Overall, the integration of AI technology with the BitcoinTalk forum has the potential to greatly improve the user experience and enhance the community's ability to share knowledge and insights. I would love to hear your thoughts on this proposal and any ideas you may have for its implementation.
I guess it's not really necessary, everything is fine so far. I'm not talking about technology or anything like that, I'm talking about user experience and what this forum has and is bringing. It's perfectly fine, everyone here is fine with these wonderful things. All previous suggestions, and yours, are being worked on very well by the hard working users of this forum. Everyone is always ready to share knowledge with each other, there are dozens of topics to help people, weekly statistics, cheat,... AI can't do things like them, adding AI is not an optimal solution, but it takes a lot of resources and resources to implement, so why need it? |
|
|
|
It's really confusing that there are still so many people putting their trust in a worthless system  How long have you been following it? 5 years ? 5 years on a promise that still doesn't have any real value on exchanges right now? Is that worth your continued trust? your blindness makes me feel so pitiful  |
|
|
|
Does anyone know an escrow who escrows mountains of fiat banknotes? LMAO.
LOL  I'm trying not to laugh after reading your reply does this bring us back to the form of trading of the last century? Consignment by simple forwarding, maybe it takes a few months if traveling by water?
sorry if i got off topic  |
|
|
|
all the scammers hustling to set up their own fake escrow service...  OP mentioned about reviewing escrow service, it's not really a concern, as long as both agree, it's a small issue, the problem is the amount that needs to be transacted Fiat (cash) will be deposited into escrow, while your BTC will be deposited into escrow.
It is possibly one of the craziest things I've seen since i started seeing this forum Are you confused? if it's an intermediary escrow service, maybe we can do online transactions instead of cash like you said? just a little concern, the amount is too big for me to interfere, keep an eye here and see what OP does next, really curious  |
|
|
|
for some time now i have been looking to buy complete crypto casino script like https://demo.phoenix-gambling.com/ but they are expensive and i read that they have some bugs in the casino system. anyone can offer me anything ? Personally, I find it a really bad idea, although not sure if anyone can make money from using them, but if they really work, why don't they use it to make money themselves but sell it to you ? I guess it's just ideas and the buyers are the ones who have to spend money to experiment for the seller  |
|
|
|
Other mixers are surely under the radar of the authorities, but are not at this of meeting the same fate. They are not illegal and can only be indicted when there is strong proof of illegal flow of money through them.
But it also means that any mixer could be the next target. It's not too strange if a mixer is involved in money laundering, the larger the mixer, the harder it is to judge. Who knows when they started investigating  Bitmover was trying to say that the exchanges would only scan the surface of the transaction history, maybe through an automated system and would not scrutinize all the details of previous transactions nor go too far back.
Personally, I think they are just doing it to make sure they are doing the right thing legally, suspicious transactions will be sent out, but it certainly won't be investigated too deeply, they don't really do it because they want, they do it because the government wants |
|
|
|
The best solution is to use a current mixing service and/or to use instant, kyc free utilities to move into more private blockchains and then to the chain of choice. Sending transactions to your own address is a band-aid solution, if it could even be considered a solution.
Just a bit curious about this, as I haven't seen it in the news lately, I was told that Chipmixer is banned for money laundering, so, what about other mixers? After Chipmixer, a series of other mixers took the throne to replace it, do you think we will meet the same thing in the future? It's like I'm talking about something illegal, maybe |
|
|
|
I'm still available to work with you at any time, contact me if you need Even though I don't have any feedback in this thread from my clients, don't worry about it, because I always make them happy. And I also feel that it's unnecessary to ask my customers to leave feedback Please contact me when you need, you will surely be satisfied with what I provide |
|
|
|
In the playboy casinos the women were dressed as bunny girls and no nudity was allowed but obviously that was more than enough to get the imagination of the clients going, so personally I am not against those kind of casinos but I suppose they will be way more expensive than your regular casinos as they will cater to a VIP audience so despite the fact that we may like such casinos I prefer to get my fun in traditional casinos than to pay more for the illusion those sexy casinos may sell.
No, don't get me wrong, being sexy doesn't mean being naked. Personally, I don't like nude girls, rather, I like girls who are pretty and dress sexy. Sexy doesn't mean they're naked or showing off their sensitive body parts, it's simply a slightly revealing way of dressing, it will stimulate our curiosity rather than expose it all I'm not sure if you understand what I mean. In short, if a casino uses nudity, I'll discard it instead of enjoying it and using it |
|
|
|
this is unfair
Yes, we know nothing about them, but they are wanting to know all about us. Oh no, they are not the one who knows all about us, they do KYC through a third party, who knows, what that third party will do with our information. It is bringing us back to the question, what risks does KYC pose... skip
So that means, in this case, you are willing to do KYC to be able to continue to experience this platform, as well as earn some extra money for newbies in their program. Well, one option might be good for you I do not want to do KYC just for gambling because that is not worth doing. I am better to search for the other gambling site which does not require KYC for their members. Besides that, I do not playing gambling very often so I will skip on that site if I see they require KYC. I am not good at searching for referrals through referral links so I do not think I will still use that site.
