I won't even bring up the messaging users urging them to add me to their trust exclusion settings. I feel like I'm watching someone drown in slow motion.
I won't even bring up messaging FJ urging them to remove/deny users. Both sad and pathetic, some of the reasons for which she left you.  Indulge me. I asked why FJ was seemingly paying someone like TMAN to represent them. I was then told that TMAN was wearing their signature without their consent and not being paid and will not be a member of their campaign due to his reputation. As far as the "she left you" comment... I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about but have seen you and TMAN repeat this many times now. Although at times I do wish the "she" in my life would give me a little more free time to follow my passions. Girls take up a lot of time, well, real girls, not Aria. Now how about indulging me and telling me why you feel a forum member who admitted to attempting to scam users on this forum with a fraudulent ICO announcement doesn't deserve your negative trust, but anyone without perfect English does? It's obvious abuse of conflicts of interest like this why your opinion is worthless and you don't deserve to be in any sort of position to evaluate trust or anything else. |
|
|
|
I destroyed all your nonsense almost trivially. Move along and go back to supporting Quicksie the scammer. FTFM.
How do I support Quicksie? You aren't helping yourself by posting more lies, although I guess your goal is to bury the recent posts as quickly as you can. Seems to be your MO. I updated the post after it has been made. You support him with your recent rating and jumping on any nonsensical bandwagon of his. So anyone who rates you as the extortionist you are is now supporting QS? Desperate, desperate, desperate. I'm grabbing the popcorn to see how you try to weasel yourself out of this one. Hope you've got something other than deflection in that bag of tricks. The facts are that an ALU member publicly and with full knowledge was pushing lies on behalf of a fraudulent ICO for personal gain. You are a member of ALU, and thus affiliated with the scammer through your own choice. So what is your move? Leave ALU? Mark aTriz the admitted scammer with negative trust? or... Lash out at anyone who brings this up and try to deflect to bury the evidence against you? |
|
|
|
I destroyed all your nonsense almost trivially. Move along and go back to supporting scammers like Quicksie.
How do I support Quicksie? You aren't helping yourself by posting more lies, although I guess your goal is to bury the recent posts as quickly as you can. Seems to be your MO. |
|
|
|
Labels are unnecessary.
Says the guy who has tried to label more people on this forum than any other user. I can smell the desperation as your arguments turn to ash. No Phoenix coming out of this one buddy. Yes, the former is true. Just don't go back to your old habits, I don't need people visiting the hospital.  Is this some sort of threat? Pathetic. I imagine your claims and actions will become more and more desperate as time passes
I called it months ago and it has been playing out before our very eyes. Getting sloppier and more desperate by the day. I won't even bring up the messaging users urging them to add me to their trust exclusion settings. I feel like I'm watching someone drown in slow motion. |
|
|
|
ALU is a private organization run by you and it's members are hand selected by you to represent your for profit services.
No. Yes. No. It is not run by me. Must be nice to think you can advertise services for scammers, and then have no liability whatsoever.
Managers don't advertise, and this is not related to me. Wrong, he did act on it. He continued with his charade knowing full well it was a lie. I don't care what he didn't do, I care what he did do. In this case, he did go along with a lie in order to scam users out of their funds with the excuse that the scam was a marketing strategy.
No, it is not his charade. In order for it to be his charade, he'd either have to: a) Make the statement himself. b) Back it up. c) Be part of the team who made it. None of these apply. What he did wrong was not stopping both threads as soon as that statement was made. Any exaggeration beyond this is just malicious on anyone's end. Then why make the information public? I would think ALU exists to give it's members a united front that the organization is backed by more than one person, giving it the illusion of having more accountability if one of them goes rogue, yet you have now openly stated that ALU is in no way responsible for the actions of it's members, which in my opinion makes it worthless and you should be open about this.
There you have your answer. You would think. ALU can never be responsible for the actions of individuals. You seem to state that nobody needs to know who it's members are and if some of them are scammers it's nobody's business. I disagree, a lot.
Former, correct. Latter, incorrect. Quite the number of *managers* don't disclose any members (some notable names have people working with them, but these people are usually just in the background), yet you don't seem to take interest in who is working with who unless it revolves around me.  Quoting for ridiculousness. You've heard it from Lauda. ALU is nothing. Has no accountability. Has no funds. Shares nothing between it's members. It's members can post announcements for scams and that is not considered their action or responsibility nor does it reflect upon the other members. Basically, if ALU is pushing an ICO it means that it could be a scam and Lauda is perfectly fine with that so long as it doesn't effect him negatively in any way. This evidenced from the fact that a fellow ALU member has now openly admitted to taking part in a scam to steal investor funds through fraud and still maintains a positive trust rating from Lauda. Why would I want to disclose our inner workings to you exactly? You need an actually profitable endeavor to copy?
