Good advice. I can say that (although this is paradoxical) one of the best luck for a beginner is a loss. Losing and unpleasant emotions associated with this give an understanding that there is no easy money here. If a novice player wins, then he might think that this is normal. And then when at a distance he will suffer losses he will not stop but will continue to play expecting his luck.
It also have have different approach if the newbie when the game since the outcome will different for that matters, I've seen so many newbies got addicted when they win their first bet so this discussion really depends on what type of person the gambler is. If they have self control then theirs no problem even if they are skill based or chance based games. I also saw such cases. I agree that much depends on the person, but I think that it is best to avoid risk, because no one can be completely sure in own abilities or lack of addiction. Sometimes psychologically strong people in some aspects are amazingly weak in other aspects.
|
|
|
Забрал 5-ю. P.S. Чет желающих все меньше. Халвинг переводчиков что ли произошел? ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
Still there is no clear sign whether the price will move upwards or in the downwards, it just keep dancing for now from $9300-$9800.
Hope it will clear the barrier of $10K resistance level soon.
![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Do you think that a situation is possible when there is a "clear" signal where the price will go? This is a market, and here there are a lot of completely different factors that cannot be predicted/calculated. And as you can see, the price was already above 10k and after that it just as easily dropped below this level of "support".
|
|
|
вчера видел новость, что группа инвесторов хотят нанять серьезных адвокатов, для подания иска против Дурова. они хотят не 72% как он обещал, а все и еще + за моральный ущерб.
Правильно делают. Лучше получить часть своего под защитой государства и в порядке установленным законом чем получать лапшу на уши обещания от rеволюционера-неудачника. Будет забавно если Дурову придется продавать свою долю в Телеге чтобы расплатиться по долгам ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Меня это интересует чисто в плане посмотреть во сколько будет реально оценена Телега которая никогда не имела какой-либо монетизации и всегда была убыточной.
|
|
|
This question (and its results) would be very interesting if it is divided into two questions: 1.) What inspired you to buy BTC when you found out about it? 2.) What inspires you to buy the BTC now? I can assume that the answers to the first question would be more diverse since almost everyone will answer the second question: I want to earn money from this and become richer ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Indeed becoming rich would be the primary reason, and that's what everyone is aiming for. Another answer for your first question would be the convenient use of Bitcoin upon transacting with people from around the world. While the 2nd question remains the same with the primary reason , only thing is they become more inspired because of the block halving hype lol ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) I think the answer to the first question is more than just another opportunity to conveniently pay people on the Internet. I think the most important thing is the idea of decentralization and the creation of a monetary system that would directly belong to people. A kind of invention of financial democracy. Unfortunately, we can say that these ideas are almost all in the past ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif)
|
|
|
Pick the luck based casino games when you are begin with, it maybe harder to make money from these games but this will make you aware that it is not easier to win money from gambling so they will always try to save themselves from getting addicted to it.
Good advice. I can say that (although this is paradoxical) one of the best luck for a beginner is a loss. Losing and unpleasant emotions associated with this give an understanding that there is no easy money here. If a novice player wins, then he might think that this is normal. And then when at a distance he will suffer losses he will not stop but will continue to play expecting his luck.
|
|
|
This question (and its results) would be very interesting if it is divided into two questions: 1.) What inspired you to buy BTC when you found out about it? 2.) What inspires you to buy the BTC now? I can assume that the answers to the first question would be more diverse since almost everyone will answer the second question: I want to earn money from this and become richer ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
My opinion will not be original - I believe that now everything depends on how the issue with the virus is resolved. The global economy depends on this, and crypto depends on the global economy. If a collapse occurs in traditional areas (a lot of signs indicate that it will be so), this will directly affect the cryptosphere and I think that here will be more deep fall.
|
|
|
Single-deck games give an advantage only if they are not mixed in time. For blackjack, 30% of the deck used is a signal to shuffle. Obviously, if you use one deck, shuffling will be too frequent. Maybe that's why casinos switched to multi-deck.
Insteresting, how do you know that? Did you experiment it and made your calculations yourself? Or you have read it somewhere else? If it's the later do you still have the source perchance? This is well-known information, I studied it both from the point of view of mathematics and from sources like Wikipedia. In any open source, you can read the history of the "casino - player" confrontation in blackjack and understand why and how the rules changed (including the rules for the number of decks and their shuffling).
|
|
|
halving expectation is there, and btc price may keep in a rational range for a time before it explodes. so maybe it is good time to buy alts to get more btc now?
As practice shows in the long run, all altos lose to bitcoin. Earnings are possible only in the short and medium term. In the short term, I see no reason for the growth of altcoins - there is no base for this. If we talk about the medium term, then there is one clear favorite - ETH, but its future price very much depends on the success of the transition to ETH2. Therefore, it makes sense to carefully study the news on this topic.
|
|
|
The idea that Privacy lovers can start using Dex exchanges more than any is highly possible but not all privacy coins will be delisted from Centralized exchanges, and again pray that this never happens, privacy coins are lagging presently and if eventually every single one of them get delisted from Centralized exchanges there will be problem, why? Dex has no good volume, bad experience overall, low Liquidity and Dex doesn't solve hacks
I see nothing wrong with delisting private coins from centralized exchanges. Any centralized exchange contradicts the ideology of private coins. I think it will be good if they are used for what they were created for - which means they will go past centralized exchanges and will be used directly by people.
