You guys are gonna LOVE this!!! Julian Assange is promising a DNC-level take-down of HILLARY before the Sept. 26 debate -- Expect CRIMINAL LEVEL INDICTMENTS. He was interviewed 2 weeks ago while digging through thousands of Clinton's leaked emails: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqMRAQ5h7GYWhat is really funny is that the Clinton crime syndicate probably really did do a pretty thorough job of bleaching a bunch of data and probably don't have very good access to the material themselves in order to prepare. They themselves might have had to go hat-in-hand to the NSA  No she showed up and showed off because she is Hillary and found 2 or 3 people that were star stuck and willing to send her shit she was not cleared for from the satellite on top of the building direct to her e mail. In other news Looks like Putin just survived a 'hit' why the media not covering this car crash? copy this before it gets taken down: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIyN4QS6NQ8no information on any driver... |
|
|
|
Trade BEERMONEY with Megacrypton.com Our trading system is totally perfect.Buying/selling depends on user,not with us.It means if any user put for sell order, someone also need to buy it. This exchange works for me. |
|
|
|
|
BADecker,
My points was/ are clear:
1) that quote is not in Penhallow.
2) False legal quotes can be harmful so I spoke up.
3) I believe you incorrectly concluded what Penhallow is about due to the false quote and the significance you placed on it.
4) I do not require any discussion, I only offered to pay for proof and my offer still stands and I am sure I could take up a collection to increase the bounty if that helps.
5) Are you an attorney?
6) Thank you for posting your information. I am excited to be checking out some of the other info!
|
|
|
|
<>
BADecker, I am not trying to pick on you actually trying to help you with your arguments. In fact I agree that the judges let the attorney's get away with things they should not be doing when they allow them to argue facts of the case when instead the jusdge should remain neutral. So the local rules are important as shown in the other case you mentioned. And it seems that was why that case had the outcome it did. Thanks now I have a new case to verify next time I go to the law library.
Some of the actual wording from Trinsey v Pagliaro, from http://www.youarelaw.org/stop-attorneys-from-heresay-with-trinsey-v-pagliaro/: "Statements of counsel in brief or in argument are not sufficient for motion to dismiss or for summary judgment," Trinsey v. Pagliaro, D. C. Pa. 1964, 229 F. Supp. 647. "Factual statements or documents appearing only in briefs shall not be deemed to be a part of the record in the case, unless specifically permitted by the Court" – Oklahoma Court Rules and Procedure, Federal local rule 7.1(h). Trinsey v Pagliaro, D.C.Pa. 1964, 229 F.Supp. 647. "Statements of counsel in brief or in argument are not facts before the court and are therefore insufficient for a motion to dismiss or for summary judgment."  BADECker, are you an attorney? |
|
|
|
|
BADecker,
It alternated from P v D and D v P over the years. So it depends on when you are talking about to decide which way the parties are listed.
And I really do not think you have any right to go grammar nazi on me after I just busted you posting a fake quote in it';s entirety. I mean really it is Penhallow v. Doanne and also Doanne' admin v Penhallow at various times through it's incarnations through the courts. However that quote about parity never existed in over 22 years of litigation that I can find.
Your other quotes check out and I did not pick on you for minutia only the substance part. I know it is hard to say thank you when you know everything and attorneys are used to picking on people who disagree with them but the correct thing to say when you are corrected by someone is "thank you".
|
|
|
|
How much GLD was lost on cryptsy?
If you had coins lost on cryptsy you should register with the attorney in Florida who was assigned by the courts as receiver. He can match your information to the accounts they have control off and assist you with your claim for getting the coins back or compensation. This is happening now so I recommend contacting them soon. |
|
|
|
Clinton is an empire, backed by narcissistic greed, corruption and, apparently, immunity.
