The OP wants to find a winning strategy and it doesn't ask about certain games or casinos. From this I conclude that the OP does not have any information on this topic and he is looking for ways to make money.
Here, the correct advice was given in relation to the fact that gambling regularly does not earn money.
By the way, you are right. In fact, there is no specific strategy on how to win at the casino. If the OP created a topic for a specific game, for example, Dice or Roulette or Slots, then probably he was prompted by several strategies with which he could work and understand how these games work. Therefore, his initial question a priori will not bring the answer he needs. |
|
|
|
There is no way to confirm the age of gambler on the gambling site unless the KYC is mandatory at the time of signup. You signup on the gambling site and submit your documents. The Site verifies those documents and issue you the password to login and play. No site does that because the main purpose of the gambling houses is to make money, no matter who is playing at their site.
Yeah this is why most gambling site are in demand due to the users that are came from the gamblers of different ages. This ain't bad anyway unless those young ones had been closely monitor with their parents. As hi tech as we are now parents should adapt the trend and make a good guidance on their kids. This includes the watch on gambling activities. If the parenta the allow kids to gamble then better let it put as an experience and not should be the priority as part of growing. Most parents hardly study child psychology. We do not know exactly how the development of addiction in children occurs, but according to the latest research, this is due to the experience of a lack of something. In this case, gambling will constantly create a lack of wins, which can lead the child into some kind of addiction. Are you ready to take responsibility for making your child addicted? |
|
|
|
Gamblers are people who are willing to take risky steps especially if huge amount of gains is in front of them. Some are cautious whether a site is trusted or not, while others do not really mind.
In this situation, Vietnam may have illegal casinos which may be brought by conflict with regulations of their nation. Maybe this casinos intends to not be affiliated with the government to prevent more problems.
The gamblers you are talking about take risk until the first big win they are not paid, before the first serious problem with serious money. The goal of gambling is to hit the big jackpot. Nothing worse when you manage to do it, but the casino refuses to pay. But if you have taken a risk, then you must be ready for it. Right? Big money and politics are inseparable. I think someone from above did not have enough money and they decided to close the shop. |
|
|
|
|
Several times I have participated in freerolls. Considering that I'm not a very good poker player, it was interesting.
The prize pool was not big, but it was real money and there was excitement. However, I flew out long before the prizes, although I spent several hours in tournaments.
Much effort, little sense. So it seemed to me then. But the thing is definitely useful for attracting new users. Trying your hand at other newbies of the same kind is nice.
|
|
|
|
If there are such strategies, then it is obvious that no one will tell you about them. A few people are able to beat the casino, while pretending to be ordinary guests.
Beating a casino is a whole strategy, you must not only win but also lose so as not to arouse suspicion. Plus you need to know HOW to do it. I don't think it's worth hoping to find an answer here.
Some of them would be able to know it or just might have an advantage over others in some form or together so they might win it. But it may not always work it and at times they may also have to face losses. Though for normal people if they play in limits then it should not be worry as one cannot always win from the gambling and should be ready to accept it. Obviously, someone does it better than others. In addition, in any case, they will have to face shocks, because otherwise they will be mistaken for scammers and deprived not only of their winnings, but also of any opportunity to play in the casino. Casino is arranged in order to earn and not lose money. Even if you are super lucky, the casino might not like it and take action. Gambling is just for fun and victory is just luck, and that is my symbol and only fills my free time by playing gambling.
and I only have a stop strategy when my position is in victory and not to continue so that I get the full benefit because when I win and keep playing I will eventually lose everything, so I will stop when in a winning position.
and I bet with enough capital provided by me, and if I lose or win, I will stop according to the capital that I prepared but that way I have more wins than defeat, stop when I win and stop when I lose according with the capital that I prepared before.
Not sure if this is a winning strategy. If you leave when the card hits you, then you are probably leaving too early. I agree with you that it is worth leaving in moments when you have lost a certain amount, or when from the very beginning your game did not go well. But the moments of luck when you are winning inexplicably should be used to the maximum. |
|
|
|
This seem to be a good news,I hope it does make more Ponzi developers to take a break or put an end to it, I think it has caused so much harm than good, but sometimes I honestly don't even think of the administrators of those Ponzi but people who patronises them,if every one stays off it, I think it come to an end,but no, everyone wants quick money.
