#1 wallet on trex has over 1.7M coins! Don't want to imagine if he/she decides to dump
|
|
|
Polo and YoBit both down!
|
|
|
Volume drying up at Bittrex. Pumpers finally exiting DNET? I guess we're going to find the real floor soon, any guesses? I'm thinking buddy was right on the money at 250 sats.
Me likes 250 sats DNET Just need something released. Any news on something? Even just a list of everything that going on in background be good. Yeah, some updates will be good.
|
|
|
Volume drying up at Bittrex. Pumpers finally exiting DNET? I guess we're going to find the real floor soon, any guesses? I'm thinking buddy was right on the money at 250 sats.
Me likes 250 sats DNET
|
|
|
I am guessing not, they were contacted, so not sure what to tell you. Coin-Server.com 's Pool is still running Lots of hashpower being wasted.
|
|
|
Just throwing some names on the table: DarknetSend TrulyDarkSend DarknetTransfer DarkNetXfer DNXFER DNETXFER DNETTRANS AnonTX AnonSend BlackTX SecureSend SecureTX VeryVeryDarkSend
|
|
|
I don't see the main selling point i.e. 'truly untraceable' transactions in the new ANN roadmap.
|
|
|
IMO at this stage focus should be on implementing proposed tech and usability instead of aesthetic changes. OK guys and gals.. I did end up finding crz that Danonthehill suggested, his work is "Outstanding", but with that quality, comes a cost. a significant one. He has asked for a budget, so I need to guage what everyone thinks. If you want to see a sample of his work, check out this link; https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=745352.0To start he is willing to redesign the the BCT ANN, Coin Logo and Default Wallet Design. I am sure this would take us to a higher level of professionalism, but I need to hear your thoughts before I create a budgetary proposal for his work. The Tech is happening regardless of any other options, it just takes time. We have a whole plethora of items in the works to be integrated into the wallet over the next few updates. Yes, it takes time, I can surely understand...questioning anything related to it wasn't my intention.....I meant will it have any positive impact at this stage if a significant amount is utilized for aesthetic changes? Well, that is a great question, and I am sure it could help to some degree, but mainly I was doing the research as I am trying to follow up on every suggestion that is posted by Masternode owners to see how viable something is.That's exactly why I have interest in this coin!
|
|
|
IMO at this stage focus should be on implementing proposed tech and usability instead of aesthetic changes. OK guys and gals.. I did end up finding crz that Danonthehill suggested, his work is "Outstanding", but with that quality, comes a cost. a significant one. He has asked for a budget, so I need to guage what everyone thinks. If you want to see a sample of his work, check out this link; https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=745352.0To start he is willing to redesign the the BCT ANN, Coin Logo and Default Wallet Design. I am sure this would take us to a higher level of professionalism, but I need to hear your thoughts before I create a budgetary proposal for his work. The Tech is happening regardless of any other options, it just takes time. We have a whole plethora of items in the works to be integrated into the wallet over the next few updates. Yes, it takes time, I can surely understand...questioning anything related to it wasn't my intention.....I meant will it have any positive impact at this stage if a significant amount is utilized for aesthetic changes?
|
|
|
IMO at this stage focus should be on implementing proposed tech and usability instead of aesthetic changes. OK guys and gals.. I did end up finding crz that Danonthehill suggested, his work is "Outstanding", but with that quality, comes a cost. a significant one. He has asked for a budget, so I need to guage what everyone thinks. If you want to see a sample of his work, check out this link; https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=745352.0To start he is willing to redesign the the BCT ANN, Coin Logo and Default Wallet Design. I am sure this would take us to a higher level of professionalism, but I need to hear your thoughts before I create a budgetary proposal for his work.
|
|
|
What if during side channel communication between the masternodes, one MN deliberately decides to go offline? Will there by any adverse effects? Well, without going into specifics, which I will be happy to do after it is released. By using side channel communications between the masternodes, we will be able to achieve a "Trustless air-gap" essentially removing the transaction details in the middle of the transaction from the blockchain. If a portion of the transaction details are not on the blockchain how would you trace the transaction from point 'a' to point 'b'?
|
|
|
I also agree.....we need USP for this coin......there are many anon coins offering similar services. It would be a disaster if DNET is called just "another anon coin". But again.. A anon feature is not really gonna boost much. Why suddenly buy into this coin when other coins offer the same?
What we are going for is to become an accual currency, right?
This is not FUD this is just me asking relevant questions because I cant see the reason why people should buy into this coin other than because of the masternodes that can make you money. But at some point there will be so many, or the value of the coin has dropped too much for it to be worth have running.
That is what I can see is going to happen. This is my opinion, not facts.
Does anyone here have some points to make so I get a better understanding of the plan of this coin, or if its just a profit run.
|
|
|
ATM there are only 66382 WARPs for sale on trex.
|
|
|
#1 wallet on trex jumped from 47K to 60K WARPs!!
And i know why, because this nice piece of a masterwork will have soon a million dollar market cap My wallet is also rising. WARP was very attractive at 13K.
|
|
|
#1 wallet on trex jumped from 47K to 60K WARPs!!
|
|
|
oh, now I understand why shapetwist keeps low-profile here.
|
|
|
I originally thought this was going to be a good coin, but my opinion, I'm afraid, is changing.
What has been happening over the last few days has all the hallmarks of a dev ignoring investors in the hope of the price collapsing (which it has) , so that he can buy up cheap coins before making some announcement that will raise the price.
He's been online several times since his last post over a day ago, but has posted nothing.
There's been no mention of v1.1 for days.
He shut the slack unannounced and still hasn't explained why.
I have posted two items here that, I think, deserved a reply..... they got none. He even asked for a discussion to take place and then virtually disappears.
None of this inspires confidence for the investor, and shape has been around long enough to know this..... why would he behave this way?
Saying he is busy working isn't an answer - I offered to help, I was ignored.
I can't decide if he is bent or just flaky. Either way, I've sold enough of my coins to get my initial investment back plus 12%. I now have a couple of thousand left which I will keep to see what happens, but I won't be buying any more.
I tend to agree. @shapetwist, even if v1.1 wallet is not ready, everyone would like some updates. We know you are working, but it won't hurt if you share progress (no matter how small) with your community.
|
|
|
Nice buy support at trex @shapetwist would it be possible for you to share progress on bug fixes?
|
|
|
|