Bitcoin Forum
September 10, 2024, 11:00:57 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.1 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 [669] 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 ... 754 »
13361  Other / Meta / Re: Content leeching websites on: January 28, 2015, 08:01:30 PM
Why would we want to? Such websites make it more difficult to scam via changing and deleting posts
13362  Other / Meta / Re: REMOVE NUBBINS FROM THE DEFAULT TRUST LIST FOR REPEATED TRUST ABUSE on: January 28, 2015, 06:50:15 PM
I would speculate that he knows at least partially because the "tor tax" was paid from addresses and/or inputs were connected. WC had said that he connects via tor so it would make sense that his alts would sign up via tor as well
YAY - MORE SPECULATION! Just what we need.
if this was the case then would you agree that they would reasonably be the same person?
13363  Other / Archival / Re: . Delete on: January 28, 2015, 06:34:21 PM
This sounds fishy to me. It is also why auctioning your account generally will not work very well.
13364  Other / Meta / Re: REMOVE NUBBINS FROM THE DEFAULT TRUST LIST FOR REPEATED TRUST ABUSE on: January 28, 2015, 06:25:27 PM
I would speculate that he knows at least partially because the "tor tax" was paid from addresses and/or inputs were connected. WC had said that he connects via tor so it would make sense that his alts would sign up via tor as well
13365  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Marcchernandez scammed me for $500.00 on: January 28, 2015, 06:06:07 PM
Give me one week to repay everyone. I have all your repayment addresses so expect a payment within a week.
i somewhat doubt that this will actually happen. I would speculate that you are trying to trick the guy who scammed you into giving you Bitcoin he was suppose to give you. Either that or you were approached by law enforcement about your thefts
13366  Other / Meta / Re: PM restriction for new accounts is needed on: January 28, 2015, 05:21:03 PM
if you force users to make at least one post before sending a PM then this problem would be solved.

These s{c,p}ammers could throw an small auto-translated post into a small regional subforum and bam mission accomplished. I didn't knew that shdvb or Blazedout419 were worthy of being impersonated so I for one would leave the posts by their impersonators undeleted (as long as they weren't too badly autotranslated or too insubstantial).
Compared to the time it takes to create an account and send a PM this would be huge. For all intensive purposes each of these accounts is only going to be able to send one PM before it will be reported and they get a trade with caution tag. As it stands now it takes 6 (maybe 7) minutes to create an account, create a payment address, write and send a PM to someone.

If you force them to make one semi-substantial post then they need to wait 6 minutes to make their first post, spend a minute or two writing/translating it, then another 6 minutes to send a PM. Not only that but if they plan on impersonating someone then there is still a chance they will get negative trust before they shoot off their PM.

At a minimum it will take them 12 minutes per account verses 6 minutes, that is a 100% increase in the effort they need to put into it. More realistically it will be ~15 minutes per account verses 7 minutes which is a ~114% increase in effort.

Maybe a flashing bright red "NEWBIE" warning on PMs by newbies would be enough to deter impersonators/scammers, while not preventing legitimate new users from asking their questions?

Onkel Paul
It used to be that the first number was red when you had neutral trust.

I get 5-10 PMs a week from newbies / literally just signed up accounts asking legitimate questions or asking for help. These are accounts that more often then not become useful members of the community. You can't paint everyone with the same brush.
Is there a reason why they can post the question publicly?
I don't see one. People would likely want to post a question privately because they are embarrassed that they appear dumb, however this does not matter because it is a brand new account anyway.

Plus posting questions publicly means that the next person who has the same question can find it via searching instead of having to wait for an answer
13367  Economy / Services / Re: [CFNP]Quickseller Account sales signature campaign (earn up to .03 in two weeks) on: January 28, 2015, 04:59:07 PM
TXID 0c2d6a2ad094de2963b701009b843d23bb3f80e6cc1daa959bab82dfa363fef7
CrackedLogic has been paid a reduced rate of .019 (as per the terms we previously discussed).

All participants should now have been paid and the campaign is officially closed.


@hilariousandco please refund the escrow/bond funds (should be .6 BTC) to 1MALrxpLST3ocHG9fsEQp9tM8GgCGxKpEH when you get a chance.