This is good news only if among the arrested there are the largest fish of this scam, otherwise all captured were pawns that were led by the larger scammers. The danger is that the main accomplices can easily create a second such pyramid, while pawns cannot. |
|
|
|
|
If there are such strategies, then it is obvious that no one will tell you about them. A few people are able to beat the casino, while pretending to be ordinary guests.
Beating a casino is a whole strategy, you must not only win but also lose so as not to arouse suspicion. Plus you need to know HOW to do it. I don't think it's worth hoping to find an answer here.
|
|
|
|
|
I heard the opinion that the elimination of short positions on several major exchanges, for a total of $ 600 million, provided fuel for Bitcoin's growth to $ 11,000.
It's really hard to say what is going on, but the $ 600 million in liquidated shorts is quite a large amount.
|
|
|
|
Is it just me or did you say Ledger is centralised? Do you think anyone would use Ledger wallet if the data of private keys and user access keys were stored on their servers? Hardware wallets store private keys internally, which eliminates the possibility of users' private keys leaking into the network.The point is that only you own the keys to your wallet, which means that all that hackers can get is your geo data (if you entered it) and your email. Those whose data has leaked now should be wary of phishing emails. |
|
|
|
So unrealistic, we all know that market is not balance, we all know that there's a time it goes up and down. Maybe in the near future it will come. But in 3 years? i doubt, but in my inner side. I am hoping that it reach $500k, no one knows right?
500,000 is too much. Remember how the market behaved after ATH, a correction of more than 90 percent. Perhaps one day bitcoin will reach such numbers, provided that the entire global economy will show frantic growth. There is really no balance in the market due to volatility, and there are high risks of manipulation of various kinds, which suggests that there is no point in waiting for 500k in the next 3 years, just as there is no point in waiting for McAfee to eat his dick. |
|
|
|
I wonder what the site defines as illicit/illegal activities. What laws(in relation to countries transaction origins?) are they based on? And how did they really determine this? Did they factor in the deflationary nature of Bitcoin? 1 BTC in 2010 would be worth alot more today... When did this research take place, by the way?
Can thesame method be used to determine how much of physical/digital fiat currencies and precious metals are used for illegal activities... maybe from 2015 till now? Just want to know if the research is reliable and can be repeated with good results. Also to compare the illicit transactions to other currencies and determine how bad things are.
In order to qualitatively analyse information of this kind, it is necessary to have data on dark net wallets, such databases probably exist. But if we consider that various services always change wallets to new ones for anonymity, then it turns out that we have far from complete statistics. By the way, it is interesting how the bitcoins that have passed the mixer are determined and what is the attitude of this statistics to bitcoin mixers. |
|
|
|
I don't know if they change addresses on the site, I'm almost sure not. But at the moment this address is empty, I'm pretty sure not. While the counter on the site shows that Ether is being sent to them.  Just in case, I'll blank out the address so that no one has ever thought of any stupidity. |
|
|
|
So far, as bitcoin has no improvement in its price, I try to use altcoin to somehow have a small profit. A little progress is also a progress so as soon as I can, I trade using those shitcoins that others say. If bitcoin's price is not increasing, why settle and wait for that to move when you can find another way to earn a profit.
Holding bitcoin is okay but we have no idea when its price will increase in the market, so if I were you, I will try to look for more ways on how can i grow my investments.
If there's an opportunity to use other coins, grab it!
You need to have big cox to trade altcoins. Given that they themselves have certain characteristics in pricing, they in addition depend on bitcoin, which can turn the game plan at any time.Trading bitcoins is very difficult, and doubling altcoins. There are no 100% reliable indicators that could accurately predict the movement of prices, this greatly complicates and introduces an element of luck and chance. |
|
|
|
This is quite interesting that Coinbase actually does some good that is not based on something that benefits themselves. That said, I would still not ever use Coinbase again. They are a scummy/untrustworthy company that is all about what's best for themselves not the community.
