One of the biggest contributing factors to debt in the world, is the fact that we have literally lost touch with our money. The wide acceptance of payment methods where you do not physically trade with something you touch, for example Credit cards, debit cards and electronic money, could make it easier to spend money.

In South Africa, a company is testing this theory with a reality series, where the contestants are given their monthly salary in coins. The idea behind this is to see what impact this has on the spending habits of these people, when they pay for everything in physical coins.
 
Source : www.onerandfamily.co.za

Question 1 : If Bitcoin or Crypto currencies replace fiat, would you spend more or less?

Question 2 : Do you think physical contact with your money, makes you spend less?

Question 3 : Would we have less debt, if we paid for everything in fiat?

Hey I was wondering if it's possible to do this?

Is it possible?

Bitcoin is NOT a currency!

In it's simplest form it is just payment rails. Stop thinking about is as currency and what is left to regulate?

If a merchant selling a pair of jeans for $250 accepts a 1 bitcoin and customer 2 weeks later asks for a refund with a value of a bitcoin going up to $300. Is he going to get 1 bitcoin back or a value of the jeans he bought? Naturally, the value, which means 3/4 of a bitcoin at the time of the refund. So, how does it make bitcoin a currency. ITS NOT!

What do you think?

they accept bitcoin ?
no.

so, they don't have my 6 USD ... simple.  like apple, vimeo, XXX porn ... 

change addresses are used for security. each time you send bitcoin the remaining balance will be split to change addresses.

Address 17ABrUpBNURhgiSfTuRvtpMDEXwivcdCZ has 0.991871 BTC in it, if it isn't showing up in your wallet there's something wrong with the wallet.

You got me within a few seconds I guess. May I know what kind of charitable institution are you planning to give the earnings? Kinda curious in this one actually.

A non-profit gambling site would be impossible because a gambling site would generate revenues continuously and you can call it profits. Unless you won't bag the earnings for yourself (or you would donate the earnings to a charity or whatever) then you can say that your gambling site is non-profit.

You have a quite extensive answer about that issue here : http://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/Gambling-sectors/Online/Getting-a-licence/Applying-for-a-licence/How-do-I-apply/How-do-I-apply.aspx
This first part of it pretty much sums it up:

"You need an operating licence from the Gambling Commission if:
you currently run or want to run a gambling service through remote communication (including online gambling) and any part of your remote equipment is based in Great Britain or
when the Gambling (Licensing and Advertising ) Act 2014 is implemented (1 November 2014) your remote equipment is based outside Great Britain and you advertise remote gambling to consumers in Britain through a British-facing business."

btw i think that if you move this to gambling section, you may receive better responses.
One think tho; how is it involving gambling, but remains a non-profit? You should include more details to enable us to understand and assist you better.

cheers