TrustDice.win kampanja ima slobodnih mjesta za 1x Sr. Member i 2x Full Member člana. Minimalno 20 postova tjedno (od toga barem 10 u Gambling sekciji). Local postovi se broje u tjednu kvotu (do 10 postova tjedno). Payouts & Positions:Full Members - $40 in BTC/Week. Sr. Members - $55 in BTC/Week. MY friends, if you scroll up in the thread you can see that a member said he'll be leaving the campaign after I made the post about the open position. If it's one or two full member spots open won't matter since I'll just pick 2 full members from the applicants rather than 1.
There's also 1x Sr. Member position open!
|
|
|
|
|
Losing a bet due to a referee's call can be a tough pill to swallow, especially if it feels like a questionable decision. But let's be real, making split-second decisions under intense pressure is no easy task. That's why we have VAR technology to assist referees in making the right call. Now, imagine if the shoe were on the other foot. What if you had bet on there being fewer than two goals and the referee let them slide despite an offside position? How would that make you feel?
I get that you had a stake in this, but it's important to consider all perspectives, not just your own.
|
|
|
|
Atleast a decent guy will reply that he no longer need someone for the job instead of ghosting.
It doesn't necessarily mean that he is ghosting you. It's possible that he is dealing with some personal issues or just busy with other things. It's also possible that he may have been suspicious when you asked for a down payment. Given that your reputation on the forum is relatively unknown, it's understandable that some might not feel comfortable trusting you with money upfront without using escrow. Also, as _act_ has already mentioned, it would be helpful if you could provide the username so that we don't have to guess.  |
|
|
|
It's the first time I have heard someone say martingale to be profitable. It's definitely martingale in the above post but it's surely not profitable over long term.
In the long run the losses turn out to be greater than the profits which is why it's not profitable over the long term.
It's easy for beginners to use but they should avoid using it consecutively to avoid losses.
It depends upon difference experiences from the gambler who play martingale. Sometime the gamblers keep on playing with martingale and keep on wining and thinks that this is the best winning strategy in gambling. In freebitco you can use Auto bet and apply this strategy , and you may start wiing few of the games. But one day will come, when this strategy will fail and you will lose all your balance. I would like to defend that strategy (a little). It would be great to be able to export rolls history - unfortunately we do not have that option. But having - let's say - half a million rolls or sth like that, and knowing that you bet Hi or Low consecutively, you may look for the longest series to evaluate the pessimistic scenario. Of course it is just a pure statistic, as just next second you may roll serie twice as long as you had in the past. But, statistically, it does not look so bad if you are not too greedy. And I talk about scenario when you have bankroll like 0.02 but play with bets 0.0000002 and 110% increase on lose. That way of course all takes longer, but also the are bigger chances you survive longer. Yes, yes, I know, each roll is independent, past rolls have no impact on the future ones etc - what I wanted to say is playing quite low bets, you increase your chances. used to give you the full lowdown on your roll history, including basic stats like your longest losing streak and stuff like that. But I'm not sure if that software still works with FreeBitco.in, though. I've seen some reports saying there are problems with the latest release, so you might wanna do some research before you give it a shot. |
|
|
|
<cut>
I'm sorry to hear that you had a negative experience and can understand the frustration that comes with not receiving winnings from a casino. However, making baseless accusations won't be given serious consideration by the community. If you want your claims to be taken seriously, I recommend posting them in the Scam Accusations section of the forum and providing evidence to support them, and following the Scam Report Format. |
|
|
|
Mislim da je menadžer popunio sve pozicije u Green zoni i trenutno ne traži nove članove.
<cut> Istina, sve pozicije su popunjene, ali prema ovome što piše, Royse je ostavio otvorenu mogućnost za nove prijave. We don't have an OPEN slot however if you think you are someone who is a good fit for GREEN ZONE then feel free to apply.
Slažem se u vezi isplata, 2$ po postu nije mala razlika. Zaboravio sam to spomenuti. |
|
|
|
...
Are the members that were listed by FatFork the only ones using the word ideal instead of idea (regardless of pidgin or not)? If most of the Nigerian local board are not making that error then it could be isolated to that group mentioned by FatFork and the issue suspicion is rightly attributed to them.
...
