Ill name some names dammit. ETH. And any other coin with an independent block chain (none of these ERC20 tokens). the reason? there is no way in hell smart contracts are going to work as a layer on the Bitcoin block chain, given the level of congestion going on now with this low level of adoption. people are digging the trust less nature of these things, even though the trust of the entire scheme is only as good as the contract is coded. I digress. the coins designed to facilitate this will be the most valuable, esp the ones that are proposed as business solutions rather than end user products.
I semi like the concept of ETH with ETH being the network for distributing contracts (mini type of programs) and then charging "Gas" for hosting these programs so that I could run a dirty as you like porn site (Joking) and no one could ever take it down but after looking at some of the code for these contracts it becomes obvious that the scripting language (Java-script almost) is little more than a bean counter that runs on the network and allows you to store bean values in the block-chain so long as you keep paying "Gas" that must be paid for in ETH Earning a bit of "Gas" by providing services to other ETH contracts that would allow them to validate credit card numbers via your service is not what it is about (sad to say) because you are stuck with just talking within a closed system and cannot kick out using HTTP request and sockets to pull data from the real world. Fantastic for converting Red-Beans to Blue-Beans, having a balance and calling it money needed for a new ICO and then having public history for the event held within and mixed up with the ETH block chain but not much good for anything else from what I could understand. I was kind of hoping for something like Tor's onion sites that would be fast and not going down if I un-plugged my pc at home that hosts the site/service and would work without having to be accessed via Tor from the tinternet that was Pay-as-you-Go for the service using ETH and GAS being charged based on the resources used by the site/program Having said all that I think ETH has more to offer in it's own way than BTC were fork/clones might become ten a penny
|
|
|
Why doesn't these forks just correct the problems that we are all having, they should just increase the block size so that transactions can confirm earlier and so that we pay lower fees, Thats what everyone wants.
Everyone except the current BTC miners and the bankers that own them and if you keep people thirsty by blocking the water well then you can charge almost what you like for water if no one moves away Trust that was weak at best has been broken here over fees and tweaking the block size or time will buy some time but longer term the block-chain needs throwing in the bin with all its flaws, least of which is PoW and we needed a new sleak mean machine if Joe public arrives and they want to do micro-transactions which is kind of obvious anyway See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6V365_59-Lc and learn whats on the other side of the coin
|
|
|
Some exchanges like localbitcoins allow you to convert physical cash into bitcoins. This offers the person converting the money peace of mind as its very unlikely that physical cash being converted to bitcoins can ever be traced back. But, some other exchanges require identity confirmation and as such. Some people prefer anonymity and the peace of mind that comes with it and are willing to pay a little bit extra for that. Having said that, the difference between many of the competitive online only exchanges aren't that big.
Yes we have one of these in the UK where small seller sell direct to buyers bitbargain.co.uk/buy if selling you have to pay them a registration fee of about $90 and it seems to only have a about ten sellers but i thought it was a manual type system were they set the price in the morning as off they go to work. My evil mind had the plan of front running them and buying from them if the live price shoot up before they noticed it but alas it was not to be, prices are linked to live prices and go up or down during the day. Longer term we should be buying or selling back to cash using what we call miners today instead of brokers even if we have to have a 3rd party a bit like ShapeShift to deal with USD/GBP payments and then these miners could offer a useful service instead of earning money from a pointless race not that we would need 200,000 of them "the difference between many of the competitive online only exchanges aren't that big"I've seen over $700 difference on a single BTC today between two exchanges but i grant you that one being GDAX is ten times bigger than the other one.
|
|
|
Yeah I heard same opinion from many. I guess It is almost effect less
The old team lost it's bottle so can we trust them anyway and this move seemed to give a green light to put the mining fees up and if the new team is a fake then how come the old team is not screaming it from the roof tops ? Someone is weaving a deep web here and I don't think any of us really know what is going on and was this mr 'S' from Japan as smart as some people make out he is then what was his plan for preventing this ? More PoW to waste electric and sell GPU's maybe when he talked about a "Trustless" interconnection of computers
|
|
|
Dont waste time trying to search it, it is a waste of time, it will be worth less than $10 of course.
