"Darkcoin was launched in March of 2014" => January 2014 "Total currency: 22 million DRK" => "Total currency: 22 million DRK maximum". Best is to clone his repo and create a pull request for the changes/errata ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
No idea about fees but if you have the privkey you can import it into any wallet you like, but you'll need that wallet's passphrase to do anything with it subsequently.
Hum not real understand that point "but you'll need that wallet's passphrase to do anything with it subsequently" You speak about passphrase of import privkey or of the new wallet ? Does the new wallet need the same passphrase than the old one ? Certainly evident for you, but not for me. When you import the privkey into a wallet, it's exactly like someone sent you the DRK. The wallet now has more DRK in it, it's gone from the wallet it came from. That's it. at this time im real stupid ? If i just need the privkey, like E9 87 3D 79 C6 D8 7D C0 FB 6A 57 78 63 33 89 F4 45 32 13 30 3D A6 1F 20 BD 67 FC 23 3A A3 32 62. Why dont hakers dont try generat aleatory privkey and import it to they wallet ? ? ? im sure i miss something, but what ? You missed the GIGANTIC keyspace :-) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fmiguelmoreno.net%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F05%2FfYFBsqp.jpg&t=663&c=MT5on62cPmM8YA)
|
|
|
Is there a place were a list if the current bugs are listed. i know we have what im calling "big wallet" bug... lol. that seems to be the biggest one any other bugs. we should compile a checklist that is publicly displayed. and as we work through(mainnet) them we publicly check them off. thoughts?
All known bugs are in their bugtracker --> http://jira.darkcoin.qa/![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi.snag.gy%2FQmFQk.jpg&t=663&c=PtKw5sGolvp-9w)
|
|
|
My .31 is claiming I have no funds at all when I try to send, while it shows the proper balance at the same time. Won't step up to God Mode, won't let me send a single DRK...
When I changed from 1 to 8, it stopped declaring that I had any denominated finds. It just shows the balance.
Not denominating. Won't let me send a single duff...
Can't confirm, working for me ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fw6FWwIa.png&t=663&c=gYGCRkOlRHe3EA) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fm2jXEeK.png&t=663&c=2sbaEv6I8tX6yA)
|
|
|
Tried Mac OSX Binaries: 10.12.31 (RC) : Working. 8 Rounds. Same here, Windows Binaries: 10.12.31 (RC): Working. 8 Rounds. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F68gZ1Fj.png&t=663&c=U8DSywvG8X-s9A) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fy7uxoJU.png&t=663&c=oq05ylCmGMHahg) Evan got it!!!
|
|
|
Is it mandatory for MN owners to update?
No, this is only for DS+ users.
|
|
|
1DRK = 1LTC - almost there ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FQFH0yf7.png&t=663&c=8gfiWaQc1K3SGw)
|
|
|
Sehr schön, endlich mal eine deutsche Seite zum Darkcoin ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
question about testing the windows wallet 10.12.14 on testnet :
When i'm testing it on 1000 Darkcoins from the test faucet i always end up with an Anonymized amount of 999.00000023 instead of 999.998 (-0.002 for the fees of using the standard 2 rounds of Anonymizing).
Have more ppl testing RC4 on testnet seen this?
You should report what fees you're being charged on testnet. Looks like you may be incurring collateral fees. Are you losing connection? Works as designed: His 1000 DRK were anonymized into 23 denominations --> 999.00000023 This is also the largest amount he can get anonymized out of 1000 DRK, as denomination takes at least 1.1 DRK (1 DRK + 0.1 DRK). So his 0.997999977 un-denominated funds are not qualified for further denomination ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
I got slightly aroused while reading that, am I normal?
If you're a boy, you should be, she is gorgeous. Ok, question everybody, if I withdraw my earned coins from my masternode, not using darksend, will it disrupt my masternode (take it off line because funds were removed from original address?) Or will they be safe? Thanks for help! Maybe this helps: https://darkcointalk.org/threads/withdrawal-of-master-node-payments.1786/#post-12076
|
|
|
I guess raising MN rewards to 50% is good against multipools.
Why do you think so? Furthermore, the less miners darkcoin has, the more block reward they get, right?
This is not specific to Darkcoin, but to all cryptos: Hashrate affects difficulty, difficulty affects block reward, block reward affects miners, miner affects hashrate. This is called a feedback loop.
|
|
|
I do not understand.
