|
Regarding the diff 8 change: Assuming your vardiff is currently below 8, you will see a higher variance in your personal stats reporting when this change is made. Your miner will report shares less frequently to eligius, but each share will be worth more. You will not earn less due to this change.
|
|
|
|
OK! Now it works with bfgminer !! Had to use the 32Bit Version! NOT the 64Bit ....  Don't use bfgminer with blades or cubes. You'll lose a pretty significant amount of hashrate. This depends on the computer you are running bfgminer or slush's proxy on. I had a significant drop in hash rate using BFGMiner with my blades on my Raspberry Pi. Currently I use an old Atom netbook for my mining (they are really cheap used/refurbished) and over the course of a week of mining I did not see a significant difference in my hashrate. BFGMiner uses a lot of CPU on my ten blade setup on that netbook, so I suspect the number of devices being proxied and the size of your processor are factors to consider. In the very beginning on bfgminer I did have a really bad hash rate until I gave each blade a unique username/password. After that all was well. |
|
|
|
We talking about more than 1 300 000$ !
That may be enough money to cause you to do the dishonorable thing, Reyhs, but not everyone's honor can be bought so easily. |
|
|
|
Ok, software, server or DDoS collision, thats sounds better ? I talk only my opinion about that situation, situation looks like scam, smell like scam, etc. IMHO.
A very humble opinion. Like bugs are humble. And mud is humble. Exercise your humility and keep your opinion to yourself during this time. WK doesn't need to waste effort on humble minds opinions. This outage has been handled professionally and there is no one who has put any amount of effort into reading the history of this pool who would doubt the effort occurring right now to bring the stats back online. |
|
|
|
|
Is there a problem with the website / checkout? I ordered a couple shares last night and got the receipt in my coinbase account, but no email and no order shows on the dzminercoop.com site. No urgency, just want to make sure I didn't get lost somewhere.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Are you still selling this Trout? Salmon?
At the risk of increasing competition for this service and thus increasing the bidding I'll say that I've currently got some rented hash going on from miaviator and it has been rock solid. |
|
|
|
|
Question:
With the PPLNS reward, how big is "N"? In other words, how long does someone need to be mining at a constant rate in order to receive their maximum reward for that hash rate?
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Verified hashing. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
I was also curious about my payment since it was more than the same shares in 21. The spreadsheet indicates 100 shares rather than 50. Did we double up on this buy? I'd also be glad to send back the difference if that is easier for accounting. Feel free to PM if this is easier than delaying future payments.
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Only 5b? Sounds like a best case scenario... I'd pre-order more if I thought we'd only be at 5b by May.
|
|
|
|
|
Except that has been in their FAQ all along. I'd like to see a timeline, but yes a very good move.
|
|
|
|
My prediction is that if BTCGuild does not lower fees it will continue to lose position within the total network speed share.
Again, I disagree. Saying BTCGuild is loosing network share isn't a completely honest statement. BTCGuild is NOT loosing hashrate. I'm not even sure BTCGuild is loosing it's network percentage, but I haven't been keeping tabs on that so I don't really know. It's just smaller than GHash at the moment. Ugh, I saw a CYPER post because someone quoted it.  As an experiment, I pointed identical hashing power at 4 different pools for some weeks. The experiment is still ongoing. In spite of the fee, BTCGuild still beats all the others for revenue. I disagree that people will leave the guild over the fee. It is worth every penny to have such a stable pool and a plugged in operator who cares about it. |
|
|
|
|
Right - not a coincidence. It is obvious they diluted the commodity. I just don't want to invoke the wrath of the severely pro/con cex.io people here because cex.io is irrelevant to the current hash rate. Those miners are mining regardless of whether you or I have rented them or they are currently not rented to anyone. The pro/con debate over cex.io being a way to make money hasn't been resolved yet, so it is unlikely to be resolved in the midst of this current issue, but bringing it up it is likely to make it harder to focus on the real issue if people can't get away from it.
|
|
|
|
Don't confuse cex.io with ghash.io. These are two separate issues.
cex.io is part of ghash.io The ghashes people trade on cex.io are hashing for ghash.io I'll try to make it clearer. The OP and the point of this and other threads is the hash power not the potential for someone to gain or lose trading at cex.io. It is completely irrelevant if everyone sold their cex.io hashing power today at a loss or gain. Ghash.io would still have the hash power and possibly even more incentive to do something untoward with the blockchain. People are pointing their own miners to ghash.io. That's what OP wanted to figure out how to stop, or at least slow. |
|
|
|
|
Don't confuse cex.io with ghash.io. These are two separate issues.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
