Hello There,
What are the steps one need to take in high level, if he / she has a unique concept and want to build a block chain ? What are the points we need to focus and plan for ?
Thanks,
CD.
Knowing how to code would be very helpfull. And I assume you don't know how to, so having a good team of developers, co-founders, and some seed investors who believe in your project is a nice place to start. It takes years to build a decent project with a decent team behind, while building a basic blockchain nowadays takes 15min. Don't start a project because of the hipe of ICO's, you wont make it. Good luck!! |
|
|
|
|
Is dit al in orde gekome?
|
|
|
|
|
He invertido en tres ICO's, i despues de eso no me ah interesado mas perder my dinero en eso... LOL
|
|
|
|
|
Quand c'est comme ça, tout change...
Je pense que ça peut donner quelque chose, si vous êtes sérieux, et que vous arrivez à monter une bonne équipe, pourquoi pas?
Je rejoindre votre .me un peut plus tard quand je serais devant mon pc pour me tenir informé et suivre le développement.
Bonne chance.
|
|
|
|
|
Salut! C'est vous qui pensé à développer cette idée?
Personnellement, je pense que c'est une bonne idée, mais mon seul souci est avec les "paquets". Comment s'assurer que le contenu de ce qu'on transporte est légal?
Parce que si jamais ça marche et que des gens à l'esprit malsain commence à envoyer des affaires illégal... Ça va pas le faire.
|
|
|
|
|
Where are the devs of this project? Did they already disappear??
|
|
|
|
Welcome to the the crypto space!! You are not late  Chose a few projects after you've done your research and forget about them, buy the dips, and enjoy your freedom... |
|
|
|
Hello, I have a question. How can I get rewards?
IMO it's not always about "running a Block-chain", it's also about people wo need funds to launch their project... |
|
|
|
|
Website hasn't been updated for over 3 years, the website is not secured, the maker of it is a joke, there are billions of it circulating, there is no developement team behind, the last commit on GitHub was 2 months ago and before that, twoo years, even.
The only hope the coin had was Exodus, and they removed it from their wallet...
|
|
|
|
It's a really a shame people are snapping up all the decent .com related crypto domains. Hope to see this kind of practice made illegal by ICANN.
What a strange comment - should Supermarkets be allowed to buy food to sell on at a profit? How about all those people buying Bitcoin, and saving them. What really annoys me about domain names is when a great name is registered, and somebody puts a Mickey Mouse site on it. and they won't sell it for proper development. It takes a lot of time and skill to find decent domain names. Would you spend 3 hours looking through lists, and not buying anything? If you want to sell stuff like a supermarket, you open yourself a supermarket and pay taxes like anyone else who owns a supermarket. If you want to sell domain-names, you do like other companies who are selling domain-names, you open a legit company and start asking the same as those companies... But taking domains in hostage in the hope of finding someone who is interested in them, and then go ask them for 500 instead of 15 is not very legit as a business. |
|
|
|
It's a really a shame people are snapping up all the decent .com related crypto domains. Hope to see this kind of practice made illegal by ICANN.
I can agree with that. Was going to buy a domain for a startup I'm working on, but someone got it before me and is selling him for 2500$ which I can really not afford for a domain-name. They are just buying names they don't need because those are names someone could probably buy one day in the future, making it almost impossible for little start-ups to start their company just in the hope to sell them one day for 100x of the original price. I have nothing with people doing business but, 2,500 or even 500 instead 25 it's just another way to scam people and I'm not playing that game, if it depended on me, they can keep their domains as long as they want, not buying anything from such individuals... |
|
|
|
|
The thing they don't know is, the punishment they are inflicting towards their soul... There is not enough money in the world to hide themselves from that, one day of another they will have to pay for all the wrong they have been doing towards others. Those people can never be 'rich', not even with all the money in the world. That's why some people have more than enough with a few thousands in one life time, while others never have enough.
They will always hate being alone with themselves, and how older they become, the worst it gets and the least chances they'l have of ever coming back, their mind will always remind them the wrong they have done towards the community around them. If they knew what they are doing towards their souls they would never play that game in the fist place.
It's easy to hide behind a screen from us, but towards your soul and towards the truth, there is no hiding when it comes to that, and the punishment for those actions you take it to your grave and beyond...
Every moment of our lives, we perform actions -physically, mentally, emotionally, and energy-wise.- Each action creates a certain memory. That's called karma. And karma can be quite a bitch, but only if you are. It is towards those people that life never laugh, they bare sick children, lose a loved one in some other accident, they are alcoholics and/or drug addicts, and most of the time, they die from a tragedy, or old, sick, and unhappy.
|
|
|
|
Thansk for the list, hopefully it'll help some newbies make the right choice when they first come in contact with these ponzi scam sites. I know that for me, when i started with cryptos, i wasted a hella lot of money on ponzi schemes that did not pay off at all.
The only problem that i can think of is that even though you have this huge database of sites, you're not going to be able to update it in time. The profitability of running such scams is so alluring that new ones pop up every single hour.
