What opinion? Obviously this is a twitter security bug, and it has no effect on the cryptocurrency market. And this security bug will cause twitter to have big problems with the privacy of users' information
Yes, obviously, the Twitter security BUG has nothing to do with Crypto even though all crypto players have a Twitter account and it must be taken care of so that they are not affected by hackers who have appeared in the past few days. |
|
|
|
previously I have never checked the authenticity of a new project address, for now, I prefer projects that have been listed on the market, although the price is cheap but the success rate of the project is clear.
Yes, and maybe some other people also like the same thing as you, because they also don't want to take the time to check the wallet address of the project, they are more likely to check which tokens are listed on the exchange, so that when the tokens are distributed they can be directly sold to the exchange that. |
|
|
|
now it is appropriate to invest in BTC, as well as the current top coins, I hope that the crypto market will soon return to the green zone as in 2017-2018.
Do not get your hopes up in the impossible to happen again, because although the market will improve and look green, conditions like in 2017 - 2018 will never come back again, because every year the market conditions will always be different even though they are always colored by green and red . |
|
|
|
It is still too early to judge this project as a scam, there is no evidence yet. But if you invest in it now, I believe you will be at a great risk, this is not a good altcoin and they do not have too much liquidity.
If this project didn't give birth to good Altcoin, why do you say that it's still too early to judge this project as scam ? Is not every analysis and research on a project that is always done earlier to be able to assess it in full, even though authentic evidence does not yet exist. |
|
|
|
Each system has its advantages and disadvantages, but comparative analysis is the key to choosing the right one. Although the ICO was once considered a common practice, various forms of fraud and deception gradually led to the invention of the IEO, and through it projects now raise the funds they need. However, I do not think that investors will be interested in re-investing in ICO, so the chances of ICO returning are very low.
Yes, investors will not be interested anymore to reinvest in ICO, because they have also found better than ICO and have felt a lot of disappointment about the fraud that had happened in ICO in the past, so because of this ICO has been very difficult to return like the old days. |
|
|
|
there are many project in various aspect that are scams with little or nothing to offer. the reason why professionals insist on investors to reach and research about projects before spending their money to invest. unless you are good in gambling. the new tools for scammers also include gambling projects which are totally cpy cats from previous projects.
I don't think anyone is good at betting, especially in terms of investment, all jobs really need further research and analysis, because making hasty decisions without doing research will only ruin oneself and one's life. |
|
|
|
People want to earn easy money and we know that this doesn't exist, they still think that will earn easy
Who thought that making money would be easy to do? anyone will not be easy to make money at this time, let alone in crypto, in the real world it is very difficult to find the name of money, so think logically. |
|
|
|
The problem doesn't like in the fact that etc 20 tokens cannot be backed by real gold. We have sent gold ETF funds selling but the problem is whether you believe if the team members are really buying physical gold .
If you doubt a team, then you are welcome not to follow it, because in crypto you are not required to follow someone just out of doubt, but follow people who make you feel confident in them, each support has a specific foundation to support and so does otherwise. |
|
|
|
phases distribution with limits participate good helpful planning for a project like if they wanna make bounty. I deep some bounty hunter excited always for selling even their do not ahead patients market situation. although i wanna share phases movement in monthly with 2-3 step.
Project team planning for the good of the project will always be supported by everyone, but we also need to know that they also cannot control the price of tokens in the market even though they make distribution in three phases, because if tokens that are liked and liked by everyone will obviously increase although the price is distributed in one phase, and vice versa, so the effect of distribution in the three phases is only temporary, not forever. |
|
|
|
I don't see any real reason to push the blame on bounty managers, if all they have presently are bounties that are listed on small exchanges like Probit it's always left for bounty hunters to make their choices, some will promote and some won't
Yes, and it also depends on the assessment and the wishes of the bounty hunters, because the manager only provides a bounty campaign, while the hunters see and analyze the campaign whether it is worth promoting or not, this is more towards each other I think. |
|
|
|
All hope on binance team, they can do better in helping crypto gain mass adoption, I don't trust PayPal yet not until they actually take real actions, presently it's all words, they will do this, they will do that, action speaks louder than voice
Yes, speaking is easy, but doing what has been said is not easy, because every plan and concept will always run smoothly if there are no obstacles and obstacles when implemented, but if there are suddenly obstacles or obstacles, then the plan that has been prepared obviously will be changed in order to be successful, so acting is not as easy as talking. |
|
|
|
This is way too much and unexpected, Twitter team needs to clean up their mess and get better security protocols on their platform, imagine if many people believed in that scheme millions of dollars would have been stolen already
It is inconceivable that Twitter has not immediately improved security protocols on their platforms, because everyone around the world has been using the Twitter platform for various purposes, both business and personal. I believe everything should be normal by now as Twitter has responded hugely to it. It seems this is a hacker association attack. Never experienced something of this nature. Twitter need to do more in security wise.