No i checked and they do have a site and will even answer emails and the price of B2X was about $1,000 the last time I looked so if it is a scam then it's a very good one and I seem to be very open to suggestion on jumping ship since BTC transactions fees hit the moon but this new/old team do seem to be offering all things to all men but if it's free at 1:1 to anyone with coins outside the control of Coinbase by owning your own coins on the block-chain What have I got to loose on the deal ? Nothing I say
|
|
|
Forking of bitcoin have becomes a good approach for blockchain teams to receive quick money,that is why there will be so many forth coming forks.And it will also affect the value of bitcoin by adding some shoot up in price.
What shoots up in price and are you talking pre fork or long term because when you double the money supply it is called inflation but reading Satoshi's white paper you would think he had it licked by limiting the supply to 21m so again this is an area where BTC has not achieved what it said on the box. Firefox developers all seem to say one thing but when you look deeper and see how in bed they are with Google you start to understand the deception and dig a little bit more and you find out the google "Donate" tax free of course $50m a year to the firefox team who are all based in India these days The world is falling apart, greed has taken over from logic and trust
|
|
|
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but this doesn't look like its being orchestrated by the same team that was supposed to implement the original segwit2x fork before it got cancelled...Seems kind of gimmicky if this is the case.
And this whole receiving a portion of Satoshi's btc is confusing to me.
Yes I picked up of something about this not being the same team but it's hard to see whats propaganda and whats not and did you notice how BTG got DDOS as soon as it stated and we can all guess who was behind that attack. I have this wild theory that this public BTC block-chain is not owned by anyone and therefore I can take a copy and then get the open source BTC code and put a flag in the coin to indicate it's now called the "Alt-Cen" and set up a few servers and away I go and because I am so rich, well i can give everyone some free coins at 1:1 if they were on the old block-chain. Look give me $1,000,000 and i will even share half my evil new company with you and let you keep all of Satoshi's coins only because I think his Pow and block-chain is a pile of crap and the wheels are now falling off it
|
|
|
Everyone says that segregating the witness will open up opportunity for fraud.
The name is B2X and i looked into it for a few hours and yes it does seem to be real but it's as if Google is keeping news about it off the screens for now and maybe it was rushed out to stop people dumping BTC before 28th Dec due to prices going down thanks to high transaction fees. This "Everyone" could be everyone that runs mines and don't want to take a hit on profits but it's becoming clear to me that nothing about BTC should be trusted and you might like to view the link given below https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6V365_59-LcI moved my coins out of Coinbase and on to the real block just to ensure I had a stake in this new segwic2x fork yesterday instead of having to see if Coinbase would give me access to my free gift or not in six months time which might not be fraud but it's the next best thing.
|
|
|
I use to have this big red V8 sports car and all my friends wanted one but then my girlfriend dropped me and the price of gas went up and the value of my pride and joy shot down.
Do you think it was because my girlfriend dumped me or because the gas price went up on my V8 12 MPG ram-rod
|
|
|
this is common because each different exchage different sellers and buyers offer. and each exchange will try to match the price with another exchagne.
Yes Bid/Ask and both exchanges had a small spread down to about the last cent so orders were flying out the window as they became matched and both were priced in USD and yet at times they were out of sync by $500 or more per BTC so yes they matched the buyer/seller to get paid in fees but they are miles out on matching exchanges. Prices on GDAX are being driven by computer programs using a type HTF because you would see something like this for BTC 14.26100000 $15,4321 13.28100000 $15,4321 11.22100000 $15,4321 10.20100000 $15,4321 4.20100000 $15,4321 OK no one buying big amount at this price so try again 14.26100000 $15,4319 13.28100000 $15,4319 11.22100000 $15,4319 10.20100000 $15,4319 4.20100000 $15,4319 The other exchange did not seem to be doing any of that
|
|
|
This way of trading is called Arbitrage trading. It is possible to make profit with this but doesn't always work. Since different exchanges are from different countries, the supply and demand price is based on that country. People usually exchange within their currency. For example the price of Bitcoin is $18000 in India when its $15000 in Bitfinex. If you send BTC from Bitfinex to Koinex (India) You can convert the BTC only to fiat (INR). Now if you try to buy some other coin with the INR you got form the BTC, it will also be higher priced like BTC. So you won't be making any profit sending it back and forth.
