I have seen this on the news feed while browsing my Facebook. Reading some comments there, I didn't see any positive thoughts about Paul Butler. This is also a mismatch for me and in the first place, it's just because Paul Butler has a title that's why Inoue has to take him to become the unified champion in the bantamweight division. I even think that Donaire at his current age is more powerful than Butler.

The funniest comment from netizens while I read some comments, is that Paul Butler should just give the title to Inoue without having a fight.
That was funny and partially true.

That was too much and you guys are disregarding TNT's talent, skills and chances of winning.

If they will win next game, that's already considered a product of game fixing?

Alright, maybe we just have to watched the game live and see for yourselves if there's something unusual on that game

This fight was struggling to become a reality for several years. What's worst for a rematch? Maybe it will take several years again. But seriously, if either of them will win, I think too that no rematch will happened since their respective goal is to moved up weight.

Just for speculation:

if Spence win = no rematch since as everyone always says, Spence always dodge Crawford. Now that he beat Crawford, no reason for a rematch.
if Crawford win = there will be rematch since as always Crawford accepts any challenges for his legacy.

But correct me if I'm wrong, after a unification match where one becomes finally the undisputed champion, it's unlikely to have a rematch between them right? Since the undisputed champion will now moved on to his next goal. Correct me on this.

Pretty good point. Fernando Martinez is also not prepared for a specific strategy against Ancajas but still, he won. It's because he was prepared physically and mentally. There's no need for him to formed a specific plan on how to counter Ancajas but instead he will just do his usual boxing form that he trained for before their fight. Adjustments will follow once they are now fighting and it turned out good in favor for Martinez.

Sometimes it's really sick to hear reasons for losing instead of accepting the defeat and come back in fully best form next time.

In my whole experience of betting in live casino games, I didn't bother to focus on dealers. As long as I have an interest to play that casino game, I will just play the game. In live casino, I even mute the sound as what matters to me is to wait for the results.

Since this topic was being raised, is there really a popular dealer at live casinos? On what site?

I'm pointing to crypto-casinos since we are in crypto-forum.

After reading the article, I can conclude and assume that those arrested people did that illegal thing not because of the gambling addiction.

There's an intent of stealing money and it was all planned right from the beginning. That's shady doings are their expertise from the start. That maybe their bad doings for long and it's just that they just finally caught now.

Although the news was in gambling portal website, I don't think it has something to do in gambling in general.

Confirmed as received.

Thank you, DS.

Request For a No Collateral Loan
Required BTC Amount: BTC0.0047
Estimated Loan Duration: 2 weeks
BTC Address: (via Stake tip) | Stake username: goinmerry

No. Familiarize with Spot trading first and gained some knowledge of how trading works.

There will be no such caution as "Future trade can be very risky" just for nothing.

After becoming used to how trading works, you can now start learning how the future works. Do some trials with a fair amount and start learning.

I thinking the other way. These players will disregard their trash talk history on a certain player once they will become teammates. These guys are professional and will surely work as a teammate. Unless the trash talk is nothing personal, they will just forget it and work as a team.

Good thing also that Westbrook and Pat are playing different roles and expertise. Even though they will not have a friendly status, there's no conflict in their respective positions and roles for the team. And if they will play badly because of that history, LBJ might put a banhammer on them and ask the management to trade these players lol.

Can you point out where is the part where I compare Murata and Canelo?
Can you even read the quoted part about why my reply is like that?

You even disregard the last statement of my post where I said the situation that happened during GGG vs Murata shouldn't be applied against Canelo where GGG allows some punches to be thrown at him in the early rounds. That's suicide for GGG if that happened against Canelo.

A close game by Gilas. Not bad against one of the top teams in Asia. Lebanon even said that the game was so tough and the Philippines gives them a competitive match. Jordan Clarkson slows down in the second half after becoming a scoring machine in the first half. He exceeded his usual playing time in the NBA. He played the entire second half of this game aside from more minutes he played in the half. Although he can, that is exhausting.

At least, they now see how their chemistry works. Hoping for an adjustment next game.

If we refer on GGG's last fight against Murata, there's no aggressiveness on GGG on the early rounds. Lots of punches being thrown successfully by Murata and all those are good shots. There was even lots of solid punches that Murata gave on GGG during the first few rounds.

While the fight is progressing, GGG now slowly get back on track and becomes beast mode. Murata can't answer now and that leads for GGG to a knock out win at Round 9. That proves that GGG still has the strength and power to end the fight in a KO Victory.

But that situation shouldn't be applied against Canelo. Every rounds count and matters if fighting against Canelo in scorecard.

Actually that's true. Mood plays a big role and most of the time and it varies per user while having in the session.

Depends on the slot if that gives us winnings, that's the time we will decide if to continue playing on that slot or go on to others.

That's the reason while sometimes I'm doing the Option A then if my mood swings, I will do the Option B. If what slots will give me a good winnings, I will stick for it until I realized that something is not good now.

I don't like that idea. It's a clear violation of our privacy. It's unethical for me to ask that question to their applicants and used that as basis if they will accept that person or not. What if that person properly passed the initial interview that leads them to be qualify at the final interview.

If that question is being asked, these employers are already judging the book by its cover.

Refer to their performance later on, if they are not doing their properly their work, then take an action.

That's the reason there's a probation period for around 3-5 months at most, before upgrading the employee into regular status.

To solve that problem by OP, then why not just consider doing trades on top exchanges and platforms like Binance? I know they are also prone to fake volumes and not a perfect tradinf platform but we can bet that's not the case there most of the times. If not preferred using Binance, then another top exchange like Kucoin. Not saying Probit exchange is not that good but since OP wants to avoid the gambling part in doing trades, which can't be avoided, then focus on reputable trading platforms like I mentioned in order not to encounter fake volumes trades.

Either way, it's not always the trading platform as the reason why you will lose on trade but rather your own strategy.

Not a Monero fan but since they already well-established on the field of being a privacy coin for a long time, I think they are on the top.

Might be more risky if you will choose other coins which is not that being considered by many. Who knows though if there is/are.

Is that just what are you trying to find out?
No related to investment or something?
Just looking for other privacy coins that can be considered as best?

Regardless of the Bitcoin's trend, either bullish or bearish, still, if its use as a legal tender, it will be used as how usual fiat currency was being used. I don't see how it will harm the economy where in return, it's still a currency. No changes at all. In the first place, bitcoin was meant to served as a currency.

Although expect some more regulations, maybe more strict ones once it becomes a legal tender in a certain country.

Like to see someone here from El Salvador and share experience on how's the feeling that bitcoin is being used everywhere on that country like fiat.

Technically, Metaverse will bring something new if it will be fully utilized. The technology will not be created in the first place, if it's just about non-sense and not useful as a whole. It should supposed to bring changed in whatever field or industry it will be applied and integrated.

In Crypto, Metaverse concept gets a hype in just a short period of time when it was first introduced. Good examples are AXS, SAND, MANA etc. Although since it's crypto, expect that Metaverse hype will be affected obviously by the price actions of Bitcoin.

From what I observed, NFTs related to collectibles is much risky to invest with. It needs hype and there's no big reason why should we collect those unless a big fan or just want to simply collect it. Even those NFT's related to popular personalities aren't that hype. I know there are NFT collectibles that got hyped before but it's only few.

It's really risky to invest in NFT nowadays as it requires lots of factors to consider before placing a money with a specific NFT.

My suggestion is not to stop being a NFT fan. Just continue to follow those you prefer and use your best skill in terms of DYOR before putting money. You should also looked for other worthy investments outside NFT instead.