutes before to be posted here. (price are in EUR)
Oh sorry It's my bad Maybe I should be more careful next time Goes to show a lot, you launch a brand, try to push it on the biggest platform there is (by target audience) and then... The signature campaign as a cheap means to buy people's trust in their platform as soon as they have a rock blocking the way, they stop the operation, they are definitely looking for another way But clearly this thorn comes from their subjectivity |
|
|
|
No wonder 1xbit is advertised on coinmarket or anywhere else, even etherscan.io. These websites don't care about ethics, they only care about the profits they can make through ad space. It can be said that this forum is the only place that rejects phishing websites You cannot even trust Google on this
Some companies (Google) will advertise known scams. Some people (theymos) will not advertise possible scam (ICOs) even if it costs them (around 9 BTC per week). This is a reason why ChipMixer buy ads at this forum and not on Google. But I was shocked by your image for 5 seconds. I had to check the Bitcoin price right away and I realized your image was old LOL  |
|
|
|
Pulev will fight AJ at 39 years old (almost 40) when many boxers start thinking about their retirement. Yea, probably Pulev would look fine and tireless, but in reality, his age couldn't cope with AJ's physical presence.
Therefore, this may be your last match to end his career. And with this match, he will unleash everything he has  Like this saying "with age comes wisdom", he is not an easy opponent However, anything can happen in boxing, and especially this is IMO, the last chance Pulev would have a title fight. If he lost, he could say "bye-bye" to his dream forever. The betting odds also way better compared to Wilder.
It's impossible to say that Pulev can win this match, but I'm sure this will be an exciting match for everyone, the only thing that is unfortunate is the odds are so different With a small hope, I still want Pulev to win despite his chances |
|
|
|
Surely there are more voters. Let us get some more public opinion on this one Do you plan to make any bets regarding this match? I find you quite excited with it - Pulev is old, and he will run out of gas in about 30 minutes;
Not really, although he is old, but because he is old and he has paid a lot of matches, he has a lot of experience, it is not easy for him to run out of gas in 30 minutes, it will take more time. I still believe that Pulev can make something, a surprise that is different from his victory. |
|
|
|
Although what you presented may sound reasonable, I still feel that it is not necessary to add a new board here. We have those topics, but it was there reasonably, it existed, other future topics could also exist that way. Creating a new table cannot guarantee that other topics will be posted correctly there. Instead, a series of junk topics about bullshit history will be added for some crap purpose. Please continue to operate the way this forum went, not necessary with this change my personal opinion |
|
|
|
Although I'm sure that Seuntjies DiceBot is legit, I'm not using it either, because, like you, I prefer manual betting. Even when hunting for very high multipliers and making hundreds of bets in a row I'm doing it manually because it's fun to watch some close hits, wrong side hits, etc., and of course it is much more pleasant to see your winning roll live than seeing it post factum.
And in those rare cases when I want to use a bot, just for the fun of it, I'm fine with the site's AUTO-BET.
Basically, the bot features are developed based on the existing features of the casino, it is only upgraded to utilities. The AUTO-BET feature of website is similar, it's just less in the analysis and display. Bots can't increase our chances of winning, using bots doesn't have much effect. Manual betting will be more interesting, AUTO-BET is also not so necessary. |
|
|
|
I wonder if KawBet has any way to clean up the current allegations? These allegations have been going on for a week and you still don't have the explanation and reasonable evidence to prove your purity It is completely bad for your platform I don't understand why there are so many new accounts here to complain, but it also proves that you guys are not trusted, you have a good campaign on Bitcointalk, hope you can solve the current problem  Most of the evidence is against you |
|
|
|
Checking the newbie's profile page to check the last log-in isn't enough to make that assumption since the forum can be read without logging in.
Agree with you on this view In case you do not keep logging in, users can still receive email notifications, links from emails do not require you to log in to see, so checking the last log-in is not an accurate option. They should be limited in terms of home many topics they can create.
