Yes, we already know you'll be using the real banking hubs like a good little Ripple shill. You don't need to keep reminding us. It's reassuring to know that you still feel threatened enough by Lightning to keep up this little campaign of yours. It's been more than 10 days and I'm still waiting for an answer on how many times the word "fee" appears in the Ripple whitepaper, you worthless troll. No mate, I just don't like seeing people ripped off by worthless paid trolls like you who spend the day spamming to make out that Bitcoin is so fantastic and break out into a sweat when someone reminds people that Bitcoin won't scale or the rip-off $55 fees we were forced to pay. Ripple for all I know has the word "Fees" all over it's white paper but one they are cheaper than Bitcoin and two they are not pretending to be something they are not and three it scales. we already know you'll be using the real banking hubs Yeah, Ripple understands distributed (No single point of failure) but this was lost with the LN development team here but that's above your head I guess and anyway I like EVO better than Ripple, ETH more than BTC so lets get your facts right. Tell me DooMAD why do you keep punching with your face.
|
|
|
Storing data on a Blockchain like Bitcoin can be done in theory. However, Bitcoin's current activation limit allows 1MB of data to be stored every 10 minutes. Even if you remove that limit, the last node will stop maintaining a copy of Blockchain due to its size, resulting in a centralized and easy-to-break network. Of course, the problem of scalability did not prevent developers from trying to use Blockchain as a storage solution and a project called Archain might have found a solution.
For documents you would store the hash of the document in the block-chain and you should not jump to the conclusion that a trusted party (Government agency) is not writing the blocks but these blocks are then replicated by 3rd parties to ensure accountability of government held documents. That's a mirage made in heaven. it will be archived on blockweave with fees that the user has to pay for the miner finding that volume. All sounded good until we got to the part of fees ! Democracy at a price, privacy at a price, freedom of speech at a price, it has no price and the people to trust are the ones that will do it for free, block-chain or no block-chain. Donations I am happy with, must be 100% optional but apart from that we are not so far apart.
|
|
|
You must known well C++ programming and the ability to modify an existing code to integer new functions.
Did the last guy leave or was he pushed and what's the pay like ?
|
|
|
We must do everything we can to improve Bitcoin to be able to compete with other new and better cryptocurrencies
It's needs a total re-write to compete and the lightning network is a big step in the wrong direction but the likes of Mr P Noon who's project manager of LN won't even answer emails and the censorship we in the developer section of this site receive is a total joke. The democracy is not working, mafia gangsters and bankers have taken over Bitcoin and it was not "We" that changed the rules without asking and pissed on loyal supporters was it now. oh, and when I say "We" I am not talking about the slot machine players that came along about six months ago.
|
|
|
"Gold mine"? More like the golden scam, when someone earns money someone has to lose this money, and who do you think that lose this money? Usually people who are newcomers and it causes them to lose money, do you really want newcomers to think that the crypto industry is a scam and it's dangeorus to trade in? I believe not, and that's what this ICOs are exactly doing.
Don't blame everyone else, blame the miners here for the scam of pumping fees up to $55 and this has rubbed off on all the other alt-coins. That debt has yet to be paid, house cleaning is needed, bitcoin needs to be made an example off for any faith to return to cryptocoins dealing with it's own scammers
|
|
|
If this post is worth of your merit, Thank you I see you got your merits and now you are able to add a advert to your post footers so you are now able to earn a whopping $2.51 per day in page impression fees talking FUD but that's megabytes of data you need and I read that scammers were making as much as $55 just to store 250 bytes of data in diss thing they call a block-chain the other month. Price of lead must be rising around here, putting lead weight on post to weigh them down here must be pushing the price up you know.
|
|
|
Smart people sold out at $18k after seeing the writing on the wall after fees hit $55 ! The people that are left with pipe dreams don't want to know that posts here are being weighted down and vanished like this one I posted early. The little image Google is feeding me for the Bitcoin price chart looks like a flat line up to about mid 2017 and then it spikes up to $15,000 (NOT $20,000) and looks like it's going to flat line again which is not such a surprise given that the world now knows that it can cost as much as $55.00 to conduct a single transaction using Bitcoin. My plan was to jump out at about $50,000 because it was obvious that this was Tulip Mania version two but the miners got too greedy, too soon and now Joe Six pack is never going to come and fortunately I read the writing on the wall and panic sold at $18k Cheesy Since then I have found out that the Lightning Network is just a system of centralized off block banking hubs and are already charging 0.65% per transaction which is more than anyone else is charging and even worse than high street banks. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYHFrf5ci_gif you are playing with money you cannot afford to gamble then give in with the pipe dream about money for nothing from your gambling "Investment" and get out now whilst you still have a shirt on your back and don't listen to the many gambling addicts here and paid trolls that will still be talking about buying on the dip as bitcoin goes below $1000. So boys, who likes being spoon feed propaganda or didn't you notice.
|
|
|
Yes. It's a big problem. I think we all should admit that decentralization is not good at all. We need some rules. Cryptocurrencies and specially ICOs must be regulated. Sadly, some people are misusing cryptocurrencies to scam people.