I agree, it's a fairer assessment. It's a borderless transnational criminal organization, specialized in using political bribes to loot nations and rape children. ....and rape all of the Earth's precious resources: preying on the poorest & most vulnerable countries: Haiti, India, Nigeria... People, read Clinton Cash or watch the free documentary on youtube. As much as I detest Trump, I appreciate that he is raising awareness of corrupt Clinton's Foundation & State Department treacheries. We must build the third parties NOW to ensure this never happens again: a corrupt 2-party system that nominated 2 greedy, entitled gazillionaire thugs who profit off the people worldwide. A choice of two is hardly a "democracy."A diverse choice is. Very true... the problem is that the executive branch has taken too much power in recent years... Potus wasn't designed to be like that... However it's a natural evolution of corruption to take all branches of the gov to merge them to serve the looting. It isn't that the government has taken too much power, as much as the people have let them. The American form of government allows people to individually or in groups put down almost any law of government that they want. It is done through the basics of the governmental system, which is the court jury system. In all cases where government has a case against a person, the person can file a claim against the government official, man to man, who started the case against him. The individual's case can be filed right inside the government's case, requiring that the official show what harm or damage the individual has done. If there is none, the individual can claim damages and court costs. When an individual does the above man to man rather than individual to government, he takes the case out of whatever administrative court it might have been in, and moves it into common law. Common law means that the person can request a jury trial. Juries can judge the law, and effectively make a law to be null and void in the particular case. The judge is only a referee, and can be held in contempt of court if he opens his big mouth too many times. If enough juries shut down the same law in their cases, the law is held to be null and void across the land. This can be done in Canada, Britain, Australia, and with some difficulty, in India and Bangladesh. There are a few other countries that allow this as well. But America is the easiest. In all of these countries, if people don't know what they can do, they probably won't do it. If a jury makes a decision that the judge doesn't like, and the judge files complaints against the jury members, the jury members each have the duty to file a man to man claim against the judge. Help to wake the juries up. They have absolute power every which way in all the cases they hear. Jointly the jury has more power than a king. Juries are connected to common law. America is a common law land. We can essentially shut down every law the President and Congress make through the jury. Tell the juries to look up the law. Jury nullification.This is the best post I have ever seen on Bitcoin talk forum. I am glad to be here. Thanks Karl Lentz talks a lot. You could listen to him all day, and still not quite understand what he is saying. He shows how to use common law from a common law standpoint. Some links: http://www.myprivateaudio.com/Karl-Lentz.html = Angela Stark's Talkshoe. http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5duR4OvEHHxOSdEZhANETw = TrustInAllLaw snippets of Karl's audios. http://www.broadmind.org/ = Karl's main page. http://www.unkommonlaw.co.uk/ = Karl's United Kingdom page. http://www.youtube.com/user/765736/videos?view=0&live_view=500&flow=grid&sort=da = Craig Lynch's snippets page. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOkAHRzuiOA&list=PLHrkQxgz0mg6kUBciD-HIvTXByqjcIZ-D = Ten great Youtube videos, might be the best introduction to Karl. http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=127469&cmd=tc = Karl's Talkshoe site. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iua56K4Mysk = Karl Lentz - The Brian Bonar Incident - YouTube. