I don't think if they will be saving it or automatically sent it to the charity.

I think it is best if the gambling sites have some charities that gamblers can choose from though I think that would limit the gamblers and might think twice about these donations. I guess it is better if they would be saving it first before they send it making the amount good and it will help a lot of people or maybe kids in the process.

Is gender important in the Blockchain?

I mean if we will be relating cryptocurrencies into gender it is useless right since we already have the anonymity, the privacy and that just means that we don't care whether they are a girl or a boy. All we know is their address and we are connected to it, right?

I know right?

It is easy to follow these investors but it is a bit of unfair since they lead people and getting commissions out of their profits while they just follow them. I think it would be great if they can do that too. It is like having a car and you have a driver but for a long time you have that car, you still can't drive and still depend on that driver. It is good since you have a driver but isn't that pathetic, right?

I think this is good for those beginners.

But I don't think people should just be depending on this to get rich or have a profit at all. What if these investors realized that people are just following them with every one of their investments? Either way, I think people should really learn to invest in their own, it is also better for investors to learn how to lose since that is also something that investors will learn from.

But it doesn't mean cryptocurrencies have the upper hand.

There are a lot of mobile wallets that offer payments using Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies but I don't think people are actually using it right now since the halving is closing and people would be thinking to just save or hold it rather than selling it. That just means that despite the chance that we are seeing people would use cryptos, they are not. And another thing is that not all of the people are actually interested in using it and usually, people don't know what it is.

For me, it is no too.

I don't know what you mean though but I don't think people should trust these exchanges. You just open or visit it when you need it but I don't think people should really depend on it. These wallets are prone from being hacked and you are prone from being scammed so people should really worry when they are using an exchange.

This would be the idea.

I don't think teams would be pushing the games since we all know the risk they will be taking. They will be risking millions to every game they will be attending and they couldn't risk that much. I think some games that can be done locally would be pushed through, but games with people going into places won't be good at all for the players.

That is just amazing.

To be honest, I am feeling the same way but because I am working from home right now, I don't have this rough like the OP. I am busy so I am a bit preoccupied with it that I don't really think of it. I think people should do the same as the OP, to be honest it is really hard to avoid thinking about gambling if you are not so busy this ECQ.

I think that is a great idea.

But I think this should be done by the gamblers itself. The gambler will be setting up the percentage of the amount they wanted to donate and it should depend on the deposit they have. Gamblers might regret doing that in the long run since they might have a good amount in deposit and would just want to bet the amount they betted.

IMO, there is no such thing as a safe haven investment.

I don't think we should be worrying about our lives in the future if we have an investment in a safe-haven asset and obviously, people would be fawning all over it since it is a safe-haven investment, isn't it? Another thing is that despite the good price movement of Bitcoin in the pandemic, it is still volatile so we can't really say that a risky cryptocurrency is a safe haven investment.

I think we all wanted to be rich.

It is the hidden desire of the people and we are not just talking about the money here, love to new things, love to technology, to freedom and such. The difference here is the time we went in and invested in BTC. The desperation of me to earn a profit while I am unemployed is the reason why I am here, it leads me here. I don't know what will happen but I think I am here for a reason.

In my opinion, I think it would not be the same as in the past years

Right now, the price is getting better and better. From $6K we see the price rose to $9.3K now. We are not even at post-halving and I thought that this would happen after the halving. Maybe there are some investors that are taking advantage of this price and thinking it will be having a price higher than this after the halving, the price might still drop before the halving though.

I don't think it is that good.

Even in the normal days, I don't think it is that good for cryptocurrencies to be taxed. I think it is better to what it is right now since people are enjoying the freedom they have and I think it is also good for privacy out of the government's hands. If you are a good citizen, why don't you just add your profits from cryptocurrencies to your income taxes?

Then that is not panic selling, right?

Panic selling is when people are not thinking straight what to do and just sell since they think they would be missing the chance of selling at a higher price. When they will be selling cryptocurrencies or other investments since they need it, then they are doing the normal thing an investor would do in a normal day, right? Trade.

Betting alone is a risk and the more we do it, the higher of chance that we are losing.

What I am saying is that this is a strategy of gambling sites so that people would continue to gamble and increase their chance of losing and that means profit in their side. Just like businesses, gambling sites has their own strategies so that people would actively gamble in their site, right?

I know right?

The government will not be allowing these casinos to function at these times, I guess they should really consider making an online casino or gambling site so they would continue to earn a profit and continue to give their workers their expected wage or payment. They are the ones affected by these and not really us gamblers.

I think it is called asymptomatic.

Those people without any symptoms of the virus but have the virus are asymptomatic and they are the ones with high immunity when it comes to those kinds of diseases. This is a problem to health workers as they can't really identify these people but there are also some that say these asymptomatics are also affected by the virus like losing their sense of smell. This is the reason why we should not get out that easily or normally or even think of gambling in a casino since our enemy has no face and unseen while killing many people globally.

For me, it is not that huge, really.

It is true that the pandemic has an effect on the price of Bitcoin but I don't think it is that huge. If we are really seeing a huge effect on the price of Bitcoin then we should be seeing a huge price drop and at least now we should not see it recovering. But what happened is that the price drops and returned so fast to $6K and now it is $9K.

I think 21M is just enough.

It is not really at 21M right now since there are some bitcoins that are lost or stuck in a wallet that no one knows the code is to be moved. The lower the amount is, the better for its value and I think that is enough.


I think that would make it worse.

You are making the gap of these halving longer means more miners will be able to get Bitcoin before the next halving. Despite the additional 9 million, I don't think that would really help there. Satoshi Nakamoto is a genius, just think of it, no one really knows if people will really use it but despite that, he made it better so it would be programmed to be used until the future, the devs might misunderstand but I am talking about the halving.

But I guess this depends on how he is using that $100.

Maybe he is not investing that $100 into one, maybe he is doing it with other cryptocurrencies as well making that $100 being invested into 3 or 4 cryptocurrencies, right? I guess you could do that but I agree that as long as you can afford to lose this money. OP said he already lost $100 and $400 so that also means he can afford it.