This is not entirely true. The funds that the exchange did not allow to transfer at the wrong time belonged to the exchange technically. So, in fact, CoinBase saved itself from additional losses, including from leaving customers in connection with this incident. Good job anyway. |
|
|
|
|
That's why I love blockchain. You can't hide anything, no matter how hard you try, no matter how much you want, the blockchain allows you to see everything. Even if you use a bitcoin mixer, everything is exactly possible to understand the original wallet.
I am not a supporter of de-anonization, however, given the youth of the crypto market, and how much it suffers from all kinds of scam, we probably have nothing but to create such a base to isolate dirty bitcoins. Although I doubt that there are no loopholes to launder them.
|
|
|
|
|
It is surprising that talk about this exchange continues to this day. It seems to me that it became clear for a long time that the scam exit occurred at the stage of the first problems.
I would like to hear the news that these scammers were caught red-handed. If you believe how much they raised it is several million dollars, and if so, it is possible that politics is involved here.
And this is perhaps the most unpleasant thing, considering that there is no news from the regulators.
|
|
|
|
It looks like Elon Musk is the part that Bitcoin is missing and everyone is waiting for. See how quickly people were in a hurry to part with their bitcoins by sending them to the above-mentioned wallet. Imagine what would happen if Elon Musk wrote on his Twitter "Buy Bitcoin, I believed." And he will throw off a couple of screenshots from any exchange. This is to create an instant FOMO effect and then to the moon  . |
|
|
|
We can read huge wins from slot machine but its rate to find high consecutive wins so the probability of people keep winning on slot machine is rare so we can't find those gamblers were kicked from casinos.  Getting kicked in a casino would only happen if a gambler are caught cheating, it's very clear, you can cheat but don't get caught so you'll not pay the prize. We all know that casinos are into profit, but there are also gamblers who are winning most of the time but I don't think casinos would not mind that as long as they'll be profitable in overall. When there are winners that means casinos are legit, they only win because of their advantage and that would attract gamblers as well. Casinos will start noticing if you are winning in a streak on luck-based game and if you are cheating then it won't take too long to identify it from their side.But chances of cheating in luck based game is less to none that is why gambling sites are in profits for their lifetime. I agree with you. You can be kicked out of the casino even if you play fair but you are lucky to win. Just like reinsurance. After all, it is not known how you manage to do this, maybe you are cheating, and maybe you are just lucky, but there are no guarantees. If at least something is suspicious, they can easily expel you, and even deprive them of money. Often, you’ll be allowed to withdraw money anyway, but they won’t let you in at the casino. |
|
|
|
Look what’s going on inside this casino. Some visitors wear masks but the most ( in the background) don’t have it on the faces. And that’s when scientists warn of the danger of airborne viral particles wandering around.
It seems to me that there is nothing worse than sitting in a room in a mask, which creates a favorable atmosphere for the reproduction of bacteria when you breathe into it. It’s hard to breathe in a mask, which means that sometimes people’s charter will take it off for a few seconds, spreading the bacteria indoors. It is obvious that the casino will be forced to quarantine after the first detected case of infection in their premises. I wonder if they will hide it. You must change the mask that covers you face every two hours. It is a small price to pay for your health. As to the indoors atmosphere casino must care of it and have good ventilation system, taking ( through the filters) the clean and fresh air from the outside and pulling out the breathed air. The problem is only the top class casinos can afford such ventilation. The second-rate places don't have it. I have many friends who work in stores, and I also know what happens to doctors in hospitals. No one wears masks as prescribed by WHO. To the same volume, who will monitor whether the guests of the casino comply with these rules? I don’t think that everyone will come with a pack of masks and will change them every two hours during their entire time, which may take 2-8 hours. People around the world violate the rules of wearing masks and the rules of hygiene, if casino will distribute masks and track each client reminding him of the need to change his mask or wash his hands, this can affect the situation. Otherwise, the risk is huge. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
