I am not fond of online betting, but if I made them, I would wait for the completion of the event without the early closing of the bet. Bookmakers offer too unprofitable odds, it is better to take a risk and win the entire bet. And you need to understand that you cannot win all the bets and you cannot "understand" which one will lose and close it ahead of schedule.
|
|
|
Пользовался их старым ботом ранее, но не могу сказать, что очень много от него было толку. А нынешнее "воскрешение" более похоже на очередную попытку срубать бабла на хайпе. Хотелось бы ошибаться, но почему-то мне кажется, что все именно так.
В статье вроде ничего нет про какие-то движения похожие на рубку бабла. И если я не ошибаюсь токены разрабов давно разлочены и должны были быть слиты давно если такая цель ставилась. Проект давно в таком вяленьком темпе работает, непонятно почему на них обратили внимание.
|
|
|
You really can't trust anyone unless there is a real name or account behind every user in the leaderboard. I feel the same with the exchange trading competition, I have joined several times and although I'm not really hoping to win, I just notice the top usernames do not resemble any real name.
If they connect the Bitcointalk account to the account on bitcointalk I guess that's something transparent. I think stake.com has this kind of system in which users in their stake.com forum are connected to their casino account.
Oh, why does a casino have to do this? I don't think they want to be associated in any way with BTT. Plus, how did you get the idea that real people are behind the accounts on BTT? Check out my investigations and how many multi-accounts I found here) Maybe I misunderstood you, but if not, then your idea is very strange to me.
|
|
|
Are you going to continue your bankroll investment test in another crypto currency casino from now on since YoloDice is over, or is it the end of the experiment?
The answer to your question is contained in the previous pages. And it would be useful for you to study the whole topic since you are interested in this area. In general, I find such topics very useful and it would be nice if the links to them were fixed somewhere. I think if people saw the actual state of affairs in such investments, then there would be fewer investors and perhaps casinos would improve their conditions for investors.
|
|
|
I don't quite agree with you. Luck can bring you a win, but you can't bet long on the distance with wires alone. Obviously, there is no guarantee of victory in betting and no one can give it. However, you can reduce the probability of losing with analysis, but it will always be there. Analysis will give you an understanding of what to look at and what factors can contribute to the result.
Money management can extend the life of the deposit, but you will not change the likelihood of losing in any way. The advantage of a casino is a constant indicator in any game (in the sense that a player cannot influence it). All these strategies and tricks taught by experienced players to beginners (often for money) are self-deception.
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EvkM1_eXoAARTX 3060 в Майнинге | Nvidia провалилась с Блокировкой Майнеров от Соленого Алгоритм кефира заблокирован на максимальный хешрейт и падает, но все другие алгоритмы доступны, а некоторые даже профитнее кефира. Хотел сказать что они дауны, но наверное стоит их поблагодарить за то, что 3060 не пойдут на майнинг эфира и не будут уменьшать мой профит ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Зеленые показали креатив регулирования майнинга Лишнее подтверждение тому что любое регулирование экономики суть ненужное действие и идет всегда строго во вред - стоит денег плюс несет риски. Я думаю это не единственный косяк который есть просто другие обнаружатся позже. safar1980А вы следите за облачным майнингом вычислениями? Я немного погуглил и был удивлен как много уже таких сервисов предлагает свои услуги - сдаются любые карты (даже теслы) на любой срок. Хотелось бы знать динамику цен в этой отрасли. Тоже всех нормальных потребителей распугала поди ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
Have you achieved everything you wanted? Even those who have earned a lot want to earn more and would not mind if, for example, bitcoin first fell in order to make purchases at a cheap price and then continued its growth towards new ATH. Have you made so much that you no longer want to enter the market and try to earn even more?
Well I have not said that i don't wanna enter mate , What i said is i have already achieved what i believe is enough. But as i ama bitcoin believers , i trust this market and will stay Keep on holding my coins , but i don't wanna demand more and more but instead i will let it come what ever the market can give. I have taken my capital more than 3x so what i have in my wallets now are just my extra profit and the literal amount that i can called , "Can Afford to Lose" I thought we were talking about amounts like "I can afford not to work my whole life" ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) At least I would be less greedy about profit if I earned something like this. I understand you and sometimes by myself risked money that was not a pity to lose, and I am also glad of even a small profit, but still my ultimate goal is very big)
|
|
|
The price of bitcoin is still very high and it is possible that the market is now looking for "fair price levels". Levels where there is no FOMO or FUD pressure. It seems to me that if the price of bitcoin stabilizes at any level in the range of 30-40 thousand, then it will be very good. Compared to the previous ATH, this is a big growth.