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdHLHWS4gPE = Lentz-Sense - don't be a More~On - YouTube. Other Info http://voidjudgments.com/ = The Secret is most judgments are Void on their face and not merely voidable. http://educationcenter2000.com/Trinsey-v-Paglario.htm = Trinsey v. Pagliaro - Attorneys cannot "speak" in common law trials if the one who is bringing the suit orders it. Holding from Trinsey v. Pagliaro: "An attorney for the plaintiff cannot admit evidence into the court. He is either an attorney or a witness." And now I am afraid I must call bullshit: The last link you provided has a quote attributed to a famous court case called Penhallow vs Doanne's admin. It is from 1795 it is case #6 of the S.C.O.T.U.S. and that text does not appear in that case. That is a fake quote in my opinion and I feel qualified to say this since I have carefully examined all of the originals of the case across the country. If you can provide a certified copy of the case that shows that quote I will pay you for your trouble. I have tracked that case for more than 16 years (well over 22 years by my counting) and find that text nowhere in the arguments of counsel. However, since I did not review all of the counselors notes on the case I will offer you $100 USD in bitcoin if you can direct me to the source where the arguments of counsel can be found regarding this quote. Basically the case was about admission of evidence and the rules governing the settling of jurisdiction and international law was invoked to reason which court should or did rule and how proper the rule was. Finally, the scotus allowed evidence that a previous court had barred from the record and this new evidence changed the outcome of the case and thus the property was dived differently as a result. Are you sure you clicked the correct link? Trinsey v Paglario is mentioned there, along with its relevance. What are you really saying? T v P was not meant as a listing in or part of P v D. It was meant as another case that was relevant to the issue along with P v D. When you actually check T v P at the legal site given in the website, you will find that the wording IS different than the website I listed. In the past, I have found the actual wording online for T v P, and I understood how the wording can be construed to mean what the website I gave says. One of the important things about using common law is that you don't need T v P. It simply helps to show that even the legal common law is active in the same way as lawful common law. Here is the big point. You are never a citizen of the legal system unless you are a BAR card carrier. And, you are never a "citizen" in a man-to-man common law case unless you are a witness, or a part of the tribunal. This is what P v D and T v P are all about. That is not at all what Doanne v. Pennhallow is about and you bring up a big concern that was voiced by the commentators of the time who reviewed the case in 1796 following the case. They feared that false legal advice would be proffered as a way to game the system here in America and in fact this fake legal advice would be the only way to truly game the society here as it is now set up since 1796. So I recommend you only copy and paste legal citations you have personally verified otherwise your attempts at legal advice actually do this country a disservice if they are not true as in the case here with Penhallow v. Doanne where not only you cite a fake quote that is not found in the case but also conclude things that are never discussed in the case. In fact it is a truly remarkable case that is worth study. I am sorry but a web page quote is not legal research. And if you take a quote from a court case into court as part of your argument you will want to make sure it is correct and true certified copy. I am saying that you cannot do that with the quote you are providing us from Penhallow v. Doannes admin. Instead I am saying that this case is a good study on jurisdiction, courts, evidence, things like that. It is the longest case in our history and it still has not ended to this day technically. It is also the first real case the Scotus handled. It came about from ships that were taken during the revolutionary war in early 1780's or earlier commonly called the 'prize cases'. The court had to wait for enough counselors who were learned enough to become approved to practice before the SCOTUS before they could hear this case and Doanne was already dead waiting for justice to be granted him through the courts. At the end of the case the court lamented how no one should ever have to wait that long for justice. Doanne v. Penhallow was the first true test of the new jurisdiction the SCOTUS had been given by the new congress. BADecker, I am not trying to pick on you actually trying to help you with your arguments. In fact I agree that the judges let the attorney's get away with things they should not be doing when they allow them to argue facts of the case when instead the jusdge should remain neutral. So the local rules are important as shown in the other case you mentioned. And it seems that was why that case had the outcome it did. Thanks now I have a new case to verify next time I go to the law library. |
|
|
|
Clinton is an empire, backed by narcissistic greed, corruption and, apparently, immunity.
