|
Very interesting picks today. A lot of people have lost a lot today. I'd advise the following:
1) Parlay those small bets (1.2/1.3 odds) with something else so total is above 2.
2) Keep better statistics in OP.
3) Show/share how much you've bet.
I'm just posting here to watch though.
|
|
|
|
You say & think 2 YEARS are a short time?
I can code your a complete forum with the same features within 2 months from scratch and im not a pro!
Interesting statement there. What are you waiting for then? 
I'm certain that such a forum would get obliterated by hacks in no time.  |
|
|
|
hello guys what do you think of me creating new super safe picks that will cost 0.003 btc but the odds would go from 1.20 - 1.50
How about a parlay with such bets so that the total odds go around 2-3. Make it cost 0.003 BTC usually, but make it free every day after premium losses? This seems fair to me. Maybe somebody else has a better idea though. |
|
|
|
I am just wondering, like 2 years ago people said the new forum was almost done, yet I see no changes at all to the forum software being used.
There are just too many features that the admin wants so it is taking more and more time. I'm not sure why members are impatient. It will be a especially huge update for moderators, yet we are calm (or at least I am). Is there a thread somewhere where I can see the progress being made?
You can see it on the Beta forum. Keep in mind that it is down for the weekend. |
|
|
|
|
1) Strange topic.
2) Wrong section.
3) Why is Tomatocage on a list with TF and Shrem?
|
|
|
|
This is what happens when you are lead by greed and politics come into play. It's quite surprising that a good number of people do not see what is truly going on. To quote from the article: In short, we have one group (Bitcoin Classic) that thinks that bitcoin should always be a payment network, aimed at ultimately replacing traditional payment methods. Then we have another group that thinks of bitcoin as more of a settlement network (Bitcoin Core), and that end users should use sidechains, the Lightning network or other future initiatives that could appear in the future as networks for payment.
+1.
The real question is whether it can replace traditional payment methods via mostly on-chain transactions or not. The answer to that question is leaning to 'no' if you want to keep the decentralization. Divide and conquer...
Trying to 'Divide et Impera', since Hearn. |
|
|
|
|
Tl;dr; Banks are bad and you are slowly making a return on your investments. Did I understand this correctly?
It is unfortunate that one is still unable to easily use some alternative system (e.g. cryptocurrency) to completely avoid using banks (without it being a huge inconvenience).
|
|
|
|
It does not look good for this pick at the moment. There is still more than enough time, but still. It's actually quite rare for either team to go under 2 goals in a match if you look at the statistics. Looks like this week is filled with bad luck. |
|
|
|
I really do not trust this eth thing...
I hope it will not damage bitcoin in future.
It should not. They can co-exist. Not really, they're the same team
They aren't? Yes. it should be possible to implement ETH where BTC is currently being accepted. who's willing? It might convince users if one day I can see some signature campaign here paying ETH of some gambling sites like ETHcasino.com to any with eth on its domain exist. Itshould be a great leap for ETH if this happen. but until we use this forum, it may never happen. and look at its domain bitcointalk.org
There isn't a good reason to do so. You don't really have any good reasons to switch over from Bitcoin to ETH from a users perspective. If anything, you have reasons to stay here (e.g. POS). |
|
|
|
|
OP either pay the amount or create an account using a different onion node.
|
|
|
|
Lets revisit these points at the end of the year, quoted for posterity.
I'm not sure what you think should be revisited. The fact that it has centralized planing, had a IPO and is POS can't really change (or won't). The real question is the place that it is going to have I guess. Pre-mined as hell 60/77 mio Eth, "hidden" as crowdfunding.
It is just a matter of time until somebodies throws the IPO coins at the market. Please all sell your btc, so I get it cheap.
R.
Bitcoin is for the real gentlemen. I cannot see why Alt coins discussions like ETH is tolerated on a Bitcoin forum under non-Alt coin sections any way.
I guess because it started of as a thread related to Bitcoin. Just use the report button. |
|
|
|
People really need to stop being hyperbolic about this. Things are simple in the Business world: If you don't get enough customers that pay with Bitcoin, you drop it eventually. Why would they bother if they can't generate many sales? Why exactly bitcoin could be a threat to Microsoft?
It isn't. The step towards blockchain instead Bitcoin makes sense for M$.
If profit is the main agenda, possibly. Where did you get this settlement thing? From Blockstream and core propaganda?
That's exactly where he got it from since he is in support of a controversial HF. |
|
|
|
So instead of reasonable counter arguments you protect your investment with nonsense?  While it does have its advantages, it certainly ain't much better than your everyday (IPO/POS) shitcoin. Might be time to move this one to the trash section. Banks are buying ethere
People are run by greed here as well. Initially it was to get away from the banks, but if one can earn money they'd become their ally in a second apparently.
Update: Yes, the ad hominem is lovely. It might be time to put you on ignore. Trash section == altcoin section. |
|
|
|
tl:dr follow the shitcoin pumps and post edgy gifs that have nothing to do with the post
Some people actually care about what bitcoin means and not just in for get rich quick schemes/pump and dumps.
Just put the troll on ignore. He's pretty obvious. One does simply not join a Bitcoin forum to trash talk about Bitcoin. 1- A fully funded foundation.
2- A team of developers who are not splitting up and creating a core and classic.
3- Microsoft looking at them the eth team seriously.
4- It's new and exciting while bitcoin is old news and boring.
5-Dapps
6-Smart contracts
1. Okay. 2. No. You basically have 3 people that have left the original team. Almost everyone else on Classic is basically random. 3. Irrelevant. 4. False. 5. Fine. 6. Bitcoin can have those two. Tl;dr: It has nothing besides centralized planning, an IPO and inflation.
Any proof that toronto, Microsoft, wall street buy ethereum None. |
|
|
|
The thread was solely designed to not mentioned any implementation. It seems that the 'forkers' are unable to follow simple rules. Why am I not surprised? What is happening is certain people want to take over development. The TX capacity of Bitcoin is what they saw as a way to socially engineer the public into believing there is a problem the core developers are not addressing.
Exactly. People are obsessed with the 2 MB block size limit. Pro: Not bumping limit to 2MB could cause a fork.
I really doubt it. People who are really working for the best of Bitcoin would never risk this. |
|
|
|
My logic would tell me that you missed out on Ether and are raging...... haha enjoy the rage quite big lad.........  Foolish ad hominem. You have no arguments to defend your position. I don't know why I expected anything valuable from people who invest in shitcoins. I dont think so. Eth pump is a sign that open crypto world is growing.
You mean Bitcoin holders buying another Altcoin == crypto world is growing? This doesn't add up. The traded volume ETH/Fiat is low. Bitcoins problems are pseudo developers and nervous community
ETH problems (for example) are centralized planning, lower security (POS), inflation If you've come along to Bitcoin for the right reasons, you would not consider getting involved in ETH. People need to calm down, ETH can have its own place next to Bitcoin, but that's it. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
