I tried to join but I did not know which package I should pick then I think it was asking me for money.  Can you tell me here how much this costs or if it costs anything to join?

I get an error every time I try to log into steemit.  I entered the wrong email the first time now I cannot go back and change the email.  Is there another way to participate with steemnit?  Must I get a new reddit id just to participate?  Thanks

https://www.booster.com/dont-tread-on-meme

Call to Action

Buy a shirt or donate or both

Shirts Ship internationally

Bravo!  Meme America Great Again!

I will donate to this billboard!

Also would make a good flag, sign, shirt.

Can you send that in AI format?

Parties are not required for Democracy.  Parties were invented in USA in 1790 and democracy existed long before this date so how did democracy survive without a political party all those years??
 You could have no parties and still have democracies I promise.  
The fact that you are thinking in terms of a party is flawed.  In fact the entire party system came about because people rallied around their platform which is a word for the views and beliefs they hold.  
The party did not even exist the first few years in USA.
 The party system is a pure USA invention that really serves little legal function.
 But as we see now it holds great power over the process in ways that were never meant to be.  
SO the statement that more parties = more democracy is like saying you get more water because you use more cups.

The notion that if you limit the money in the election you limit the corruption is a very noble one until you find out that it is not realistic.

Let me give you an example: Israel

Israel citizens will tell you until they are blue in the face that they have elections where they removed money from politics and blah, blah,blah.  And if it were true it would be truly wonderful.

And it really sound good unless you know the facts.

Fact is that for Netanyahoo's presidential election, FOREIGN INDIRECT CONTRIBUTION came 90% from USA for the sole purpose of influencing the election results in Israel.

So the folks who have analyzed this system have deduced that while the Israel citizen feels really good while they brag about their free elections...in fact what has happened is now the election is completely influenced by foreign interests.  And with no domestic money to counter balance the indirect foreign influence, the removal of money in fact made their election process more vulnerable and not less vulnerable to influence.  And in this case foreign money is arguably much worse by comparison than domestic money.

     So while I agree that removing or limiting the money in a USA presidential election is a tempting thought the reality on this planet and the evidence as shown with Israel prevents me from being convinced that is realy possible to implement and therefore in fact more dangerous at this time.

I say this because today most people in Israel do not know that 90% of Netanyahoo's money for his campaign was sent from addresses from within the USA.  They do not even know about the money that was used to help him get elected.

If they knew that information they would understand their president is not the guy that would have won that election.  It was this money that made it possible for him to win.  His election could have gone very different.

So once again I must respectfully disagree.  However I am grateful for the opportunity to debate this important topic and respect each opinion and my chance to respond

I respectfully disagree that parties make it a democracy.  You can have a democracy without the party system is my understanding.  Therefore I will suggest your statement is the one that is ignorant since you do not see that a democracy was never depending on parties to exist and sustain them.  for reference I will include a link to Wikipedia, nowhere in their definition of democracy do I find the mention of parties being a functional component necessary to operate or any mention at all for that matter. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy

And the Whig party of Lincoln started as an omage to the Whigs that were the founders party during the revolution (because of the White whigs they wore).  And by the time Lincoln won with the Whig party they were one of the top 2 parties in the USA since the the federalist party was seen as too central to be supported by the people at this time who did not favor a strong central bank so it was dead by 1814-1828.  In fact the Whig party that Lincoln came from was essentially a split in the republican party which was called the "democrat-republican party" at the time.  And so no the Whig party was not a 3rd party at the time with Lincoln in my opinion.  And also nowhere in the constitution does it say anything about a party system.  And when the USA started there were no political parties at all any where in the world.  Yes however it was only a few years later that the politicians in USA began devising various systems to popularize the vote for their benefit.