Faster response will be much better, because everyone already believes in the Twitter platform as the easiest social media account for anyone to use, so it is necessary to have a fast response to follow up on this and improve a better security system. |
|
|
|
Yes altcoins are doing well lately but how far can they go when Bitcoin is still struggling around 9000+ price level? Only DeFi projects are doing so well without the help of any bull market because of the HYPE, it's not altcoins season time yet, not until Bitcoin turned bullish itself
One thing that you need to keep in mind, which is that Altcoin is already very strong and has been very popular in the market, they will always survive and run as they should, even though Bitcoin is still struggling around the price level of 9000+, except Altcoin is rubbish, it is clearly not will run smoothly or even die automatically. |
|
|
|
This is an obvious win since fiat has been used a long time ago. Bitcoin or cryptocurrency only emerged 10years and still early to compare those two. Many will be biased about this comparison cause your comparing a long time event on fiat versus 10years of crypto.
Its not a good view but the ratio should actually be like that. I will be shocked if bitcoin shows more than money laundering than in fiat.
True, the comparison is basically not commensurate, although now crypto users are already very numerous and even almost the same as fiat users in the past, but this is not very comparable compared to now, because 10 years is a very short time for cryptocurrency. |
|
|
|
I'm seen many new projects get launched this year, enough to make me judge others who failed to launch, I can't help but think that the team aren't capable to begin with, stay away from projects that failed to launch project because of cov19, it's a stupid excuse
Yes, now if there is still a project team that argues that the project failed because of cov19, it is a project team that does not have the ability to run the project, meaning they still need to learn more to succeed the project in its current condition. |
|
|
|
It is quite difficult to say at the moment, but there are some top projects coming to the cryptocurrency market this year like Republic, Avalanche, NEAR, which are likely to hold ICOs. So, maybe a new era of ICOs is coming.
Every possibility is still possible, but we also have to look at the bad side that has already happened in the ICO, so that it must be thoroughly cleaned up so that investors can come back to trust the ICO program, because if bad things have not been cleaned up In ICO, I think the three projects that you mentioned will be difficult to succeed if you use the ICO program in fundraising. |
|
|
|
patience does determine everything. because it can prevent feelings of panic when the market goes down. patient in responding to the opportunities that exist. every step taken must be seriously considered. if not then we must be prepared to lose.
Yes, in crypto it is not taught to panic, because panic is something that will destroy someone, even though everyone has a different patience limit, but the main thing is to remain patient in dealing with market situations when the market is not in good condition. |
|
|
|
Don't invest in what you know nothing about, that's the best advice I can gift you, make sure you become more friendly with research, top coins are best for new investors for a certain reason and that's to avoid getting scammed, new coins are most unreliable
Yes, novice investors should consider this problem, because they are also often trapped in investing in new coins at the moment, even though they are still preferably older coins that already have a large trading volume in the crypto market. |
|
|
|
I joined some bounty in 2018, after that they kept delaying the distribution and until the end of 2019 they distributed it again but by then the project was dead. I am not too interested in bounty like that, if they postpone distribution or change the schedule then I think their project is scam. After the price dropped hundreds of times and they started distributing the token, it didn't make any sense at all
Yes, and I have also found cases like this on the bounty project, and it could be that the team deliberately delayed distribution for bounty participants so they could trade in the market from the token ration for the bounty, and after the demand began to decrease and the price continued to fall to the root, then they give tokens to bounty participants, and that is rubbish that is completely useless and obviously makes no sense. |
|
|
|
yes it might be better if payment by usdt or stable coin for the bounty hanters. but it does not rule out the possibility of the project being promoted to be finally happy with the payment in the form of USDT
Yes, and generally for the better it is when the payment is made to the bounty participant, it will be equally beneficial, both the project and the bounty participant, and in this case the project team has two options for making payments, namely in the form of tokens stable as USDT and in the form of tokens from their own project, because sometimes paid in the form of tokens from the project are also better than stable tokens. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
