Busoni and OldManKidd, I submitted a request to have our coin added: NexusNiro BTC/NIRO Currently, we have the Github repository closed-source since we have a number of technical innovations that we did not want scam developers to clone until we were ready to release the code to the public. It is based off of peercoin but having been heavily re-coded to address and resolve many flaws in both the Peercoin and Bitcoin protocols. There's a number of innovations you can read about in our white-paper: http://nexusniro.com/papers/. We are fine with open-sourcing Nexus Core if this is a requirement for adding to Poloniex. Here's our ANN from July 19, 2014: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=657601.0Here's the breakdown of just one innovation, nPoS: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=657601.msg11882668#msg11882668We have had the code reviewed by Bittrex and it is currently traded here: https://bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=BTC-NIROHowever, we would like to have a second exchange for arbitrage and increasing volume. Poloniex is considered the go-to exchange for legitimate cryptocurrencies and we are seeking your help. Cheers, Patrick |
|
|
|
Yes we are all very happy to see tokyopotato return and willing to offer his help and take over marketing and community growth. So far our team consists of 7 members (including me) each filling their own spaces in Nexus, this takes a large work load off of my shoulders and into hands that can handle websites, public relations, bots, marketing, pools, social media, etc. This frees me to be focused towards building up new technology for Nexus and the long term vision and plans. This being said, I would like to extend my appreciation to these 6 members that have decided to dedicate their time as a part of the Nexus Development Team.
We Are Nexus
Viz.
Thank you very much for the kind welcome. We've got a LOT of great things in the works. Will keep you guys updated this week as we roll out some great things. |
|
|
|
Dear friends, Some of you might know me from other places in the crypto-sphere. I have decided to return to crypto and will be joining with the Nexus development team to assist in marketing and community development. Today I met with 4 of the Nexus development team and we have formulated a plan to launch Nexus Tech into hearts and minds of all those interested in cryptocurrency. We will be making a big push on the social media front, and Videlicet has pledged to open-source Nexus Core with the next major release due Nov 25th. We will have Mac/Linux/Windows builds available with launch of open-source. Going forward, I will be pushing our team to meet deadlines and direct the community to the answers they need by providing content across many platforms. Our goal will be to buildup as much promotional content and to make a massive push to bring more users to the Nexus platform so that they can be a part of this amazing network. Part of this plan is to get us onto Poloniex after November 25th when the Nexus Core repository will be open-sourced. Our communication outlets will be updated daily with new information and resources: Bitcointalk: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=657601.0Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/nexusoft.ioTwitter: https://twitter.com/NexusNiroReddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/nexusoftIRC: http://webchat.freenode.net/?nick=nexususer.&channels=%23nexusniro&uio=OT10cnVlJjExPTEzMyYxMj10cnVl37 |
|
|
|
only those that have 'compliant' api's to the exchanges - which is fair ... but that means officially - not ALL crypto can be accepted due to the lack of backend connectibility to ALL exchanges - unless ONE exchange has ALL the coins and plugs into the backend ... did i get that right - or have i misunderstood ... #crysx All cryptocurrencies that are traded on the supported exchanges. Of course... it takes time to integrate more exchanges and it's important to add exchanges with the highest security and track-record first. Unfortunately, half a dozen exchanges were hacked recently. The industry is still so undergoing lots of growing pains. This project will take some time to identify the best niche markets and opportunities for this product. As for the CXC currency itself, I am still advocating for exchange activation in addition to cxc.bid API activation. |
|
|
|
Once again you have opened my mind to the decentralized innovations that CoinShield brings. This is a huge learning curve for many people such as myself into understanding just how these features can be decentralized. It is hard to break out of the mindset limited to the one-way capabilities of the Bitcoin protocol and virtually all cryptocurrencies currently in existence. This also refers to the over centralization that exists in the Bitcoin ecosystem. I am compiling as much information here as possible - I encourage others in the community to do the same: http://coinshieldtalk.org/forum/coin/coinshield-discussion |
|
|
|
How will the sign to receive transaction will work?
How will it be in transaction script?
This is from the white-paper, due to be released soon: Section 8.4.2. Final Transactions
When a transaction is sent out to the network, if it is accepted by nodes as valid, the user then has no power to reverse it. The needs for a reversal would come into view when a user accidentally sends to the wrong address. In this case, the coins would be lost with most digital currencies, but for the case of Coin Shield, there will be an option to send the transaction as reversible. What this means as far as informational processing, is that the transaction will be sent out and accepted into a holding structure. It will remain in this holding until the given expiration time has been reached. This will give the user who sent transaction power to cancel the transaction by one’s node verifying ownership of the inputs, and then sending a transaction void to the network. This will remove the transaction from the holding structure, preventing it from being confirmed by the network. In this, the inputs will not be spent by this node’s wallet, so therefore the coins will not be debited from one’s account. If the expiration time is reached, and a transaction void is not sent out by this time, the transaction will then move to the main holding structure termed: memory pool. This will hold the transaction until the miners include it in a new block, therefore confirming it by the network.I am assuming this "holding structure" would be a master-node on the network or centralized escrow service of some type, but Videlicet will have to give us a glimpse into his vision |
|
|
|
Nice, looks like the pool is now public. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=657601.0#post_DownloadsCoinshield Beta Pool: 204.27.62.234:9549 You will need to edit the start.bat and put in the pool IP address and your CoinShield address Can someone let me know the parameters for running the cpu on the pool?
coinshield_prime.exe 204.27.62.234 9549 your_address nb-threads example : coinshield_prime.exe 204.27.62.234 9549 2Sxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxfv 10 |
|
|
|
tokyopotato,
I'm sure that as the economy grows, new minds will come to compliment that, and enhance further the innovations that began in my development.
