What you said all is correct but in the end you said if their is no newly smerits generated then this whole forum will finish that is false as forum will be living but the merit system will come to halt and who ever is holding what rank will be stuck in that rank and their wont be any upgradation. So smerit are normally generating and the smerit source are receiving it to distribute it. Merits will not dry up.Merit sources are allocated new merits every month and they distribute them to users who deserve them. Only the individuals who dont receive new merits from other members wont have new sMerits to spend. But that doesnt mean that the overall supply will be lower it just means that other users received those merits you could have gotten, or me, or anyone else. |
|
|
|
|
I decided to do a quick check on the first 3 users I merited to see if I made the right decision or not in giving them a merit each. Besides one entry in a facebook and linkedin bounty, where the merits and account rank dont matter anyway, all other posts have been non-bounty/airdrop related since receiving the merit. That is a good thing.
|
|
|
|
It is only January, wait for a few months, there will surely be some more HOT stuff  |
|
|
|
|
You keep calling them 'bitcointalk escrows', but they are not 'bitcointalk escrows'. There is no agreement between bitcointalk and the escrows to offer those services. They have not been appointed by theymos or someone else to offer the services nor are they forced to do so. They dont pay a fee to bitcointalk (as far as I know) or work for the forum directly so you cant refer to them as 'bitcointalk escrows'. They are just trusted users, using the site to offer their services. You can do the same thing and you wouldn't be a 'bitcointalk escrow' or a 'non-bitcointalk escrow'.
If you sell your PC over ebay - should I call you an Official Ebay PC Dealer?
|
|
|
|
|
Juventus seems to have agreed a deal with Genoa regarding Stefano Sturaro. It looks like he will initially join them on loan before making the deal permanent if he plays in a certain amount of matches.
|
|
|
|
...I go with gambling sites like bet365, ladbrokes, paddy power etc. I have account with all of them.
I have not tried ladbrokes or paddy power, how would you rate their streaming services compared to bet365 in terms of delay and quality? Sometimes I google for urls on demand. I didnt understand what you meant with urls on demand, what is that exactly? |
|
|
|
Der Benutzer o_e_l_e_o hat vor einigen Tagen eine sehr hilfreiche Seite vorgeschlagen, die für Benutzer mit mehreren Wallets und vielen Adressen nützlich sein kann. Die Webseite dient zur Überprüfung von Bitcoin/Ethereum-Adressen. Es ist sehr ermüdend, eine Adresse nach der anderen zu prüfen, und http://www.homebitcoin.com/easybalance/ kann für diesen Zweck sehr nützlich sein. Geben Sie einfach alle Ihre Adressen ein, eine Adresse in jede Reihe und klicken Sie auf "Get Balance". Die Seite zeigt Ihnen dann den individuellen Saldo jeder Adresse und darunter den Gesamtsaldo. Die Seite speichert die von Ihnen eingegebenen Adressen. Dies ist wiederum eine nützliche Option, damit sie diese Adressen nicht jedes Mal erneut eingeben müssen. Wie am Ende der Seite erklert ist, muss zwischen dem Überprüfen verschiedener Adressen eine Verzögerung von einigen Sekunden eingegeben werden, um das System nicht zu überfordern und ein IP-Verbot zu erhalten. Quelle: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5092295.msg49017981#msg49017981 |
|
|
|
|
Bravo Trofo, nisam dosad obračao pažnju na to.
Hvala
|
|
|
|
Ako je razlog za ban kopiranje posta, da li se uzelo u obzir, da ovaj što je prije njega napisao post, mogao urediti svoj post i kopirati Regulusov? To je dobro pitanje. Ako je to moguće onda bi osoba koja je napisala komentar prije vašeg bila u mogućnosti da edituje svoj post, kopirajući vaš post, tako da izgleda da ste kopirali post. Ali mislim da bi u tom slučaju vrijeme objave bilo promjenjeno na vrijeme kad je post editovan. Edit: Upravo sam probao uređujući svoj post, ali vrijeme objave se ne mijenja! Edit 2: Je li moguće da se ne mijenja vrijeme objave posta na zadnje uređivanje posta? Vrata širom otvorena za manipulacije. |
|
|
|
Staking my address here. Message:
This is Pmalek from bitcointalk. I am signing this message as proof of account owership. Todays date is 09.01.2019.
Address:
1P1Efagwg23nKKLkk48ZLF2MhhCaQcQuNP
Signature:
IF4GDMBne4Iru6IhLz7QTcHBHbHIyZpIGVhkCLH7uSGXXh2M8hU3exjvZEZSKqzXoUNOcRPE+AUjoECvejiNWjw= Please Quote and Verify. Thank you |
|
|
|
|
My apologies if this was mentioned here already or somewhere else on the Forum (I did a quick search through the 5 pages looking for bounty and altcoin as keywords and didn't find anything).
