Well what of the requirements that used to be in action where newbie accounts were restricted.
I would wholeheartedly endorse doing something because this isn't a community and it's all altcoins are being traded against bitcoin.
I'd love to be able to read altcoin announcements without newbie accounts spamming support. I'd love to be able to put reputation against coin projects.
The problem here is multiple accounts and not so much pool operators.
All of the hubris and buzz surrounding ANNs is bought up like with USBcoin, which leads to sore losers threatening Bittrex with FBI investigations. Can you imagine the outcome of looking into logs of BCT and finding the IPs showing mass collusion by serial scammers with nothing whatsoever on place to stop the schemes?
I'm not asking for censorship. I'm asking for checks and balances stopping multiple accounts. It's like a gypsy marketplace here and all from clogged up posts by alias newbie accounts.
I understand your reasoning with pools mprep, but
newbie accounts are the issue

I neither agree or disagree re pools bc I don't mine any more...
But OP has a point. BCT allows has ignored all calls for moderation of altcoin sub-forums and this is the first thing to bring into action? I'd say the pressing issue is multiple accounts and serial scammers more so than the pools clogging up threads with "spam".
Whatever happened to the rule where you couldn't post with a new account until a certain threshold of time and/or newbie introduction?

The Blockchain may be able to be rolled back, but who's going to buy usbcoin? I mean, it's not rolling back time... You still own the coins. The benefit is that the inflated numbers are rolled back which makes sense.
I think ppl need to realise that cryptocurrency transfers are one-way. MintPal rolling back vericoin was wrong.
How can you have faith in a coin that could potentially roll back whenever it so chooses?
Attn mod: deleting posts gives little credibility to a cause... If this is development of the ideas of usbcoin it's a great idea but more details and discussions required.

Is there any reason why you'd need to delete posts in this thread disagreeing with USBcoin 2.0?
I ask because my opinion was to let the project go, and the post was censored.
It may as well be answered here or I can just start a new thread, but honestly, is there any reason EVER to delete negative feedback? Even UROcoin doesn't do that.

Sadly, this is why the scams keep perpetuating.
It was good of the person below to answer how compound interest works but it hits me that every man and his dog think they're going to get rich on the next bitcoin and you're not. It's not all about money anyhow. At least to me. Devs and bag holders are the ones who pump the coin and then it dies and people like this guy may believe the hype, invest 1btc he can't afford to lose, then when it's gone, he's gone and altcoin has lost new blood.
And plz, don't even bother saying I'm FUDing because I'll tell it how I see it and this is bullshit. No plans or dev even working on the feature the coin is named for. Dev promises not to dump premine? No dev has ever kept a promise on a clone coin. Ever.
Seriously, wtf?

Your whole pitch is bitcoin anonymous ie dark and you haven't got anyone working on the anonymity part? Don't start a coin, pre-mine and offer a bounty; get devs to implement anonymity, then steal 2 innovative coin names and portmanteau your coin name.

How progressive of you to stand up for Indians like you did.

I have a strange outlook in that I sympathise more so with the "starving Indians" so in need of 12.5 kTonne of urea than the guy with Indian heritage who netted a multi million dollar haul at the expense of Bitcoin, common decency, and of course, never being called Ghandi.

Re: wasting my time, we're in agreement there... I'm at a loss to explain why I care enough to think of people like yourself as victims. After all, your majority of URO supporters are quite adamant being fucked in the ass is fantastic and anyone not agreeing must be jealous. Or spreading FUD etc etc.

You're right when you say I "don't believe in this shit". Perhaps it's best I "get the fuck out of here". You stay and circle jerk all the while being fucked in here. Don't be offended mate, it's business, not personal.

PS. You wouldn't attack an Australian with Indian decent would you? Hopefully not! After all, I have no issue with consensual rape amongst willing community participants of double digit IQ. In fact it saddens me to think all this FUD is stopping the FUD (fucked, up derrière). Each to their own!

I don't want your URO. Did you read any of the links or just decide it's a protracted FUD scheme?
If you didn't read the links, well, you're a straight up moron if you really can't think critically, but hey, the Nigerian check scam keeps going because ppl like you.  

I would never support scammers of this type because they promise people won't starve. This is so far beyond whitecoin clones or NAVAJO or VOOT I am going to step away from this altcoin thievery.

Commodities fraud is fraud no matter whether it's online or not and that's all this is. It's not a doge meme or a country coin but now it's a straight up con and all because there's nothing which rhymes with Euro...

Hats off to everyone who believes $20 of URO buys a metric tonne of urea priced at USD$300 today.

Greediness and pumping coins under the guise of humanitarian support. Dry out this sales pitch and that's the most fertiliser you'll get from URO.