None more so than Bitcoin if you care to take the red pill ! We don't need full blown centralization (YOU GOT THAT WITH LIGHTNING NETWORK) but a cluster of dare i say "Trusted Nodes" is something that you have to accept if you want something to scale on the internet but the founding fathers here want people to believe that it will send you blind if you beat the bishop, just sends you deaf it does
|
|
|
The pink elephant in the room killed Bitcoin.
$55 Miner transaction fees
Now the FUD blames China, Putin and bad weather but who on earth can trust a currency when it known to have cost $55 just to store 250 bytes of data on this thing they call the magical block-chain and if it was such a fantastic thing then how come it's been dumped in the lightning network ?
|
|
|
No good coming to the casino with empty pockets because you blew your last stack but if you hang around then I am sure that soon some of the bitcoin lightning bankers hubs will be able to offer some financial assistance, half price to wonga loans they will be once they get going.
Hate to tell you but you can borrow fiat cash you know and buy Bitcoin, it's selling them back to fiat were you get the trouble.
|
|
|
The Titanic is holding strong on the bottom of the sea floor and you have to remember that Tulips had up and down days until, well until they didn't anymore.
The jigs up my friend, Miners with $55 per transaction fees killed it, fertilizer (SHIT) needed to grow tulips become worth it's weight in gold towards the end you know.
|
|
|
BULLSHIT This forum is loaded and posts from the other side are being removed without trace and are being weighted down like this one. The little image Google is feeding me for the Bitcoin price chart looks like a flat line up to about mid 2017 and then it spikes up to $15,000 (NOT $20,000) and looks like it's going to flat line again which is not such a surprise given that the world now knows that it can cost as much as $55.00 to conduct a single transaction using Bitcoin. My plan was to jump out at about $50,000 because it was obvious that this was Tulip Mania version two but the miners got too greedy, too soon and now Joe Six pack is never going to come and fortunately I read the writing on the wall and panic sold at $18k Cheesy Since then I have found out that the Lightning Network is just a system of centralized off block banking hubs and are already charging 0.65% per transaction which is more than anyone else is charging and even worse than high street banks. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYHFrf5ci_gif you are playing with money you cannot afford to gamble then give in with the pipe dream about money for nothing from your gambling "Investment" and get out now whilst you still have a shirt on your back and don't listen to the many gambling addicts here and paid trolls that will still be talking about buying on the dip as bitcoin goes below $1000. OP wants spoon feeding by mother and protection by daddy but the numbers down't lie, was a baby when fees in December hit $55 and the poor boy didn't know how to read the writing on the wall.
|
|
|
" How far can Bitcoin go?" I don't think it could go much below zero but posts from the other side of the coin are being weighted down here with lead weights and here is one i found early. The little image Google is feeding me for the Bitcoin price chart looks like a flat line up to about mid 2017 and then it spikes up to $15,000 (NOT $20,000) and looks like it's going to flat line again which is not such a surprise given that the world now knows that it can cost as much as $55.00 to conduct a single transaction using Bitcoin. My plan was to jump out at about $50,000 because it was obvious that this was Tulip Mania version two but the miners got too greedy, too soon and now Joe Six pack is never going to come and fortunately I read the writing on the wall and panic sold at $18k Cheesy Since then I have found out that the Lightning Network is just a system of centralized off block banking hubs and are already charging 0.65% per transaction which is more than anyone else is charging and even worse than high street banks. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYHFrf5ci_gif you are playing with money you cannot afford to gamble then give in with the pipe dream about money for nothing from your gambling "Investment" and get out now whilst you still have a shirt on your back and don't listen to the many gambling addicts here and paid trolls that will still be talking about buying on the dip as bitcoin goes below $1000. By the time BitcoinTalk is manipulating the comments you know your in trouble and are being selectively spoon feed propaganda but it's your pocket they will hurt, not mine, I panic sold at $18,000 you see
|
|
|
Transaction fee BTC is really good now, as of April 2018, the average Bitcoin transaction fee is over 95% less than the fees seen during the cryptocurrency rush of late 2017.