Maybe you don't gamble very often, but what do you think about doing KYC and getting their $200 withdrawable tokens? I think it's an attractive proposition, do you think you will KYC to receive it? |
|
|
|
No offense but I don’t think you know what you’re talking about. Of all the types of sites offering games that involves money, poker sites should be the most enforced sites to KYC. There’s a thing called ‘chip dumping’.
On the contrary, I am not really understanding what you are talking about. I am talking about crypto casinos, it has nothing to do with chips on actual casinos, so the chip dumping you talk about is not here at all I play regularly in ggpoker and I submitted my KYC. The KYC stuff is pretty much standard practice for most poker site right now
How long have you known it? Are you nervous when doing KYC? What information do they ask for? I think it depends on the level of KYC requirements that we can consider I don't like and I don't do KYC.
I play for fun, not for profit, so I dont see a reason to submit my data to a site.
Nothing special, I just love this answer |
|
|
|
I've been with some poker sites but most that I've been with doesn't require KYC like requesting for an identity card or a national card, most of them just want like email verification and nothing much even on the withdrawal process.
that's right, most of the current casinos here do not require KYC when you join and play on their platform, this is the exception so i wonder I rather will look at another casino and not to go for KYC. Know your customer is not ideal for cryptocurrency that is suppose to be discreet in our transaction. A casino don't need kyc to function or for withdrawal, they can only restrict withdrawal, make a daily limit for it.
i agree with your opinion, but what do you think about selling your identity for 200$ through KYC on their platform? Since it's a gambling platform, I'd say it's not worth it [money wouldn't be the only thing you'd be gambling, if you go through that KYC process].
me too, it's really not worth selling your identity, which can cause a lot of potential dangers later there's so much we're dealing with doing this KYC, a KYC requires a lot of information like I mentioned |
|
|
|
Let's say you have some illegal money and would like to wash it, you could sit down at poker table and just lose all the money to a buddy of yours. He will just withdraw and pay some taxes on it as legitimate poker earnings.
Your comments are really great! You gave me a new perspective that I never thought, you are really right, casinos like this can be used to launder money easily. But in reality, there are always ways to launder money, as the crypto space is the best place to do it Crypto casinos usually do not require KYC. However, exceptions are there! Try to check their FAQ and T&C page and see if there is a mention of KYC requirement. If yes, then you will need to be KYC compliant in order to withdraw funds to your wallet.
Sure, it's necessary, because without KYC I wouldn't be able to withdraw money from their platform, that's what I'm wondering, they're still a brand new platform I prefer websites with mild KYC policies
In this case, it is a bad KYC policy. They collect everything from me, including my current address, that's why I'm annoyed with it |
|
|
|
So, I just heard that certain sites that win poker games have to go through KYC, personal data (identity), this is worth asking what KYC is for....while at the beginning of the registration process, the requirements have been passed, Supposedly when you win poker, you are free in all dealings/withdrawals, without KYC.
With regular casinos I find that they only do KYC on winners who have too much money or hit their trading limit, with withdrawals at tens or hundreds of dollars, I rarely see casinos who need KYC. The situation seems subjective since it's hard to judge a gambling site that you've played for a day but at the same time I guess it depends on how you view the poker site
ya, I get it. Evaluating a platform for the first time is not a good idea, i just wonder why they ask for KYC when i want to start with them Back to gambling and crypto, it's entirely up to you whether you want it or not tbh, the casino isn't exactly forcing you, but don't expect to actually play on it. I reckon there are other casinos out there that don't require KYC, but as @YOSHIE said, they may ask for it later on in the game, which is kind of worse imo than asking it from the very start.
Oh, this sounds reasonable, the plus for this is that they require KYC for us to decide whether to continue or stop, it sucks when you win big and the casino starts asking for KYC, it must be more annoying You did not name the gambling site I hope you will name it, you're not promoting the site it's for awareness purposes so we'll know if we are already playing on this site or planning to register and play, doing KYC in a gambling site depends on the player's preference if the site is new and there are offers that are good to be true I don't think it's worth doing KYC, you'll regret later because there's no free money in a gambling site, there's always a catch
As far as I can see, this is a new casino, they are testing their platform, and they are giving newbies a bonus, so I guess no one here has experienced it. And since it's a new casino, KYC is clearly something to consider |
|
|
|
So that every round I just put the same odds without being able to change them, in the first many rounds I kept winning even though sometimes I lost but it didn't matter. But in the end I lost everything and it turns out, the movement doesn't always bounce, meaning when the spin only reaches x2 which should be able to bounce higher the next round, but what happens in the next round keeps getting lower without even bouncing at a higher chance, until finally I lose everything.
lol, you are very brave to do this test, because in fact, this test simply burns your money. Even if your win rate is 50%, you will definitely lose all your money in a short time. Do you keep track of the betting process? I believe most of the money you lose is from trading fees, not from losing bets |
|
|
|
When it comes to choosing between a typical gambling place or to those who had sexy girls then i would definitely be choosing to those who had sexy gals.