Quick forum search in Nigeria (Naija) section says that majority knows the word idea (dozens of results) and there is one person who uses the word ideal instead. But it proves nothing this way I guess. I'm not sure about that one. Based on the phrasing, it's possible that both "idea" and "ideal" could fit semantically in the sentence mentioned. "Idea" typically refers to a concept or thought, while "ideal" refers to something perfect or optimal. So, when he said "the ideal of stable coins emerged after Bitcoin was created to solve issues related to volatility," even though "idea" seems like a better fit, "ideal" could also work in this context. |
|
|
|
Oh, with over 23 thousand posts on this forum, I'm sure you've posted your seed words online multiple times already. Congratulations on potentially compromising your entire crypto portfolio!  Nice try, I'm not going to enter my seed words into a search string  Damn it, you got me! And here I was thinking maybe I could get away with it... |
|
|
|
So you're saying if I post my 12 seed words online, someone can steal my Bitcoins? What's next, if I post the details for my bank but scramble my PIN, someone can steal my euros too?  Oh, with over 23 thousand posts on this forum, I'm sure you've posted your seed words online multiple times already. Congratulations on potentially compromising your entire crypto portfolio! |
|
|
|
<cut>
I assume I have a stable Ip address, or is possible for Ip address to still change even on a sim card that is assigned to a single user?.
Yes. It's possible for IP addresses to change even if you're using a mobile network provider and a sim card assigned to a single user. However, this depends on your provider's policies and configurations. Network providers typically have a limited range of IP addresses that they can use, which is often smaller than the number of users on the network. This is because IPv4 addresses are limited and can be expensive. Providers must use techniques like dynamic IP address allocation to ensure that their available addresses are used efficiently, where IP addresses are assigned to users only for the duration of their internet session and then returned to the pool for reuse. If you want to know your IP address, you can use a free online tool. Some popular ones are WhatIsMyIP.com, IPChicken.com, or MyIP.com. Just go to one of these websites and it will show you your current IP address. Keep in mind that this only shows your public IP address. If you're using a VPN or proxy server, your real IP address might be hidden. |
|
|
|
Ali nema smisla da uopće raspravljamo o CBDC-u jer ako ga država odluči koristiti, građani nemaju izbora. OK, može se ići na prosvjede i slično ali znamo kako to kod nas završi, čak i sa stvarima koje većina populacije razumije. A ovo je kripto...
Ja ne mislim da je uzaludno raspravljati i upozoravati ljude. Jedna od dobrih stvari koje vidim kod nas je to da smo mi nepovjerljivi prema vlasti i nismo spremni samo tako progutati svaku glupost, iako sami biramo debile na vlasti. To je jedan od razloga zasto smo imali jedne od najmanje restriktivnih mjera u Europi, te zasto se kod nas kes i dalje rado koristi te se nadam da cemo medju zadnjima uvesti i taj CBDC. Rasprava o CBDC-u je bitna, ali treba biti realan - ne možemo spriječiti da se ovo dogodi ako Europa ili ECB tako odluče. Možemo se samo informirati o tome kako CBDC radi i kako će to utjecati na našu svakodnevnicu, i možemo razmišljati i informirati druge o alternativama, poput korištenja decentraliziranih kriptovaluta, ako nam se CBDC ne sviđa. Ja ne kažem da je uvođenje CBDC-a samo po sebi loše, i svakako postoje i pozitivne strane, ali također može imati i vrlo ozbiljne negativne posljedice. Razgovor o tome može nam pomoći da se pripremimo za promjene koje dolaze, što god one bile. |
|
|
|
Excuse me if I'm making a mistake, but isn't VAR something football matches implement? Where do crypto sportsbooks come into play here?
You are correct. VAR is a technology that has been implemented in football matches to assist referees with decision-making on the field. It is not directly related to sportsbooks or sports betting. However, some bookmakers offer betting options related to VAR in football matches. For example, they may offer odds on the number of VAR decisions that will be made in a match, or the likelihood of a decision being overturned after a VAR review. not sure which crypto sportsbook offers VAR market but I found this article on a website talking about "VAR tips", at the end of the article you'll find a list of sportsbooks that offer VAR market(at least according to the website). Makes me even more confused after reading, more specifically on the why? Especially if you consider what the articles say about VAR refunds, which makes sense and could potentially be used to profit off if possible, sportsbooks would be on the losing end then I feel. Why the confusion? If you know your teams and referees well, you can take advantage of these betting markets to make smart wagers. It's like any other sports betting - with VAR-related options, you'll need to weigh the odds and make your predictions based on the info you have. |
|
|
|
Thanks for the feedback. Yes, I plan to add some preloaded filters like BTC-only wallets.
Not sure if all the wallets can be visible at the same time. But I could try changing the column width so we can see more wallets at the same time.