No, they should not be limited. We have to admit that new accounts are being abused for malicious purposes. But we have to accept it, because many people don't use this forum, but they know it as the best place to ask some issues (I'm talking about non-advertising questions). In this case, they can ask in any sections (because newbies don't know exactly where to ask questions), if we set limits, it will cause difficulties for them, which is not recommended, because fundamentally, this forum is geared towards freedom for all users In summary, the abuse of new accounts will cause discomfort, but if limited functionality of new people, it will happen other unwanted incidents. New accounts have limited posting time at the start, I think it is already the best solution for now.... |
|
|
|
Yeah, you come to the world's largest bitcoin forum to challenge people with a silly question Making free money with faucet is the basic knowledge for cryptocurrencies and making money online, it's boring for you to come here and search your ref. In the opposite, you are the one who needs to learn here. Keep your account and learn on this forum, there are many ways for you to earn decent money without looking for referal |
|
|
|
I need suggestion what to replace the Received merit 120 days with, I need someting shorter but I cannot come with a good idea.
So is this the only change in your rules? I can get you a weekly list (each Friday or Saturday) of all users sorted by most Merit received in the last 120 days if you want (and I find some time somewhere).
Well, looks like we have a lot step of work here I send you the user list, and you give me information about merit. Does it take a long time? I think it would be more convenient if I use the bot to count their merit within 120 days, then make updates. More importantly, you are the only one who can give us trust score images for list user |
|
|
|
Sounds more like a scam accusation. Maybe you should move this topic to this board. Damn it, if I were you, I wouldn't give a false guide for a newbie Scam Accusations is required to post this allegation. In addition, OP should be edited in format below, it is necessary according to the forum rules. [b][color=black]What happened:: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Scammers Profile Link: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Reference Link: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Amount Scammed: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Payment Method: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Proof of Payment: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]PM/Chat Logs: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Additional Notes: [/color][/b] This may not help you get your money back, but it works for everyone on this forum. Warning phishing is a good job Please correct your topic, we may leave negative trust for scammers |
|
|
|
Is this a reliable source? I tracked it on https://corona.kompa.ai/ and the number of people infected (113,809) and killed (4,010) is completely different from the number that you give Now let's see what is a fake source https://corona.kompa.ai/ is from the World Health Organization (WHO), what about your information? |
|
|
|
Guys, has anyone seen the news about these books yet   I see it in articles, here and hereI'm not a superstitious person, but they surprised me, is it a coincidence? Or is prophecy really accurate? They even mention Wuhan - China |
|
|
|
I'm confused now. Where did the OP get At least 10 people from [Chipmixer] campaign There is only one Chipmixer participant in that list (yourself) and even if you count LoyceV's time-travel thread that gets bumped once a week or so, it's still a far cry from "at least 10". I think he's referring to other people who don't have a renting topic Some people like Lauda, TMAN or marlboroza (they are advertising for blockchain.com.do) But I don't understand why he felt so bad about this problem, that guys do not violate any rules We are free to do everything as long as we do not violate the rules. Why is it a big trouble with OP? Why did he open a topic in the Reputation section? Currently, there is no such campaigns. But in past (way beffore era of bounties), there was plenty of such campaigns.
For avatars, we can't put a link there, there is no link to the website in one click, that's why the Avatar campaign no longer exists, it doesn't have much effect. I think the same thing happens with Chipmixer, they might argue that avartar doesn't have much advertising effect. |
|
|
|
I don't know why he can return to DT1 after fallen DT1 members are rotated on a monthly basis. Theymos posted the most recent list of DT1 members here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5117330.msg53944515#msg53944515Tecshare has enough member votes to be included on DT1. However, other DT1 members can exclude him and that will drop him from the DT1 pool. Prior to this month he had more DT1 member excluding him than he had including him. As of today his inclusions and exclusions are the same, so his DT1 score is 0. As long as it's equal to, or greater than 0 he will remain on DT1. Although the topic was off, but you had another great explanation for me, it helped me to better understand the trust system, so thank you very much. I think I should lock this topic right now instead of announcing it off I don't want some guys to repeat what you guys have explained to increase the post |
|
|
|
So I'm wondering if there is any way to know when someone put a tilde before your name in their trust settings.
Yes of course, you can see it via BPIP or directly through LoyceV trust list viewer Basically, I don't know of any way to know the exact date it was taken, but we can know the exact week that it was taken. Users who added you to their exclusion list last week will be marked with the word NEW. Wait a minute, I'll show you an example
 You can see, wolwoo distruted me last week, so he was marked by NEW |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
