You assume that I am using shill accounts whenever anyone disagrees with you.

I would ask why you created a brand new account to sell carded Starbucks gift cards. Why don't you use your "main" account?

I got that account via my lending thread. The guy scammed both me and another lender (who said he took the account as collateral but really did not).

It is my understanding that the trust can be removed for .15 to the other lender.

I will send you a pm

Okay so I did a little bit of experimenting. 184QFyikUtYLzsGc7Hhn5xAV1rTJmpy6JZ is an address of mine that has four inputs, one for .45, one for .36, one for .015 and one for .01 BTC.

When I tried to send amounts under .45, it always proposed that it spend the .45 input except when the amount of the transaction was the exact amount of the transaction. When I attempted to spend the exact amount of the transaction, it would use the input that exactly matched the size. The same is true when I tried spending amounts greater then .45 but less then .81 BTC, when I attempt to send an amount of .45 plus the size of another input (except the .015 input) it would use those two inputs, otherwise it would use the .45 and the .36 input. I am not sure why it did not want to spend the .015 input unless it had to.

This leads me to believe that it will attempt to structure transaction in a way so that it will need to spend as little as possible on a TX fee (e.g. it wants to make the transaction size as small as possible).

It is note worthy that all the inputs are roughly the same age (within a week of each other) and I am not sure how it would react if the inputs were of significantly different ages (old inputs are generally more eligible to send free transactions as per most rules that most miners follow). One downside to this however may result in in you eventually having very small inputs if you do not spend exact amounts that you receive (IMO it is not the expected behavior for people to spend exact amounts they receive) which will potentially lead to very high TX fees for blockchain.info users if the use the same wallet long enough.

so you are in control of the address in question along with the other person?

so are you the same person as him or not?

That is really not how doing business works. If you received payment from someone and it was not due to you then you should return the funds to the person who gave it to you. If he owed you money then you should refund the difference from what he owes you.

Are you an alt of the person he was doing business with?

Let me see if I have this right.

You engage in a mob attack against WC for potentially misrepresentating how he was making his pieces, it turns out that WC was a fraud and starts trolling the forum via shill accounts, You made a laser made coin in an attempt to troll WC, it actually turns out pretty good, people want to buy your work so you can actually sell laser made art at slightly less prices then what WC was selling for. Oh the irony.

I am fairly certain that they will only use the necessary inputs. Although they may use the smallest inputs and then move to larger inputs as necessary which may make it look like they are using all inputs depending on the inputs in your address.

Both using all inputs and using the smallest inputs first will most likely result in you having to pay less in tx fees over the long run.

If you give me a few hours I will take a look and test my theory.

Unspent outputs, no. However you can structure transactions such that you spend all inputs in a specific address to avoid address reusing.

My understanding is that they will structure the transaction so that the tx fee will be smallest for the subject transaction (at least from what I can tell).

I would suggest starting a thread in meta. (Did you happen to have a GMX email associated with your account?).

I am unable to verify your signature so I can't say for sure that you were a previous owner, although the person above me said the signature matches and I don't have any reason to doubt him.

Auctions for account tend to not work very well because people do not like their real identity associated with the fact they are buying an account. Imo it is better to set an asking price then privately neogeoiate a sales price

you need to provide the post where the account previously posted that address

I would still contact the police about this if NewDeal is refusing to pay. Every minute you delay contacting the police is more time that he has to sell the miner for either cash or bitcoin which would make it much more difficult to prove that he received the miner in criminal court.

Even if he is convicted of grand larceny you should still be able to recover civil damages from him to recover your losses

If the OP listens to my advice then you will likely also have lost your freedom
You are speculating that the OP is engaging in money laundering. You have received no additional hard evidence (besides a message from an unknown sender who you purposefully withheld the identity of). If you did think hat the OP was laundering money as of when you placed the order then you would have been engaged in money laundering as well

@poksak if the OP gave you a signed message with sufficient bitcoin to pay you and such address still has sufficient bitcoin to pay you then I would give him until morning to pay you when you will contact the police if he has not. Otherwise I would give him 3 days max until you contact the police.

if you contact the police sooner rather then later then NewDeal will have less time to sell/get rid of the S5 that he received so when the police are able to search his house it will be more likely that they find it, meaning a higher chance for a conviction

EDIT: I would highly recommend against sending the sex toys to him

That is between you and amazon. This does not concern the OP.
It is understandable that he wants his money first. The agreement was that he order a specific product from a specific seller, he fulfilled his part of the bargain. You should give him his money you owe him and then he can attempt to work with the seller on amazon.
Doesn't matter. Bitcoin has value and stealing it is larceny. You do not need to steal money to be guilty of larceny.
If you sticks to the facts that he set forth in this thread then he would certainly not be liable for defamation. He did follow through on his part, you have not. Regardless of if you actually received that battery from the amazon seller or not you are most likely guilty.
That is between you and amazon. This is not the OP's problem. You should have picked a more reputable amazon seller.
You are not reputable. Two deals is nothing. It was scammy for you to refuse escrow in the first place. An escrow setup would be one similar to what just happened. You would send bitcoin to escrow, the OP would place an order for you, once the items are delivered the escrow would release the funds to the seller. If there is a dispute then the escrow can log into the seller's amazon account to make sure the order was not canceled.

Bitmain is selling the S5 on amazon, why didn't you pick them? Your agreement was for the OP to purchase a specific item listing on amazon from a specific seller in exchange for bitcoin. If he followed through on is end then you owe him the amount of bitcoin that was agreed upon. If the amazon seller scammed you then you need to work with amazon and the OP to get a replacement or a refund.

Since you gave the OP your address if the order is not canceled and you do not pay him then the OP could easily contact the police. Your address in Alexandra,VA would not make it difficult to find you. My understanding of VA law based on my quick google search reveals that stealing the amount you have stolen is Grand Larceny, is a felony and is punishable by between 1 and 30 years in jail (likely closer to the former then the later)

You don't have any collateral do you

If you are comfortable logging into someone else's amazon account. According to this screenshot it was NewDeal that suggested the specific amazon seller so he should be held responsible if the seller scammed, not the OP

Give Blazr your amazon email address and password via PM (if you both agree) and he can confirm that the order was in fact not canceled.