Great work! That's quite an impressive project you've undertaken and it's great to see that you're continuing to improve and expand on your comparison tool, especially with the additional features you plan to include. It's a good point that fitting all the wallets on one page might not be possible, especially with the total number of wallets. However, I do agree that adding more filter options would be a great way to make the website even more user-friendly. Here are a few ideas: Price range - this would allow users to filter wallets based on their budget. Security features - this would allow users to filter wallets based on specific security features, such as secure element, biometric recognition, etc. Display size - some people prefer larger screens for readability, while others prefer smaller screens for portability. Another potential filter option could be based on the connectivity of the wallet, such as Bluetooth or USB. etc |
|
|
|
While analyzing the posting patterns of "martyns" and his alternate accounts, "BlackViruse" and "Blackpussy," I stumbled upon a curious grammatical mistake where the term "ideal" was wrongly used instead of "idea". This error caught my attention since I've never encountered anyone from the English-speaking community who confuses the usage of these words. I share my password to him, to help me apply for signature campaigns,,I have no ideal to do it then,,,
do anybody get any ideal of what the psalm was really talking about ...
I don't know where you get this ideal from but ... I also noted this same grammatical mistake in the posts of users "Lordhermes" and "blackened515." Personally I don't buy the ideal of re-signing Messi to Barcelona, ...
It won't be a bad ideal if he goes to another team, ...
And now, there's also this Josefjix character: A simple neutral is not a bad ideal ... Not entirely sure if this is a regular occurrence among the Nigerian community - anyone care to enlighten me? As for what to make of it, I have a hunch that it might give someone some ideal worth exploring further. |
|
|
|
This is a bogus argument; there are tons of people who buy accounts with literally zero merit (Newbies rank) and zero reputation and build them to the highest rank; this is the internet, and there are people who prefer to join a forum or social media with accounts that have no connection to their real life details, not because they intend to scam with them, but because they do not trust the internet with their sensitive information.
Comparing this forum with other social networks that prioritize financial gain for their owners is just not right. BitcoinTalk values personal information privacy and doesn't require any sensitive details during sign-up. You can even register with a throwaway email address (not a great idea, though) and use Tor or VPN to hide your real IP address. So, buying newbie accounts doesn't make sense at all, and I really don't think that many people do it. Are you aware that this forum stores the first registrant's IP address?
Where did you get that from? I suggest you read the current forum's practices regarding privacy-relevant information before making any assumptions. Furthermore, the forum, like any other social media, does not prohibit buying of accounts
Account sales are not strictly prohibited by the forum, but they are generally frowned upon by its members. The DT system is only for scammers and high risk trade zones; tagging someone with zero scam history, who bought an account to participate in discussion and forum activities is clearly an abuse of the system.
No. Tagging someone with zero scam history is not necessarily an abuse of the trust system. The system is designed to help identify and address potential issues before they become bigger problems. Even if someone has no history of scams, they may still engage in behavior that violates forum rules or causes other users to feel he/she is untrustworthy. It seems like you might not fully understand the difference between the trust system and flags. You should check out this post by theymos for a better understanding. |
|
|
|
Evo malog pregleda trenutno otvorenih kampanja, da ne provjeravam sada jesmo li ih sve već spomenuli: BetterCallRaul.it kampanja ima slobodnih mjesta za 1x Sr. Member i 1x Full Member člana. Menadžer: Royse777 Sr. Member: $2.40 per post up to 25 posts/week. Full Member: $1.60 per post up to 25 posts/week.
whirlwind.money kampanja prima istaknute Sr., Hero i Legendary članove. Menadžer: Hhampuz Sr. Members - $4 in BTC per post. Max 25 posts/week. Hero/Legendary Members - $5 in BTC per post. Max 25 posts/week.
SINBAD.IO kampanja prima istaknute članove za "GREEN ZONE". Menadžer: Royse777 Legendary: $4.00 per post maximum 25 posts. Hero: $3.20 per post maximum 25 posts. Sr. Member: $2.40 per post maximum 25 posts. Full Member: $1.60 per post maximum 25 posts
Duelbits.com kampanja prima još nekoliko Hero i Legendary članova. Menadžer: Hhampuz Hero Members - $65 in BTC/Week. Legendary Members - $70 in BTC/Week.