I agree, it's a fairer assessment. It's a borderless transnational criminal organization, specialized in using political bribes to loot nations and rape children. ....and rape all of the Earth's precious resources: preying on the poorest & most vulnerable countries: Haiti, India, Nigeria... People, read Clinton Cash or watch the free documentary on youtube. As much as I detest Trump, I appreciate that he is raising awareness of corrupt Clinton's Foundation & State Department treacheries. We must build the third parties NOW to ensure this never happens again: a corrupt 2-party system that nominated 2 greedy, entitled gazillionaire thugs who profit off the people worldwide. A choice of two is hardly a "democracy."A diverse choice is. Very true... the problem is that the executive branch has taken too much power in recent years... Potus wasn't designed to be like that... However it's a natural evolution of corruption to take all branches of the gov to merge them to serve the looting. It isn't that the government has taken too much power, as much as the people have let them. The American form of government allows people to individually or in groups put down almost any law of government that they want. It is done through the basics of the governmental system, which is the court jury system. In all cases where government has a case against a person, the person can file a claim against the government official, man to man, who started the case against him. The individual's case can be filed right inside the government's case, requiring that the official show what harm or damage the individual has done. If there is none, the individual can claim damages and court costs. When an individual does the above man to man rather than individual to government, he takes the case out of whatever administrative court it might have been in, and moves it into common law. Common law means that the person can request a jury trial. Juries can judge the law, and effectively make a law to be null and void in the particular case. The judge is only a referee, and can be held in contempt of court if he opens his big mouth too many times. If enough juries shut down the same law in their cases, the law is held to be null and void across the land. This can be done in Canada, Britain, Australia, and with some difficulty, in India and Bangladesh. There are a few other countries that allow this as well. But America is the easiest. In all of these countries, if people don't know what they can do, they probably won't do it. If a jury makes a decision that the judge doesn't like, and the judge files complaints against the jury members, the jury members each have the duty to file a man to man claim against the judge. Help to wake the juries up. They have absolute power every which way in all the cases they hear. Jointly the jury has more power than a king. Juries are connected to common law. America is a common law land. We can essentially shut down every law the President and Congress make through the jury. Tell the juries to look up the law. Jury nullification.This is the best post I have ever seen on Bitcoin talk forum. I am glad to be here. Thanks Karl Lentz talks a lot. You could listen to him all day, and still not quite understand what he is saying. He shows how to use common law from a common law standpoint. Some links: http://www.myprivateaudio.com/Karl-Lentz.html = Angela Stark's Talkshoe. http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5duR4OvEHHxOSdEZhANETw = TrustInAllLaw snippets of Karl's audios. http://www.broadmind.org/ = Karl's main page. http://www.unkommonlaw.co.uk/ = Karl's United Kingdom page. http://www.youtube.com/user/765736/videos?view=0&live_view=500&flow=grid&sort=da = Craig Lynch's snippets page. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOkAHRzuiOA&list=PLHrkQxgz0mg6kUBciD-HIvTXByqjcIZ-D = Ten great Youtube videos, might be the best introduction to Karl. http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=127469&cmd=tc = Karl's Talkshoe site. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iua56K4Mysk = Karl Lentz - The Brian Bonar Incident - YouTube. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdHLHWS4gPE = Lentz-Sense - don't be a More~On - YouTube. Other Info http://voidjudgments.com/ = The Secret is most judgments are Void on their face and not merely voidable. http://educationcenter2000.com/Trinsey-v-Paglario.htm = Trinsey v. Pagliaro - Attorneys cannot "speak" in common law trials if the one who is bringing the suit orders it. Holding from Trinsey v. Pagliaro: "An attorney for the plaintiff cannot admit evidence into the court. He is either an attorney or a witness." And now I am afraid I must call bullshit: The last link you provided has a quote attributed to a famous court case called Penhallow vs Doanne's admin. It is from 1795 it is case #6 of the S.C.O.T.U.S. and that text does not appear in that case. That is a fake quote in my opinion and I feel qualified to say this since I have carefully examined all of the originals of the case across the country. If you can provide a certified copy of the case that shows that quote I will pay you for your trouble. I have tracked that case for more than 16 years (well over 22 years by my counting) and find that text nowhere in the arguments of counsel. However, since I did not review all of the counselors notes on the case I will offer you $100 USD in bitcoin if you can direct me to the source where the arguments of counsel can be found regarding this quote. Basically the case was about admission of evidence and the rules governing the settling of jurisdiction and international law was invoked to reason which court should or did rule and how proper the rule was. Finally, the scotus allowed evidence that a previous court had barred from the record and this new evidence changed the outcome of the case and thus the property was dived differently as a result. |
|
|
|
Clinton is an empire, backed by narcissistic greed, corruption and, apparently, immunity.