|
|
|
Even if you somewhere find a place where they play one deck, then mixing is done when about 30% of the deck is used, so there is no way to make calculations and get an advantage due to this.
i disagree. face up cards = dead cards which cannot be dealt from the deck again. if single-deck gives card counters no edge, why did casinos switch to multi-deck? why do single-deck games pay with worse odds? ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Single-deck games give an advantage only if they are not mixed in time. For blackjack, 30% of the deck used is a signal to shuffle. Obviously, if you use one deck, shuffling will be too frequent. Maybe that's why casinos switched to multi-deck.
|
|
|
I don't think Blackjack is a skill-based game. for card counters it definitely is, especially when it comes to single-deck blackjack. with a house edge around just 0.15%, it's beatable if you know the game well and can ride out variance. i would never gamble on chance-based games. i love poker, and i'm all about playing in games where i have an edge. Does a single-deck blackjack exist somewhere? As far as I know, 4 to 8 decks are usually used. Even if you somewhere find a place where they play one deck, then mixing is done when about 30% of the deck is used, so there is no way to make calculations and get an advantage due to this.
|
|
|
~ halving effect only brings hype IMO.
At the moment, yes, and I note that the hype is completely concentrated in the crypto community - bitcoin is still far from ATH and few people think of it from the “outside” world without interesting news about price records. As for gambling and investments in casinos, it seems to me that everyone in this community already knows about the advantages and possibilities of cryptocurrencies in the field of gambling. But maybe if a new hype begins (if there is reason for this) around bitcoin, then new people will learn about this area.
|
|
|
I think the situation will be the same in a year. And in general, I think this is the wrong position "to wait for the arrival of a Big Money." Many different infrastructure projects have already been created and if we need them, then we must use them. But instead, many "crypto enthusiasts" are only waiting for the price increase for their crypto assets to get rid of them at a good price ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) Im not already hoping for such thing even though most of us do prefer decentralization but lets give this one to centralized platforms on where there are really things which are only good for a specific area even if we do need to sent out documents but we know on what are the benefits that we do get.We cant make fiat transactions on dex just earlier mentioned thats why i dont see a reason why would big money will flow into this area if centralized exchangers are doing the things which had been commonly preferred? You are right - there is practically no fiat on decentralized exchanges, so there is no “big money” to try to get there. Fiat is complete control by the regulators and transparency in front of them - this is clearly contrary to the ideology of crypto, so I do not think that in the future it will be possible to combine these two things: decentralization and fiat. More than $200 million dollars is traded weekly on DEX's and these numbers are getting higher and higher. Just saying....
How real are these volumes? Probably 99%, like on any other exchanges, is a fake. Plus, I think that this data is expressed in dollars, but it was not the dollar in the trading pairs - only cryptocurrencies.
|
|
|
The only connection that I see between gambling and halving is trading. Many traders try to guess the effect of halving and place their bets on the estimated price movement. If these bets are placed on movement in the short term, then I consider this a simple guess = gambling.
|
|
|
I think that ETH will be able to grow to $250 in the near future, which is not the highest price for it, so I think that ETH will grow to $250 in the near future and continue to grow to $500.
+ 25% to the current ETH price is quite realistic, especially if a big movement on bitcoin begins. But reaching $ 500 seems completely unrealistic to me, especially in the short term. ETH is a coin with huge capitalization and there must be some very good reason for such growth. At the moment I do not see such reasons. If you say that such a reason may be the transition to ETH 2, then I think that this event is already contained in the current price.
|
|
|
we are already in Q2 2020, and no Big Money has yet arrived, and no DEX project has gone up to All Time High, maybe not this year, still seeing ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) I think the situation will be the same in a year. And in general, I think this is the wrong position "to wait for the arrival of a Big Money." Many different infrastructure projects have already been created and if we need them, then we must use them. But instead, many "crypto enthusiasts" are only waiting for the price increase for their crypto assets to get rid of them at a good price ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif)
|
|
|
https://telegra.ph/What-Was-TON-And-Why-It-Is-Over-05-12Ну вот и ожидаемый пост самого ПАХАНА ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) 90 процентов текста в стиле - какое гос-во плохое, тра-та-та... либертарианстово-анархизм, гос-во угнетает. Во только почему он не выбрал другую страну для запуска своего проекта,а сидит в США, которое везде критикует - он не написал Публично открестился от всех проектов, которые будут использовать имя проекта ТОН, что тоже было очевидно. Вся "карьера" Дурова (если отбросить другую грязную часть - сотрудничество со спецслужбами) это постоянно воровать и обвинять тех у кого он ворует ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) А тут он еще собрался воровать непосредственно на территории собственника и после того как получил по щам заскулил. Топовая история ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
I think you missed some more resistance levels ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) From your words it turns out that growth to 19k is "open", but this is not at all true. Even reaching a level of 12k will be a significant event and many traders (and investors) will take part of the profits at this level. For people doesnt really care much about technicals then its normal for them to miss out those resistances and instead would head directly into that previous ATH where they do focused on to break but talking with the reality then there would be still lots of ceilings to break before we would head back in that level. People’s forecasts reflect their desire rather than reality, otherwise it is difficult to explain such optimism. Most long-term investors expect prices above ATH because they consider intermediate fluctuations only temporary, but they forget that everything is changing and current levels may well be a local maximum that will be unattainable for many years.
|
|
|
|