Thanks again to everyone who participated.
13368  Economy / Invites & Accounts / Re: Selling very very old btctalk account 2011 registered - 0.10 btc on: January 28, 2015, 02:57:17 PM
If it has never been used then what is the point?
13369  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SCAMMED BY A HERO MEMBER KRISHATNET on: January 28, 2015, 02:28:36 PM
He may of deserved it but that doesn't justify it or vindicate him. If he knew the guy was a scammer and took the money but gave it to one of the person's scam victims Robin Hood-style it might be justifiable, but merely taking them money for himself isn't justifiable or ok.
yea as I said above he should give it to some good cause.

And until he does I can't see any good reason to remove the feedback. If he at some point returns the money you could maybe remove it then but I cannot see that happening. Just looks like a regular scam to me.
I guess that is fair enough.
13370  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Senior Member oscarftw has not yet repaid loan as agreed on: January 28, 2015, 02:24:09 PM
I left him negative feedback. Let me know if/when he repays
13371  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SEGVEC CONNED ME OUT OF 14.09 BTC on: January 28, 2015, 02:15:52 PM
And people who are saying court of law, police etc what is the use of snitching? If the dude can be traced down, how come he hasn't been yet from those phone numbers and address? Even if he is traced down and everyone is aware of his identity, that probably won't do anything either (Supa, Charlie Shrem, TradeFortress etc). Everyone just seems to be an Internet gangster on here but can't take any action in the real world.

How is it snitching if someone steals something from you? And the police have more powers at their disposal than those so called 'Internet gangsters' (though they likely won't be able to do much anyway but it's an option if you're not getting anywhere).
The cops would laugh in my face if I came to make a report and knew nothing about the guy other than his online username
you acknowledge the stupidity of sending him money this way yet you did it anyway.
13372  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SCAMMED BY A HERO MEMBER KRISHATNET on: January 28, 2015, 02:11:10 PM
He may of deserved it but that doesn't justify it or vindicate him. If he knew the guy was a scammer and took the money but gave it to one of the person's scam victims Robin Hood-style it might be justifiable, but merely taking them money for himself isn't justifiable or ok.
yea as I said above he should give it to some good cause.
13373  Other / Meta / Re: PM restriction for new accounts is needed on: January 28, 2015, 02:09:42 PM
Making them make one post would give more chances for someone to notice that someone is using a "fake" account and call them out for it and/or give them negative trust. (It increased visibility to the account)

If they don't make a post they are more likely to have neutral trust as of when they send the message.

Maybe, but it doesn't guarantee they will be spotted and they'd likely just try make the post in some obscure thread in some obscure sub and hope it goes unnoticed. Besides, redsnow or someone else usually busts them before they get a chance to scam anyway. I just think whatever restrictions are put in place people will just wait them out and get round them and adding this one just because someone gets scammed once in a blue moon by an imposter seems overkill.
There is a reason why they don't make any posts before sending the PMs. It is not uncommon for them to have neutral trust when the PM is sent.

It is not just the impersonators that is a problem, I have gotten several unsolicited PMs advertising some website or service from brand new accounts, forcing them to make one post will make this much more difficult for these spammers.

They wouldn't *have* to post in the thread but it would just be there if they don't have anything else to post.
13374  Economy / Reputation / Re: Videos of WoodCollector Hand Carving: Care of MOB on: January 28, 2015, 01:54:08 PM
in the us. The mail is usually delivered during traditional working hours so most of the time no one will be home when mail is delivered. It makes having to sign for packages a huge pain.  

If no one is home and no signature is required then they will generally leave it on your front porch or on top of your mailbox if you have a community mail box (like you have in apartment complexes).

If a signature is required then they make a limited number of attempts then will return the package to the sender.

...they don't just bring it to the nearest storefront location and leave you a pickup notice?!

Sorry for the OT post, genuinely curious here. I regularly miss deliveries, but I always can pick up the package at my leisure afterwards. Canada Post, UPS, Purolator, FedEx...
if they require a signature you can either sign the notice for them to leave it or you can pick it up. But if a signature is not required then they often will not even attempt to make prrsonal contact (they sometimes may knock on your door but immidiatly leave so you can see the package when you answer)
13375  Other / Meta / Re: PM restriction for new accounts is needed on: January 28, 2015, 01:51:42 PM
Making them make one post would give more chances for someone to notice that someone is using a "fake" account and call them out for it and/or give them negative trust. (It increased visibility to the account)

If they don't make a post they are more likely to have neutral trust as of when they send the message.
13376  Economy / Reputation / Re: Videos of WoodCollector Hand Carving: Care of MOB on: January 28, 2015, 01:48:11 PM
I had 60 BTC of Casascius coins delivered to my house while I was on vacation in another province... What, you don't trust the mail Wink
if I had to guess this was when the price of Bitcoin was much lower then it is now.