Also now a days the BTC withdrawal times and confirmations will make up for any price difference making it harder to arbitrage.
One last way is having a guy in another country and cashing out in one more with higher price and sending the profits by wire transfer or other method. But this also will lead to a lot of complications.
Both exchanges to cross trade i looked at use USD or it looked like that to me on the surface of it so I thought you would just send USD$ direct so they could not skim off the top to one exchange and then use say the ETH network to shift your Buy/Low/Sell/High coins over to the other exchange and sell back into USD I suspect what you say is right because Coinbase held GBP for me but to get the money back in my bank it was sent via SEPA and that uses Euro so it needed converting at both ends and that cost comes out my pocket. Thanks guys, some very good answers here
|
|
|
So what's the purpose of this? If there are no new transactions going through then miners will chase down the unconfirmed transactions? Do you think we can clear 288,000 transactions in a mere 24 hours? I suppose it's 48 hours if you account for the time frame from the earliest timezone hitting Christmas Eve to the last timezone that completes that same day. There's are 24 time zones across the globe.
This is the first I've heard of this but I like the idea. Are you the sponsor? How's the promotion of this event going worldwide?
I am not good at maths so maybe you can help me 60 seconds in a min so that's 3,600 per hour and we times that by 24 to give a total of 86,400 seconds a day Now it get complicated processing the transactions because we don't have any dead periods waiting for new orders to arrive so instead of processing seven a second like the max speed is on BTC we will call it eight instead for the reason given. 86,4000 X 7 = 604,800 without me even having to cook the numbers so maybe you can help me with my mistake b/cus i am useless when it comes to maths Just think these miners will be sitting in the cold after about (top of head) eight hours because they use these power hungry mining devices to heat the room they are working in and they won't have much work to do.
|
|
|
trying to share with you all what I do to stay ahead of the game.
Indeed you are a smart man ! Hope you stack a little silver/gold like me and I hope BTC plays a part in pushing the price down even more and I am sure you can work out why and those that mine it are real nice people and will even post it to my door with transaction cost being free after stamping a nice little picture on the front of it.
|
|
|
Easy Fix , Use Bitcoin Cash or Litecoin instead, not just for Christmas Eve but for all time.
old bitcoin is dead, it is just most people are too stupid to realize it.
Currently $55 to make a transaction and still wait days, RIP old BTC.
I hope it does not go quite as far as that because of the knock effect but today you are my hero because I thought that i was the only one here that dares to call in to question the block-chain or Lightning but then I noticed your advert in the footer that many addictive gamblers here tend to use to peddle their wares but in your case I decided to click the Youtube link . I would send you a $1 in BTC as a compliment if you pay the $40+ transaction fee for me but if you have a BTG address then games a good one.
|
|
|
If anyone here thinks that bitcoin (or any other crypto for that matter) will be able to grow forever to meet network processing requirements of on-chain transactions - you are dead wrong.
The block-chain is the problem and that's without mining (Revving engine with car out of gear) " (or any other crypto for that matter) " Would you agree that VISA uses digital money that uses encryption for security and would you also agree that VISA can process 25,000 transactions a second and they do all this with hundreds of time less processing power than the BTC network has at its disposal ? VISA is also decentralized to some degree or else I am sure ISIS or a power cut would had taken it down by now and yes I am aware that CryproKittie nearly took the ETH network down but again, what would you expect when its using block-chain even if it is version two. Maybe i have helped you to answer your own question here.
|
|
|
Troll on home girl. You obviously understand next to nothing.