We can't stop FOMO and FUD's but people are learning already, they will ignore it by then. I believe the market could able to sustain at its high price. Even the price will drop to $35k-$40k, that still at a high level and for me, still in the bullish. For the market showing an increase in the number of users and investors, the more it likely not to drop hard just like how the 2017 bullish season ends where it dumps straight. I agree that the number of market participants and its volume is growing - this is indisputable. I am concerned that the number of transactions and the use of bitcoin as a means of payment is not growing. If you remember bitcoin was invented as a means of payment and not as a store of value, this is its basis.
|
|
|
The price of bitcoin is still very high and it is possible that the market is now looking for "fair price levels". Levels where there is no FOMO or FUD pressure. It seems to me that if the price of bitcoin stabilizes at any level in the range of 30-40 thousand, then it will be very good. Compared to the previous ATH, this is a big growth.
|
|
|
for now ? i Already have everything mate, Last December 2020 I prayed is for the price of Bitcoin to reach 30k and yeah this took this year to Break almost double of my Prayer so i will choose nothing but enough .
If the price will break down again to 20,000? i am more than accepted and wont demand for anything, because 58,000 value is already a perfect achievement and asking for another more is greediness.
Have you achieved everything you wanted? Even those who have earned a lot want to earn more and would not mind if, for example, bitcoin first fell in order to make purchases at a cheap price and then continued its growth towards new ATH. Have you made so much that you no longer want to enter the market and try to earn even more?
|
|
|
The problem is that you cannot conduct a full study of the legality of the casino business - they are mostly registered in offshore companies and you can assess the legality of their activities only by the comments of their users (are there any problems or not). But even user reviews cannot be trusted as they can be fake.
Yes, if you make an account personally they can just let you withdraw, play and deposit normally but do selective scams. Only way to avoid this is by promoting well known and already reputed casinos so that you don't have to worry about the trustworthiness. By the way, this topic of selective scams is becoming very relevant (not only for casinos but also for exchanges) and these scams are carried out under the guise of a struggle for legality. I think many have come across or at least heard about this: a casino or an exchange easily allows you to make a deposit, but when you want to make a withdrawal of funds, requirements (often unrealizable) begin to be made about providing a source of earnings, passing the KYC and so on.
|
|
|
It is clear after seeing the results that signature campaigns are a good business for casinos as most people gamble at least partially what they earn with them, so casinos find it cheaper to advertise than it would seem at first glance.
Some people may even gamble more than what they earn with signature campaigns.
The main profit of a casino is not in the return of these funds, but in advertising. Advertising gambling (and especially crypto casinos) is banned almost everywhere, so advertising on such niche forums is a great option for casinos. In fact, they have a very small selection of sites for advertising and for the participants of this forum this is an excellent state of affairs)
|
|
|
I have not heard of this. A very funny situation. I cannot judge Deontays' mental health, and I think the survey is too unfair. It may be absurd, but sometimes even the stupidest conspiracy theories turn out to be true. Theoretically, this could happen, and why not happen when millions and tens of millions of dollars are at stake? Accordingly, I would add a third point to the vote, that he may be right.
|
|
|
Привет, куда исчезал? [1]Опыт без правоприменения. Если хочешь эмоций, переводи сумму более 600 тысяч за 1 раз ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Данные передаются автоматически, а обрабатываются человеком. Проверяют самых жирных, потому что время ограничено. За перевод со своего счета на другой можно только наказать потерей времени. Продолжишь в том же направлении, увеличишь шансы нарваться на неприятности. [2]Не стоит путать обязанность уплаты налогов с мониторингом переводов. 1.) Привет. Погряз в онлайн бизнесе (с криптой никак не связан). И сорри что так и не сподобился сделать интервью, вину ощущаю ![Cry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cry.gif) 2.) Ну и как быть если площадка позволяет работать только с пейпал а для россиян максимальная емкость ПП ~ 6500$ ? Соответственно постоянно приходится выводить бабло. Зарубежных счетов у меня нет, да и чтобы вывести туда с ПП надо будет какие-то очередные танцы с бубном махинировать, чего как бы не хотелось так как все это суммарно повышает вероятность проблем/блокировок.
|
|
|
If it's a wager competition then I won't participate since I am a small gambler so wager competition is out of my hands unless it is another competition that is not based on wager then I'll be gladly to join to try my chance on winning the competition rather than gambling for fun and not taking chances on competition that does not take a lot of money to have a chance to win. Putting fake top participants on leaderboard have consequences and one of it is trust or reputation.