You have made the right choice, and I like your choice, the appeal should not be ignored skip
lol, not exactly, but obviously, any kind of business needs beautiful and attractive avatars. It is an essential part that cannot be changed. Just like his instinct is to love beauty, we will naturally choose beauty |
|
|
|
Hello guys, Surely everyone here has played Poker at least once, or heard about it, right? Poker is not a strange game, and it is available in all famous casinos in this space, at least the ones that I know. But, have you ever been asked for KYC to be able to play and withdraw in Poker? Rarely do I see a casino asking for that, until today I have access to a new platform where we play Poker PvP on a download app. Speaking of KYC, I'm sure most people here don't want their identities revealed anywhere, and KYC is something really bad that we always want to avoid, even when A highly regarded project. No way we can use crypto to stay anonymous and then do KYC so they know exactly who we are, where we are, what we do, right? And that's what I'm talking about here, a crypto casino but requires their users KYC to be able to withdraw funds from the platform to their wallets. It really makes no sense, even with small transactions of only a few dozen, a few hundred dollars. Yesterday, I was introduced to a new gambling platform by a friend, namely that I can play Poker there directly with other people through their app. Yesterday, I was introduced to a new gambling platform by a friend, namely that I can play Poker there directly with other people through their app. Since this is my first time gambling with a downloadable app, I am quite interested and want to experiment with it. After doing my registration as well as linking my wallet, I consider withdrawing, and luckily when I review it, they need KYC. What do you think about this issue? Do you want to do KYC just for gambling on any platform? Also added that they are giving new users registered through their referral link some money, and they also require KYC to receive it. I heard that this amount is up to 200$, if you are, would you like to sell your identity to get this money?
I won't post information about that platform, because I don't want to be told that I'm promoting them |
|
|
|
Wow! This statement caught my attention for real! Is gambling ever easy? I don't fine gambling to be any nit easy. One thing with a game of luck is, its unpredictabilityand gambling has hot a lot of these. Most especially, the virtual gambling where the system has been pre-programmed and all your doing is trying to predict the outcome. Its more like, predicting the bitcoin price to its least 100sat difference at a specific time. Its a no easy deal.
ya, thanks for your interest in this topic Speaking of gambling, if we gamble, is it really that easy to win something that excites us? I think no, winning with a little bit of difficulty will make everything more fun, and of course, I'm talking about that feeling when you win the hard way and when you win the easy, losing is never happy Anyway, my favourite game to gamble on is the sports betting. In sports betting, at least you can quantify the teams your betting on in a way, looking at the fact that, you know the team ratings, the situation with the team and you've got statistics to aid you in your prediction. So, its a plus!
I agree that sports betting can be a better option to some extent, however, the analysis is not always accurate, unless the strengths of the two teams are quite different, if no, the outcome remains a mystery just like other types of gambling I never had much luck with Crash games, rocket launches, or in this case Blast. I am cautious by nature so I never place to high of a multiplier. When there is an opportunity to bring home x5, x10, or more, I mess it up by getting out to early. I also consider various tactics. For example, if the last two rounds were low and finished at 1.50 or below, I naturally expect a much better performance in the next round. I can't say such a system paid off for me.
Personally, I highly recommend your strategy, it looks pretty safe and can make you some money if you maintain it. It is possible. But betting with low coefficients will also lower your winnings, right? So if you're a bit unlucky, a loss can cost you 2x your winning bet, I think that's the flip side of it |
|
|
|
when the person is having a losing streak, the person needs to stop playing for a while, it helps to calm down and think about where he went wrong and be able to fix it.
haha, but how many people can stop and calm down before they lose all their money? Most people say that we need to stay calm while gambling, however, when we encounter an unfortunate loss or some regret, they will surely have extremely strong emotions. strong, it makes it hard for them to hold back and continue playing instead of stopping and staying calm, even, play bigger and more to win back the lost money |
|
|
|
lol, as a man, I don't think I can refuse sex casinos many people may feel that gambling has nothing to do with sexiness, but it would be nice to play gambling with some stimulation. If someone were to force me to choose between gambling with a casual casino and a sexy casino, I think I would choose the sexy casino. Because I really like it however, i also have some standards for sexiness, it's not nudity |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