The facts and numbers to you must be more like "Hate Speech" surly and now all you have left is insults and hot air but miners have lots of that due to over clocking the GPU's and then having to cool them down so I won't take it personal anyway Nice signature i see but should it not read "Anything that is not BTC is a Ponzi scam, trust me I am here to defend the faith
|
|
|
If bitcoin goes to zero then the miners will still want transaction fees and many of the slot machine players that frequent this forum won't blame them.
Sorry the bread today and jam tomorrow (Well six months) Lightning Network fix does not quite do it for me and the miner monopoly is not only holding us hostage but they are also holding the team developers hostage but they have themselves to blame for that don't they.
Remember the boycott of trades that's been planned to send them a message because it is their greed that will send it to zero and not ours.
|
|
|
that is called a fee war.
since the block space is limited, it is bound to happen sooner or later in any cryptocurrency that is designed with a limited block space. it doesn't matter how much that limit is, as long as it is a limited number the blocks can only include a limited number of transactions. it can be 2000, 10,000 or anything but it will be reached at some point and the fee war begins when people battle over that limited space in the blocks.
Yes ye old block size via the block write speed argument but this is linear and you have to take into account orphans too but much more trouble is coming our way and it's lographic because already the ledger comes in at 200gb but to process a wallet to stop double spends you have to first go back down the chain and trace the history of each coin part making up an amount back to the creation of the parent coin s in the end the processing will more or less grind to a Holt as the history becomes longer and longer. 7 Transaction per second is BTC speed limit and this satosi is not seen as the second coming of jesus in my book and if you look around then already new systems exist like IOTA using Tangle which seems much better at first glance and VISA-card has to handle more than BTC does just in the little town where I live not that i am really comparing apples with apples here.
|
|
|
Because usually the miner will put his bigger fee first. Why is the fee now bigger? As more and more people are attracted and jumped into the world of blockchain resulting in busy blockchain traffic, so it is important that the cost is a little more costly for faster processing.
Sounds like a nice story but would you like to listen to my version ? Well 90% of all miners belong to ten mega big groups and they all refuse to process transactions unless the transaction fee amount is sky high and if a miner outside this group decides to offer a service at a normal rate (<$0.10) then this 90% monopoly rejects the changes so it never gets put in the block-chain. Cast your mind back to the release of BTG and the DDOS and ask yourself who was behind the attack if you believe we are not dealing with anything other than a Mafia organisation who have seized control. The active input to the network from the market is only 14kbs and is not making all these servers break out into a sweat but counting silly things like grains of sand in a cup to see which computer can guess the number first in a cyber arms race does tend to warm up the old CPU and the plant too.
|
|
|
When are you going to send me the keys to your house. I need a place to live.
Home girl, I was mining years before you ever heard about bitcoin. It costs a hell of a lot of money to buy equipment and today it’s incredibly difficult to ROI. Finding a cryptographic hash with an ever increasing difficulty is crazy stressful on equipment. Miners have a big investment in equipment that will not last long.
Mining was never intended to be a free service. Originally, the block reward was the payment for mining and was expected to eventually be replaced by mining fees. IF bitcoin use grows large enough and IF the fees can be spread among enough users the fee will come down but it will never be free. Bitcoin is not and will never be a free service.
Little boy racer i was aware of BTC when it was trading at a mere $0.15 and if you go back to the white paper then you would see the term "Virtually free" when it came to transactions costs and $40+ is anything but that. Your in a race to compete for a prize with all this hardware you have that is offering next to nothing of any use to me Lets do the sums between us Max transactions per second = 7 Average packet size (inputs, outputs) = 250 bytes 250 * 7 * 8 =14Kbs "Bitcoin is not and will never be a free service" You will want it priced in bits next instead of bytes so pop outside, rev the boy racer without driving anywhere and wait for a big guys from "Green Peace" has a few words with you. "IF the fees can be spread among enough users the fee will come down" So are you saying that at the beginning of the year when fees were near zero that we had less users than we have today ? Tell me, what you smoking because i want some and the chances are that i was cutting code before you even started school
|
|
|
|