That's nice but since we are playing with numbers, cooking the books well did you know that for 95% of Bitcoins eight year life the fees were below $0.01 per transaction ? You best switch to the Lightning banking hubs, only 0.65% per transaction just now, never mind my free home banking and the fiat currency value is not crashing like Bitcoin, exciting times
|
|
|
Bitcoin network fee is at like $34 right now. When will they go back down?
I am a time traveler from the future and fees will go up to $55 in late December 2017 and then after that for obvious reasons the price of Bitcoin will tank because no one will trust the development team and miners anymore. The crystal ball is a little foggy, yes I see they called them Lightning network hubs but really these were centralized banking hubs, yes, yes and started to charge 0.65% in transaction fees but people caught wind of the scam and jumped ship to more stable ships.
|
|
|
Oh dear, we have lead weights being post on posts in this forum, gone before anyone read them The little image Google is feeding me for the Bitcoin price chart looks like a flat line up to about mid 2017 and then it spikes up to $15,000 (NOT $20,000) and looks like it's going to flat line again which is not such a surprise given that the world now knows that it can cost as much as $55.00 to conduct a single transaction using Bitcoin. My plan was to jump out at about $50,000 because it was obvious that this was Tulip Mania version two but the miners got too greedy, too soon and now Joe Six pack is never going to come and fortunately I read the writing on the wall and panic sold at $18k Cheesy Since then I have found out that the Lightning Network is just a system of centralized off block banking hubs and are already charging 0.65% per transaction which is more than anyone else is charging and even worse than high street banks. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYHFrf5ci_gif you are playing with money you cannot afford to gamble then give in with the pipe dream about money for nothing from your gambling "Investment" and get out now whilst you still have a shirt on your back and don't listen to the many gambling addicts here and paid trolls that will still be talking about buying on the dip as bitcoin goes below $1000. You do know that you are being spoon feed fake news I hope here don't you all
|
|
|
USD>USDT Guaranteed USDT>USD is NOT Guaranteed Boggy from my left nostril is pegged to the $USD at 1:1 so they much be worth $1 each but please note that I do not accept returns and don't let speak about USDT being used to prime BTC price during the pump-en-dump when you can watch the movie. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwKYbT9MoPE
|
|
|
Bitcoin (the one and the only real Bitcoin created by Satoshi Nakamoto) is the first decentralized peer-to-peer payment network that is powered by its users with no central authority or middlemen. BCash is not. That's the point!
Yeah but with centralized lightning network banker hubs you are now living on past glory that is off-chain and is charging 0.65% per transaction which is also a scam as was the $55 fees charged by miners back in December. BCASH sounds closer to the original plan than what we have going on here and forks do have both a left and right side to them so who's to say who's misleading who but I will be happy to jump back to your side if BCASH charges $55 per transaction and goes "off-block" Satoshi built a system that they knew eight years ago would not scale and took most of what he used from Bit-Torrent and introduced the world to CPU-Wars and energy wastage so please don't think that all software developers are singing his praises, we are not but it what you will think if you hang around here too long.
|
|
|
It should have become clear by now that the chemical attacks in Syria and the UK that they blames on Russia and Syria for were false flags given zero credible evidence and follow up news that is being kept out of the news.
UK Prime Minster Mrs May should be in jail next to Tony Blair for these WMD lies and her husband should join her given the conflict of interests and him making money from the attack.
Bring it on if you still run with the state propaganda but do have your answer ready about why Dr Assad would use such weapons given he has all but won the war in Syria because such arguments fail to stand up to the test of logic.
Please note that I am not a fan of Putin, he's working for "Them" and is playing his part in the 1984 script being feed to us so it looks like we need to clean our own house instead of thinking someone else will do it for us.
|
|
|
A while back there was a thread on a proposed method of creating a withdraw address that was really just a "honeypot,"
I wrote a honeypot as a proxy service and 99% of the traffic was from robots fake clicking internet adverts (including googles double-click) so I did a lot of caching and faking HTTP reply's to limit the amount of up-stream traffic and at times I was dealing with about a million requests an hour on a little PC. Contracts are sold on Tor by add-servers that pay in Bitcoin and these guys have there own underground network for this type of activity but I could feed these bots for weeks and still they didn't seem to notice and i would say that today we have 70% plus of data being generated by bots and twatter is awash with them and is starting to include a little A.I
|
|
|
|