My criteria for a ponzi is very simple: does it promise more than 30% per year guaranteed? does it have an affiliate program? If the answer to both is yes, 99.9999% of the time it's a ponzi/pyramid.
I guess you are right about this, It's not only about the difficulty I'll have in updating the thread every day, I come here every day and it doesn't really bother me if it could help someone. But how I see it now is that not a lot of users are showing interest in the thread himself. And also with the last rules on the forum to upgrade your profile, it doesn't make any sense for me to be doing this on a daily basis and after a year still be a basic member. I was doing this to bring some light into some projects and also to deserve my place in higher ranks while taking some scammers down. I guess everyone likes to learn their lessons the hard way, I really thought people would be interested in someway in knowing this... Anyway, thanks for your input, it was nice to have a few of you comment on this. Keep it up!! |
|
|
|
Selling BTC. 1btc = 5500eu, the more you buy the cheaper i sell. Have 84 btc. Accepting National Bank Transfer. For more info contact me by email, mindaugas.svegzda@gmail.com or write with your offers. Dang dude!! Not even two weeks on the forum and you already got negative trust. And then you come up with this   !! I wonder how stupid you really think people are? Even @ scamming you are bad. Get a life man... |
|
|
|
Too many scam reports now on etherdelta for this issue of giving and sharing the private keys to them, can you or someone tell me why do users should give their private keys to their platform? What exactly the purpose? Just want to ask since I never use this exchange ever, even there's still no issue from anyone who use this platform.
I'm using it for a while now, and the only problem I had with them a while ago is that the miners don't mine your tx and let it pending for I don't know how long, even for over two days I experienced once, making inexperienced users to try to make the tx again and then they get to keep the mining fees. It is actually very secure you know. Your private keys are needed in order to make and to log into your account. The best way I can explain this is that they are needed to make some kind of extension of your wallet, it's a decentralized exchange and the only way to enter it is with a pair of your keys and address. You create some kind of 'channel' between your account and their exchange. Once that channel is created you still need to deposit the tokens from your main wallet to that account you just created, the deposit can only be asked from the inside of EtherDelta and must be sent/confirmed from your wallet. They don't have access to your funds unless you send them from your wallet to that copy of your account you just made with your address and your keys, and the only way to get scammed is if you are on a phishing website and you send your tokens to them, then, those one are lost. That's probably what OP did, he did send his tokens/ether to one of those fishing sites... Get over it OP, shits happens!! Learn from it... |
|
|
|
Is this a shitposting newbies free for all ?
Litebit.eu seems legit. I have never used them but the fact that only one guy, whose account was frozen after a government request for further investigation, is complaining...
Among the other newbies with less than 10 posts. Makes me feel like it's the same person.
If this was a scam, we'd be hearing from more people.
There is always a beginning dude... If you think it's all false what people are telling over them and that it's the same person making new accounts to just make some false accusations, I invite you to send them your money and to prove us wrong. I don't get your kind, you come over here to say 'it seems legit' and start to complain about people asking for their money, who is the one losing his time? The one who could just scroll over a post he doesn't like, or those who send them their money and have been waiting for I don't know how long? But here you are, telling us how newbies we are and so on... Go ahead, send them your money and we will speak after that... Easy to speak when you haven't experienced the situation we experienced with them... Have fun!! |
|
|
|
Is this system creating an incentive for users to give merits to other users? Even if it does, I don Because I think this is the problem that encompasses all other problems.
In an ideal world established members "should" give merits to newbies who are making high quality posts, but is there any incentive other than goodwill? Are they penalized if they don't give merits? No, because this would be ridiculous and impossible to implement. Do they have a direct impact on their experience in the forum as a user (similar to how reddit actively rearranges posts based on upvotes)? A no to that as well.
In my opinion, if we can't address that, we will never get the merit system running as it was intended.