How about preventing plagiarists from reading and posting in the Altcoin and Bounty sections + the ability to send PMs?
That way they would not be able to search for, participate or send bounty reports (make money off the forum) but they can still post in other sections of the forum. Not all users who copy/paste are merely shit posters and they can still contribute in some positive ways.
Then it will be possible to see the distinction between those who simply give up and leave since they cant take part in bounties and the others who actually want to participate in the forum and try to better themselves.
|
|
|
|
Imam jedno pitanje - davati merite članovima poput marlboroze ili ne? Napredovati više ne mogu, pa im meriti za te svrhe ne trebaju. Ali da bi mogao davati sMerite drugim kornisnicima onda im trebaju + kao vid podrške da se njihov trud cijeni. |
|
|
|
@Pmalek, see the dates carefully. Yury1 was an original poster.
But despite this, most likely that Yury1 has been banned because he has copied text without indicating the sources. You are right, I completely missed the year, my only focus was on the June-July part, since Yury1's post was from July and the other one from June. Well in that case that means that the user hafsaumer copy/pasted his reply from either Yury1 or someone else - who knows how many times that sentence has been used until now. I took a look at hafsaumer's profile and while his activity was 20 back when the post was made he has since then deleted all his posts but according to the modlog he has not been banned yet. He hasn't been active since October 28, 2018 though. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2221156 |
|
|
|
Možeš li pričekati da prođe dan, dva a onda u određenim razmacima prijavljivati ostale svoje postove?
Hvala ti na razumijevanju. Nikakav problem! I ako bude i ako ne bude, hvala i na 1 i na 10 i na 100, jbt kakva poezija Da se nadovežem na marlboroza i njegov post. Ovo je taj post od theymosa u kojem on kaže da ukoliko merit sourcer pronađe samo 3 posta za koje smatra da zaslužuju merit u jednom mjesecu, više bi volio da ta 3 posta dobiju po 50 merita nego da ti meriti propadnu na kraju mjeseca. If they complain about amounts, tell them to complain to me. It's best if sources try to exhaust their source allocations, even if it means giving posts higher amounts than is typical. If you have 150 source merit and you only see 3 merit-worthy posts in a month, then I'd rather you over-give each of them 50 merit than let the merit expire. That way there are more people capable of sending merit, and the "merit economy" is less top-down.
If a DT member tags you for something stupid involving merit (ie. probably anything less than selling merit), then they're not going to be a DT member for much longer.
Aside from that, if people complain about whether things deserve merit at all, then that's something to perhaps think about, but if you conclude that they're wrong, then that's that. You don't need to stress about it or defend yourself constantly. It's conceivable that someday you and I will end up disagreeing too much about this stuff and I'll remove your source status, but it's really not a big deal. Što se Regulusa tiče. stvarno je šteta da je se to desilo, pogotovo što je post još iz 2017! U posljednje vrijeme sam vidio dosta naloga banovani iz 2017. Upravo se jedan korisnik žalio na ban u Meti i pronašao sam mu copy/paste post iz Jula 2017! Kojim metodama to tek sad otkrivaju, ne znam. @marlboroza da li to imaju neke botove koji pronalaze te postove? Da neko sad sjedi i pregleda postove iz 2017 malo je vjerovatno! Bilo je nekih prijedloga da se određeni copy/paste incidenti oproste ako je razlog bio da se pomogne nekom korisniku pa osoba koja je kopirala tekst zaboravi navesti izvor, što se lako može desiti. Međutim, kada su u pitanju bounty kampanje, učešče u airdropovima i drugi razlozi finansijske prirode, tu su onda pravila vrlo stroga. Opet se nadam da će se Regulus žalit na odluku jer se je to desilo davne 2017 i ako je to jedini takav post sa njegovog naloga pa mu možda sreća bude naklonjena. |
|
|
|
This would seem to remove any abusive/illegal incentive for posting. Requiring that the posts be created prior to the thread, means that there would have been no possibility that the user is posting with this thread in mind. Maybe I am being naive, but this seems to be the important distinction; a very thoughtful rule. Yes, I made the rule exactly for that reason. To avoid users to post/spam and then ask for merits. I dont know if that is the difference between this thread and the others that were not allowed and were moved to Off-Topic but it just might be. |
|
|
|
I think this post got you banned because it is copy/pasted: I'm sure you can do without bounty programs. Very many people are interested in your project.
Someone archived it here and the original post was made on June 28, 2018, 10:25:13 PM: http://archive.is/NG3ot You either copy/pasted from there or another source. |
|
|
|
The VAR should be added to all the Championships, even to lower Leagues. It should but the underlying technology is quite costly and makes it hard for small teams in the lower leagues to finance. I am glad that it will be used now in the knockout stages of the Champions League. It is ridiculous that such an elite competition didn't have it until now. |
|
|
|
|
@rockethead
Ja, das stimmt, danke für den Tipp.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