Thank You,
Viz.
I certainly hope so. |
|
|
|
In the case with most digital currencies, if you send a transaction to an address that is not owned by any party, the coins will be lost forever. This can be quite nerve racking when one decides to send high quantities of money, for if the transaction never reaches its destination, both parties will be out the funds. This is not sustainable for wide spread adoption, as many users will encounter errors generated from their own lack of understanding of digital currencies, possibly causing them to lose coins. The solution to this is developed by Coin Shield, Inc. within Coin Shield Core. The way it works is from a two way signature. What this means, is that when a user sends out a transaction, they will have a choice to send it out as secure, which will require a signature from receiver before transaction will be processed. This means that the receiver will have to have a wallet open, to accept the transaction and sign it allowing it to be processed. If the receiving party never signs the transaction by its given expiration time, it will be returned to the sender. This prevents any coins from being lost from simple errors that may be encountered through the use of the system. - From CoinShield OP I've gotta say, this is a really interesting development. CoinShield seems to have some smart contract type functions built into the protocol. Clearly CoinShield, Inc. is developing some centralized systems that will rely upon the decentralized peer-to-peer CoinShield network. What type of Smart Contracts platform do you find the most interesting Videlicet? I am starting to see that CoinShield, Inc. will also essentially be developing Contracts systems and I am curious how much of this will be a part of the CSD core and how much could be derived from adopting a platform like Codius or Ethereum. |
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure if this was ever replied to, but has CXC Dev Team considered adding activation functionality using the exchange activation like Quatloo Trader? This would be in addition the API activation?
Adding the ability to activate the register with 5,000 - 10,000 CXC on Bittrex would give additional value to the CXC cryptocurrency and once the price rises much higher, customers would most likely activate through CXC.BID
I don't see a downside to adding this, if there is one, I'd like to know
|
|
|
|
Any nodes, wallet won't sync
Are you guys still offering trial license for beta testing?
I have connections and am synced... here's some nodes: addnode=108.61.167.67 addnode=75.170.121.62 addnode=72.78.100.4 addnode=144.76.64.123 addnode=46.119.206.103 addnode=176.31.188.48 |
|
|
|
Why ?
because someone banned the 3angel account so we cannot update the opening page or answer PM What do you mean "someone" ? It's not that a user can ban an account, nor the devs would ban account, there must have been some good damn reason to ban an account. What was the answer from the forums' staff ? It got banned for "spam" when informing Doge, Ripple, Litecoin and Darkcoin about The Cash-Register for Crypto-Currency. 4 posts. We have sent countless emails to this forum to get unbanned, but .... not even a reply from them. Well, it's nice to see that the anti=spam is working  I guess the anti-troll isn't working though. I remember when you asked me to stop trolling a thread and I stopped... |
|
|
|
OP has been updated  This is very well put together KK. Nice work. |
|
|
|
all is going well here i see! excellent dev team and excellent ideas.
Regards,
ActualUpsurge
Hey welcome ActualUpsurge ! Difficulty its 70.926524 so high, at this price is absolutely unprofitable for minig,
can anyone who mining could says hasrate and 24hour coins reward at this hashrate ?
If its not profitable to mine then there is no logic in running for it. lot of copy/paste coins without block explorer, site, maintain price of 600- 1000 sat. and CSD is only around 600 sat. at this point and this diff, that is very cheap. Unfortunately the miners need to know this and stop selling at this price for the price to go up. This is in part with us creating value and consensus of value for assets in the free market. Thank You,Viz.Clearly the difficulty and price are rising... people are investing BTC and energy into CSD. Miners are mining in anticipation of increased value and difficulty in the future. This is a great! https://bittrex.com/Market/?MarketName=BTC-CSD |
|
|
|
Here is an article regarding Quantum computers and potential SHA2 vulnerability should the NSA succeed in building them: http://www.bitcoinnotbombs.com/bitcoin-vs-the-nsas-quantum-computer/All of that is a complicated way of saying that while an attacker with a quantum computer could derive the private key from the public key, he couldn’t derive the public key from the Bitcoin address since the public key was run through multiple quantum-resistant one-way hash functions.
However, you do have to broadcast your public key to the network to make a transaction, otherwise there is no way to verify your signature. What this implies is that in the face of an NSA quantum computer all Bitcoin addresses would have to be considered one-time use addresses. Whenever you make a transaction you would have to send any excess bitcoin to a newly generated address as “change”. If you didn’t remove the entire balance from your address, the NSA could steal the remainder. While this is inconvenient, it would buy the developers enough time to swap out ECDSA for a quantum-resistant digital signature scheme. - from user pistdov in IRC I love that CoinShield is way ahead of the game with pure SHA3 Quantum security  |
|
|
|
Mining became 2x more hard Community grows, dumpers have less coins to dump  Now its only for the professionals. Never too many miners  |
|
|
|
One more question...
When is Coinshield planning to get the show on the road (meaning destroy it's first shitcoin)?
Petitions have already started: http://coinshieldtalk.org/forum/coin-shield-talk/shitcoin-petitionsI would estimate that 30-60 days from now the first scamcoin will be lined up at the guillotine... hopefully sooner with more people's help. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
