I am not using this bot, but since it can only  run on a browser, 99% chance that it has memory leak (drawback of web browser engines google/firefox itself) and would not alive long enough before getting a sudden crash.

The main reason is their site performance, in which favour bots for wagering contest. Whales don't need eyes  catching site, they need to bet as fast as possible to get high wager amount. It's computer(bot) vs computer(server) war.

Yeah, your calculation of 300.25 is correct for the formula, however the real stat collected from real betting is as what I've reported 1744 for current month (1700-1900 range collected stats are few times during that "n"), once get 2367 (after around 20m bets long time ago).

It seem incorrect
n = 4166576
p = 0.0495
=> 3358.8 (3359)

While my actual result is currently at 1744 after above "n" rolls (ever seen of 2100-2300++ but not 2400++), it might be correct if  above result is not "mean" or "average" but it is "rare", "extremely rare" streak.

It can't reach a plan or proposal level, he did not study the feasibility of the project, did not think of a clear plan, don't know how to program a website, or at least tracking of registered addresses (including addresses that donated and free take only addresses), daily participants cut-off, how is the winning numbers determined. At first when i looked at his wix.com site, i thought he would do it by using "Export CSV" feature, or Order/Cart management features, some excel skills..But a big not surpising laugh after all, he might came up with a sudden idea after a wet dream sleeping and decided to post here right away without a due deligence.

The most important part of this project is that he doesn't want to spending anything, at least for the free lottery model, and it draw every day, he need to spend money to feed the prize, like at least few bucks. At least for me if I am him, 10$ each day as minimum, let it run for a month to test the market / community reach.

freebitco.in whole numbers from 00000 to 10000, few  other sites i can see have 00 to 99 range, but it is too limit to allow big odds. The rest implement the same thing 0.00 to 99.99 or 0.0000 to 99.9999 or more decimal digits.

Yeah, having the same concept of playing (in which the same algorithm behind in the code) and change of appearance / display will not make any thing new. A famous game is P2P Poker in which they take the dealer role and take house edge commission 1% on top of the pot might attract people but I am not sure if it is easy to implement (in term of provably fair) or not, hope one of the casino out there could release something like this lol.

Good to hear that, myself is goining with strategies too -- non existence in the public, in which these public methods of multiplying after each loss or stop loss will result the same result "losing too fast". Hope we got the same pathway (but surely don't tell each others lol).

Definately something wrong, asked a friend to logout and login back, he can't login.

If they are going to offer what you've suggested, the House Edge gonna be pumped higher. For the Lambo i think it's fair, i.e: paying for a Lambo at 10,000 USD / BTC (20BTC total) is different than paying it at 3000 USD / BTC (66.66 BTC total), right now I think that the admin there would praise for BTC price to be pumped as high as possible at the time of Prize being paid out, specificically:

Case -- BTC Price at payout -- Total BTC amount
2017 ATH: 20,000USD / 1BTC -- 10BTC (200,000 USD lambo) -- the more it rise, the less they pay in term of BTC.
Current: 11,000 USD / 1BTC -- 18.18BTC
Worst: 3,000 USD / 1BTC --- 66.66BTC

Above cases might already considered in their due diligence plan before commencing the contest, thus current model on rate/ratio of getting 1 ticket is fixed, unless within this quarter BTC price surpass 20k and on it way to another new ATH then they might push a hand in helping people FOMO in by lowering ticket price (imaging paying for that lambo at 40,000 USD per BTC).

For the wagered amount i am not sure if you are meant to wagering bonus (50x claimed amount or, 25x initial claimed bonus account balance), i would say it's easy to get that amount by claiming many times a small amount rather than claiming all at once.

I can see these new slots, but I am not sure why they put ton of them which has the same playing methodology, it should be "Slots with themes" to be exactly.

Nope it's direct connection, it was normal before i tried to play bitaces, in which placed a bet then a red message came, not sure what is it, refresh the page and then getting blank dashboard.

What's wrong with blank dashboard and websocket error with the site? anyone get this issue?

I am not sure the OP understand the real need of his potential customer or not. Probably (his dream) few % current market price. But anyway he need to do it P2P if someone really need it, no one will do it online unless he give the address first.

Too expensive, the time of reserving some unique domain names in hope for skyrocket in price due to blindy interest of people is ended, valuation of domain price today is basing on many factors, selling 10,000 dollars each for some random names is like a dream of winning lottery from 2 dollars ticket.

You are speaking another way of "peak" in sport events, thus in this case the sports players just sit out for a contest period that has no sport events, and vice versa the dice player might just sit out which contest occuring during a peak sport events, thus the casino might not get their expected wager since one of the players sit out. And another factor could result a lack of interest is the prize, currently it is 400mBTC for a one week event, it could be ideal if the casino can pay the same 400mBTC for each day and I have nothing to comment if this is the case, but if they can't and could only pay 400mBTC/7 for each day, thus might cause loss of interest from one or more players.

Speaking in term of big house which can out beaten any kind of whales (a bankroll big enough to pay out every single win until the whale get into his bad streak), then your statement(s) remain true the house can conduct as many and as frequent as they like taken into account the risk they are able to pay a bad scenario that a single/multiple whales keep winning not one or two but ten continous events before he get into bad losing streak (which he/they can't affort to,lose more).

The OP doesn't know himself what is a ponzi scheme, and might just be another noob thait fail into these trolls. The ponzi scheme is exactly what he is offering, in which it cost nothing to get money for him, and promising everyone to spent nothing to get money.

This can't make anyone to believe you by your begging. The first thing to do is, throw away that app, make a website with responsive design for compatible with any device, phone/tablet/pc and publish it source to github right away but not to wait after sometimes.

The most suspicious thing is why it is not a windows pc based app and must be/ only on mobile app? I am thinking my way: my phone store all kinds of important shits including OTP app, banking app, personal notes, password app, these are attractive targets for hacker, and your app might target these things.

Finally I am not risk to wake up on a random morning and got these notification messages of which my money is sent out of my account to some random person due to my bad decision of downloading a random app few days back, lol.

It would be a bad idea to increase frequency, first if within that timeframe one of the players get lucky enough to win more than the house edge in this case the house lose its advantage (applicable to dice game), second for player who is like ben which only play on sport betting and you cant force it to have more events in a short timeframe, third you have to think where is the fund for them to play, may be trading and to finish a trade it takes at least one or two weeks to get out in profit (thus having some spare coins for gambling).

Hi,

A quick question, what is the minimum bet and what is the speed per second?