Ya, you know me. Broke as a joke barely getting by in my shanty. Clearly my motivations must be financial and not trying to make this place better by getting rid of the trash that is flooding this forum with ICOs and turning away newbies from Bitcoin by giving them an awful first experience investing in scams. |
|
|
|
ALU is a private organization run by you and it's members are hand selected by you to represent your for profit services.
No. Yes. ALU is funded by apparently lying to investors to scam them out of their funds.
There are no ALU funds nor is there ever a case of funding of this "private organization", thus this statement is false. So what is ALU then? Just a forum thread with no organization whatsoever? You feel it doesn't come back on you at all?
No. Must be nice to think you can advertise services for scammers, and then have no liability whatsoever. You think it is ok that you still "trust" this member who fraudulently acted to destroy the name of ALU and cast doubt upon whether or not you are in charge of an organization that's purpose appears to be to help scam users out of their money with fraudulent claims?
Wrong. It is not that he acted, it is that he did not act on it. Wrong, he did act on it. He continued with his charade knowing full well it was a lie. I don't care what he didn't do, I care what he did do. In this case, he did go along with a lie in order to scam users out of their funds with the excuse that the scam was a marketing strategy. You think it is ok that a member who has been caught trying to scam investors with an ICO is a part of ALU?
It is none of your business who is and who isn't a member, nor what my opinion on that is. Then why make the information public? I would think ALU exists to give it's members a united front that the organization is backed by more than one person, giving it the illusion of having more accountability if one of them goes rogue, yet you have now openly stated that ALU is in no way responsible for the actions of it's members, which in my opinion makes it worthless and you should be open about this. You seem to state that nobody needs to know who it's members are and if some of them are scammers it's nobody's business. I disagree, a lot. |
|
|
|
Please explain what the point of ALU is, if a member's actions don't reflect upon the group? I don't want to make any assumptions.
Senseless question. It is not my job to babysit others, the same way it is not your job to babysit NastyFans members; the same way that a member's actions don't reflect on the whole NastyFans group (/charity/whatever it is). Don't compare ALU to NastyFans. NastyFans is a public organization anyone can be a part of that is largely funded by my personal donations. ALU is a private organization run by you and it's members are hand selected by you to represent your for profit services. ALU is funded by apparently lying to investors to scam them out of their funds. So, now that it is a documented fact that an ALU member worked with an ICO team to lie to potential investors in an attempt to fraudulently separate them from their funds, you feel it doesn't come back on you at all? You think it is ok that you still "trust" this member who fraudulently acted to destroy the name of ALU and arise questions about whether or not you are in charge of an organization that's purpose appears to be to help scam users out of their money with fraudulent claims? You think it is ok that a member who has been caught trying to scam investors with an ICO is a part of ALU? |
|
|
|
|
I've been generating Ravencoin addresses but haven't been able to get one of them to import successfully. Anyone had any luck with them?
|
|
|
|
It was a marketing strategy and they tried to say they raised so much in just a day or 2.
I doubt they raised anymore then 1 BTC.
You are ok with ICOs stating false information about how much they have raised to other potential investors... and you would call this a marketing strategy? YES, definitely, we would hit our hard cap. We are on round 2 and out soft cap is already half-reached.
Our soft cap is $5,000,000
Currently smart investors have grabbed 3,111,374 BIBCs.
No, but when I'm 2 weeks into a bounty program I'm basically forced to go along with it.
There should be 0 tolerance for this sort of behavior. aTriz has publicly admitted to lying to potential investors with advance knowledge in order to help raise funds fraudulently so he can get paid while "investors" become victims of his scheme. |
|
|
|
No campaign manager should be seeing this as a marketing strategy and letting it go unhindered, especially from a group like ALU whom centers themselves around being "Trusted. Experienced."
This one is not on ALU, but solely on aTriz. People seem to make *unusual* assumptions as to how ALU works, although some of those aren't because of malevolent intent (unlike QS's). Please explain what the point of ALU is, if a member's actions don't reflect upon the group? I don't want to make any assumptions. |
|
|
|
|
Satoshi created Bitcoin, then founded Bitcointalk to discuss it. It's really not rocket science.
|
|
|
|
No one is jealous of this. I think most people here aren't big in to sports. I am a sports nut and would forget about this in my closet in a day.
