lets hope it will lead to further innovation!
Bottom line, this +10000000000000. Good thing it's open source. That's one thing really good about it. |
|
|
|
|
Ok. One suggestion... Your website kinda needs a little work. But all in all, good job.
|
|
|
|
What is the Best Marijuana Coin?
The one who grows their own weed. |
|
|
|
Haven't heard of that shitcoin for a long time.
Hello Vitalik. I see what you did there... |
|
|
|
Coindesk has always been one of the biggest shills for Ripple and always printed misleading headlines / titles.
As the article later explains Ripple was 1 of the 24 but that probably means Ripple will probably be eliminated and won't receive a thing. Much like they've been eliminated / removed as a partner by Fidor, Wells Fargo, Western Union and other companies they've tried to "partner with". I know everyone here is in lala land but even centralized blockchain can't compete with better centralized models.
I don't know about "can't compete"... In the real world, banks and its billions usually win. But decentralized models are way better.. and cooler. And if I were to speculate, the world's biggest banks will get together and create their own distributed/decentralized ledger/blockchain that they themselves control... Taking the small - medium banks in. In other words there's no room in the banking world for parasitical middle men like Ripple Labs, especially when Ripple has already been proven to be forkable / cloneable (see Stellar) and developers you can contract for high 5 or low 6 figure salaries are a dime a dozen. Heck even Ripple Lab employees are poachable if you offer them a slight salary increase. That's cos they (banks) are the ultimate middlemen. I could see Ripple Labs being acquired by a big financial company for billions in the future. Then they could use and create their own versions of Ripple's tech. Closed source, of course... |
|
|
|
Coindesk has always been one of the biggest shills for Ripple and always printed misleading headlines / titles.
As the article later explains Ripple was 1 of the 24 but that probably means Ripple will probably be eliminated and won't receive a thing. Much like they've been eliminated / removed as a partner by Fidor, Wells Fargo, Western Union and other companies they've tried to "partner with". I know everyone here is in lala land but even centralized blockchain can't compete with better centralized models.
I don't know about "can't compete"... In the real world, banks and its billions usually win. But decentralized models are way better.. and cooler. And if I were to speculate, the world's biggest banks will get together and create their own distributed/decentralized ledger/blockchain that they themselves control... Taking the small - medium banks in. |
|
|
|
lol ripple? .. its not even a blockchain.. RBS are wasting 3.5billion on yet another centralised system......... im lost for words
Banks don't care much about decentralization, really... |
|
|
|
|
Cool! Just wondering... Is D9 and co. interested in expanding to industrial hemp in the near future? It could be the next big thing imo...
|
|
|
|
|
Drak, syncing is too slow. This is a problem. Please fix.
I know someone mentioned to use Clearwallet. But that doesn't mean it shouldn't be looked into and get it fixed.
|
|
|
|
|
How's the indoor grow room/s? Is the team still growing Canndy?
|
|
|
|
Ryan pumper , Bob surplus, and all they have a good P& D Group But im not want to join him, i think we can learn with read grafick and learn from more source also we can watching how P & D group action, emm when accumulation and when time to sell we can see it but some people still join to P & D group give some BTC to him and pump will be do with him use your money (sorry my english not bad ?  ) Don't worry about it. We don't speak chinese that well too... Ching chong chang ching. |
|
|
|
Drak, just wondering... Would it be possible to make Clearwallet capable of generating BTC addresses and store BTC? It could be a cool and useful feature to have, or at least make it an optional feature.
+1 Or better yet, make it a plugin. |
|
|
|
|
Drak, just wondering... Would it be possible to make Clearwallet capable of generating BTC addresses and store BTC? It could be a cool and useful feature to have, or at least make it an optional feature.
|
|
|
|
|
Btw, Drak. XCH blockchain explorer doesn't work if accessed from Clearwallet. Please look into it. Also syncing the VIA wallet using the 32bit one seems faster than the 64bit one in windows. Weird..
|
|
|
|
|
^ Because no one's interested.
|
|
|
|
Almost all, if not all of the assets listed in Clearinghouse is useless. Sorry if I'm mistaken. But most of them have no use and company backing. I think another goal for Drak and everyone involved is to attract real start ups to use Clearinghouse. One good example is Reveal. Check out this article.. http://www.coindesk.com/reveal-1-5-million-crypto-snapchat/
Reveal Raises $1.5 Million for Crypto-Powered Social Network
Cryptocurrency-powered social network Reveal has closed $1.5m in seed funding from investors including Mike Hirshland of Resolute Ventures, Boost VC, Digital Currency Group and the Stanford StartX Fund.
Founded by Matt Ivester, former CEO of social network Kindr as well as college gossip news site JuicyCampus, and Kindr CTO Josh Beal, Reveal is perhaps best described as a visually oriented, Q&A social mobile app.
Like Instagram, SnapChat, Vine and other new social media incumbents, Reveal targets users in high school and college. Unlike these market leaders, Reveal's posts offer a unique combination of doodles, photos, video and cryptocurrency.
It's biggest asset according to its founders is reveal coin. A cryptographic token traded on the Stellar network, Ivester and Beal believe reveal coin will serve as a user engagement tool that will resonate with their target audience.
I have nothing against Stellar, but afaik, it's having problems of their own with a lawsuit against Jed Maccaleb and their network was unstable and had to switch off nodes except for one. Clearinghouse should take advantage. |
|
|
|
This thread is misrepresenting the Truth
Be Careful  This is what John Matonis said, "Block size hard fork debate is instructive because it's precursor to inevitable fork revising block reward that increases 21m cap." I don't see the point in pretending he didn't say something he said.  He was being sarcastic...? Is Jon Matonis against the hard fork? If he is, he's trying to say Gavin's move is a precursor to a shit storm coming in BTC land. If XT succeeds, increasing the 21m cap would not seem farfetched. At least in his eyes. |
|
|
|
|
Post addresses of your coins here and let's figure out where they went.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