I think that how this is designed will only have as result more stupid comments all over the place: "I didn't get the merits I need, let's give it another try" with some other crappy post or duplicated ones from somewhere else. No one should get rewarded for making a decent post, the point of posting something in a forum is that it should be valuable to everyone, otherwise, don't make a post. And also, in no time bad souls are going to start taking a profit out of this, asking people for money to give them merits, and beggars will also start begging for merits. Start banning the makers those crappy posts, and you will have a decrease of 75% of low-quality posts in no time... |
|
|
|
And they won't rank you up if that was your point, so registering multiple accounts for the sole purpose of promoting a certain higher-rank member would be meaningless. I admit this is still a very raw idea but somehow I feel there is some sense in it. We should just find a way how we could create a positive feedback loop from newbies and junior members. That is to make the merit system complete by furnishing it with a two-directional feedback device (of which we have only one half)
Well, newbies can also earn sMerits by being given Merits, so that loop is already possible. Still, this might be a good idea because there's currently little incentive for the older members to help out newbies knowing that they likely won't have any sMerits to give out (unless other older members see the random act of kindness I guess). The problem would lie in making sure the system doesn't encourage any more account farming, which is exactly what the Merit system hoped to combat, while making sure it gives enough incentives for older members to actually bother. I personally think the Merit system is enough, except something has to be done with the scarcity (or general reluctance of awarding) of sMerits. Honestly, these are my thoughts exactly And I have to tell you that I don't feel like giving out rewards, so this is an apparent flaw, deficiency, or imperfection in this system. And making s-merits burn after some time is not going to change anything, at least as far as I'm concerned. I'd rather let them burn than give them to posters which I don't find worthy enough. And this is the gist of the matter. Old-timers here have become very pesky and meticulous about the quality and constructiveness (or lack thereof, huh) of the posts of other users, especially novice members. And this is where the benefit system could kick in and make the old-timers less reluctant. To sum it up, in addition to merits we also need a system that would incentivize higher ranks to share their s-merits with newbies That's what I'm also thinking. Old members are not going to be giving newbies their merits. Newbies will be posting every day and never grow up in range no matter the quality of their posts. Making it more difficult than now to find a decent post on the forum. Why not just ban the maker of low-quality posts? Let's say a certain amount of users report a post that is not relevant to this forum, or low in quality, the maker of it gets banned for a certain period of time, let's say a week. If he restarts and that he gets banned again he will be banned for a longer period of time and so on, once he is banned for a certain amount of times the account would be permanently banned. And to get rid of users with higher ranks that also make low-quality posts, -which are the one to blame for mods taking this measures-, they could lose their ranks once they get banned a certain amount of times until they are back to 'newbie' and after that, they would also lose access to their account. Because the only ones who are getting punished with this measures are those with lower ranks, we will never receive the needed merits to grow up in rank no matter the quality of our posts because no one is going to give their merit to us, but those with higher ranks can still keep posting crapy posts and nothing happens to them. *What I mean by that is, like we all know, no one likes to be giving something away (even if it has no value, people like higher numbers and don't like newbies), but they have no problems with reporting something they don't like. So, instead of 'giving' merits for the quality of the post, taking something away that one already own for low-quality posts will have a way bigger impact on the quality of the posts. And so everybody, and not just those with lower ranks, are going to think twice before posting any crap... |
|
|
|
And they won't rank you up if that was your point, so registering multiple accounts for the sole purpose of promoting a certain higher-rank member would be meaningless. I admit this is still a very raw idea but somehow I feel there is some sense in it. We should just find a way how we could create a positive feedback loop from newbies and junior members. That is to make the merit system complete by furnishing it with a two-directional feedback device (of which we have only one half)
Well, newbies can also earn sMerits by being given Merits, so that loop is already possible. Still, this might be a good idea because there's currently little incentive for the older members to help out newbies knowing that they likely won't have any sMerits to give out (unless other older members see the random act of kindness I guess). The problem would lie in making sure the system doesn't encourage any more account farming, which is exactly what the Merit system hoped to combat, while making sure it gives enough incentives for older members to actually bother. I personally think the Merit system is enough, except something has to be done with the scarcity (or general reluctance of awarding) of sMerits. Honestly, these are my thoughts exactly And I have to tell you that I don't feel like giving out rewards, so this is an apparent flaw, deficiency, or imperfection in this system. And making s-merits burn after some time is not going to change anything, at least as far as I'm concerned. I'd rather let them burn than give them to posters which I don't find worthy enough. And this is the gist of the matter. Old-timers here have become very pesky and meticulous about the quality and constructiveness (or lack thereof, huh) of the posts of other users, especially novice members. And this is where the benefit system could kick in and make the old-timers less reluctant. To sum it up, in addition to merits we also need a system that would incentivize higher ranks to share their s-merits with newbies That's what I'm also thinking. Old members are not going to be giving newbies their merits. Newbies will be posting every day and never grow up in range no matter the quality of their posts. Making it more difficult than now to find a decent post on the forum. Why not just ban the maker of low-quality posts? Let's say a certain amount of users report a post that is not relevant to this forum, or low in quality, the maker of it gets banned for a certain period of time, let's say a week. If he restarts and that he gets banned again he will be banned for a longer period of time and so on, once he is banned for a certain amount of times the account would be permanently banned. And to get rid of users with higher ranks that also make low-quality posts, -which are the one to blame for mods taking this measures-, they could lose their ranks once they get banned a certain amount of times until they are back to 'newbie' and after that, they would also lose access to their account. Because the only ones who are getting punished with this measures are those with lower ranks, we will never receive the needed merits to grow up in rank no matter the quality of our posts because no one is going to give it to us, but those with higher ranks can still keep posting crapy posts and nothing happens to them. |
|
|
|
|
I think it's obvious, you leaf your site open for deposit but let no one withdraw... And then they come with 'maintenance' How the heck are you accepting coins to be deposited on your site if it is under maintenance but at the same time people can't withdraw? It's a one-way operation.
If you think it's not a scam, go ahead and deposit your coins. No offense, but if you want to grow up in rang I kindly suggest that you first do your homework before posting such kind of crap.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
