|
It is very important to skip fillers, I did it with Naruto and the story felt better, it made more sense because I ignored the garbage fillers.
I am doing the same with One Piece, currently on episode 277-278.
|
|
|
|
No that's not the flat earth explanation for gravity, that's the controlled oppositions attempt at discrediting flat earth with a straw-man. Gravity is a fallacy invented to explain the orbits of the fake ball planets they claim are solid objects flying around in their fake vacuum space. None of the forces they attribute to gravity here on earth require gravity as an explanation for their cause.
OK, I'll bite. Explain the flat earth explanation for gravity. Why does the apple fall from the tree? I'll answer your question but first you have to explain why a helium balloon rises up into the sky when you let go of the string? Then you have to explain why the apple has to play by a different set of rules? tl;dr I have no idea is what you are basically saying. This flat earth thing is so bullshit it's easy to see the holes in their crack pot "theory", this is even more crazy than the whole Bitcoin was made by the NSA thing. If the earth was flat, how do you not find an edge, or even fall from said edge. "Drugs" is one hella of a drug. |
|
|
|
|
Anyone that is able to post in the chat, can you post a link to user luckbox, I want to see his stats right now, but I don't have enough satoshi in there. Or better yet, please post his stats here.
|
|
|
|
You need to contact Bitfinex support, only they can help you....
Exactly, it's not necessaryly a scam. Contact support and let us know what they say! Yes, but you have to remember how similar things happened to all past services. Withdrawals started to take too long or get stopped and the result is, stolen coins. |
|
|
|
|
Retardation emanates from this thread.
If I get rich some day, all of you should expect to be on the first private space cruise and see the so called "flat earth" with your own very eyes.
|
|
|
|
|
I would like to inquire if anyone knows the formula of the probability that X number of losses in a row can occur at some win chance per X bets.
|
|
|
|
Can anyone tell me why betting on a 2x multiplier does not give me back double the betted amount but only the amount I betted? Like betting 1 satoshi on a 2x multiplier should give me back 2 satoshis if I win, I only get 1. If I set it on a 3x multiplier, instead of 3x the betted amount, it's 2x.
If you bet 1 satoshi you will get your 1 satoshi and 1 satoshi profitIt doesn't work like that on say Just Dice. There, I bet 1 satoshi, I get 3 on 3x multiplier if I win. You get 3 here too but only 2 of it is profit, just like everywhere else. You can check it by looking your balance. Ah wait, it seems I was simply wrong. The winnings are identical. |
|
|
|
Can anyone tell me why betting on a 2x multiplier does not give me back double the betted amount but only the amount I betted? Like betting 1 satoshi on a 2x multiplier should give me back 2 satoshis if I win, I only get 1. If I set it on a 3x multiplier, instead of 3x the betted amount, it's 2x.
If you bet 1 satoshi you will get your 1 satoshi and 1 satoshi profitIt doesn't work like that on say Just Dice. There, I bet 1 satoshi(it's clams now though), I get 3 on 3x multiplier if I win. |
|
|
|
|
Can anyone tell me why betting on a 2x multiplier does not give me back double the betted amount but only the amount I betted? Like betting 1 satoshi on a 2x multiplier should give me back 2 satoshis if I win, I only get 1. If I set it on a 3x multiplier, instead of 3x the betted amount, it's 2x.
|
|
|
|
|
I haven't been following much of Bitcoin for a while now. Is what I read true that the Bitcoin network has lots of congestion and that transactions take too long?
|
|
|
|
|
As always, be careful whose binaries you run.
|
|
|
|
How do you propose generating a random number? Unless your computer is hooked up to a hardware random number generator it could be producing pseudorandom numbers which are unsuitable for sensitive applications like cryptography.
And how do you think generating private keys happens on a computer? |
|
|
|
shorena and knightdk have provided reasonably good answers.
Under normal circumstances with a properly operating wallet, a signature of one or more transactions will not provide enough information for an attacker to create valid signatures for other transactions that use inputs that were sent to the same address.
However, when generating a signature, it the signing software needs to generate a unique and unknown (to anyone else) number that will be used for that signature. It is VERY important that that number not be re-used for any other signatures for the same address.
If the software that's generating your transactions re-uses the same number in more than one signature, then an attacker would be able to use the two signatures that were both generated with the same value to calculate your private key.
Generally it would be safest to just use a new address for every transaction that you receive. Then you won't have to worry about this. If you choose not to use a new address for every transaction that you receive, then make sure you are using well reviewed and well written open source software on an operating system that you can trust.
Wasnt there an issue before with re-used K values? |
|
|
|
Since I have not mined nor been too involved with Bitcoin for some time, what is the current difficulty right now?
72 bill https://bitcoinwisdom.com/bitcoin/difficultyBitcoin Difficulty: 72,722,780,643Estimated Next Difficulty: 80,756,924,981 (+11.05%) Adjust time: After 1326 Blocks, About 8.7 days Hashrate(?): 552,660,432 GH/s Block Generation Time(?): 1 block: 9.5 minutes 3 blocks: 28.4 minutes 6 blocks: 56.9 minutes Updated: 9:15 (5.3 minutes ago) Has it fallen below a previous higher difficulty in the past 10-12 months? |
|
|
|
|
@DannyHamilton
I am astonished by the number of times you have replied to these kinds of threads. Anyone else would've lost their mind.
|
|
|
|
|
Since I have not mined nor been too involved with Bitcoin for some time, what is the current difficulty right now?
|
|
|
|
I also just realized something really crazy... If you read the paragraphs starting from the bottom and work your way up, it makes even more sense... Woahhh
Expected John Cena reference. |
|
|
|
|
Person A offers some digital goods to Person B, they both don't know each other. Person B however requires that Person A show him the goods beforehand as proof that they are legit, which reveal them in such a way(and no, it's not possible any other way), that Person A can be scammed and not got paid.
How should a deal be made, where neither entities can scam each other, but also Person B to pay for sure.
|
|
|
|
|
The thing is, you should have bought Bitcoins directly. I mean think of it this way. You bought miners to get the same amount of BTC you'd get if you had just simply spent the money on buying them.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