That is why it is extremely unlikely that at least someone does this. The savings from such actions are minimal and the loss is fatal. The casino actually exists because of its reputation, if it is lost then the players will avoid it and this business will fail. I doubt anyone would risk losing their existing business trying to save a couple thousand dollars.
|
|
|
Wow, it hurts me even to think about such amounts. On the other hand, one must think that since he risked such money, he could afford it. Yes, I looked through many profiles with open statistics and everywhere I saw significant losses if the number of bets was more or less large. This is why it has always been surprising to me to read that casinos (and investors) lose profits to someone's big wins.
Yeah that guy is rich for sure and I asked him once how he could digest such losses and he told me he is winning in another casino. The algorithm used isn't good for investors since you can't recover what you lost when someone loses the same amount when gambling. Since I am updating table 2 everyday now, It is interesting to see that the invested amount is stable in 4 days with only 2 days left for closure! What's so surprising about that? Investors do not lose anything if I understood everything correctly? Apparently they will be given time to inform the address to which they will have to receive their investments. Any business after the closure gives time to resolve such issues. I admit that some of the (small) investors have completely forgotten about their investments. This often happens. I have an online store and about every 500th customer makes a purchase but does not pick up their product ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) ~ Snipie, do you have a plan to run another investment on another gambling site?
I think that those who have studied such topics on the forum have no desire to make such investments, and especially continue it ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
Я бы даже согласился, если не одно но... Вы говорите о "универсальности" как лекарстве для всех пользователей продукта. Я больше склонен думать что для того чтобы сделать цилиндр проще использовать токарный станок, а для того чтобы выбрать паз сгодится фрезеровальный (при том что оба обрабатывают одну и ту же заготовку). Также и в вычислениях. Если нужно обрабатывать десяток инструкций блочного характера с большими массивами данных (майнинг), то трассировка лучей, 12 Gb памяти, 5 портов вывода излишни. Вы понимаете что именно я имею в виду.
Если честно нет ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Я не токарь и не хардверщик. Я вижу простую ситуацию: майнеров все устраивало и трассировка лучей и количество портов вывода, геймеров тоже. Возник дефицит (такое бывает) и теперь весь рынок некоторое время потерпит пока этот перекос будет исправлен рынком. Каким образом разделение рынка на две ниши принесет хоть какую-то пользу? Вижу только вред. Проблему дефицита это не решает (чуть-чуть локализует дефицит в нише майнеров). Зато доплнительных минусов куча - теперь майнер не подстрахован тем что свое устройство может сбыть на рынке геймеров если что. Геймеры получают устройство с каким-то левым локом который может (и несомненно будет) глючить.
|
|
|
Кстати, а что вас смущает? Такая практика (с некоторыми оговорками) сложилась со всеми абсолютно легальными биржами/казино/банками и т.д. Депозит принимается на ура и без лишней волокиты, а вот при выводе средств начинаются выяснения откуда средства и принесите нам справку что у вас есть справка ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Какое отношение LiveCoin имеет к легальным биржам? Посты набиваешь или адвокатом устроился? А вопрос прочитать (понять) нее? По-моему все очевидно - если все легальные биржи/казино/биржи пользуются таким приемчиком чтобы бабло отжимать, то с какого перепугу ожидать иного от скамин? Вообще это идеальная тактика сейчас: под лозунгами KYC/AML можно и легальное бабло отжать не то что серое - обширное поле деятельности для скамеров.
|
|
|
Надо аккаунт регистрировать на себя. А также понимать какое количество фиата можно выводить чтобы не имееть дел с налоговой.
Аккаунт на меня естественно. Я задал вопрос именно с целью получить ответ от того кто фактически сталкивался с правоприменением в этих вопросах. Теорию я сам могу почитать. Вот вы лично понимаете сколько вы фиата можете выводить? Огласите сумму и откуда понимание такое взялось?
|
|
|
Нее, специализация наоборот ухудшает эффективность рынка.
Объясните каким образом? Любой модельный ряд, включая 30х серию, можно назвать "специализированным" для обработки информации. То есть новое поколение работает использую дополнительные возможности. Наличие тех же лучей, начиная с 20х серии. Поэтому я думаю что выпуск специализированных серий оправдан наличием своей ниши использования (майнинг/гейминг/рендеринг). Тем более можно вести более гибкую ценовую политику в каждой из них. А сейчас сложилась ситуация когда "смешались в кучу кони, люди...", все что ни выбрось на рынок, все сметается в основном майнерами. И это хорошо. А ухудшает таким образом что в нише падает емкость. Проведите мысленный эксперимент и углубите специализацию вплоть до абсурда вроде видеокарт для отдельных игр. Не очевидно что в таком варианте будет перманентный дефицит карт во множестве сегментов? Когда устройство универсально, то рынок больше, производственные мощности больше и любой дефицит будет устранен быстрее (и обойдется в среднем для потребителя дешевле).
|
|
|
|