Ok, how do you suggest leveling the playing field a bit more without targeting people or specific miners such as large miners?

If you guys think its a bad idea, great, it's gone.  It makes no difference to me personally.

But seriously, where is Hazard and the other C4n10 guy?  No reply in 24 hours.  Bad service I tell you.

I really want to run these ideas by a programmer to see what's actually doable and how much extra it will cost me.

Ahahhaa.  Man, that has a kind of likeable sound to it.  A people's kind of sound.  Like meat and potatoes as opposed to the caviar and lobster out there right now.

Man, I like nuggets.  Kinda gets your attention even though it doesn't mean much.  Lots of McDonalds lovers in this world.  Ha!

Ok, but this coin is meant to help level the playing field.  And I tried mining LTC with a $1,700 dual 7850 GPU and I was barely covering electricity.

So clearly, any new guy without tons of money or the small miner who can't get that brake is nose screwed.

So ignoring fear, money or greed, is the best way SHA256d?

I mean why wouldn't you wanna merge mine?

Why wouldn't you want a future proof coin which is ASICS.

Next year ASIC 2.0 will come out and the little guy will own an ASIC.

To me SHA256 is the best way to go.  And relatively speaking, this coin would benefit the smaller miner so that's gonna help a lot.  And it's not like scrypt is an easy way to mine.  It's all a joke now unless you have minimum $5,000 just for starters, and let's face it, most don't.

Ok.

Let's brainstorm this mofo. The name should ideally come from here not me.

The 2 guys building coins for people, are they both on vacation?  I PM'd them both yesterday and nothing.

What, they don't want my money?  I won't to run this by a programmer but don't know who to trust.

Amin brother.

And I'm not weird, this idea is weird cause I officially don't give a damn about the status quo, and that's a rare stance to see which is why this sounds weird.  I always functioned in the "I don't give a damn about popular opinion" world and in general I suffered for it.

But in this case the popular thing is the good, right thing.  

This is a rare and wonderful thing.  

How about MineLifeCoin?  This coin is for the masses, the miners(MINE) with the scope of improving the mining capacity and thus the life (hence: MineLifeCoin) of those that need it most.

Isn't the democratic process putting ideas up for a populous vote before implementation?  Why is inviting coin killers any different.

I think these attackers serve an important service.  They're the white blood cells in this crypto body - killing off all unwanted foreign entrants.  More power to the hackers - kill all CrapCoins.

I guarantee even the biggest miners will not think this is a commie coin.

Thanks for the correction.  I know nothing about programming and I'm new to alt coins.

Bingo!

That's why I'm not afraid of failing and I invite a 51% attack.  Given it doesn't cost that much to launch a coin a fair launch should be fair for the community not the developers. 

And what better way to know a coin is wanted and will potentially succeed than to invite hackers and miners to kill it?  If it has merit then you'll quickly find out.

If it's another CrapCoin then it should be killed.

And the fear of an attack should make a coin better but instead devs do sneak launches and scrypt coins so they get rid of the democratic process.

A computer guy can explain a 51% attack better.  But, If you want fundamental analysis of a real asset I can help.  lol

No.  The majority of the miners have small rigs and they just can't catch a break.  The people's will is usually the best way to go but if you're a dev your main concern isn't the miners but rather how can you keep your coin from getting killed and then you actually take steps which go against the power of the miners since it is the miners that can kill your coin.

I'm doing the opposite - I'm runnin' and gunnin' straight for the miners and if they love this coin then they'll adopt it and it will thrive and if it sucks then I'm giving enough heads up time and making it SHAW256 where they can easily kill it.

What's more democratic than that?

Thanks.

Any preferences for a name?  How's SantaCoin?

What about making it future proof by using SHAW256 instead of scrypt.

Shaw means it may get killed easier but I don't care about that - merge mining is a huge benefit and soon even the small guy will own an ASIC.

Therefore, I think SHAW256 is the best way to go as far as you, the miners, are concerned.  If this coin was for me I'd so Scrypt to prevent any chance of anyone killing it with a 51% attack.

Ondrata, how am I launching a crappy coin when you don't even know what it is.

Nice attitude.

And isn't this the best way to not launch crappy coins?

A) Ask the audience what they like?

B) Give minimum 3 day heads up and SHA256d to have the coin killed if it is trash?

Who has done this for this community?

I killed my CatholicCoin and OrphanCoin idea due to too many people not liking it even though plenty did and it might have survived a sneak launch or I could have forced another CrapCoin down your throats with a scrypt coin that can't be killed.

If everyone did what I'm doing, no CrapCoins would make it to exchanges.

Can you people not even recognize honesty when you see it? Maybe you all deserve to be buried under thousands of worthless coins.  In the next 24 months there's gonna be over 3,000 alt coins on the market.

My honest and open approach prevents that.  

No, but that's a good guess.

I don't want to give anymore hints cause I want to me the first to launch this feature since I thought of it.

I wish there was a programmer I trusted to run this by them.  The Hazard guy ain't responding.

But I'm not socialist bro, and I'm launching this particular coin mainly cause I tried mining and it sucked cause I didn't have a huge rig.  Why should the majority suffer when they have the power to write their own ticket?

And I promise the big rigs will be happy too and this feature will encourage more mining not less.  It's fair to everyone but more-so to the smaller miner, the smaller the bigger the benefit.

But I promise it's not a feature any miner, big or small, will dislike.

In fact, after mining with this feature all other mining will appear, archaic, dead, boring and unfair if you're small.

I sincerely expect most if not all new coins from now on to employ this "VGB Protocol" feature.

I can't say anymore - too many idea thieves lurk about.  

Fresh ideas.

New perspective cause I an
a newbie and an Econimist and not a programmer.

Total honesty with self imposed checks and balances.

And I can pay. I didn't think I could yesterday cause I thought it was $10,000 to just launch a coin.  Now that I know the cost is way less this is almost comical.

Hence, I'm the only guy offering at least a 3 day heads up and ASIC merge mining so people can mobilize and kill any coin I put out of its trash.  This is what a real fair launch is - let the community and mining market decide what's trash and what should die, no more sneak launches.


Who has been that honest? Who has put that power in the hands of the people?

Yesterday I thought a new coin cost $10,000 to launch that's why I wanted 25% and was a bit worried about a coin getting killed.

Dude, launching a coin is way cheaper than that.  If it dies it deserves it and I'll be out a bit of money.  No big deal in my mind. 

How is scrypt quicker?  I tried mining LTC AND it was the lamest thing. 

And don't you want the option to merge mine with Bitcoin?   Think about a year from now when you may buy an ASIC, it would be nice to merge mine Bitcoin and this coin.

I think SHAW256 is the best for these reasons, its future proof.

And I think most coins today avoid SHAW256 to avoid killer 51% attacks by ASICS.  I don't care about that, if this coin gets killed it deserves the brutal death it gets.

What do yo guys think:  SHA256d for merged mining or scrypt?