The chances of theft from the mail are much higher when you are away because it is usually appearant that you are not home. Plus I imagine that the packages sent by WC are not going to fit in most mailboxes therefore it would potentially be sitting outside for several days (unless of course you have your butler take it inside when it arrives)

Around $100 iirc.

Wait, when a large package is delivered to your house and there's nobody home, they just LEAVE IT OUTSIDE?

 Shocked

What country do you live in? That's insane.

in the us. The mail is usually delivered during traditional working hours so most of the time no one will be home when mail is delivered. It makes having to sign for packages a huge pain. 

If no one is home and no signature is required then they will generally leave it on your front porch or on top of your mailbox if you have a community mail box (like you have in apartment complexes).

If a signature is required then they make a limited number of attempts then will return the package to the sender.
13377  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SCAMMED BY A HERO MEMBER KRISHATNET on: January 28, 2015, 01:43:12 PM
I have decided to remove my negative trust for the person who scammed the OP. Although I do think he should give the money to a good cause and not keep it personally

Why? It's still a scam. The guy likely didn't know he was scamming a scammer.
The dude who scammed OP is a clown. Abandoned his account for a measly $325, hasn't logged on since. Can't trust anyone on this forum nowadays without escrow no matter how "legendary" they are
I think it hasn't been long enough to say that he abandoned his account.

I am also not sure how Vanilla works or if when you receive funds via vanilla the email address of the sender will be shown. If so then it is possible that he saw who he was trading with and decided to scam him
my feeling is that the guy he scammed deserved it. (He scammed for over ten thousand in a very short time).  Him scamming revealed a scammers new account. As speculated above it is possible he saw the email address of the person sending him the money.
13378  Other / Meta / Re: PM restriction for new accounts is needed on: January 28, 2015, 01:34:55 PM
I get 5-10 PMs a week from newbies / literally just signed up accounts asking legitimate questions or asking for help. These are accounts that more often then not become useful members of the community. You can't paint everyone with the same brush.
if you force users to make at least one post before sending a PM then this problem would be solved.

Forcing someone to post for the sake of posting will likely feed the other forum issues of low quality / spam. Also that user would then have to wait 10 minutes before being able to PM me.
I think one post is a very low threshold. A thread in beginners could easily be created/stickied for a "first post".

They need to wait 6 minutes before being able to post after logging in so if they post once they would need to wait a total of 12 minutes. There is a good chance they will be able to learn a lot in that time.
13379  Economy / Reputation / Re: Videos of WoodCollector Hand Carving: Care of MOB on: January 28, 2015, 01:31:10 PM
You are having a thousand dollar piece of art delivered to your house and you aren't even going to be home???

I had 60 BTC of Casascius coins delivered to my house while I was on vacation in another province... What, you don't trust the mail Wink
if I had to guess this was when the price of Bitcoin was much lower then it is now.

The chances of theft from the mail are much higher when you are away because it is usually appearant that you are not home. Plus I imagine that the packages sent by WC are not going to fit in most mailboxes therefore it would potentially be sitting outside for several days (unless of course you have your butler take it inside when it arrives)
13380  Economy / Reputation / Re: Videos of WoodCollector Hand Carving: Care of MOB on: January 28, 2015, 06:56:37 AM
My point is that if you are potentially buying something that was made by a laser then you would essentially be pissing it away. Someone with that kind of money is not going to take those kinds of risks.

People that earn massive amounts of money generally do not have the time to take months long vacations with their family

If some one has lots of money, wouldn't that mean it is LESS important if they lose this so called "large amount" that would be nothing to an actual wealthy person? Rich people piss away money ALL THE TIME. Furthermore, if you don't HAVE TO go to work every day because you are rich, why wouldn't you be able to take week long vacations. You are trying REALLY HARD now to make your speculation fit within your confirmation bias.
Almost all the time, the reason someone has/makes a lot of money is because they have spent a lot of time/effort into their career and continue to spend a lot of time on their career. People with a lot of money also tend to be more savvy and generally require more due diligence before spending their money.

Just because someone has a lot of money doesn't mean they will sornd it on random crap that could potebtially be worthless.

Woodcollector also said that he is not willing to share his identity however showing his ID would sleeker reevaluate
Pages: « 1 ... 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 [669] 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 ... 754 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!