I agree, it's a fairer assessment. It's a borderless transnational criminal organization, specialized in using political bribes to loot nations and rape children. ....and rape all of the Earth's precious resources: preying on the poorest & most vulnerable countries: Haiti, India, Nigeria... People, read Clinton Cash or watch the free documentary on youtube. As much as I detest Trump, I appreciate that he is raising awareness of corrupt Clinton's Foundation & State Department treacheries. We must build the third parties NOW to ensure this never happens again: a corrupt 2-party system that nominated 2 greedy, entitled gazillionaire thugs who profit off the people worldwide. A choice of two is hardly a "democracy."A diverse choice is. Very true... the problem is that the executive branch has taken too much power in recent years... Potus wasn't designed to be like that... However it's a natural evolution of corruption to take all branches of the gov to merge them to serve the looting. It isn't that the government has taken too much power, as much as the people have let them. The American form of government allows people to individually or in groups put down almost any law of government that they want. It is done through the basics of the governmental system, which is the court jury system. In all cases where government has a case against a person, the person can file a claim against the government official, man to man, who started the case against him. The individual's case can be filed right inside the government's case, requiring that the official show what harm or damage the individual has done. If there is none, the individual can claim damages and court costs. When an individual does the above man to man rather than individual to government, he takes the case out of whatever administrative court it might have been in, and moves it into common law. Common law means that the person can request a jury trial. Juries can judge the law, and effectively make a law to be null and void in the particular case. The judge is only a referee, and can be held in contempt of court if he opens his big mouth too many times. If enough juries shut down the same law in their cases, the law is held to be null and void across the land. This can be done in Canada, Britain, Australia, and with some difficulty, in India and Bangladesh. There are a few other countries that allow this as well. But America is the easiest. In all of these countries, if people don't know what they can do, they probably won't do it. If a jury makes a decision that the judge doesn't like, and the judge files complaints against the jury members, the jury members each have the duty to file a man to man claim against the judge. Help to wake the juries up. They have absolute power every which way in all the cases they hear. Jointly the jury has more power than a king. Juries are connected to common law. America is a common law land. We can essentially shut down every law the President and Congress make through the jury. Tell the juries to look up the law. Jury nullification.This is the best post I have ever seen on Bitcoin talk forum. I am glad to be here. Thanks |
|
|
|
I don't get why so many republicans don't like Trump. He has been on Fox news many times. They helped make him what he is today as far as a political figure. He just shakes things up more than anybody else.
I get it perfectly.  Trump is anti-establishment and therefore the RINOs and the political elites have umpteen reasons to hate him. Also, he is against the "compromise politics" put forward by the establishment guys such as John Boner and Lindsey Graham. Other than this, some of the grassroot activists are against his foreign policy, and some are against his anti-Mexican rhetoric. The establishment is anti-establishment these days. And he does understand negotiations and that is a form of compromise he just likes good deals which we have not had in a while. Last guy got shot in his limo. And being for USA does not make him against any other country your rhetoric is deceptive. Only if we keep USA standard high will Mexicans have a good life here which will be in their best interests. People are only against him because the corporate media is telling them they should be. Good luck thanks for playing |