[banned mixer] kampanja prima još jednog člana za ovaj tjedan i nadalje. Menadžer: julerz12 Legendary: $4.00 per post, maximum 25 posts. Hero: $3.50 per post, maximum 25 posts. Sr. Member: $2.50 per post, maximum 25 posts. Full Member: $1.70 per post, maximum 25 posts Ne sjećam se kad je zadnji put ovoliko kampanja bilo otvoreno u isto vrijeme, očito još uvijek postoji potražnja za kvalitetnim članovima. |
|
|
|
Hello, not a scam not even slightly actual scam is person claiming its a scam. Something a person has been working exceptionally hard on for the past 2 years and someone points to wording in a whitepaper as his only proof. It's good to get rid of people trying to scam people but you do your cause a disservice when you are not thorough. Most developers aren't ICO whitepaper writers. Most developers are just that developers so it would make sense to hire someone that writes whitepapers to write it. Because the developer is pending time writing code. But I understand check me out. I am real. TheTopSpotOnline is very real and I look forward to showing everyone my work. Do a little better research. email: bpjones@thetopspotonline.comlinkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/bradley-p-jones/https://www.facebook.com/bpjones101I appreciate your defense of your project, but I believe it is important to consider all the facts before making such bold claims. I'm not a scammer and don't enjoy seeing other people being scammed. In fact, I'm a big proponent of transparency and accountability - so your accusations are unfounded and unprofessional. The notion that you worked hard on a project for two years does not necessarily mean that it can't be a scam. The whitepaper is a crucial component of any project, and if it contains plagiarized content or misleading information, it raises red flags. While I can understand that not all developers are proficient in writing whitepapers, it is still their responsibility to ensure that the content is accurate and not plagiarized. It's not just about the wording in the whitepaper. It's about the overall quality of the project, and how it stands out from other projects in its niche. It is not uncommon for scammers to hire writers on freelance websites to create their white papers. This means that even if your company hired someone else to write your whitepaper, you still have some responsibility for ensuring that it doesn't steal content, ideas or solutions from other projects. How would you feel if someone stole your work, which took years to complete, and passed it off as their own? Would you consider such a project to be a scam? As for your request for better research, I can assure you that my research was thorough and accurate. As you can see from the OP, I have meticulously listed out the various sources from which the content was copied verbatim, and have provided a side-by-side comparison to clearly demonstrate my findings. If you feel that my research is flawed, please let me know where and how I should improve it. I will gladly review the content again and make any necessary changes. |
|
|
|
|
OP, it's always cool to discover new interests, and there's no shame in asking for help when you're starting out! But hey, if you're thinking about making some bets or gambling on these sports, it's definitely a good idea to do your homework first. As mentioned earlier, watching lots of fights and analyzing the fighters is key here. See how they match up against each other and look up some stats to get a better understanding. And the good news is that there are plenty of resources out there to help you with this. You don't necessarily need a satellite receiver or anything fancy to keep up with the latest news and updates on these sports. You can check out boxing or UFC websites, follow social media, or even join online forums to connect with other fans and get insights on fighters and matches. Good luck and have fun exploring your new interest!
|
|
|
|
|
OP, I'm sorry to hear that you invested all you have in something that turned out to be a scam, but can you please provide more details about your issue? Firstly, which website did you use to invest? This information will help us better understand your situation. Also, if you share more info about a scam, it can help the rest of us avoid falling for it too. So if you've got any details, please do share!
|
|
|
|
The account had not been frozen or restricted , just dep bonus and related profit had been canceled as the user created dozens of account used for deposit farming purposes; In such cases we have right to cancel the dep bonus;
<cut>
As this was your last post in this thread, I believe it's important to revisit your previous comments regarding the scam accusation, especially now that it seems to have been resolved positively. So I am echoing it here: We take all such cases seriously, and made extra deep investigation of the user, ignored automagical authenticator tools and made manual investigation and as a result the bonus amount had been returned to the player;
So it turns out your initial assessment against the player was nothing but a mistake, huh? It's quite concerning to think about how many other wrong assessments have been made in the past, and only because this player decided to publicly state their case, you finally took it seriously. How many players out there have been wrongly accused and didn't have a platform to voice their grievances? And let's talk about these so-called "automagical authenticator tools" that you ignored during your manual investigation. If they are so unreliable and prone to false positives, why even bother using them in the first place? It's ironic that you claim to take all cases seriously, yet you rely on tools that clearly can't be trusted. It's baffling. This whole situation just leaves a bitter taste in the mouth, doesn't it? What measures have you taken to prevent such situations from happening in the future? Clearly, your current approach is flawed and has failed in this case. It's time to step up your game and ensure that players are treated fairly from the get-go, instead of having to go through the hassle of public outcry just to receive proper attention. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