I am not worried.  I just think if you take issue with a 2 party system then what makes a 3 party system any better?  Trump has full support from his party and he is not getting the funding which is where the rubber meets the road in terms of most of the benefits that a candidate gets from the association with a party anyway.  So this wonderful party endorsement you think will help more issues get discussed is a red herring at least the way I see it.  The parties know how to control their candidate and after Trump they will make it so expensive to run for president you will never get a real guy who can afford to speak the truth to us for 18 months on TV no matter how many parties you have.  Parties are abusing the system IMO.  Bye Bye parties.

      I liked your original interpretation of it's all one big party called USA.  Then from there we can start making sense again.  I lived in New Mexico Under Johnson I know what he offers trust me.  They ran a great guy like him on purpose it is killing me.  Why can't they run a Johnson when there is two terd sandwiches running like usual?  Now do you see my point?  I am just saying he is not much different than Trump and so for this cycle he should decide if there is some issue Trump is not voicing that is worth risking a Hillary presidency over.  Then after he realizes there isn't (unless he is wanting Hillary to win) we all can realize Tump is responsive to the people.  When is the last time you have ever seen that from a politician?   He wants to do a good job and he is not lying.  He is the King of Hospitality and he wants to give back and save this country before it does the final flush down the tubes.  We have all been watching it circle the bowl including Trump for a long time.  The American dream is coming to an end and folks need to wake up.  And the scammers are going to hurry and flush USA because they cannot break the love the people have for Trump so the least they can do is start wwwIII and finish their other scams now to hurt Trumps future legacy.  

 the 3rd or 4th party candidates get introduced in such a fashion as to pull votes from the 2 dominant parties. the third parties should refuse the votes unless they are really trying to win in which case they should be realistic about their chances.  If they really care about USA they should realize that Johnson is not much different from Trump and he is just pulling votes from someone who can win this year  like Trump (who was going to maybe be a "3rd" party candidate himself don't forget).  If it is about issues then Johnson or Stein should adopt the platform that McAffee had it is the only 3rd party platform that makes any sense and it was 100% about issues He refused all votes.  Instead he encouraged voters to vote for one of the main candidates.  That takes leadership and these fools are really there to fuck all the election promise because they really are trying to win.  They do not wish to help American they wish to be President or two fuck all the election because that is usually the only two options they are given.  And they can always drop out the week before but they never do either because someone is paying them for fuck all or because they paid too much of their own money to stop now.  Poor decision making thought process.  Because it is attempting to act like it is a two party system and because the running for office is so expensive we have this rigged system you call the 2 party system (which it is not).  Yet these other parties somehow get involved and they actually try to win the office and never do and it only serves to pull votes from one of the two candidates who could win.

The party system is silly go by values or policy or platforms but like you said they are all moving around anyway so it is just words that have lost meaning.  So why not have the people all do a 1st tier then the remaining two with the highest votes face off for the win on the second tier vote.  You get max satisfaction this way for the people (better deal).  If you have lots of people add a third round to include more people in the beginning.  By adding the 3rd and 4th party in to "talk about talk about issues" only prevents the actual winner from ascending to office because of the way the popular vote and the electoral college work together for the presidential election.

    And the reasons this year is so important should be obvious for the exact reasons we are discussing and because this year it is about reform or more of the same.  Not about which party you are from.  There is no 3rd party when it is Trump and the peoples' movement vs the world established government that is not two parties in the traditional sense so this year is not the traditional voting cycle. 

    This is tragic too because normally Johnson would be a good candidate, he did amazing things for New Mexico,  I am very impressed with his governance capability..  I will encourage Trump to hire him as a consultant or state association liaison.   But we have Trump who is shining brighter than a super nova right now.  How can America refuse this?  Dear Mr. Johnson please do your country a great service and step down and throw your support behind Donald Trump.

Who cares about the parties.  We do not have a 2 party system anyway.  This year it is 1) vote for Trump and we remove cancer from government and reboot or 2) More of the same failed government snakes.   But we should keep it down to 2 people yes.  The round before this had lots of people and it was weeded down to 2 now more people getting introduced is fuck all.  What has a third party ever done for a presidential election except totally fuck it up?