Right back at ya! That's exactly what went through my mind when i read his post...
|
|
|
10022 PCS x 4.1 = 41090 Mh/s (41 Gh/s)
41 Gh/s = Diff skyrocket (%50+)
Aproxx mineable DRK = 284,5 / Day (Excluding electricity and cooling costs)
Approx Darkcoin daily now: 2880 DRK (%20 is 576 DRK --MN payments--)
IHMO your aproximation for mineable DRK is wrong: As you stated 41 Gh/s will skyrocket the network hashrate from currently 66.15 Gh/s to 107 Gh/s But your 41 Gh/s is still 38% of overall hashing power then --> 38% of 2304 DRK (80% of 2880 DRK) == 768 DRK expected from mining. More profitable to invest your $4mn in GPU power than in masternodes ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Current 82.63 GH/s + 41 = Does not mean a 50% increase? Sorry, got my "current" from p2pool output ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Ok, even with 82.63 Gh/s current hashrate, we will end up with 82.63 + 41 = 123.6 Gh/s And 41 Gh/s is still 33% of that 123.6 Gh/s --> 764 DRK mined / day - making GPU investment 33% more profitable than masternode investment So what's your point?
|
|
|
10022 PCS x 4.1 = 41090 Mh/s (41 Gh/s)
41 Gh/s = Diff skyrocket (%50+)
Aproxx mineable DRK = 284,5 / Day (Excluding electricity and cooling costs)
Approx Darkcoin daily now: 2880 DRK (%20 is 576 DRK --MN payments--)
IHMO your aproximation for mineable DRK is wrong: As you stated 41 Gh/s will skyrocket the network hashrate from currently 66.15 Gh/s to 107 Gh/s But your 41 Gh/s is still 38% of overall hashing power then --> 38% of 2304 DRK (80% of 2880 DRK) == 768 DRK expected from mining. More profitable to invest your $4mn in GPU power than in masternodes ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
Can we get an updated node list?
I am adding them to my .conf and I found some from the original thread:
addnode=23.23.186.131 addnode=50.16.206.102 addnode=50.19.116.123 addnode=98.165.130.67 addnode=54.242.50.205 addnode=50.17.98.53 addnode=54.225.43.37
However, seems like only 4 of them work now. Any sort of node list out there?
These lists are not needed anymore, as darkcoin uses dnsseed since 0.9.11.6 If you still want to have a list of reliable nodes use dig +short dnsseed.darkcoin.qa or nslookup dnsseed.darkcoin.qa You will always get a "fresh" list :-) That dnsseed business doesn't work worth a crap behind socks5 proxy... I run a darkcoin.conf with only that first addnode entry and instaconnect... Really doesn't make sense. That's just how it is... Where did he mention that he is behind a SOCKS5 proxy? He asked for a list, i provide the information to generate one. BTW: If you really want to help in this case: run your node as hidden tor service and provide the addnode=fshtfsvnjzt.onion address to users which ARE behind a SOCKS5 tor proxy. That's just how it is...
|
|
|
Can we get an updated node list?
I am adding them to my .conf and I found some from the original thread:
addnode=23.23.186.131 addnode=50.16.206.102 addnode=50.19.116.123 addnode=98.165.130.67 addnode=54.242.50.205 addnode=50.17.98.53 addnode=54.225.43.37
However, seems like only 4 of them work now. Any sort of node list out there?
These lists are not needed anymore, as darkcoin uses dnsseed since 0.9.11.6 If you still want to have a list of reliable nodes use dig +short dnsseed.darkcoin.qa or nslookup dnsseed.darkcoin.qa You will always get a "fresh" list :-)
|
|
|
If we create a forum of just good info for investors and holders, you will see Dark's value go through the roof!!
darkcointalk.org darkcointalk.org
|
|
|
Hold approx. $4335K on masternodes now.
This means %14 all the coins.
This is an excellent thing.
Note: If masternode number exceeded 2000 in the future, miners will go crazy. ASIC manufacturers will explode for x11.
Isn't the maximum number of MNs limited to 2000? I don't know. Maximum number is not limited technically, but by coin supply: 4,459,150 DRK in circulation --> 4,459 MNs maximum - but then there are no coins left for payments/trades ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) I'm expecting a equilibrium of 2,000 MNs
|
|
|
|