I'm a little jealous. I'd buy it in a heartbeat and hang it framed on my wall with spotlights if I thought for one minute it was authentic. Sadly, there are just too many fakes like this to warranty purchasing such an item from anyone but a reputable dealer in my opinion.  Well, what else can I do.. No idea what to answer It was authenticated through https://www.spenceloa.com/ which can be easily verified both on their website and with issued COA. How do people verify an item is authentic these days? Are there any other ways but to verify item through credible authentication service and by COA they issue after? Honestly, there's nothing you can do online (at least for me). Maybe pictures of you watching the athletes signing this jersey. I would need merchandise like this to be an actual product released by someone like Upper Deck. Like this: https://www.sportsframes.com/lebron-james-autographed-framed-maroon-cavs-jersey-auto-upper-deck-coa-d2-l/I may be less trusting than others as I've seen a documentary on fraudulent autographs and am aware that a majority of items like this are fraudulent, many times without their owners even being aware. I tried to sell an autographed Rollie Fingers ball here once. Nobody was interested and I even watched him sign it in front of me (ran into him at a Spring Training game in Surprise, AZ and talked about how a friend of mine sold him a house, so he signed a ball for me). In this environment, I just don't think things like this will sell, regardless of how you treat perspective customers. |
|
|
|
|
aTriz, is there a list of the ICOs you've announced somewhere? I'm sure you have no reason to hide this information right?
|
|
|
|
There is undoubtedly efficiency savings from operating at a lower temperature and not using fans, but I would guess somewhere in the 5%-20% range. Yeah those numbers are much closer to the actual savings that could be achieved. You really can't ignore the air conditioning aspect when it comes to savings. I estimate that using immersion cooling would save ~$1,500 annually on air conditioning costs (~15% efficiency improvement). Not to mention cutting down on the impact of running an air conditioner would be a benefit for this project. How do you cool the mineral oil though? You have to change it every now and then once it reaches a certain temperature? The system I'm looking at uses a water line to cool the oil in a heat transfer unit. |
|
|
|
I imagine trusted owners of legitimate Casascius coins directly purchased from Mike could be greatly rewarded someday by collectors.
I get what you're saying but this isn't possible for blanks/peeled coins like the one referenced in the OP. I’m sure fake holograms are out there. I’ve been a bit surprised we haven’t seen fake loaded rounds in circulation yet. Certainly it is only a matter of time. Well unless they get that ANACS guarantee, then you will for sure know they’re real   |
|
|
|
Og seems to be douche-canoe of epic proportions but that's an entirely different topic.
I don’t think me having never sold an account and advising that Blazed remove the conflicts of interest rather than pay a fine deserves a personal attack. |
|
|
|
|
I imagine trusted owners of legitimate Casascius coins directly purchased from Mike could be greatly rewarded someday by collectors.
|
|
|
|
|
I've got an Antminer D3 that hashes at about 17GH/s. Looking to get $275 shipped in the US for it.
|
|
|
|
Users began to be suspicious of Zeroxal, and started asking him questions in a Slack chat. I believe you were a member of this Slack at the time, so you may remember this vaguely.
I remember it very well. I witnessed the entire thing, which was you and your crew of extortionists acting like drunk 5 year olds who just learned profanity. You referred to me as a scammer and NastyFans as a Ponzi many times, spreading lies that are still being spread by you today. Keeping it 100% real, we both know that what started this was me in that slack chat saying that I put up a lot of NastyFans seats for sale and if someone bought them, I would use the funds to buy a solar array. Then Zeroxal came forward and claimed he purchased the seats, which set me going solar in motion. This set off a wave of jealousy that I have never witnessed in my life and still deal with from certain individuals today. You as well as the others in the extortion allegation badgered Zeroxal with wacky claims for hours and eventually one of you resorted to calling his mother on the phone to harass his family. The best you all could come up with was that Zeroxal had to have gotten his money illegally and is evading taxes, in a pathetic attempt to somehow tie me into receiving ill gotten funds for my solar project. When Zeroxal showed that he had a lot of funds and tried to explain how he got them, it then turned into an extortion scheme of how you could all get your hands on his BTC. You can say what you want now, but your statements are nothing more than lies, and since you've confirmed I was there and witnessed it, I'm fine to go public with the truth of what occurred as it seems you and others have buried many of the details and harassed Zeroxal to the point he doesn't want to participate here anymore. My main gripe with NastyFans is that it is unprofitable, and that you hand pick and skew certain statistics in an attempt to hide this.
NastyFans is not unprofitable. NastyFans has no costs, so what you're saying is actually impossible. These are the kinds of lies you spread which I am absolutely sick of. I've explained to you personally a hundred times now that the organization is run on donations and yet you still spread the same lies, now evolving to wasting my time justifying why I don't trust you. I used to assume that you were uneducated and had no investment experience, so I'd take the time to explain to you what you don't understand but I've been down that road and seen how you simply ignore facts to continue spreading lies about me and things I'm involved in. I'm sick of doing so at this point, as you're obviously trolling with comments like this. I don't believe you are stupid enough to think that Apple as a company is unprofitable because the dividend is less than 100% annually. Nobody is that stupid. Please explain this unprofitable comment, as this is a perfect example of why I don't trust you, your judgement, or your opinion. |
|
|
|
Like me, I still am not a quality poster but I'll just keep on posting until someone can finally realize that I've been trying my best here. I just glanced over your recent posts to see if I could leave you merit for something. Here's what stuck out to me.  Then what do you think of it faggot?
Well this is only possible for IDIOTS.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