|
|
|
I know this is possible but maybe difficult to explain. Is there any one who can help explain how to rent a rig from say for example https://www.miningrigrentals.com/and us it to solo mine a scrypt coin? I have a coin in mind I will like to mine it is called BEER money https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1577170.0I also have an inquiry out to the rig rental site for help with this question. Thanks to any who can assist on this topic! |
|
|
|
Glen123, Some users are reporting problems with your pool please have a look when you get a chance and let us know. Thanks as i PMed i said that coincode is buggy : ns# ./beermoneyd sendtoaddress BQFtpmhjqZbLgR5Y4Bsg39caXowhfriaUr 17415 error: {"code":-4,"message":"Error: Transaction creation failed "} root@gcpool2:~/coins# ./beermoneyd sendtoaddress BQFtpmhjqZbLgR5Y4Bsg39caXowhfriaUr 7415 60345d399b6026d06ad24c24753fd6afd54c95f1cafdc410aebee2a481632e7e root@gcpool2:~/coins# ./beermoneyd sendtoaddress BQFtpmhjqZbLgR5Y4Bsg39caXowhfriaUr 10000 96041234a317259baece451a142b2b750237321a2662e46e4db5499c59875c1c root@gcpool2:~/coins# Transactions over 10k does NOT ! work for Coindaemon ( not Pool ) thats why i set autopayout and from 200-1500 Coins . If a User ignore that PayoutWarnings i am NOT responsible for his lost Later i will close this Coin on my Pool and manual Payout - I dont have any Time to babysit this Coin Regards Glen Pool Removed from ANN. |
|
|
|
I have more than 4.7 bilj mooncoin at cryptsy.com. Now they website are down i'm lost al my mooncoin
We are all in the same boat. You have not lost your coins yet: 1. Mooncoins are still at Cryptsy addresses: 2F2RsYK3Ac6zGvENWTosF7xKor7g2bqzra 2bhtQXsgVSna9FGZfuAWenr1Smed59rLZQ 2QERTtcwHyDJzyH6WzqUpA1PBadD99ddTe 2VyUQR43efHyY9a46VbnMWCC97RmFy4Xm9 2YjTgNSPixzdVPBnZP7kNYLQ2kow8Lrqtw 2J8xmNve5e1RQYTyaptdYCVnNT7o6yGix8 2. A Florida court has frozen the assets of the digital currency exchange Cryptsy. http://www.coindesk.com/cryptsy-assets-frozen-as-florida-court-appoints-receiver/We hope that a court will return coins to their legal owners. Anyway Moonlite bonuses initially can be distributed amongst Mooncoin holders, even if their coins are at Cryptsy. is this Cryptsy addreess? Does the Court move Mooncoin addreess? I will highly recommend anyone who has coins stuck at cryptsy to contact the attorney in Florida who is the court appointed receiver. There is a procedure one must go through in order to claim your lost coins and this attorney can take what information you have and match it to the accounts he now controls for verification of claim to coins |
|
|
|
[ANN] BeerMoney | POW Scrypt | Random Blocks | Unlimited Emissions | Low Pre-Mine Dev Wallet Address .5M[BEER]: BD8nS2ucahFum4FnVrowQeaMmgtEPpQ9zd Mining Pools http://139.59.139.196:8080/getting_startedVarDiff 2-8192 yourminer.exe -a scrypt -o stratum+tcp://139.59.139.196:7650 -u yourwalletaddress -p x Diff 8192 yourminer.exe -a scrypt -o stratum+tcp://139.59.139.196:7660 -u yourwalletaddress -p x Pembayaran setiap 2 menit Thanks! Bounty sent: Transaction ID: 25cda0fd19a57739fe98571eb912b8f2bdcbea8f1d9fe97d9961534bfe523146 |
|
|
|
|
Announcement
I am now selling part of the remaining DEV fund (.4M BEER) to raise BTC for the yobit registration
I will sell 10,000 BEER money coins for .034 BTC
If I can sell 3 of these then I will use the .1BTC raised to apply for yobit registration
If anyone would like to buy BEER money please Private message me. Thanks
|
|
|
|
no exchange, another loss, very shitcoin  technically this is an exchange that has listed us: Megacrypton BEER WebWallet: https://live.megacrypton.com/loginand we have requests out now to 3 others. I will now ask for donations to help increase our chances to getting on these exchanges. For example yobit allows free registration but it may take a long time and there is no guarantee. But if you give them Bitcoin then they will list you faster. So I have a btc address in my signature. Any one can pm me for the chance to donate to speed up this process with yobit. |
|
|
|
Glen123, Some users are reporting problems with your pool please have a look when you get a chance and let us know. Thanks |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