This is a straight up con and you're on par with grifters. One day you'll learn this shit isn't ok when you're taken down as a SilkRoad DPR martyr.

Which companies signed this so called protocol? Because something like this would be recorded in a PDF ie minutes of the meeting, not to mention press coverage.

As for this alternative means of buying urea... How is this solving world hunger in the 3rd world? Are you telling me the fees involved with a commercial or industrial urea purchase is somehow being fixed with URO?

Give a single source of someone buying $300 of urea for $33 of URO coins

No, GES is housed at a virtual office in Sydney at a notoriously shady building (Lvl 33 @ Australia Square.

http://greenearthsystems.com.au/commodities/branches/ = Level 33, Australia Square, 264 George Street, Sydney NSW 2000 ... http://www.executivecentre.com.au/virtual_offices/faq

Oh and GES is a company but check the Australian Govt details....

https://anonfiles.com/file/75ecb5ec6064bc9182a99ae7a95fdeea   = ( https://connectonline.asic.gov.au/RegistrySearch/faces/landing/panelSearch.jspx?_adf.ctrl-state=kpvusdliz_27 )

Listed address is officially Rydalmere which is 20 miles NW from Sydney CBD BTW.

Need proof it's all a scam?
What company has an Australian email domain for all it's supposed offices?

• egypt@greenearthsytstems.com.au
• au@greenearthsystems.com.au
• india@greenearthsystems.com.au

As for starting decades ago....


Oh and the signing of the document at this link ....
http://greenearthsystems.com.au/ges-honored-to-be-the-first-member-of-the-uro-foundation/

Highly unlikely since June 9th = public holiday across the whole country (Queens Birthday). As for the so-called Annual General Meeting, you're confused with the Navy : http://www.nautinst.org/download.cfm?docid=CBFD1A22-F031-45FE-908E7EC4D5ADD8CD

Oh and there's the issue of urea fertilizer hardly being used, let alone manufactured in a first world country like Australia. Urea fertilizer is used in Africa and Indian subcontinent. Even the USA has to import it.

As for the shady tactics, the REAL GES has told me they're going to notify Australian Federal Police who'll no doubt be raiding the virtual office tomorrow.

THIS IS THE LOWEST ALTCOIN SCAM I'VE EVER SEEN... YOU'RE NOTHING MORE THAN CON ARTISTS AND YOU'LL LEARN SOON ENOUGH FRAUD IS FRAUD AND THEFT IS THEFT.

A warning to anyone considering DRK.btcgamblers . com ... DON'T! It's a scam.

I've been scammed for ~5 DRK (~$40)  

The site has no contact details which is an issue since 2 deposits were lost (stolen). I've tried PMing the OP of the thread here at btctalk but no reply. Proof of one deposit:

http://explorer.darkcoin.io/address/mmmAHpphAeQEgwT5VHRErvWowchBKfJdCT

btcgamblers . com is a SCAM!

Fantastic work! A glimmer of light in the dark CryptoVerse.
Devs take note of what a real whitepaper looks like; detailed and EXECUTED.

SMOKE is the shadiest project I've seen. Why the hell are you teaming up w a closed source untested unproven project?

The fact SYNC and VOOT have announced links to this project makes it clear it's another scam. Your original post started here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=664436.100
What happened?

Trade volumes can be faked! I'm a VOOT fan but not so much I'm ignoring basic facts. Volume can be faked. VOOT isn't somehow immune

So you're saying you're happy downloading an exe from any website which is labelled as infected? And I've NEVER tried downloading Bitcoin Core 0.8.x or 0.9.x and had a virus warning. Ever.
How can you be so blasé about this stuff when malware is designed to steal private keys?

What's more profitable...
1. Breathing life into a dead coin ?
2. Starting a new coin and leaving XBC to die?

I don't understand why people don't get it... These are repeated scams and it's being run again and again and yet everyone believes the promises.

This will be labelled "spreading FUD" - the fear, uncertainty and doubt is palpable, but it's the scammers responsible for the uncertainty and doubt. The fear only comes from over-investing in cheap knock-offs. Stop buying into projects based on price and gauge a dev team by what is actually delivered and the investment will look after itself.

You honestly want to know what creates value? A coin that serves a purpose.
You release a whitepaper outlining how TOR works but have no functionality at all utilising TOR.

We know how TOR works. We want to know how ISIS integrates with TOR. Otherwise all you've done is taken source code for an x15 coin, tweaked it, and promised vaguely to use TOR for anonymity in combination with POS.

You do know bitcoin can be run over TOR already right? Or any other coin for that matter.

Yes you just posted in Poloniex trollbox. You didn't answer ppl's question... "Why is this different than anything else?"