 Or in the alternative get rid of the party primaries and let the candidates all compete in rounds leading up to the final choices like the primaries but not monopolized by a "party".  

Johnson did great things for NM but he really needs to drop the act that he is actually running for president.  At least McAffee had the correct platform a 3rd party should have this cycle: "do not vote for me I am running to talk issues only"  All Johnson can do is take away votes from Trump and Hillary.  Then the scammers can tell us Trump lost by a little while the voter machines rig the hackathon for Hillary. They both have almost identical platforms except in a few areas and so there is no point since Trump is willing to adapt to the people's will.  Trump is our manager.  Trump can do the job.  We do not need a 3rd rail this time around.

No I just was self conscious.  No one told me to remove anything.  I think billboards is great I love the image you posted I think we can get a good deal on a billboard.  

"It is just a frog" goes along with re correcting the record.  Sublime

I have enough BEER Money to sell to raise the fee for application to Yobit.  If anyone wishes to buy some BEER money from me for bitcoin I will use the btc for the yobit fee to add coin also you can send micro amounts to me I will keep tally on the thread.  PM me for btc address.

\
No Plans for exchange as of now trying to raise funds for this project in other projects ATM.  Guest Dev's are welcome to fill in!

Here is a guide to solo mine: http://blockgen.net/setup-your-own-mining-pool/
A private mining pool can be created for Beer Money just for yourself using this tutorial I am told


Current Bounty for each food and drink establishment that begins to accept Beer Money for goods and services: 10,000 BEER

There were 14 websites that suffered immediate soft censorship within 1 minute of the internet going under title 4 jurisdiction AKA the FCC.  This was done under "net neutrality"  And it is obvious the websites were preselected for this soft censorship.  Many of them do not know about this still to this day.  The web site owners do not know why no one is buying their books or their message does not get out.  Their breaking news never gets heard.  Only the ones that hand coded their entire website and rewrote the startup (to remove SUDU) portion of their linux live boot cd even noticed the bug running in the background.

The soft censorship is so complete that we are arguing about search engines which is outrageous while entire websites never come up in those search engines because they are not being found at all due to the ip games via registry manipulation.

  And the fact that the ip numbers are registered at the time of ICANN registration still does not mean the viewers know the numbers or that the website publishes them.  Plus they may not be static so now you need to try many.  Plus how do you know the numbers of the websites you have not yet visited?  I can not predict what I will like to read tomorrow.  That was the job of search engines.

Let's review:

Main stream media =  Failed

State primary elections  =  Failed

DNC fraud exposed

Internet search engines = Failed

Impartiality of supreme court justices in the political arena  = Failed

Impartiality of the president in current race for President  = Failed

There are not many failures left before we must admit we are underwater/
If you are reading this you are now taking on water what do you do?

The greatest hope of the globalist is that your brains is as soft as your money you have been using.

Yes busting the search engines for their bias is a huge topic that needs attention. 

As for the typing in of ip numbers directly you are correct that will work...the problem is that it lowers security for the website host and most people do not know the ip address for their websites they need if they have not yet found the website.  So the search engine thing goes hand in hand with the ip registry games.  Unless you are the rare one who knows ever website you will use for the rest of your life.  Plus many web site owners do not have static ip so they do not even have a number to give their viewers that will not change.

I like the new cover Tyke!

Yeah I agree Masha p2p has far to go.  And now with the new legislation set to be passed during the election the ICANN registry databases will be forever under the control of different nation states...leading to the great firewall of China being implemented around the world.  Hillary said she will destroy her critics like Alex Jones and Breitbart.  Problem is she cannot do that without first having great change in the internet.  So once this legislation gets passed then she will be able to destroy them via ICANN registry redirects.  Good luck people of the world you will need it.